The Year London Blew Up: 1974 (TV Movie 2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Superb Docudrama
Theo Robertson21 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
It's difficult to believe that this went into production in 2004 because it feels like it was made in the aftermath of the July 2005 London bombings to serve as a reminder to the world that Britain has been visited by ruthless terrorists who will stop at nothing to bomb the British people into submission . Indeed there's a moment when newsreel shows an old lady saying " If it's bloodshed they want then let them have bloodshed . Bring our boys home now " a statement that has obvious parallels to modern day British policy in Iraq

There's little I can criticise the producers , director or scriptwriter for , though maybe I should point out that

1 ) A bombing campaign in the West Midlands carried out by another IRA active service unit ( ASU ) is overlooked

2 ) The Provisional IRA ceasefire of 1975 in Northern Ireland wasn't really a ceasefire in its strictest sense - The Provos' just changed their name to " The Republican Action Force " and engaged in a sectarian campaign against the Unionist community and an internal feud against the Official IRA

3 ) The first two thirds of the narrative is so good that the last third featuring the Balcombe street siege is slightly anti climatic

But apart from that THE YEAR London BLEW UP is an absolutely gripping docudrama featuring reconstructions , interviews and newsreel footage

From the outset we hear no excuses for " The Balcombe Street Gang " . There's no historical discussion of Cromwell , the Irish potato famine , the partioning of Ireland , Bloody Sunday or the rights or wrongs of the Irish troubles . These men are rightly portrayed as the most ruthless terrorist cell to have set foot upon English soil at that time and the narrative is all the better for it . We see reconstructions of the bombings and shootings carried out and listen to the real life victims maimed for life or the orphans and widows of the murdered . Apparently going to a restaurant that had been bombed the previous day or doing a bit of Christmas shopping or even walking by a London pillar box makes you a legitimate terrorist target

The police at the time were at a loss as to how to stop this ASU , just like they're at a loss how to stop future terrorist attacks from Islamic extremists today .With the exception of one member ( Who was believed killed by his own bomb ) the ASU members had no previous convictions or were suspected members of the IRA and the story goes into how the police had to track down members due to very intensive detective work but mainly down to lucky breaks . A man is seen acting suspiciously in an area targeted by house breakings and is followed by a plain clothes policeman convinced he's a burglar and not an IRA member . A chase follows and an off duty policeman is shot dead which leads to the police tracking down the ASU safe house where they find fingerprints which leads to the identification and arrests of 14 other IRA members who were involved with this particular ASU at one time or another . Unfortunately they can't trace the four core members who are now engaged on a more reckless and violent campaign in the West End of London

One very interesting aspect is to do with the Guilford bombings which were immortalized in the movie IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER , which while being a very good film is not entirely accurate . What TYLBU shows is that one of the bombers in Guilford was a teenage girl with blond hair . One of the Guilford Four Carol Richardson was a blond teenager so you can see why the police may have jumped to the wrong conclusion . We're also shown a clip of the Balcombe Street gang looking at the newspaper reports of the Guilford Four being convicted and having a bloody good laugh . The scenes with one of the Balcombe Street gang apologizing to the Conlons in prison IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER is total invention and you feel that there's no sorrow or redemption in a terrorist heart

I expect this to pick up a few prestigious awards in the coming months
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An impressively succinct and engaging documentary
bob the moo25 September 2005
In 2005 terrorist attacks rocked London but this was not something that the city was unused to having been under attack from Sinn Fein/IRA for many years. The first attacks on the city came during 1974 when a small cell of the IRA set themselves up and began a campaign of pub bombings. While the population took on a wartime mentality, the police frantically search for any leads and the terrorists' confidence grows and their attacks become more daring and deadly.

With terrorism now stuck in the minds of people as being associated with Muslims, it seems that many have forgotten that it is not a new problem within the UK. For decades Sinn Fein/IRA had bombed parts of Northern Ireland and the mainland, killing many and maiming many others and, although they now hide their violence behind a spin of peace and politics, it is important that we remember who they are. This documentary stays away from commenting on their modern incarnations or actions (robbing a bank, punishment murders, training terrorists in Columbia, punishment beatings etc) and focuses well on the start of the English campaign back in the 1970's. The manner of delivery is a mix of old footage, talking heads and dramatisation; the latter is the weakest of the three but fortunately is not used as much as the others. When it is used it is generally supported well by the other material and it is better for it.

The end product is a documentary that captures the facts and the atmosphere of the time really well and provides a fascinating look back in enough detail to engage the totally unaware as easily as those who had been alive at the time. The narration is a bit too forceful and gruff; he does sound too much like the sort of person you'd find narrating on "When Dogs Attack" or some such programme but this is only a minor problem. The talking heads are all concise and interesting, while the use of news footage from the time make it that much more involving and real. Overall an impressive documentary that is engaging and detailed in its focus on part of the decades of Northern Irish terrorist violence; it does have minor weaknesses but the good vastly outweighs the not so good.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed