The Lottery (1969) Poster

(1969)

User Reviews

Review this title
33 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The short film that inspired me to take up writing.
Kelly G.7 June 2005
It's been a very loooong time since I've seen this; 12 years or so, I think. It was screened in my very first real writing class in High School.

The actual name of the class was "Term Paper" I think, meaning by the end of the semester we were going to have to compile a seven page or so report on a topic of our choice, with annotated notes and references and what not. Now, even back then, I knew that reading and writing were my strong points as a student, but I still wasn't really looking forward to the final assignment. Now, looking back after college, I would KILL to write a paper as short as seven pages, but back then, that was quite a lot to a kid who was just about to get his driver's license.

Now, I can't remember the exact reason why the teacher showed us this one. It's possible it was just to give us a break, or maybe inspire us. For whatever reason, my initial reaction wasn't exactly thrilled. After all, it was awfully hot in those classrooms, and as I remember I was madly in love with the girl who sat three rows ahead of me, and one seat to the left (she always twitched her nose as she wrote), so needless to say, paying attention to some moldy, out of date, production of a short story that I had never heard of didn't exactly make me want to leap to attention.

The film was an adaptation of "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson, a story I'm going to assume you've read or at least know about if you've read this, so I won't really go into the plot.

But needless to day, I was drawn in instantly. And although we didn't know what was going to happen in the film, we could all sense that something wasn't right. Why were these people drawing paper from a box? Why didn't some people really look happy about it? What was with that scary old man talking about the "old days." Well, when the ending played out, we were pretty horrified, and rightly so. Like I said, I don't know what lesson teacher was trying to teach us besides the usual comments about the tyranny of tradition and the danger of mob mentality, but I always assumed that what she was trying to impress upon us was not to judge a story before it's been told, and that good writers can suck a reader in before laying in the killing blow.

Personally, as a writer, and as a just for fun critic of horror movies, I took from this adaptation the power of an image unexplained, of a tone of detachment from reality. What made this film so strong was how it just seemed so off kilter from common sense. Sure, growing up in the midwest, me and my fellow students all were very familiar with the images in this film; the fields, the friendly small town folk and their soft patter of "how ya doing" banter, the undercurrent of stab your neighbor in the back gossip, and the commonness of "do this because your dad and his dad did it too" tradition.

But yet, the film doesn't feel "familiar." Maybe it's because so much is left open and unexplained until the horrifying conclusion, but watching the town gather to participate in the lottery, the feeling is one of isolation. Not just from your fellow townsfolk, although I can understand this (sometimes it's just as easier to feel lonely in a small town as it is a big one), but from the outside world. As this film went on, and I started to realize the truth, I just couldn't help but wonder where this town was. Truth is, it may be the only town left on the planet for all I know, surrounded on all sides by endless fields of corn swaying in the breeze. I imagined what I would do if I were there. Could I get away? Could I duck behind a building, and take off running away from town square while everyone else was drawing slips from a box until i reached a road. Would I find anything else? What about the next town over? Is their yearly ritual even more hellish? It's those questions that haunted me most about the story and this presentation of it. I'm continually drawn to movies that take place in a world of their own where all you want to do as a viewer is escape what you see on the screen. Not because of gore of violence or anything so simplistic, but because you just can't bare to see a reality that's too harsh to believe, but too realistic to ignore completely.

I don't know if schools still show films like this anymore. It's possible though. All the thousands of educational films probably will be very slow to get DVD updates, and I'm sure that most school districts will be stuck with VCR's for a long time.

Heck, even as a senior in the mid-90's we were STILL seeing educational films on FILMSTRIPS (the ones where you turned the frames by HAND when you heard the beep), such as one we saw in economics class produced in the early 70's about a girl named LuLu who was learning to save her money to either buy a pink dune buggy, or to blow away on little things (like a KING CRIMSON album, I kid you not!).

So, I hope that somewhere out there this adaptation of The Lottery is still being shown. It captures the desolation, the strangeness, and the tragic sadness of life in a situation where reality becomes unhinged, and all you can do is scream at people to stop, even though they don't listen.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I've never forgotten it.
triple82 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS THROUGHOUT:

As with the previous Posters, I watched this in high school. And even today, being long done with high school it has stayed with me. It's very very good and ENDING SPOILER ALERT: The ending is so frighteningly real and creepy and you won't even see it coming-I had to comment on this movie, because even back then, being a young silly teenager who was definitely NOT(at that time) into heavy movies this short but intense little movie had me shaken. I'm not sure if their still showing this in school but If they are, be prepared, it's grim and you won't exactly leave your class whistling, but it was very good, well acted, and succeeded in shocking the heck out of this teenager.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A no-nonsense telling of the Shirley Jackson short story.
planktonrules6 October 2021
"The Lottery" is a short film based on the short story by Shirley Jackson. It was made for Encyclopedia Britannica and was intended for classroom use....most likely in English/Literature classes.

Aside from a bit of dramatic license by adding some local color and some occasional odd camerawork (such as showing feet and some odd framing), the story is a very direct retelling of the story. And, like the story, it is brief and offers nothing at the end other than a nice neighborhood stoning.

The short film is just fine, though considering how short the story is you might just want to read it instead. Regardless, it's a chilling and interesting story.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent film
l-appleby31 January 2005
I saw this film in 7th or 8th grade Social Studies class some 25 years ago, and it still has the same impact when I even think about it. There was dead silence in the classroom when this film was over and probably 30 students saying to themselves, "Are they all insane?!" Quite possibly the characters were. But we learned something that day. Going along with the bunch may save your hide, but we reap what we sow. excellent film. A must see for all teenagers! The remake was too grandiose...short and sweet is all that is needed! Even the kids that were not particularly interested in the film when it started we mesmerized by the time we all realized what was going on. The image of that person handing "it" to the lady's child was just too much for any of us to comprehend. I won't spoil the "surprise" ending by mentioning what "it" was or anything, but suffice it to say that this film will stay with me forever. It ranks right up there with James Clavell's "The Children's Story." Put these two stories in every curriculum, is what I say.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a haunting adaptation of an already-haunting short story
framptonhollis2 June 2017
Shirley Jackson's notorious horror classic "The Lottery" is among the most famous and iconic works in all of 20th century American literature, and this brief adaptation nails the story's disturbing and tense mood. The cinematic platform adds quite a bit to the story's overall horror, and this version takes full advantage of this. It is not gory in any way, and instead it provokes horror from an unsettling and gritty atmosphere in the vein of "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre". The soundtrack and design remain uneasy, the characters are mundane yet there is obviously something off about them, and every shot does not at all looked planned out, instead it feels as if it were filmed by some random spectator capturing the action. The atmosphere is that of a cinema verite style documentary film thanks to the unorganized structure of shots, uneasy camera-work, gritty cinematography, and highly natural, realistic setting.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best short films ever.
brefane3 January 2005
Excellent adaptation of Shirley Jackson's provocative short story, still has impact. Unsettling depiction of the banality of evil. Like the short story, the film begins casually with the start of the annual ritual lottery and grows more intense as we slowly realize the lottery's purpose. Its main character, Tessie Hutchinson, learns too late the dangers of not speaking up, and of blindly following and supporting tradition. Just ask yourself: What was Tessie Hutchinson doing last June? What goes around comes around. Tradition is symbolized by lucky "Old Man Warner"(77 years in the lottery). Like the short story, the film is shocking because of its matter-of-fact tone: the lottery is depicted as just another mundane yearly event. Spare, powerful, and thought-provoking. When the film ends you'll no doubt be going over it in your mind.
21 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Warm up your pitching arm for a good harvest!
thejcowboy2218 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Looking back I'll remember fondly to one of my favorite teachers Mr. Donald Morongello. He was my 10th grade English teacher. He was a sensitive man, a caring educator who introduced me to the world of writing and for that I am in his eternal debt. He introduced me to the works of J.D. Salinger and John Howard Griffin. One day Mr. M. showed our class a movie the likes I'll never forget. Like many who viewed this short film were either nauseated or traumatized by the end result. At first you see a pile of stones and parents telling their children to get off them because the Lottery is about to start. The small crowd gathers around as the proceedings begin as each adult picks a piece of paper. Our star of the short is the goofy, chatty Tessie and from how first impressions go our Tess fails miserably. My impressions of her is that she is the town gossip and fair weathered at best. If a neighbor was in trouble she would quickly throw that person under the bus but those are my opinions and completely far-fetched. The truth is we really don't know Tess at all, But her demonstrative demeanor make this horrific ending more palatable for the viewer. Some cast member worth mentioning. Ed Begley Junior from St. Elsewhere and Erested Development, Billy "Whitey" Benedict form All in the Family (Mr. Munson) and the Bowery Boys, and William Fawcett known to TV viewers as Pete from the Saturday show FURY as Old Man Warner. Blood will be spilled and many questions to ask after the viewing. As for the outcome? I watched this vignette at least several more times because I couldn't believe what I just saw.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
IMO, A Great Adaptation
walloonking25 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
In my opinion, this was a great adaptation for the short story, which I also enjoyed.

*Spoilers*

The last person to comment seemed to hate the film, and about the acting, it seems as if they where supposed to be rather dull, simple people. It really was the vibe I got from the town. Also the ending is better, with shots of them coming 'upon her' and them actually killing her. It adds a bit of a horror element to the movie.

I don't think you'll see this unless its in an English class but it might be worth it if you liked the story to find a method of obtaining it.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great Film
glazerr-7486624 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Watching the film version of "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson was a completely different experience than reading the short story. There were many elements that I did not particularly enjoy about this film, but there were many pieces that I found to be interesting and well done. Watching the lottery occur in a modern and suburban area opened my eyes to how disturbing the concept that was presented in the story is: a town in 1948 choosing to sacrifice one person each year, with what we can infer being religious motives. Another part of the film that I enjoyed was the dramatization of Tessie's helplessness and indignance after being chosen to die. From panning the camera to her face as she dawns with realization, to following her as she begs to redo the lottery, we get a sense of how terrified she was. Most of what I disliked about this film is tied to the fact that it was created in 1969. The camera quality and direction weren't top tier compared to today's movies and television. This distracted me from the story itself and stopped me from focusing on the plot at times. As an overall rating, I would give this film a 7/10. I liked many components but some were difficult to overlook.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unforgettable
cocacolanut4 February 2015
While the production quality of this short film is lacking, especially by today's standards, the impact lingers. I first saw this film in American Liturature class my Junior year of high school. I have never forgotten it. Thirty-eight years later, I am still wanting to know, "Why?"

Viewing it today, in 2015, I think of the personalities and reactions of the townspeople; as a member of one evangelical church and an employee of another, I relate these people to members of the church, and the impact their beliefs and decisions have on the rest of the congregation. As an individual, I question why I have hung on dearly to some traditions, and how selfish it can be to do so. Which doesn't mean that all tradition is bad - we just need to carefully examine why we do what we do.

Watch this film without critiquing the cinematography or getting caught up in the outdated fashion. Just get lost in the story - it's amazing how easy it is to do in just 17 minutes.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
decent
shipperj26 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The short film The Lottery is about a small village where every year someone is picked to be stoned so that the crops can grow. Although this film tells a good story, the camera work is awful and it was painful to watch, but if you can see past the bad directing you will find that it teaches a very important lesson. Just because something is tradition doesn't mean it is right. After taking all of this into consideration I would rate The Lottery short film 7/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very intense, perfectly made for what it is......
nsavage3-130 April 2005
I saw this from a 16mm print about 30 years ago, and still think about it today. This short kind of has the flavor of a "Tales from the Darkside" episode to it, but seems more realistic. I agree with the previous reviewer that commented on the made-for-TV two hour version that came out in the 90's. What were they thinking? Did the folks who made that movie ever see this short? It just didn't have the horror that was present in this classic short. I can still see that woman, crying in terror, saying "it isn't fair, it isn't fair. Heavy duty stuff.

There should most definitely be a DVD of this around somewhere.

Highly recommended!!!
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
great short film for its time
fleschc23 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Overall, this movie is pretty good, considering its age, and budget. The storyline is spot on to the original story. I'll be honest, I did feel that the town itself felt a bit modern for the storyline, and some of the camera shots felt a bit fast. But all in all the acting was great, and you really got to understand the whole thing a bit more. The end is quite the shocker, and it turns out the "winner" of the lottery just gets stoned to death in a traditional yearly sacrificial ritual.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Monotonous mess... It's OK
lind-022076 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This film was pretty mediocre for an adaptation of such an iconic story. It starts with a collection of people in a village, where there is a drawing of papers. Whoever gets the paper with the black dot gets pelted to death by rocks in order to keep the tradition of the corn harvest. I'm sure there were some difficulties when converting it into short film back in 1969. In the start, the camera movement was cool, but defiantly not up to par to today's standards. The introduction was full of abrupt cuts and lacked flow. The shaky camera did not do this film any favors. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt because again, the technology used cannot be compared to those used today. However, I do want to give credit to the realism in clothing, and accurate representation of people's emotions and feelings. Especially during the lottery where it showed the tense/nervous moments and people's expressions. The number of people in the town was also a good amount, just like I envisioned from reading the story. The acting was lackluster in some areas, but it conveyed just enough that the overall theme and ideas are solidified/maintained - mainly by Tessie's dramatic showing and Old Man Warner's annoying voice. In my opinion, this movie was very hard to watch because of the production. The quality made it a nightmare to keep up with all the events and if someone watched this without reading the story beforehand, there would be less learned and gained from it. It would be interesting to see a modern-day adaptation of the ideologies presented and how that could translate to the younger generation by providing a better visual stimulating experience (higher quality) and storyline. In the end, I regret watching this as I have lost all senses of logical perception from the amount of cringe that exists.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Short story is better.
randazzeses11 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
In the short story "The Lottery", there is an abnormal lottery that picks someone at random to sacrifice. It takes place in an small, unspecified village with people of all ages. The citizens of this town have been taking part in the lottery for many years. They believe that if they ever skip, or do not do the lottery, the villages corn harvest will not be good. Today we watched the short film version of the story, and here are my thoughts. Some compliments I have for the film are: -Word for word lines -Exactly how the story went -Right after Tessie says, "it isn't fair" a stone hits her on the side of her head, just like in the story However, I noted a lot more criticisms about the film. Including: -The town was more civilized than I imagined -Bad sound quality -The calling of the names was random and weird -Not good characterization compared to the book -Mrs. Hutchinson was not as happy as I imagined -It was very quiet when there was no dialogue -Old Man warner was not a good actor -The pauses were too long In short, I prefer the short story over the film. I think reading gives your mind a lot more room to think and the freedom to imagine the story however you would like. Films are set in stone, showing only what is visible, so no thoughts or descriptions of characters throughout the story. This restricts your mind to only see what is on the screen, and not imagine the story yourself. Personally, I give the short film version of "The Lottery" a seven out of ten.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nothing can prepare you for the shocking climax
uglygelly22 December 2004
I never read the short story, so watching this short film was a true shocker for me. Like many other people, I saw this in my English class a long time ago and since then, I still haven't seen it. But I still remember that time, it really stays with you. I remember everyone in my class with their jaws dropping, we couldn't believe it, it was awesome. The surprising thing about it is that you think the movie is silly at the beginning, the characters are annoying, and its just something the teacher is making us watch to waste time. But once these characters do something unexpected, its when you feel you need to thank your teacher. If you ever get to see this, then you are lucky. Or read the short story by Shirley Jackson, its probably better.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One could certainly do worse
krisrivats9 October 2022
"The Lottery" (1969) is a short film adaptation of Shirley Jackson's short story of the same name. The film does a very good job portraying the short story, depicting a town's controversial lottery. The acting was fine for the 1960's, but the cinematography was sub-par. The camerawork seemed hastily done on a Saturday night, since the camera shakes a lot, detracting from the actual story. The movie also seems to also drag on for far too long. The story could have been the same, but in 10-15 minutes rather than the 18 minutes the film is depicted in. This could be seen as a positive though, since the films awkward length adds to the feeling of tension that the characters are feeling. The acting was not one of the highlights of the film, however, since Tessie Hutchinson, the one who is chosen in the lottery in both stories, is not very well acted, and is not who I expected to see representing her after reading the story. Old Man Warner, the grumpy old man of the actual story, however, was acted perfectly, in my opinion. The film has a certain charm to it, which I really enjoy. The feeling that you are there is very strong, but I would say that the "feeling" of being there is a bit too strong. Overall, while the movie is objectively a bad film, I would say it is not a bad adaptation of Shirley Jackson's short story. It does have it's flaws, but overall, one could surely do worse.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I will always remember this short film
wlwh119 July 2006
I saw this movie when I was in high school. I didn't even know the name of it until just a few weeks ago when I began to search the web for anything that I thought might be this movie. I began asking friends if they had ever seen a movie about a small town in which a lottery is held, and the winner is, let's just say they are not your typical winner. It is some 30 years ago since I saw this movie. I would like to see it again. I would like to get a copy of it. If any body knows where I can find one please let me know. I would also like to thank my film appreciation teacher for allowing my classmates and I to view this short film. I will always remember that class, and the day I saw The Lottery.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Movie Review for The Lottery
samanzellotti23 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
In the short film The Lottery people in a town draw from a box and the "winner", is stoned to death for a sacred tradition. I enjoyed the accuracy to the book and the character development in this film. On the negative side, I thought the acting was bad, there was weird pacing, and the dialogue felt forced. To sum it up I would give this short film a 7 out of 10 rating but you should watch it for yourself.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Terrifying Little Film
oliver98111 September 2008
Indeed, I remember seeing this film as a child. I think of it now as such an odd choice for the public library to show; particularly to children. I think I should have been no more than 6 or 7 years of age. I can see it still up on one of those old portable silver screens. It was done in black and white and as the story progressed it was impossible to predict from the admittedly peculiar goings on, what would finally materialize in the horrifying climax. If I could somehow purchase this version I think I would probably pay just about anything for it. This little story is one of the main reasons I am, to this day, hooked on tales of the macabre. Find it! See it! Any way you can!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent Film
alvnaleon24 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The short film "The Lottery" directed by Larry Yust observes a small town's tradition of selecting a member of the community to die in order for the crops to grow. Larry Yust's cinematography is alike to a documentary because he enhances the ambient sound which helps to create a sense of reality. Olive Dunbar, who played Mrs. Hutchinson, embodied the terror and unfairness she felt throughout the short story. One thing I didn't like was when Larry Yust focused on Mr. Summers and then zoomed out. When you do that it appears to be a comical situation since it was so out of place. Overall, the film was a 7/10 because there were moments where things were unnecessary but most of the time it did display the suspense that it had in short story.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great film to watch
sofiko-3618824 September 2021
The short film "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson starts in a fictional town which has a yearly event that includes a lottery. A member of the community is selected randomly, but the prize isn't what you think. This film has a lot of advantages and disadvantages compared to the story. "The Lottery" has an excellent adaptation of Shirley Jackson's short story and still demonstrates the general idea. Like the short story, the film has a shocking end because of the tone used at the start. The lottery is depicted as just another yearly event, but some foreshadowing is present throughout the story. "The Lottery" reproduces the well-crafted suspense of the story, also showing the essential features of the main characters. This film does a great job showing the main themes that were present in the story, such as tradition, religion, faith, beliefs, violence and the real view of our society. The downside of this film is the low quality recording, low budget, cheap equipment and the shown point of view that sometimes distract the viewer. Overall, the film is better to watch if you are a visual learner and want to understand the process of the lottery better. Although, if you want more details, you should read the story first. I would say it's a 9/10 stars.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Terrible Adaptation, My Day is Ruined and My Disappointment is Immeasurable
rutkowskid6 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I did not like the film adaptation of the short story "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson. The only positives of it were the word-to-word adaption of the text and the perfect voice old man Warner. Despite these compliments, my life would have been better without these 20 minutes wasted. First, the camera shake is nice, but is way overdone and excessive. The cuts between the characters before the actual lottery starts are jarring and the lines the characters say during these cuts are incredibly generic and throw off the tone of the story. Continuing on this, there are no good transitions throughout the entire film. The cameraman someone figured out a way to make it seem so unrealistic even while having a huge set to work with. Another issue with the visuals is the terrible lighting that makes it seems like the characters are at the gates of heaven and being blinded by the radiating light from inside. During practically every scene, there are extremely elongated/extended silences that could have been cut or replaced with better visuals that actually have substance instead of non-moving camera shots with relatively no importance. The drawing scene lasts way too long and does not add anything by lasting longer than 2-3 minutes. Around a third of the film is complete silence that could be removed although I would prefer for the entire film to be destroyed. Let us talk characters. The only characters represented well are Mr. Summers and Old Man Warner. All the other characters do not act like they do in the story or show actual emotion or human reactions. The reactions of Tessie and her family are either exaggerated or nonexistent. Unlike the original text, the only reason this was in any way enjoyable was because of how laughably bad this film was. I do not recommend anyone watch this film or else they will be filled with a sense of loss and despair from the time they just wasted. If you are forced to watch this in class, I feel your pain and empathize with it. Overall, this film was a so mismanaged and directed that it deviates from the themes of the original story, and it feels like a bad imitation.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Totally Radical
underfellperson7 October 2021
This film, was absolutely dope, i absolutely did not have to leave a review for an English assignment, anyways, goodbye forever.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
one of the worst adaptation I have ever seen.
evanfranceusa7 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I did not like the short movie "The Lottery" By Shirley Jackson. From my point of view, the only positives of this short movie is that, they had a really good interpretation and the speeches were word by word. Despite these 2 compliments, my life would've been better without those 20 minutes of my life wasted instead of working on something else. The camera angles were bad, shaking too much, not being focused on something, the acting was horrible, the actors had no facial expression, when everyone opened their paper slips, it was silent nothing happened except for a " it's Bill", while in the story, there are whispers, you can feel that there is tension in the air: " For a minute no one moved, and then all the slips of paper were opened. Suddenly, all the women began to speak at once, saying. " Who is it? Who's got it." ." the motion of the Camera also makes you want to puke because it moves so much. If I Would rate this movie, I would rate it a 1/10, the box, which was described in the story as, and I quote "It was no longer completely black but splintered badly along one side to show the original wood color.", in the movie was in perfect shape and form, it looked brand new. In short this movie adaptation is one of the worst movie adaptations I have ever seen, and I would never want to watch it again. Even if It is required for a Class.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed