Krisana (2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
...and I can't get up
fnorful10 April 2006
This is a lovely tale of guilt-driven obsession.

Matiss, on a lonely night stroll in Riga (?) passes by a woman on the wrong side of a bridge railing. He passes by without a word. Only the splash in the water followed by a cry for help causes him to act. And then only too little and too late.

The film chronicles his efforts at finding out more about the woman. On a troll of local bars, he finds her pocketbook. He pieces more and more of her life together. His "look" changes as his obsession grows. He has to make things right. In a marvelously filmed dialog with the "bastard ex-boyfriend" he forces Alexej to face up to the guilt that both feel.

Haunting long takes, a gritty soundtrack to accentuate the guilt, barking dogs. Footsteps. Lovely film noir with a lovely twist. A good Indie ending.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One man's guilt-ridden, Antonioni-esquire journey
radiohed-127 January 2006
I am normally not compelled to write a review for a film, but the only commentary for this film thus far on is rather unfair, so I feel it necessary to share my point of view.

"Krisana" (or as it was titled at the theater I saw it, "Fallen") follows Matiss, a lonely Latvian archivist, as he tries to learn about a woman whom he didn't try to stop from jumping off a bridge, as well as her reasons for doing so. That's the plot in a nutshell, but this film is not concerned with story as much it is in depicting the guilt of a man who failed to act. As a detective who investigates the incident tells him, we usually don't bother to care about the anonymous faces we pass every day until after they die.

Comparisons to Michaelango Antonioni and his "Blowup" will most likely abound in any review you read about "Krisana." The influence of Antonioni's philosophical and austere style and the story of "Blowup" are clear and, in fact, writer/director Fred Kelemen makes an obvious reference to that film in scenes in which Matiss attempts to come to know the woman who jumped off the bridge, or at least who he thinks did.

The only other person to share his or her views on the film detracts the "college film class" look and sound of the film. He or she neglects to consider the budgetary constraints that an existentialist Latvian film most likely faces, but the atmospheric black and white cinematography and ambient sound succeeds at an artistic level to depict the solitude of Matiss. The background sound of wind and street noises lend an ominous aura and reminds one of a Fellini film, whether or not that was Kelemen's intention. The filmmakers undoubtedly had little money, but this constraint is used to the film's advantage.

"Krisana" succeeds as a character study with enough humor thrown in to keep it from being too self-serious. It could have easily fell into the trappings of a mystery story, but it avoids that and becomes an intelligent film about loneliness and guilt. If you are more concerned with plot, this film and its ending may frustrate you. Otherwise, take the time to be engaged by it. It is well-worth seeking out.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This feels a lot like an early Jim Jarmusch movie.
maple-227 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Matiss Zelcs (Dombrovskis) is trying to find a woman which he ignored when he passed her and who was about to jump off the bridge last night. He heard her splash followed by cries for help, but never saw her or her body. The police don't want to continue investigation as no body was found. However Matiss starts his own investigation, finding that the woman had been drinking at a café earlier in the night he saw her, and had left her handbag behind along with some crumpled half finished notes to a certain Alexej (Korobov). After pretending he was her lover to get the articles, Matiss sorts through them carefully and takes a receipt in the name of Alina into the photo developers to get some slides she had left to be developed. He sees that she appears to have been a mother with a young son and a husband that she did not seem close to. Matiss further sees that Alina (Dzerve) was very interested in another man of whom the husband seems jealous. He also finds an envelope addressed to Alexej Mesetzkis and visits his flat. There he learns that Alina had been living for several months with Alexej who indeed is the man of the photo, but she has recently disappeared after several days of fighting. Without letting on that he has the slides or the half finished notes, he asks Alexej to consider if he has driven Alina to desperate measures.

This is a very slow movie with little conversation, much of it in Russian rather than Latvian. Long slow black and white shots mirror the depressed mood of the main character in a movie that feels a lot like Jim Jarmusch's Stranger Than Paradise. But as with Stranger Than Paradise, I had a hard time staying awake through the first half of Krisana.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a Bad Movie
ugly_canadian18 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie with a theater class at the 2005 Toronto Film Festival, where it was part of the competition. I had high expectations of this film, mostly because of the expectations I had of the Toronto Film Festival. I was disappointed with this movie; I had expected a well produced and acted film, when I got what was more a piece film school worthy film. The movie starts with the main character of Matiss Zelcs, played by Egons Dombrovskis, walking across a bridge. It is unclear why he is walking across the bridge and things become more confusing when he walks past a women who appears to be about to jump off the bridge. The movie continues in a confusing fashion, giving us shots that seem not to have anything to do with the movie (such as when he is watching the children play in the water) as well as several shots when Dombrovskis has already walked off screen but the camera is still focused on the same spot. I felt that the movie was shot in black and white for the sake of shooting it in black and white. There wasn't really a reason to film the movie in black and white! As well, the background noise, mostly of dogs barking, wasn't only annoying but it took away from the film. If it was supposed to to make the film sound realistic, then why did it seem like there was no one else around, a rather unrealistic situation? The only people we see in the film are involved in the story line. It seems like Dombrovskis lives in a ghost town! The story line can be confusing, and doesn't really pick up until towards the middle of the movie. The movie also seems to want to be philosophical but doesn't want to go too deep, other than Dombrovskis many vacant looks nowhere. The only thing that redeems this film is the acting; both Egons Dombrovskis and Aija Dzerve provide chilling and heartfelt performances that I enjoyed immensely. I do think that this movie is worth watching, although the technical aspects of the movie make it seem like someone you should be watching in a college film class, the acting is superb and the story line, when it does eventually pick up, can make you think. If you get a chance to see this movie, go, but don't have high hopes. It will disappoint you.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Review
NikolicJovan8 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Fred Kelemen, cinematographer, film and theatre director, is the man behind some of the finest works of Béla Tarr (The Man from London, The Turin Horse). Even it was made over decade ago, Krisana is his last film.

Matiss Zelcs, working as archivist, becomes preoccupied finding the woman (Alina) he didn't help when she attempted suicide. Because police officers didn't find her body, he starts his own investigation just to stumble upon many mysterious and interesting facts about Alina and her life. With the advance of his investigation, Matiss find himself lost in his intentions and it becomes uncertain what are his true motives.

It is obvious that Kelemen's inspiration is rich, his work foremost resembles aesthetics, or to be even more accurate, atmosphere of both Tarr and Tarkovsky. Tarr, as his long, dark, monochromatic shots are dominant throughout the film, and Tarkovsky in a way Krisana's narrative is almost oneiric, poetic, just there is no depth like in Tarkovsky's work. Kelemen's portrayal of protagonist is rather shallow and weak comparing to those two authors (achieving characterization similar to Tarr, and especially Tarkovsky, is almost impossible task), but nevertheless, Krisana is definitely film worth watching.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Really great film
svr2217 July 2006
The combination of the superb black and white photography and the 'Eugene Onegin with a twist' plot made this a real knock out for me. The atmosphere created by the mostly very dark shots contrasted with occasional very bright overexposed white was gripping. There was a superb moment where where transparencies - apparently conventional holiday snaps but where the faces of the actors revealed character and situation subtly but instantly - were shown accompanied by Lensky's heart-wrenching aria from the Tschaikowsky opera Eugene Onegin.

For me the mark of a good film is that it should take advantage of the opportunities presented by that medium, which means that often the story is less important than imagery and atmosphere - Last Year in Marienbad is a good example of such a film. Krisana is in the same mould.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst film I've ever seen. Redefined the word 'dull'.
philllester20 January 2024
This film is the 'Emperor's New Clothes' of film. Genuinely the worst film I've ever seen - and it rates nearly 7/10??!

There are several 'scenes' which start in extreme long shot and you watch a character walk to and past the camera. No story. Just a long walk. And there's more than one of those 'scenes'.

I saw it as it was shown to the film club which my wife and I attended. It was one of the main reasons we left the club, Wim Wenders' 'Alice in the Cities' pushed us over the edge. 'If a film is foreign, it must be good', seemed to be the order of the day. Like I said, the Emperor's New Clothes. Only we were prepared to say it was tripe. Carol Reed, marvellous; this, awful offal.

A chronic waste of time and money. Not just for us. This should never have been made - it deprived a genuine artist the money and resources to make a film of value.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed