Based on a True Story (2004) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Wow. Interesting!
Spuzzlightyear19 October 2005
Again, this is what I like about Documentaries. Although I never had seen Dog Day Afternoon, I knew it starred Al Pacino, and was about some sort of bank robbery. What I never knew was it was, yes, based on a true story. Funny how it took this long for a documentary about the participants in the robbery and a reflection from the lead characters. Problem is, John Wojtowicz, the main culprit, the guy Al Pacino played in 'Afternoon', isn't too willing to appear without conditions and money money money. Luckily, Walter Stokman, the director, has lots of willing subjects to talk about the robbery including tellers that were in the bank, robbery including tellers that were in the bank, cops that were on the scene, and even the screenwriter of the movie, and Sidney Lumet, who directed it (who rather amusingly tries to shield the fact he's apparently had a stroke). And amusingly, Stokman also uses time to document his struggles to get Wojtowicz on Camera (he corner Wojtowicz during a special screening of Dog Day with the screenwriter). Interestingly, Al Pacino isn't interviewed at all, I wonder why.

Stokman has created a very good documentary, the big problem I have is that the film is way way WAY too grainy. Like he shot it on, I don't know, a pixelvision, and blew it to 35mm. What was with the grain?
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Director's Vision Worked After All
jmorris2364 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
As documentaries go, I thought it was very enjoyable.

I saw it at a film festival last year; a friend of mine was one of the people interviewed for the picture. Afterwards, I met the director and asked him a lot of questions - he was gracious and very nice. He frankly told me that Al Pacino was contacted but declined to be in the film. Sidney Lumet did agree to appear, and was very interesting.

In a way, the film rather reminded me of Maximilian Schell's documentary on Marlene Dietrich - he tried to make a film about a famous subject, but she would not cooperate. So he filmed around her and wound up with an even more interesting documentary.

This director did the same. John Wojtowitz wanted $28,000 to appear in the film, but the director could only offer $10,000. Mr. Wojtowitz was not needed in the end anyway. The story behind Dog Day Afternoon was bizarre enough to warrant a documentary, but that wasn't the director's idea - he wanted to present the "true story" behind a films that was based on a "true story" - and wound up showing that no matter how true to the events the Hollywood version was, it really didn't represent the truth. John Wojtowitz was portrayed in the film as a likable person and something of a hero. He robbed a bank just to get money because he didn't want his boyfriend to die - his boyfriend had attempted suicide many times because he couldn't afford a sex change. In reality, Wojtowitz was a vulgar opportunist, a low-class loser, and more than a little greedy. The director made his movie, the truth came out, and the "Hollywood" version was shown up on a tiny little budget.

Brilliant.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a great hostage situation!
filmlover6627 July 2005
This is a great documentary! It won an award for best documentary at the Int Seattle Film Festival. They reconstruct the robbery in Brooklyn and are confronted with a robber who is still a crazy madman. It's really stupid that this guy from Australia didn't notice the brilliant parallel between the negotiations over a phone line. Like the FBI negotiated over phone with this crazy robber, the director was forced to do the same 30 years later. The robber wants a lot of money for cooperation and he desperately wants to control the story in the way the film should be made. It feels like he is keeping hostage again (but this time his side of the story). Dog Day Afternoon made him a hero. Based on a True Story reveals the true character of the robber named john Wojtowicz. There is great archival footage of the real robbery, Ex hostages, the FBI agent who shot Sal, the Robbers ex wife, Sydney Lumet and scriptwriter Frank Pierson. It's a pity they didn't get Al Pacino. I think it's a cool film and it was very revealing for me!
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Fatally flawed
samizdat721 July 2005
The IMDb database gives a runtime for this film in the alternative as either 24 or 75 minutes. I saw (most of) the 75 minute version. The premise of the film - investigating the 'real life' events underlying the Al Pacino film "Dog Day Afternoon" - is sound. The problem is that large chunks of the film are devoted to disagreements about money between the filmmakers and the main protagonist (the man behind the robbery). The filmmakers try to cover up the fact that during shooting they failed to secure the adequate co-operation of the protagonist by half-heartedly turning the documentary into an exploration of the nature of documentary truth, but this is clearly a cover for a failed documentary and is superficial and unconvincing. The more honest approach when it became clear the key guy would not co-operate would have been to abandon the project, return any unused funding (yes i know this is unlikely) and find a new documentary subject.
2 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed