The House of Usher (2006) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Cursed Family
claudio_carvalho30 July 2010
The physiotherapeutic Jill Michaelson (Izabella Miko) has difficulties to date since her beloved Rick Usher (Austin Nichols) and his twin sister Maddy (Danielle McCarthy) left her without giving any explanation. Out of the blue, Rick calls her to tell that Maddy has died. Jill decides to travel to the House of Usher to attend the funeral of Maddy, who was her best friend in college and saved her life, and has a cold reception of the housekeeper Mrs. Thatcher (Beth Grant). When Jill is leaving the house, Rick invites her to have dinner and tells that Maddy and he have neurasthenia and is hyper-sensitive. The love is rekindled and Rick asks her to stay until the next weekend. Along the days, Jill makes love with Rick and is haunted by the ghost of Maddy. Sooner she discovers the dark secret of the cursed family Usher.

"The House of Usher" is another version of the short story of Edgar Allan Poe. The screenplay develops the drama and romance of Jill in a very slow pace but the resolution when Jill finds the bonds in the Usher Family is rushed and confused. The Polish Izabella Miko shines in this film and I look forward to see her again. My vote is four.

Title (Brazil): "O Mistério da Casa dos Usher" ("The Mystery of the House of the Usher")
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Don't be looking for the Price classic.
lastliberal7 August 2008
There really isn't much story here, so it is hard to imagine how this film can be retold. However, there is a twist in this retelling that makes for some interesting imaginings.

It is a Gothic tale with a very wooden Austin Nichols as Roderick Usher, a man who is dying, and dying to continue the family linage, and the curse as well. Izabella Miko, a really hot choice, is his old girlfriend brought back to complete his mission. She is caught in his web, although one has to wonder why, as he has no charm whatsoever.

She tries to escape once she discovers the awful family secret, but it is to no avail. It is only through the intervention of the creepy housekeeper, Mrs. Thatcher (Beth Grant), that she has a chance. Mrs Thatcher hates her, so it's hard to see how she will escape.

That's pretty much it. Like I said, there is not a of of story in this creepy Gothic by Edgar Allen Poe. It would probably be better to see Roger Corman's version.

Or, you could wait later this year for the gay version.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Extremely boring house of Usher.
HumanoidOfFlesh21 February 2007
"The House of Usher" is called "the modern re-telling of Edgar Allen Poe's story from a female perspective".Yeah right,and I'm an alien invader from Pluto.First of all,the film fails as a thriller as it's extremely boring and lacks tension.Like so many earlier adaptations of Poe's work,this latest interpretation bears little resemblance to the source material.The cast is pretty terrible,albeit it's nice to see Polish beauty Izabella Miko in the main role.On the plus side the cinematography is great and the last 15 minutes are actually quite interesting to say the least.It's a shame that the rest of the film is so painfully dull.If you want a proper Poe's adaptations rent or buy a couple of Roger Corman's flicks.3 out of 10.
18 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poe's Worst Nightmare.
rmax30482328 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
It's not worth going on too long about this semi-supernatural thriller. The young, cute, predatory-looking blond Izabella Miko attends the funeral of her erstwhile best friend at a remote New England estate ruled by Miko's ex lover, Austin Nichols as Roderick Usher.

The two of them are rather gloomy. I mean, what with the suicide of the best friend and all. The atmosphere isn't helped by the presence of the housekeeper, Beth Grant, made up like a vampire, so much so that Madonna would look like a fresh-faced virgin beside her.

The general air of dread doesn't keep Miko from spending a lot of time wandering about the mansion in her underwear. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with that. I do it all the time myself. The problem is that these scenes are the highlights of the film! This is worse than Edgar Allan Poe's worst hang over. The photography is atmospheric enough and the location aptly chosen but everything else seems slapped together. It resembles a carefully conceived feature film the way a child's rolled-together limbs and torso made of clay, topped by a tiny ball of a head, resembles a human being.

Nobody in it can act, but -- that aside -- the story itself makes no sense. Edgar wouldn't have cared too much about that, but he had other things going for him, whereas this has only Miko's buns. Of the three principles, Miko is least bad, Nichols is well into negative territory, and Grant's every utterance reminds us that she's trying to act in a movie.

At first, after doing her grief work, Miko comes on the Nichols, smooching him up, her wide-open lips revealing glistening incisors of frightening dimensions. He demurs. His neurasthenia prevents him from responding. Later, when she arranges matters less formally and straddles his lap, he apologies because he still can't perform. There is another murky scene in which she toys with the belt of his robe. Next thing -- pow! -- she's pregnant with twins. What is this, coitus interruptus without the coitus? The least the director could do is throw us an explicit and climactic scene of strenuous coupling.

"Neurasthenia," the mysterious disease from which Roderick Usher suffers, is an old-fashioned term, current enough in Freud's period of disorganized nomenclature. It was used to refer to what we might call chronic fatigue today, combined with a little attention-getting irritability.

But why am I going on about neurasthenia, you ask? Because I think I caught it from this movie. I notice it particularly in regard to my black cat, Pluto, a fiend from hell. I keep telling him, "Just keep it up, that's all." But does he listen?
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Fails to deliver....spoiler alert
nerowolfgal11 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I love horror movies and I am very fond of anything based even vaguely on Poe. So, I settled down happily with a bowl of popcorn to watch this movie.

At first it had all the things that make a horror freak happy. There was a gloomy house, an equally gloomy housekeeper with dire warnings, and a mysterious figure seem at twilight and hiding in shadows.

And at first, pieces of the movie seem to be in place. Main character girl instead of traditional male: nice twist. Hints that she had a sexual past with both the Usher twins: interesting update. Male Usher twin obsessive sexual interest in her: nicely creepy. Usher twin getting her pregnant and locking her in the house: again nicely creepy.

And then it happens. Main character finds family photos. She sees that for the past seven generations the family has produced a set of male and female twins. She mutters something in a horrified voice which cannot be understood no matter how often the movie is replayed.

This something is enough for the housekeeper(who would you'd think, know the "curse" all along) to suddenly say the family is cursed, to try to end the main character's pregnancy, and to try to kill the male twin. There is running and screaming and people dying, with the viewer with no idea WHY. There is a "twist" ending which makes no sense, again because the "curse" is unknown, and if the main character does supposedly know it, why is she happily having the babies?

The visuals are good in the movie, the director is fairly good, the early creep factor at a decent level but because of the ending I can't give this movie a good rating.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Barely constitutes a horror film
slayrrr66623 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"The House of Usher" is a bland, boring barely horror.

**SPOILERS**

Heartbroken over their break-up, Jill Michaelson, (Izabella Miko) is invited go back to Roderick Usher, (Austin Nichols) at his house, where they attend the funeral of a close friend. After the services, they realize how they've drifted apart and decide to stay the weekend to catch up. The more time they spend together, the closer they become until he reveals he suffers from an acute cell disease that renders him ill and weak. Thinking something more might be going on, she stays by his side where she learns the dreaded secret he was hiding and tries to get away from the mansion.

The Good News: This one barely qualifies as a horror film, but the few that are related help it nicely. The ghost scenes near the middle section generates a couple of rather nice shock scenes, especially in the walk outside. That's a solid scare and helps the film out. There's a nice atmosphere derived from the house, as there's an attempt for it to be somewhat centered around old-school Gothic ideals about the setting, but there's also the really great design that also works nicely for this. The only other area to work is the finale, which has a lot to like. It's the closest to actually having some excitement with some nice chasing through the house, a couple good moments in the attic as well as the deprivation tank, and along with the film's sole appearance of violence as well as the great revelation scene, make this one's finale its best scene, as well as all of the good parts from the film as a whole.

The Bad News: This here was a pretty below-average horror film, mainly for one large reason. For the majority of the film, it refuses to be like a horror film and instead acts like a drama about the family's disease. There's rarely any mention of anything horrific happening, which could've been gold with the disease plot-line already in place for it. This had the deadly, degenerative disease angle ready to go, using it to throw symptoms his way and forcing the stay to take care of him, but here they keep it a mystery and go for the romance and drama angle, which is plain weak. The other part that's weak is that this gives the film no scares, which if done the real Gothic route combined with the dangerous disease angle would've made this one entertaining, instead there's large sections, which consists of mainly the first hour of the film with absolutely nothing of interest, which is a really bad sign. None of the other flaws can overcome this, although there isn't much else since there's very little else to the film.

The Final Verdict: Pretty dreadful horror-drama that has very little about it that's worthwhile or even interesting, leaving it as a really lacking viewing. Really only watch this one if you're into the horror-drama side or are looking for something to kill an hour with, otherwise just leave this one alone.

Rated R: Violence and a sex scene
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
yet another piece of crud
zaefod15 September 2006
Poor attempt at the Edgar Allen Poe tale. . I was not invested as an audience member in the film. I actually walked out. I have better things to do with my time. The acting is wooden, the direction and editing are quite poor as well. Cinematography was so so, if not that motivated, predictable. Most everything about the film was predictable. Too bad, could have been a great little thriller. Shot digitally and projected that way, which made it look even worse. the production design wasn't that bad. It didn't get in the way nor stick its head out, which is good. The sound was often out of sync and looped after the fact. All in all, I was disappointed. It really isn't that hard with a story this good to make and even passable movie, but some how this director found a way to squander it all. Don't bother.
16 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst Poe adaptation ever?
poolandrews26 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The House of Usher starts as psychical therapist Jill Michaelson (Izabella Miko) receives th sad news that one of her best friends, Maddeline Usher (Danielle McCarthy), has died. Jill travels to the huge ancestral home of the Usher's to attend the funeral & see Maddeline's brother Rick Usher (Austin Nichols), Ricks tells Jill that Maddeline died from a mysterious illness & that he now has that illness & persuades Jill to stay despite warning from the caretaker Mrs. Thatcher (Beth Grant) that she should leave as soon as possible. While staying at the Usher mansion Jill keeps seeing quick glimpses of Maddeline, is i her imagination or is something more sinister afoot? Then Jill begins to research the Usher family & discovers a ancient curse that is the real reason behind Rick wanting her to stay...

Directed by Hayley Cloake & supposedly based on the short story by horror author Adgar Allan Poe this confusing mess of a thriller is surely a contender for the worst Poe adaptation ever with it's slow moving & badly plotted story & lack of any atmosphere or horror or shocks. The script is the biggest problem here, even though the first hour or so drags badly & might put you to sleep you can at least follow it but once Jill finds out about the curse it's all downhill. For a start it's never made clear what the curse is, are we supposed to understand it from a scene showing Jill laying Usher family photo's on the floor? Jill never says anything so how are we supposed to know the significance? I assume that since the Usher family tree doesn't 'branch' the curse is that they are all inbred & each set of new born twins will have sex & produce another set of twins who have sex & then, well you get the idea. Then there's Maddeline, OK so she isn't dead but why is she hiding in the attic? Who did they bury in the funeral scene? Why did she then kill Rick? Why not kill Rick before Jill even arrived? Why not make her presence known to Jill? Why not say anything to Jill? What was Mrs. Thatcher all about? If she wanted to end the Usher curse why suddenly decide to do it now? Why commit suicide when she had failed? Why not see her plan out? The entire climax is an absolute mess, I mean whose blood was that on the floor leading to the attic? Even though we take an educated guess at what was going on nothing quite fits, it's just bad scripting that leaves the viewer cheated & frustrated. The obligatory twist ending has Jill pregnant with twins that kiss each other in her womb(!) so I guess that implies the curse will continue, well that's fine with me just as long as they don't make any more awful films about it.

Despite being based on a rich short story this adaption of The Fall of the House of Usher is so bland & dull I can barely remember anything about it, the Roger Corman directed The Fall of the House of Usher starring Vincent Price is so colourful & atmospheric & a joy to watch visually unlike The House of Usher here which is the complete opposite with dull colours & a very plain indistinct house for the setting. The plot is as boring as the bland visuals. There's no horror here, there are no scares or gore & The House of Usher plays more like the most tepid thriller you can imagine.

With a supposed budget of about $130,000 the budget was low which is why there's only five people in it I suppose. Apparently filmed in Massachusetts. The acting is alright, I didn't think it was that good or that bad either way.

The House of Usher is a terrible thriller, it takes a rich source & ruins it. It's slow, boring & confusing with a poorly written script that whichever way you look at it just doesn't make much sense. No horror, no scares & no gore also help sink this anaemic tepid little thriller without trace.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A real stinker
scpenn13 July 2008
If you love the classics and was hoping for something remotely related to Poe.... stay away from this one. Nurse Thatcher? That really took a lot of creativity - not. I mean, thats something Mel Brooks would come up with. As a matter of fact, "High Anxiety" has more to do with Poe's "The Fall of the House of Usher" than this crap. And, they should have got Cloris Leachman to play nurse Thatcher. Geez! This was bad. So bad. It was like something out of the far left wing of the democratic party. It was so bad. Like, maybe, Dennis Kucinich. In any event, there is no need to take the Tyleno PM with this bomb. 10 lines? I'm having a hard time coming up with ten lines. This movie was so bad you can't even say enough bad things about it.
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Ennui of The House of Usher
Scelestus-113 July 2010
The 2006 House Of Usher film (as opposed to the countless other versions, most recently in 2008) is dull as all hell.

Plainly put. Not much else to say. It's far too bland to even bother typing a review. It's a shoddy little piece. Relatively faithful to the original story, but a bland and tiresome film regardless.

Move on. Buy something interesting. Like, I dunno, Blood Monkey- which I might review some time in the next few weeks.

Since an IMDb review requires 10 or more lines, I suppose I really must elaborate: The film is tosh. It's trash. It's garbage. It takes the dry classical texts of Poe and vacuum seals them, taking out what little life remained from the distinctly dated original works. It borrows only the most obvious aspects of the story, ignores subtlety, and pisses on the livelier bits of the original story. I'm hard pressed to care about it, and even more pressed to write a review for a film so utterly pointless.

Curse it. Curse it back to the burned out pit it most inevitably came from.

For other reviews, ramblings, music, pictures, and stuff: http://chaos-inc.tumblr.com/
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
return to the house of usher...
violentmochi25 February 2007
I must say, I'm not really a fan of Poe, but after this film.. Woh, I am now.. This film was great! The feel brought me back to the time of Alfred Hitchcock! I love this film! Ms. Thatcher was an amazing touch! What to say about this film? It's a great film, especially when you don't know the plot. Thats how I went in and I loved it!

The acting is very good. Austin and Izabella are very great in this film. I for one, am not a Izabella fan, only seeing her in Forsaken. But was pretty impressed. I wonder why she hasn't broken out yet. And Austin Nichols was a very nice addition. He made a great choice of the character, but felt he could've been less wooden. Other than that, great watch! I suggest this to everyone!
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
serviceable thriller, fun to view and discuss
oldwivestales9 October 2006
In this very serviceable thriller, a young woman named Jill hears from her former lover Roderick. He and his sister Maddie, her best friend when the three of them were at college together, disappeared suddenly from her life several years ago and she had not heard from either of them since. Roderick tells her that Maddie has died, and asks Jill to come for the funeral.

Roderick suffers from an illness that makes him sensitive to light and touch. He is a novelist and writes at night, wearing gloves and headphones to drown out sensation. He frequently communicates through typewritten notes that bear the Usher seal, weighty symbol of the burden of the Usher legacy. The novel he is writing parallels the happenings in the house, and he won't let Jill read it, saying that he isn't sure yet how it is going to turn out.

Roderick asks Jill to stay because he needs her, but she only gradually discovers his full intent. Austin Nichols is the restrained Roderick to Izabella Miko's translucent but determined Jill. Both are well cast in their roles.

The opening music and the repeated warnings of the housekeeper are a bit heavy-handed and the film might have done better to let the story unfold without them. The second half of the film has lots of plot twists that make for great after-viewing discussion. The artistry of the filming earned this film the best cinematography award at the Boston Film Festival where it premiered.

I recommend seeing this movie (but not alone!)
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Much to be desired
andie_lee27 September 2010
I own a movie review blog and I reviewed this movie recently. IMDb does not allowed me to include URL's, so I will just paste what you would have found on my blog as my review of this film. "Based off the popular Edgar Allen Poe short story The Fall of the House of Usher. This 2006 adaptation was nothing like the Poe story. Other than a few names being the same I don't know how they can claim this as an adaptation. It was incredibly confusing. And the film ended leaving my mother and I with tons of questions. What was originally a story about two (male) college buddies somehow became about a girl and her old college lover in this film. There was some sexual content, not severe, but totally pointless. Not to mention the way the Rodrick Usher kisses his lover Jill makes me want to vomit. It was like he was trying to eat her face! Slirping and smacking and....ugh make me shiver just to recall it. No one should ever kiss like that, especially on film. There was a pointless character added in named Mrs. Thatcher. What she was supposed to bring to the plot I do not know. She was basically just a creepy old woman thrown in to add ambiance I guess. The acting was to be desired, but the scenery was pretty cool. I liked the old large manor, though it lacked the foggy green glow that the Usher manor was described as having in the short story. Overall, I would not see this film unless you want to be confused. Its not scary, its not suspenseful, its not accurate to the original story, (and if go for the hot and steamy films) the sex in this film isn't even sexy. All around fail in my book. "
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A true twist on Poe
catfish-er14 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
*** CONTAINS SPOILERS *** The main character serves as the narrator in the Poe story. Unfortunately, in that short story, the character is a man; but, in this version of the story, the role is given to a young woman. She is a former lover of Roderick, instead of a childhood friend.

Except for that one difference; and, a few modern contrivances (like the isolation tank), the story is incredibly faithful to the Poe story… well, and the family curse is changed here too.

But, more on that later.

The role of the narrator is to act as an observer through which we see the story unfold. This helps us build empathy with the character, without all the messy foreshadowing and flashbacks that would have happened, had we seen the movie through Roderick's or Maddie's eyes.

Given that perspective, I think the acting is very good; and, I think the casting was brilliant. Austin Nichols plays the role of Roderick to a tee – embodying the twisted perceptions, hyper-sensitivity (suffering from Neurasthenia), and photo sensitivity brilliantly. In the Roger Corman version; which I think is the definitive telling of the Poe story, Vincent Price never could have (nor should have) done as well.

And, Izabella Miko is an absolute delight. Not just for the eyes, because there's plenty there to see; but, she also builds the suspense incredibly well as Jill Michaelson. As the events unfold around this young woman; and, as Roderick and Mrs. Thatcher (played brilliantly by Beth Grant) begin to manipulate her reality, she reacts honestly and credibly.

The Usher family's secret is a curse indeed! As Jill said, "They are all one line." Brother and sister as parents of the next line of twins… and, all suffering the same family curse. However, the secret is revealed when Jill takes down the family pictures -- parents have twins and those twins have twins and those twins have twins... All you have to do is listen to the names as she reads them off.

However, as Roderick's book unfolds with the movie, we find out that Jill is there as a surrogate for Maddie, who went insane because of the incest. And, Roderick and Thatcher are trying to keep her hidden; she's not dead at all! In this telling, she is trying to prevent the curse from going on - WOW, what a twist on Poe, with re-curring themes of being buried alive!

OKAY, now watch the rest of the movie, because the last 15-to-20 minutes make it all worthwhile.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gothic goodness
ale-4925 February 2007
I, for one, thought it was a solid, Gothic tale that sad, high school girls will absolutely adore. Izabela Miko and Austin Nichols are great as the star-crossed, darkly romantic leads and the mood and tone throughout the entire film. Art direction is good and the cinematography is well done. The breakout role has to be Beth Grant, who really is a delight as the rigid, creepy disciplinarian assistant. Now, if you are looking for an adaptation of the classic Poe tale, then you'll be disappointed. It's a re-imagining, not like Baz Lurman's ROMEO & JULIET. Instead it is very influenced by Hammer films. All in all, I would consider it a good DVD to check out.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This is a great movie.
jacobjohntaylor112 March 2018
This is one of the best horror films I have seen. I do not know why people do not like like. This is a very scary movie. It has a great story line. It also has great acting. It is very underrated.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Fall of the House of Busher: The horror, the horror. . .
charlytully20 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
On July 13, 2008, "scpenn" wrote here that THE HOUSE OF USHER (2006) "was like something out of the far left wing of the democratic (sic) party." At first I was mystified by this remark, as I had not observed a political bent to the left OR right on my initial viewing. Fortunately, I hadn't yet returned this flick to the video store, so I was able to watch it again at 1/16th speed. In so doing, the following amazing plot twists were revealed in a nefarious series of subliminal images and subtitles:

1)A draft-dodging coke-head buffoon uses a soon-to-"suicide" Enron bag-man from the state that lost the Alamo to keep-the-slaves slaves (!) to bribe the U.S. Supreme Court for a White House apartment. 2)Promising to be "uniter-not-a-divider," this bush-leaguer unites the Confederates, Nazis, and House of the Rising Sun under one bloody flag to take all the blue-state middle class jobs and tax dollars and give them to red state billionaires and foreign sheikhs. 3)Hearing his oil buddies were upset at making profits in only the billions when gasoline sold for 89 cents a gallon under his predecessor, the poison shrub engineers a series of catastrophes which boost oil firm executive compensation alone into the billions, while bringing down the U.S. economy on five-buck-a-gallon gas and getting more than a million people killed, including 10,000 Americans. Viewed at this speed, USHER is the most chilling horror flick ever!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nice Adaption from Poe's Original!!
PerryW12 July 2018
Slow to start but doesn't drag! Not hard to follow if you get that the girl & Usher have a past from college! In the sex scene, it would have been more realistic if she had taken off her cute little panties & tossed them aside before she straddled him!! But I guess it didn't matter as he sure was a "minute man"--the whole sex scene last a little over a minute!! Overall nicely done!! Especially when played by a beautiful Polish ballerina!!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed