One of the better films from director Sergio Garrone, Le Amanti del Mostro benefits from star Klaus Kinski, who delivers a surprisingly subtle and nuanced performance as Alex Nijinksi, a doctor who stumbles upon a secret experimental laboratory when he returns to his wife's ancestral homestead. Work in the lab turns the curious Kinski into a Jekyll and Hyde split personality, with the evil alter ago going on a killing rampage blamed on a pair of tramps--one of whom bears the name Polanski. Whether this is a tribute to the great director or a commentary on 19th century anti-Semitism isn't made clear, but the film DOES feature an amusing cinema in joke in the early going, when co-star Katia Christine (the Nicole Kidman lookout playing Kinski's wife) visits her father's grave, which bears the name Ivan Rassimov! A surprisingly bloodless late period example of Italian Gothic cinema, Le Amanti del Mostro is available on a grey area Shoarma DVD which also features a generous stills gallery of Kinski performances, and the crown jewel: a 1985 German television interview featuring a reticent Kinski and some amusing outtakes from his then current production, Commando Leopard.
10 Reviews
Disappointing and boring horror
The_Void30 December 2008
What we have here is a concoction obviously based on the classic Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde story and taking a bit of influence from Frankenstein. It actually reminded me a lot of the modern horror classic Re-Animator; although anyone expecting anything as gory/entertaining as that film will likely be very disappointed after seeing this one! Lover of the Monster is the second 1974 film directed by Sergio Garrone and starring Klaus Kinski- the first being The Hand That Feeds the Dead, and the two are apparently often confused. The plot here focuses on a doctor and his wife who go to stay at the wife's childhood home despite having some marital problems. The doctor begins snooping around the house and comes across some work investigating life and death. Naturally the doctor wants to investigate this himself, but things go wrong and he ends up with a murderous alter-ego and goes round the countryside murdering people, only for a poor innocent tramp to get the blame for the killings.
Sergio Garrone was responsible for one of the most notorious (and one of the very worst) Video Nasties with SS Experiment Camp in 1976; so it's surprising just how tame Lover of the Monster is. The film is very slow indeed and features practically no bloodshed whatsoever; which is fairly surprising considering that there are more than a handful of murders on display. All the murders are committed through the eyes of the killer; and it's really rather dull and pointless since we always know exactly who the murderer is and thus it may as well be shown. The film takes on a period setting; which doesn't do it any favours either, aside from the fact that Klaus Kinski looks right at home. The film runs for less than ninety minutes but somehow it still manages to outstay its welcome and my interest in the film waned further as the film went on, and unfortunately there was nothing at the end to reignite it. Lover of the Monster is a rather rare film; and I'm sure it will stay that way as there's no good reason to dig it up!
Sergio Garrone was responsible for one of the most notorious (and one of the very worst) Video Nasties with SS Experiment Camp in 1976; so it's surprising just how tame Lover of the Monster is. The film is very slow indeed and features practically no bloodshed whatsoever; which is fairly surprising considering that there are more than a handful of murders on display. All the murders are committed through the eyes of the killer; and it's really rather dull and pointless since we always know exactly who the murderer is and thus it may as well be shown. The film takes on a period setting; which doesn't do it any favours either, aside from the fact that Klaus Kinski looks right at home. The film runs for less than ninety minutes but somehow it still manages to outstay its welcome and my interest in the film waned further as the film went on, and unfortunately there was nothing at the end to reignite it. Lover of the Monster is a rather rare film; and I'm sure it will stay that way as there's no good reason to dig it up!
Lover of the Monster
BandSAboutMovies16 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Filmed at the same time as The Hand That Feeds the Dead, this was also directed and written by Sergio Garrone. It uses a similar cast and crew which is why so many confuse these films for each other. They also share some footage, so that is an easy mistake to make.
Anna (Katia Christine) is the heiress to the Rassimov fortune. The Ivan Rassmimov fortune? Well, if they built that crypt for The Hand That Feeds the Dead, they weren't going to spend more money getting another last name put on it!
She brings her husband Alex (Klaus Kinski) to her family's home, where he soon finds the diary of - yes! - Dr. Ivan Rassmimov, who learned how to reanimate the dead with electricity. Alex is impotent and despises his rival Dr. Walewsky (Ayhan Isik), who makes no secret of how he wants to cuck his rival. As he works on learning how to defeat death by attempting to bring his wife's dead dog back, Alex is electrocuted and gets another personality because that's how science works. He starts killing people, including his wife but he assaults her first because this is an Italian exploitation movie, and then has his conscience come back. A villager has been blamed for his crimes, so he runs to the city to stop an innocent man from being lynched. It's too late - the man is already dead - and as Alex climbs the gallows, he is shot and killed.
Don't believe the cast list you see online. Carla Mancini, Alessandro Perrella and Stella Calderoni aren't in this movie. If you're one of those people - I walk among you - that try to find Mancini in movies, well, save your time and energy for one of the other 240 movies that she may or may not be in.
This movie is an absolute mess, as production was halted and by the time shooting started again, Kisnki was gone. That's why so much of it uses POV shots, stand-ins and murder scenes from The Hand That Feeds the Dead. You have to admire that kind of carny ingenuity, right?
Anna (Katia Christine) is the heiress to the Rassimov fortune. The Ivan Rassmimov fortune? Well, if they built that crypt for The Hand That Feeds the Dead, they weren't going to spend more money getting another last name put on it!
She brings her husband Alex (Klaus Kinski) to her family's home, where he soon finds the diary of - yes! - Dr. Ivan Rassmimov, who learned how to reanimate the dead with electricity. Alex is impotent and despises his rival Dr. Walewsky (Ayhan Isik), who makes no secret of how he wants to cuck his rival. As he works on learning how to defeat death by attempting to bring his wife's dead dog back, Alex is electrocuted and gets another personality because that's how science works. He starts killing people, including his wife but he assaults her first because this is an Italian exploitation movie, and then has his conscience come back. A villager has been blamed for his crimes, so he runs to the city to stop an innocent man from being lynched. It's too late - the man is already dead - and as Alex climbs the gallows, he is shot and killed.
Don't believe the cast list you see online. Carla Mancini, Alessandro Perrella and Stella Calderoni aren't in this movie. If you're one of those people - I walk among you - that try to find Mancini in movies, well, save your time and energy for one of the other 240 movies that she may or may not be in.
This movie is an absolute mess, as production was halted and by the time shooting started again, Kisnki was gone. That's why so much of it uses POV shots, stand-ins and murder scenes from The Hand That Feeds the Dead. You have to admire that kind of carny ingenuity, right?
THE LOVER OF THE MONSTER (Sergio Garrone, 1974) *1/2
Bunuel197611 October 2007
In hindsight, this obscure, meaninglessly-titled Italian horror movie is to "Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde" what LADY FRANKENSTEIN (1971) was to "Frankenstein" but, as an erotic version of the classic tale, it is a long way behind Walerian Borowczyk's brilliantly delirious DOCTEUR JEKYLL ET LES FEMMES (1981). The atrocious print displayed on this bootleg DVD replete with fuzzy video and annoyingly processed audio as if it had been recorded under water! destroys any attempt at the Gothic feel the film strives for but, in truth, the whole production is a mind-boggling hodgepodge of every horror cliché in the book with elements of Frankenstein, Jekyll and Hyde and Jack The Ripper (whom star Klaus Kinski would play, far more successfully, for Jess Franco a couple of years later) thrown into the mix
not to mention an impotent villain given to raging fits of jealousy, indigestible dollops of Freudian self-analysis (usually uttered by a wimpish Kinski while lounging from one sofa to another), a rival doctor vieing for the attentions of the mad scientist's neglected wife, gore (the gratuitous vivisection of a dog), not one but two distinct tramps convicted of the murder spree (lazy writing, if you ask me!), hilarious character names (Nijinsky, Polanski, Boris, Ygor, Ivan Rassimov), etc.!
Having said that, Kinski who is unusually subdued here - is always worth watching but, while the movie is mostly dull, it is occasionally alleviated by the vivid colors and two effective sequences: Kinski's savage attack on his wife while transformed and the conscience-stricken flashback to his past murders. The film's final image is arresting as well, the music score is rather nice and Katia Christine makes for a lovely leading lady (almost like an older Scarlet Johansson) and the intermittent bits of nudity certainly don't hurt any. Still, all the frenzied cutting and odd camera angles prove laughable rather than laudable; Kinski's make-up only extends to close-ups of his bulging eyes and, what's worse, although a serum is concocted, his transformation seemingly occurs when he comes in contact with a certain laboratory lever (what the f***?) but what about the other times (unless his jealousy attacks bring on the mutation)? For the record, writer-director Sergio Garrone is brother to actor Riccardo (best-known nowadays for portraying God on a slew of coffee commercials on Italian TV!) and THE LOVER OF THE MONSTER itself was simultaneously filmed with another obscure international potboiler, THE HAND THAT FEEDS THE DEAD (1974), with most of the same cast and crew participating in both productions.
Having said that, Kinski who is unusually subdued here - is always worth watching but, while the movie is mostly dull, it is occasionally alleviated by the vivid colors and two effective sequences: Kinski's savage attack on his wife while transformed and the conscience-stricken flashback to his past murders. The film's final image is arresting as well, the music score is rather nice and Katia Christine makes for a lovely leading lady (almost like an older Scarlet Johansson) and the intermittent bits of nudity certainly don't hurt any. Still, all the frenzied cutting and odd camera angles prove laughable rather than laudable; Kinski's make-up only extends to close-ups of his bulging eyes and, what's worse, although a serum is concocted, his transformation seemingly occurs when he comes in contact with a certain laboratory lever (what the f***?) but what about the other times (unless his jealousy attacks bring on the mutation)? For the record, writer-director Sergio Garrone is brother to actor Riccardo (best-known nowadays for portraying God on a slew of coffee commercials on Italian TV!) and THE LOVER OF THE MONSTER itself was simultaneously filmed with another obscure international potboiler, THE HAND THAT FEEDS THE DEAD (1974), with most of the same cast and crew participating in both productions.
Hater of the Mundane
Bezenby28 February 2018
This was made at the same time as Garrone's Hand That Feeds the Dead, starts mainly the same people, with scenes occurring in the same place. It's also just as boring as that film, and I had to force myself to watch it to the end.
Hand That Feeds the Dead had a kind of mad scientist thing going on, whereas this one goes for the Doctor Jekyll and Mr Hyde deal, which is a bit of problem as Klaus Kinski kind of looks like Mr Hyde in real life. So how can we tell when Klaus has turned into a sex-crazed killer? His shirt is a bit dishevelled and he looks a bit tired.
Klaus and his wife are drifting apart, it would seem, and have moved into a new house (giant castle) in order to repair their relationship. His wife hits it off with the local doctor so in his despair Klaus somehow manages to turns himself into an insane killing machine, courtesy of something he finds in a hidden laboratory inside the castle. Was it a book? It was hard to maintain interest in this one.
Don't get all excited about that sex-crazed killer part either, because sex and gore are at the bare minimum for this one. Kinski rampages through the landscape, attacking people and gurning for the camera (i.e just acting like Klaus Kinski), while we are dragged kicking and screaming through a sub-plot about a homeless man accused of carrying out the killings, and a whole load of scenes between Kinski's wife and the doctor that make the entire one-hour, twenty-three minute film seem like an eight hour miniseries. This is nineteen seventy four, Garrone, which you seem to remember ten second from the end, judging by the downbeat ending.
Sergio Garrone, who started off with the pretty good Django the Bastard, would sink much lower by giving us the Nazisploitation film SS Experiment Love Camp. This one nearly de-railed the 'watch all the Euro-films' project.
Klaus and his wife are drifting apart, it would seem, and have moved into a new house (giant castle) in order to repair their relationship. His wife hits it off with the local doctor so in his despair Klaus somehow manages to turns himself into an insane killing machine, courtesy of something he finds in a hidden laboratory inside the castle. Was it a book? It was hard to maintain interest in this one.
Don't get all excited about that sex-crazed killer part either, because sex and gore are at the bare minimum for this one. Kinski rampages through the landscape, attacking people and gurning for the camera (i.e just acting like Klaus Kinski), while we are dragged kicking and screaming through a sub-plot about a homeless man accused of carrying out the killings, and a whole load of scenes between Kinski's wife and the doctor that make the entire one-hour, twenty-three minute film seem like an eight hour miniseries. This is nineteen seventy four, Garrone, which you seem to remember ten second from the end, judging by the downbeat ending.
Sergio Garrone, who started off with the pretty good Django the Bastard, would sink much lower by giving us the Nazisploitation film SS Experiment Love Camp. This one nearly de-railed the 'watch all the Euro-films' project.
Kinski was right about this one
lazarillo6 January 2010
The infamously ill-tempered German actor Klaus Kinski described pretty much every film he ever made as "a piece of sh*t". He was obviously off-base with stuff like "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" or the classic spaghetti Western "The Great Silence". Here though he was pretty much right on the mark. This is a very low-rent version of the Jeckyl and Hyde story. Kinski plays a retired doctor and jealous husband who returns with his wealthy wife (Katia Christian) to her family castle. He discovers his late father-in-law's basement laboratory, and angry at the attention his wife is paying to an old boyfriend, starts messing around and somehow turns himself into a slobbering, sex-crazed monster! Kinski is WAY over-the-top with a hysterically eye-rolling, pancake-makeup smeared performance. His victims, of course, are pretty much all attractive young women, generally ranging from scantily clad to completely nude. Gorgeous Dutch actress Katia Christian (from "The Designated Victim") also models her birthday suit for about ten minutes near the end. But the abundant female nudity here,while somewhat enjoyable, is the equivalent of spraying French perfume on a rancid turd.
The director Sergio Garrone was a hack among hacks when it came to Italian directors. Like fellow hacks Bruno Mattei and Rino DiDilvestri, Garrone later got involved in the vile Italian "Nazi sexploitation" genre, but unlike the other two he couldn't even pull off vile successfully--his entry, "SS Experiment Camp", was laughable and boring (albeit still banned in Britain for some reason). It occurrs to me that given the nepotism in the Italian film industry Sergio Garrone might be related to the talented, modern-day Italian director Matteo Garrone (of "Gommorah' fame), but if that's the case the apple fell far, far from the tree. I'd recommend this only to fans of unintentional comedy or those who want to see a particularly mugging performance by Kinski or a especially undraped performance by Katia Christian.
The director Sergio Garrone was a hack among hacks when it came to Italian directors. Like fellow hacks Bruno Mattei and Rino DiDilvestri, Garrone later got involved in the vile Italian "Nazi sexploitation" genre, but unlike the other two he couldn't even pull off vile successfully--his entry, "SS Experiment Camp", was laughable and boring (albeit still banned in Britain for some reason). It occurrs to me that given the nepotism in the Italian film industry Sergio Garrone might be related to the talented, modern-day Italian director Matteo Garrone (of "Gommorah' fame), but if that's the case the apple fell far, far from the tree. I'd recommend this only to fans of unintentional comedy or those who want to see a particularly mugging performance by Kinski or a especially undraped performance by Katia Christian.
A surprisingly dull exploitation film without exploitation
spetersen-79-96204426 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Lover of the Monster wants to be a Gothic horror film, with a touch of the mad scientist, but fails so abysmally that one wonders if there was a serious disconnect between the scriptwriter and the director. In fact, the credits at least on IMDb don't list a writer, and it's no surprise.
The plot, as described, makes no sense. A wife (an attractive Dutch actress) and her new husband (Kinski) are moving back to the wife's old family home. The doctor in town is kind of still in love with the wife, and the married couple seems a bit estranged, so I expect jealous shenanigans. Do I get them? No. The wife goes on chaste walks and takes tea with the doctor, and that's all. Kinski's envious "rages" consist of minor piques and a few semi-harsh words. For this, the wife accused him of monstrous jealousy. On the other hand, if my wife spent lots of time, even chastely with a former lover, perhaps there is reason for a bit of pique.
Kinski, rather than make up with his wife, though this is what they're ostensibly at the manor for, goes into the basement and looks up what his deceased father-in-law was doing. Apparently he was interested in the reanimation of the dead, and all kinds of monstrous evil works. So ... I think. I now expect some cool mad science deeds. Do I get them? No. Kinsky goes into the basement, and gets shocked by some of the electric equipment. And that's all.
Then Kinski goes on occasional rampages into the countryside and kills people. At last hope springs. Perhaps the electric shock in the basement has turned Kinsky into some kind of monster? Well, all too soon we see Kinski-as-monster, and it is identical to Kinsky-as-man. A little white powder and that's it, though he does manage to pop his eyes out a bit.
Is there gore? No. We get a little bit of blood dribbled on the dead people, who apparently die of fear, because there are no wounds visible.
Do we at least get to see lots of luscious wenches nude for the asking? Again, no. We do see the Dutch actress semi-naked in the film's last scene, but it's too little, too late.
How about artsy psychodrama? Well, personally I detest artsy psychodrama, but I don't even get THAT in this stinker, unless seeing Kinsky and the Dutch woman whine at each other while staring in opposite directions counts. Ecch.
The movie does not provide ANY of the elements necessary for exploitation (no sex, gore, horror, or action). It does not provide any of the elements needed for a normal movie (no plot, crappy dialog, and few good scenes). It is very disappointing. There are a couple of kind-of interesting subplots, if you're concerned about the fate of a raggedy hobo thief or whether the wife finally goes off with her ever-patient doctor admirer.
But I gave up all hope, and watched the film glumly. I stuck it out only because I am a Kinski and Italian cinema completist. The act gave me no joy. Not recommended. It's not a giallo. It's not a Gothic horror, really, though it is a period piece. It has no mad science. It has no artsy psychodrama. It has no romance. It has nothing. Kinski does bug out his eyes really good in the snail-paced "action" scenes though.
The plot, as described, makes no sense. A wife (an attractive Dutch actress) and her new husband (Kinski) are moving back to the wife's old family home. The doctor in town is kind of still in love with the wife, and the married couple seems a bit estranged, so I expect jealous shenanigans. Do I get them? No. The wife goes on chaste walks and takes tea with the doctor, and that's all. Kinski's envious "rages" consist of minor piques and a few semi-harsh words. For this, the wife accused him of monstrous jealousy. On the other hand, if my wife spent lots of time, even chastely with a former lover, perhaps there is reason for a bit of pique.
Kinski, rather than make up with his wife, though this is what they're ostensibly at the manor for, goes into the basement and looks up what his deceased father-in-law was doing. Apparently he was interested in the reanimation of the dead, and all kinds of monstrous evil works. So ... I think. I now expect some cool mad science deeds. Do I get them? No. Kinsky goes into the basement, and gets shocked by some of the electric equipment. And that's all.
Then Kinski goes on occasional rampages into the countryside and kills people. At last hope springs. Perhaps the electric shock in the basement has turned Kinsky into some kind of monster? Well, all too soon we see Kinski-as-monster, and it is identical to Kinsky-as-man. A little white powder and that's it, though he does manage to pop his eyes out a bit.
Is there gore? No. We get a little bit of blood dribbled on the dead people, who apparently die of fear, because there are no wounds visible.
Do we at least get to see lots of luscious wenches nude for the asking? Again, no. We do see the Dutch actress semi-naked in the film's last scene, but it's too little, too late.
How about artsy psychodrama? Well, personally I detest artsy psychodrama, but I don't even get THAT in this stinker, unless seeing Kinsky and the Dutch woman whine at each other while staring in opposite directions counts. Ecch.
The movie does not provide ANY of the elements necessary for exploitation (no sex, gore, horror, or action). It does not provide any of the elements needed for a normal movie (no plot, crappy dialog, and few good scenes). It is very disappointing. There are a couple of kind-of interesting subplots, if you're concerned about the fate of a raggedy hobo thief or whether the wife finally goes off with her ever-patient doctor admirer.
But I gave up all hope, and watched the film glumly. I stuck it out only because I am a Kinski and Italian cinema completist. The act gave me no joy. Not recommended. It's not a giallo. It's not a Gothic horror, really, though it is a period piece. It has no mad science. It has no artsy psychodrama. It has no romance. It has nothing. Kinski does bug out his eyes really good in the snail-paced "action" scenes though.
More Lover than Monster but hardly any excitement
LJ2716 March 2022
LOVER OF THE MONSTER is the English translation of the title. This movie is somehow linked to another movie starring Klaus Kinski, called THE HAND THAT FEEDS THE DEAD. Supposedly both films use some of the same footage although I don't remember seeing it. In both films, Kinski plays the heavy. No surprise there. I had read about both LOVER OF... and HAND THAT FEEDS...for years and was excited when I discovered they were both going to be available on Bluray. The label wisely released THE HAND THAT FEEDS THE DEAD first. Watched it. Enjoyed it. Very happy to own it. Satisfying 70s Italian horror. No Oscar winner but it definitely gave me what I expected from it. Then, I saw that LOVER OF THE MONSTER was being released by the same label. Now, I was warned by reviewers that LOVER OF THE MONSTER was painfully short of not only monsters, but blood, gore, and pretty much anything to set it above a made for TV movie. I figured those poor reviewers had seen some abridged version on DVD or VHS and that surely there was blood, gore and horror, if not a monster and would certainly be gloriously restored for this Bluray release, right? Afterall, THE HAND THAT FEEDS THE DEAD, allegedly made by the same people, had blood, gore and surgery scenes enough so that there was no doubt as to why Carlo Rambaldi was credited on that film. Rambaldi's handiwork is highly visible in HAND THAT FEEDS THE DEAD. He is also credited on LOVER OF THE MONSTER. What he did on LOVER OF THE MONSTER is anyone's guess. Little, if any, blood. No gore. Definitely no monsters...at least none created using latex rubber suits or makeup appliances. You have Kinski supposedly turning into a monster running around making weird faces but he still looks about the same as when he is not a monster. Makes me wonder exactly what Rambaldi did on this film. I've searched the internet and can find no behind the scenes stories about LOVER OF THE MONSTER. I don't know if makeup effects were created but edited out for some unknown reason or if prosthetic makeup was created to be worn by Kinski and he refused to wear it. Maybe some stuff was created and the schedule was too tight and they had no time to film it. I guess I'll never know, although a Making of LOVER OF THE MONSTER could only be more interesting than the actual movie. All I can say is; unless you are a fan of seeing Klaus Kinski make faces while running through the woods, there's really not much here to hold your attention. There's definitely more lover than monster here but really not much of either. No real excitement either. Unless your curiosity demands you watch this (as happened to me) or unless you are a Kinski completist, I suggest you skip this one and watch THE HAND THAT FEEDS THE DEAD instead. You'll get Kinski who is still an evil scientist and some hot women and a decent amount of cool, if not completely convincing, blood, gore and makeup effects by Carlo Rambaldi before he started working with Spielberg.
I expected more from Garrone.
BA_Harrison30 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Jealous husband Alex (Klaus Kinski) moves into his late father-in-law's villa with his estranged wife Anijeska (Katia Christine). While investigating the property, Alex discovers a hidden laboratory and begins to restore the equipment, activating machinery that frees his inner monster—his insane jealousy—turning him into an uncontrollable killer.
Written and directed by Sergio Garrone, the man responsible for sleazy Nazisploitation classics SS Experiment Camp and SS Camp 5: Women's Hell, with crazy cult actor Klaus Kinski in the lead role, Lover of the Monster sounds like a guaranteed good time for fans of trashy 70's Euro horror, its lurid title suggesting all manner of debauched sexual behaviour between man (or woman) and beast.
Unfortunately, those expecting a delightfully deviant tale of tawdry sex with oodles of gore will more than likely be disappointed, the film being a relatively tame affair on all counts: the 'monster' is extremely lame, with the transformed Kinski simply looking like the actor has had a few late nights; the killings are virtually bloodless (the grisliest scene involves the dissection of a dead dog); and the gratuitous female nudity is remarkably reserved when compared to many other Euro horrors from the same era.
Avid Euro horror fans might glean a little fun from a couple of in-jokes—a grave bears the name of actor Ivan Rassimov, while one character is called Polanski—and the ending is surprisingly harsh, with an innocent vagabond paying the price for Alex's crimes, but on the whole this is a fairly unremarkable and ultimately rather dull example of European Gothic horror.
Written and directed by Sergio Garrone, the man responsible for sleazy Nazisploitation classics SS Experiment Camp and SS Camp 5: Women's Hell, with crazy cult actor Klaus Kinski in the lead role, Lover of the Monster sounds like a guaranteed good time for fans of trashy 70's Euro horror, its lurid title suggesting all manner of debauched sexual behaviour between man (or woman) and beast.
Unfortunately, those expecting a delightfully deviant tale of tawdry sex with oodles of gore will more than likely be disappointed, the film being a relatively tame affair on all counts: the 'monster' is extremely lame, with the transformed Kinski simply looking like the actor has had a few late nights; the killings are virtually bloodless (the grisliest scene involves the dissection of a dead dog); and the gratuitous female nudity is remarkably reserved when compared to many other Euro horrors from the same era.
Avid Euro horror fans might glean a little fun from a couple of in-jokes—a grave bears the name of actor Ivan Rassimov, while one character is called Polanski—and the ending is surprisingly harsh, with an innocent vagabond paying the price for Alex's crimes, but on the whole this is a fairly unremarkable and ultimately rather dull example of European Gothic horror.
Kinski Turkish Horror Giallo!
Whisper2Scream2 April 2022
The lesser of the two Turkish Sergio Garone movies but it has some great stuff in it and Kinski kicks ass as always. Kudos to Full Moon for digging this one up. It's been hard to find and it looks great on the Full Moon channel. If you're a Kinski fan you'll want to catch this but make sure you see the Full Moon version because it looks like ass in all the bootlegs out there.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
