The Air I Breathe (2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
110 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Happiness, Pleasure, Sorrow, Love…The Air I Breathe
jaredmobarak2 March 2008
First-time director Jieho Lee has brought us the next installment of the multiple stories genre threaded together as though fate and coincidence are the name of the game. This type of narrative has been around for a long time, most definitely before Robert Altman's Short Cuts, but at least there is an example from 15 years ago, and I can't rack the brains for an earlier one at this time. The most well known to those out there today is of course Oscar-winner Crash. Lee's The Air I Breathe, based on an ancient Chinese proverb that life can be broken down into the four emotional cornerstones of Happiness, Pleasure, Sorrow, and Love, is not as good as Haggis' film, and I think even that one is overrated. It's not that I disliked this one, I actually found a lot that I really loved, unfortunately, there's more that feels overdone, overwritten, and absolutely unrealistic. One thing you can't fault it for, however, is the superb cast and acting.

Some of the dialogue is almost too obvious, at times having answers repeat all the words in the question…just a bad redundancy as though the audience might not comprehend a short answer. These characters are so important in the scheme of each other's lives that everything out of their mouths needs to be so well crafted that it becomes stiff. The delivery, though, is almost consistently superb. Brendan Fraser is great in a rare serious role, the kind of stuff that began his career. Very stoic and deliberate in all he does, you begin to feel for him as the stone façade starts to falter. Due to the story-structure going out of order, we see some of this emotional evolution before the catalyst for it, but once that event occurs, it makes everything before it make more sense and I actually think it was handled well as a result. Even his ability to see the future was utilized in a realistic way that it never felt like a gimmick, just a skill he had and used. The best actor, again as almost always, is Forest Whitaker as a by-the-books successful man who has finally realized that his pristine life is devoid of true happiness. No material needs can fill the void of actually living, whether living wealthy or poorly, it is the act of adventure and excitement that is necessary to enjoy. His final reaction of pure adulation is the best part of the film and it happens about twenty minutes in.

One would think that a story as involving as this would have pretty equal billing for all roles, but that is not true. Whitaker and Kevin Bacon are underused while Fraser is involved at almost every turn. Andy Garcia, however, is the one that stays the most constant throughout. As a hardnosed bookie/gangster, nicknamed "Fingers," Garcia shines, something that usually doesn't occur with him of late. He is good at this type of role and it was nice to see him sink his teeth into it. Even Sarah Michelle Gellar had her moments, although few, to show that maybe she can do more than Scooby-Doo and every year's Japanese horror remake. Mention also needs to go to Clark Gregg in a small, but funny role, and Emile Hirsch as Garcia's nephew, appearing to be a pawn to the plot, but in actuality becomes a role with payoff.

As far as the style went, I can't complain too much. The correlations between each thread is well conceived if not totally contrived to benefit the story. I enjoyed the transitions, especially at the start with multiple layers and progressions. I can't quite recall if that is the only part in which it was used, though. The music was also a help; very Explosions in the Sky-like, the score enhanced each moment it was used. In the end, the film just couldn't keep its bloated, heavy-handed script up. Even utilizing the four emotions as vignette titles (something used similarly in the superior The Dead Girl) was so obvious that it became laughable. Each instance made you know first thing that they will be the exact opposite of that title despite the lead thinking they were—happiness was really depression, pleasure was really regret, sorrow was really vanity, and love was desperation. Every emotion is more of a backhanded overview that is manipulated in order to serve the tale, rather than allowing the tale to serve the emotions that are supposed to be back-boning it.
27 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Underrated
totosbestmom30 July 2023
I just watched The Air I Breathe on one of those "cheesey" cable channels. It showed 2 out of 4 stars but it sounded interesting. I looked it up on here and thank goodness I did. I watched it and I liked it for a multitude of reasons.

I have to say IMHO this is probably the best "serious" ~ non comedic performance I have seen from Brendan Fraser. AlI the way around good acting. Sarah Michelle Gellar's performance is stellar and Kevin Bacon's performance in this movie is terrific.

So thank you to everyone who wrote the good reviews. They steered me in the right direction and I'm glad I watched this movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
it's been done before. twice.
widescreenguy4 July 2010
life paths crossing. the emotions, drama, pathos.

well it's been done twice before with 'Grand Canyon' and 'Crash'.

so what's new with this one? more gratuitous violence. the performances were passable, but the plot was too predictable. do I need to tick the 'spoiler' box now? also I didn't quite get the nicknames part. the stock broker up to his wazzo in gambling debt certainly wasn't happy. and if 'happy' was what he was looking for, does that mean the pop singer was looking for 'sorrow'? the sad truth is Hollyweird has run out of ideas. remake after remake, sequel after sequel.

how is this situation to be corrected? simple: billions in free cash from Washington and an announcement of a 'war on mediocrity' LOL !!!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
We all need a way out..
swAppp15 February 2008
To begin with, there were times when people didn't care about the money, didn't cry about work, popularity or power.. However, those lovely times are way back in ancient civilizations, while nowadays the religion, the bank and pure emotions steal the scene. These are the subjects I were thinking about a lot lately and probably some of you did too. Therefore, this movie probably was the best movie I could have watched at this part of my life. I did, and now I am happy.

The story of this movie could be easily summarized by one exact quote of just a random-looking worker from the movie: "I need a way out". I couldn't agree more - in todays universe, even more in my country, there are people who live to work. They live to eat, they live to buy some goods and sometimes, they just live to give their problems away to other people... This is actually all covered in this movie by a director that I have never heard of, but it might be a time for me to start learning his name. I began loving this movie from very first fifth minute- to the very end.

The cast is amazing - both main and supporting actors gave me their best. Bacon, Whitaker, Gellar, Fraser, Garsia, Hirch - what a nice choice for this movie! However, if you are not really open minded, you may not like their characters, you may not like the plot, but still, you will love the acting. Persuasive, smart and well done. That's how I would rate the crew members of this movie.

This leads to n awfully understandable conclusion - "The Air I Breathe" is actually one of the best movies I have seen this year, only "25 Hour" moved me more.. Even after seeing Ed's "25 Hour" i was quick to state that crime/drama is from now on my most favorite genre of the movie. Didn't take long to prove that it actually is - thanks to the amazing "The Air I Breathe"
104 out of 180 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Happiness, Pleasure, Sorrow, Love – An Overrated Tale
claudio_carvalho17 May 2008
A clumsy clerk (Forest Whitaker) overhears the conversation of three coworkers in the toilet about a fix in a horse race, and bets a large amount. He loses the bet and owes the money to the dangerous and powerful mobster Fingers (Andy Garcia). A gangster (Brendan Fraser) has the ability of foreseeing the future and works for Fingers; he is assigned to collect money for the boss with his troublemaker nephew Tony (Emile Hirsch) and is beat up by a gang. The manager of the pop-star Trista (Sarah Michelle Gellar) loses her contract to Fingers without her agreement and she is threatened by the gangster. A doctor (Kevin Bacon) seeks a blood donor that might have a rare blood type to save the life of his passion (Julie Delpy).

The weird and overrated "The Air that I Breath" uses four tales – named "Happiness", "Pleasure", "Sorrow", "Love" - that entwines characters and situations around the powerful and omnipresent gangster Fingers. The stories are unpleasant and the power of Finger is exaggerated – how could a famous pop-star be intimidated by a criminal the way Trista is? The attraction of this forgettable movie is the non-linear screenplay that hides a poor and boring story and the great cast. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "O Ar Que Eu Respiro" ("The Air that I Breath")
17 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
not bad but not great either
dan-frederiksen24 February 2008
overall it's not bad. you could come away with the impression it was a good film but along the way it employs various means in the script that detract significantly from it. in order to further a story line set forth the characters are at times made artificially stupid or forced to make choices that doesn't seem credible. it's always a shame when that's done because it pulls you out of the suspended disbelief somewhat and let's you see it as construct rather than experience it. apropos :). the acting is not a problem and it's a long list of celebs in the cast but it isn't always believable. it's OK but tarnished a bit by those faux pas.
16 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Unique, thoughtful, and stunning -- a winner
larry-41112 May 2007
The Air I Breathe is stunning in many ways. It should be established right from the start that this is not a movie which allows you to check your brain at the door. It demands attention and thought. Director Jieho Lee and co-writer Bob DeRosa have crafted an intriguing work which leaves more questions than answers. And, after all, that is what art should aspire to do.

The film is based on a Chinese proverb which says that life consists of four emotions: Happiness, Pleasure, Sorrow, and Love. To be whole one must experience each emotion, and by doing so we are interconnected with all other human beings. The film itself is structured in the same fashion, with each of four segments focusing on those ideas. The lead actors portray those emotions one by one. Forest Whitaker is Happiness, Brendan Fraser is Pleasure, Sarah Michelle Gellar is Sorrow, and Kevin Bacon is Love. They anchor the four segments of the film, while the rest of the magnificent ensemble cast weaves in and out of the narrative.

The idea is somewhat fuzzy at first. This is an unconventional story with a similarly unique style. Unlike most films, the major characters don't really have major arcs in story line or performance. While some may find a couple of the actors a bit deadpan, they pretty much are solid throughout while consistent in their characterizations. Whitaker and Fraser especially fit that description. Both are quite stoic in their roles, but that's what the story demands. Sarah Michelle Gellar may be the exception. She is the one who has to display a wide range of emotions, more than the others. Her character is quite tortured and goes through a lot emotionally and physically. Gellar is a very brave actress who took risks and put her heart and soul into it. She is sure to surprise many people. Bacon is a delight and is perfectly cast as a would-be hero. Andy Garcia is a chilling and devilish nemesis throughout, while Emile Hirsch provides some comic relief in his brief appearance.

The script is filled with poetic statements, hearkening back to the Chinese proverb on which the story is based. Each segment's main character provides voice-over. And while the language is somewhat oblique, the dialogue is quite blunt and to the point.

Visually it is breathtaking, with broad sweeping images interspersed with numerous gritty close-ups of tragedy. The Air I Breathe has the look of a big budget film, although it is not. Watch for some fascinating visual effects. Hand-held with close-ups is used for some of the more chilling parts and creates tension. Hitchcock would be proud.

Surprises occur at every step of the way. One of the most startling aspects of this film is that there are moments when one may think, "No, that won't happen." And then it does. It's hard to watch at times and quite violent. There's sadness and tension. But there is also an amazingly clever use of humor in the film, and that is perhaps what is most surprising. But that's what life is. The soundtrack plays a major role in this movie, as if another character. It has an Asian feel, not just because of the filmmaker's background but because the film is based on that Chinese proverb. It was quite haunting.

The Air I Breathe is, at its heart, a character piece which follows a general theme. Seems simple. On the face of it, it plays out like a crime drama. But there's more to it, and it takes patience and thought to get to the point of it. Not everyone will be able to do that. But it is definitely worth the effort.
285 out of 372 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great cast, boring plot, annoying soundtrack
siderite10 August 2008
This is a Crash movie. You know the type, little stories that eventually come to make some kind of common sense. The actors are playing great, even Brendan Frasier, who usually lands the most uninspired roles does a great one here. Actually, given the time on the screen, I would say he plays the lead role.

Anyway, I could have gotten around the obvious holes in the plot if it presented any kind of interesting idea. The background music that tried to convey all sort of emotions, but ended up being pretentious and out of place didn't help either.

Bottom line: if not for the great cast, the movie would have sucked big time.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A beautiful film based on the interconnection of human beings
kengelina841 March 2008
I read several bad reviews for this film before actually being able to get my hands on a copy, but remained optimistic about it as I sat down to watch it. Thankfully, some people actually possess the ability to sit down and watch a film with an open mind and then form their own opinion, which is exactly what I did.

What I saw was not a pretentious portrayal of "cheap irony" in which the viewer lives in "Gellar's world". What I saw was a creative endeavour to intertwine four strangers through four major emotions, thus showing that through these emotions, everyone is connected - whether or not they are aware of it. This is what sociologists study and discuss everyday.

The script was performed sensationally, by a stellar cast (Brendan Frasier, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Andy Garcia, Kevin Bacon, Forest Whitaker), encompassing a gritty, fast paced storyline, with melancholic overtones. This film is not all about Gellar - she gives a heart wrenching performance as Trista, but the film is dedicated as much to Garcia, Frasier and Bacon as it is to her. Each performance is worth its weight in gold - Garcia is frightening as mafia boss "Fingers", Frasier pulls at your heart with his resignation to the terrible fates of the people around him and Bacon and Whitaker will surely gain your sympathy with the sheer level of their desperation.

The only thing this film is guilty of is invoking emotion and thought from its viewers - and isn't that the reason to watch it in the first place?
134 out of 188 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sometimes risking everything is the only choice you have.
lastliberal9 December 2008
An incredible little film that shows just how we are all interconnected and part of the universe. When one's wings flutter, it affects all around us, and in ways that can sometimes be very surprising.

The emotions expressed in the film are all emotions that help us understand how we are interconnected. With the exception of Brandon Fraser and Andy Garcia, all the roles in the film were confined to a particular segment. There were some very good actors in small parts in the film.

Fraser was fantastic in a very unemotional role. His first attempts at showing any emotion cost him his life, just as Forest Whitaker's attempt at happiness cost him his.

I really like Whitaker's musing that happiness comes from playing by the rules and doing well in school. The reward for doing well in school is more school and more school, and then you can get a job and start wanting things. Do any of us every attain happiness? Or, as Whitaker, are we stuck in some dead-end job wanting? Kevin Bacon showed how one risks it all for love and gave a superb performance. I just kept wishing that Sorrow (Sarah Michelle Gellar) was that little girl from his past. I bet she was and they just didn't tell us.

A very pleasurable hour and a half.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Excellent acting by Garcia & Whitaker can't save this dog
rlange-315 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
It starts off well with the first of four vignettes, pulled through by an outstanding acting job by Forest Whitaker. The second vignette is OK, because Andy Garcia does a great job as the villain. But Geller is once again sadly disappointing, and by the middle of the movie it starts to disintegrate. By the last act, it is so full of plot holes it's like a piece of moldy Swiss cheese.

Kevin Bacon is supposed to be an emergency room doctor, but acts like someone being electrocuted while having a tantrum. A woman he loves has been bitten by a snake and he clearly has no real idea about how to handle the situation -- can he be that incompetent? Some research tech is screaming at him that she must have a transfusion within 24 hours or she will die. But she isn't even given an IV. He runs around screaming at everyone supposedly trying to find this rare blood type, but this is not the first line of defense for Russel's viper envenomation. It would not have been that difficult to make this episode realistic, but nothing short of a Valium transfusion would have saved Bacon's character. A transfusion is obtained and she is magically transformed into the picture of health. There's a monitor but she doesn't even have a line in; I guess they ditched realism for the ooh gosh wow picture of the monitor. Funny how that monitor doesn't even seem to be attached to the patient. This is the kind of thing you would expect in an ultra low budget flick. Most people have been to a hospital and know things just don't work that way.

It's not just the technical medical aspects that are botched. Geller is well protected by all kinds of bodyguards, but in spite of her being in a clearly precarious state of mental health all attendants melt away to allow her to climb out on the roof in an attempted suicide. Nobody notices she is missing. And Bacon runs up what must be at least 40 flights of stairs, again suddenly unmolested by the previously ubiquitous bodyguards who have conveniently disappeared. He arrives with no sign of fatigue and rescues Geller in what has to be one of the hokiest scenes ever to make it into a movie. It's just so poorly acted and set up as to make the entire sequence laughable, especially the diaphanous garment taking flight at the end. This is pure corn by this point. I was hoping they would just come crashing down and the movie would end.

Then Geller, who has just attempted an act of suicide is discharged without any apparent evaluation. It's OK because Bacon and Geller hugged each other so she's just fine and ready for a casual discharge. They aren't even trying to make this believable anymore.

A cheesy bow tie follows to wrap the movie up and try to integrate the vignettes. At least the epilogue was over quickly.
30 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Core -Shaker
xnofeelingsx19 December 2007
This is one of the movies that if you pay close attention to the story and what the message is you will find yourself profoundly stupid and clueless when it comes to basic human emotions and how everything is somehow connected.(chaos theory...?) the performances were absolutely amazing.I'd never seen Sarah Michelle Gellar portray such a role so well,she really moved me as Sorrow and Forest Whitaker as well.The roles fit the actors like a glove.the photography is beautiful.the story is very moving and the ending surprising. loved it +++++++ Maybe it wont make it as one of the greatest films ever but it's the kind of movie i'd like to store and watch again sometime later in the future instead of some box office hit.
155 out of 257 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The PLOT
glas_don8 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Its an interesting kind of story which interlinks all the character's stories.

At the beginning I thought was excellent starring Forest Whitaker and what the story develops into.

However, it didn't feel Brendan Fraser was up to the role he was playing. He just doesn't fulfill the hardman role or be able to take martial arts.

The most interesting part of the story for me is when Kevin Bacon is faced with a challenge to save a loved one and he ends up doing to succeed.

Michelle Gellar didn't do too bad in her role mind you. Its a shame there aren't enough roles around for her these days as she can turn on the water works.

Only watch when it is shown on TV or Sky Movies.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Cheap Pulp Fiction - Clichés upon Clichés
prall27 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler Warning! This film was filled with clichés plot lines and events - with predictable outcomes from cartoon characters who are supposed to represent the four emotions: happiness, pleasure, sorrow and love. The author tries to be clever and have the characters experience events almost opposite of their stated emotion. Love is Love lost, Happiness is a tragic end, Pleasure is a tortured soul, and Sorrow is the lucky escape from a terrible situation ( which I wouldn't expect to last long in any case). I know the plot is supposed to "challenge" the audience, but creating a totally obvious twist does not a twist make. Trying to make an Altman like Puzzle Piece plot where the separate stories all combine in the end was over-the-top contrived in this film. I couldn't believe the film stooping so low as to introduce snakes and the clichés scene of a person hanging off a building with one hand while holding another person from falling to their death. The film has the entertainment of cheap pulp fiction - so it's not totally bad.
68 out of 125 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A very well told story about human emotions!
Red_Identity20 February 2008
First of all, this film did have problems. There were a lot of flaws, and some of the coincidences seemed stupid and irrelevant, but it does not fail to show emotion. The emotions are all scattered. Not just one person can have one, and I think that is the point of the film. My first time seeing it, i thought it was just a GOOD film. After seeing it over three times, i can really say it is a very great film. The Acting is phenomenal, and Sarah Michelle Gellar gives her best performance to date. She really shows what she is capable of. She portrays the right signs of Sorrow. Andy Garcia was also great. The direction, from a first time director, was really amazing. The were a lot of beautiful scenes, great cinematography. It is a pleasure to watch. Some of the songs played, are kinda cheesy, but those songs go away fast. BUT the score is truly amazing. It totally captures the right feel that the film portrayed. The film should have been longer. It was only 90 minutes, it was very fast paced. They should have shown more screen time with Gellar and Bacon. The rushed feeling has a positive side to it. The film never gets boring. It grabs you completely(and for some people, that is what they want). Yes, the biggest problem is the screenplay, which at times seems silly, some of the dialogue, but the film also has powerful moments and some GREAT dialogue(sort of like the 2004 film Crash). Overall, I have fallen in love with it. It is very underrated, and some of the negative feedback it has received is not worth it. See it, expect flaws, but see it expecting something big, something about human complexity, and you will not be disappointed.
53 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'm still thinking about the film, which is a good sign.
ariasisaac-8908523 September 2021
Every story isn't quite intricately woven in to tell an overarching story, there are some misteps. Also a bit of the film is a little confusing with its message, but I appreciate the Calibur of acting on display.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not really breathtaking, still worth checking out.
KineticSeoul1 February 2011
I really didn't know what to expect from this movie, never even heard of the director. But decided to check the movie out because of the casting and I must say it's a decent movie about the converging of destinies. And if you like movies that has something to do with the converging of destinies will probably enjoy this movie and there is four segments in this one. Some people claim this movie is a copy of "Pulp Fiction" I don't really think that is the case and the cross thread story line works pretty well although there really isn't much character development in each segment. Although the fast pacing can be a good thing cause it really doesn't get boring for the most part. The screenplay is the main negative aspect of this movie, it just all seemed like a dream because it just feels silly at times. It's a ambitious movie but it just doesn't feel like it got the job done right at times as well. The acting is done really well though even if few stood out more than the other, the script is decent so all in all it's worth checking out but nothing really breathtaking. The ending isn't amazing, but satisfying.

6.9/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A beautifully depicted masterpiece
Dragoneyed3631 February 2009
I was absolutely astonished with how wonderful The Air I Breathe turned out to be. I was expecting it to be really good, basically because of the star-studded cast I believe it has, and in the end, I got an amazing journey with a beautiful story everywhere I looked.

First of all, the actors and actresses of this film make it absolutely unable to miss. They all capture their characters perfectly and make the film unable to look away from with their dedicated, spot-on performances. The plot was also majestic and deep. It was touching and moving in so many ways, and they way it all made sense in the end was simply brilliant. There is not one scene where I thought the creators have added in something mediocre or unnecessary, and there was not one scene where I pressed the pause button to do something, for I could not stop watching it.

It shows how everyones' lives all intertwine in some way and how one person's honest actions can affect the life of another who honestly needs help when they can't find it anywhere else, and it is honestly as beautiful and worth the watch as I am making it sound, honest. This is a must-see, I recommend it for everyone, and usually the haters have to complain about how boring and confusing it is, while I found it at the right pace to keep your attention and understood everything the film meant for us to understand along the way.
29 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cheesy start, solid finish
TheGOLDENWALRUS30 May 2008
Similair to the movies such as Crash, 11:14, and Go, The air that I breathe also is told from different points of view.

There are four stories told starting with Happiness (Forest Whitaker) who must find 50,000 dollars so Fingers (Andy Garcia) doesn't cut off his fingers or even kill him. That story was the weakest and the most far fetched but it all ties in very well later on in the movie. Pleasure (Brenden Frasier) surprisingly was my favorite character. This coming from someone who can't stand Frasier's other work. He works for Fingers as he takes his nephew, Tony (Emile Hirsch) out for a good time and showing him the work that his uncle does. Sorrow is next (Sarah Michelle Gellar), as she also works for Fingers as a musician. She struggles to maintain her image and find herself and eventually meets up with Pleasure. Finally there is Love (Kevin Bacon) whose in love with his best friends wife, Gina (Julie Deploy). Something terrible happens to Gina as Lovewill do anything he can to save her life.

After forty-five minutes in the movie picks up and things start to make sense and tie into each other. The whole love, pleasure, Happiness, and sorrow thing doesn't work for me. A lot of cliché phrases are randomly placed such as when Frasier's character tells Whitaker's character that sometimes you have to risk it all. Whitaker does such that and Frasier then says "why the ---- did you do that? Watch this with an open mind and watch it all the way through. It does have a 14% or something on rotten tomatoes and the critics that did like it, will say the same thing. The movie works for me and it payed off to watch it all the way to the end.

My verdict 6.5/10 or B-
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Overlooked Masterpiece
Crannicus_Maximus7 May 2009
"The Air I Breathe" is perhaps one of the most tragically overlooked films of 2007.

An ensemble cast featuring Brendan Fraser, Julie Delpy, Andy Garcia, Forest Whitaker and Sarah Michelle Gellar, among many others, is brought together perfectly in this study of the Six Degrees of Separation by relatively fresh director Jieho Lee.

The story, which is apparently based upon an old Chinese proverb, unfolds in four acts, titled Happiness, Pleasure, Sorrow and Love. Each of the acts focuses on a character representative of the suggested emotion, with Whitaker's Happiness and Fraser's Pleasure standing out as the strongest among a plethora of powerhouse performances.

Like other ensemble dramas -- smash hit and Oscar winner Crash (2005) comes to mind -- the film weaves a tapestry with its players, connecting them all to one-another in ways which may seem unimaginable at the start, but wholly believable and even touching come the film's stunning conclusion.

The film has it all, much akin to the proverb it seeks to replicate. I would recommend that anyone who is looking for a night of quality entertainment consider picking this one up.
27 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fairly engaging set of vignettes a la "Crash" meets "Twenty Bucks"
george.schmidt28 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
THE AIR I BREATHE (2008) ** Kevin Bacon, Julie Delpy, Brendan Fraser, Andy Garcia, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Emile Hirsch, Forest Whitaker, Clark Gregg, Kelly Hu, Taylor Nichols, John Ho. Odd yet somewhat engaging interlinking character by fate set of four vignettes involving Happiness, Pleasure, Sorrow and Love in Los Angeles has echoes of "Crash" and "Twenty Bucks". Whitaker is an accountant who runs afoul of a violent thug after a gambling bet goes awry; Fraser is a pre-cog hit-man for the violent thug (Garcia hamming it up), who has a Faustian deal with an up-and-comer pop singer (Gellar in one of her more memorable big screen turns); and Bacon is a doctor determined to save the woman he loves (Delpy) from a dangerous snake bite. The talented ensemble cast has a field day and novice filmmaker Jieho Lee – who co-scripted with Bob DeRosa – has an eye for the visual but not the compelling overall. Nice try anyway.
8 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Awful script wastes great premise and talented cast
highwaytourist14 April 2011
This is one of those movies which should have been great only to become a disaster. It's based partly on the Chinese proverb that four emotions form the foundation of life, Happiness, Pleasure, Sorrow, and Love, and those emotions are embodied by four very shallow characters. However, the real foundations of this film are Anger, Frustration, and Pretentiousness. Anyway, the four foundations are used to create four stories which interlock, no doubt inspired by Pulp Fiction. The first story features a timid and stressed-out investment banker identified as Happiness (Forest Whittaker) who has worked hard and played by the rules, only to have a lonely and frustrating life to show for it. So when he overhears his supervisors planning to bet on a horse race with an insider's tip, he bets heavily on the horse, only to lose it all and owe huge money to a classy but ruthless gangster named Fingers (Andy Garcia, who has played this kind of role more times than I can remember). One of Whittaker's more successful clients is identified as Pleasure (Brenden Fraser), a gangster's enforcer of Fingers' who has the ability to see pieces of the future. That ability is not entirely a blessing, as the visions are hard to interpret and take the spontaneity and surprise out of life. Well, Fraser's character is hired by Fingers to babysit his obnoxious gangster wannabe nephew Tony (Emile Hirsch), who of course makes trouble and angers powerful people, which results in Fraser's being beaten up severely. Meanwhile, the third story is about a beautiful but ditsy and vain pop singer named Trista (Sarah Michelle Gellar), who is also identified as "Sorrow." Her sorrow comes when her manager embezzles from her and sells her contract to Fingers to pay off an overwhelming gambling debt. Fingers sees this as a chance to go legit, but he clearly plans to work Trista to death while taking most of her earnings until her fifteen minutes of fame is over. In the last story, Love is a doctor (Kevin Bacon) who's in love with his best friend's wife, a beautiful epidemiologist (Julie Delpy) who gets bitten by a lethal snake and needs a blood transfusion from a rare blood type or she'll die. Did you get all that? A big problem is that all of characters behave in ways so stupid, it's impossible to care about them. It gets even more infuriating because they are forced to react to coincidences that are improbable in a way that's science fiction. There are also a number of lines featuring fortune cookie philosophy and existential angst that are meant to be profound but only evoke sneers from intelligent people. Is there anything good about this film? Well, Jieho Lee proves to be a technically competent director. Also, the talented actors do what they can with their cardboard roles. As a result, there are some attractive shots and a few isolated scenes work. But these minor virtues are overwhelmed by the stupidity and pretentiousness of the script.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
free your mind
Fram_the_Bear23 February 2008
First of all, for those of you who didn't watch this movie yet I have a piece of advise: just try to WATCH it, not to dissect it or hack it like some of the users above me did. Don't start to watch this with the single purpose of comparing with Altman's "Short Cuts" or Haggis's "Crash". You will waste your time by doing that. Also, if you watch movies looking for a message in every corner and in every line you rather watch "Lord of War" because this is not for you. Oh, I almost forgot. Don't read movie critics reviews before. If you did that keep this in your mind: those guys do exactly what you are not supposed to do with "The Air I Breathe": they dissect it, every inch of it. If you really want to enjoy this one, relax, free your mind and let it come. And that feeling inside you at the end will tell you everything you need about this movie.
49 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Crash wanabee
Amadio9 April 2009
Although Crash came out in 2004 it won the 2006 Oscar. Since then, I guess, writers and directors have tried the 'tie the vignettes together' theme to 'make something good' approach. It rarely works, which is why Crash is so worthy of mention again. In TAiB four separate people in different areas of life (except they are all in LA of course - Jeez, there's originality) are brought together in painful ways. Will it have a happy ending (this IS Hollywood after all), and if so, for whom? The casting and acting are excellent, each protagonist takes their role and makes it truly his or her own. Even Garcia as the mob boss (now there's more originality) manages to bring a new light to the position. Brendan Fraser, (in)famous for his "Mummy" roles is truly outstanding as a brooding hit-man. Yet despite the great cast and potential of the story line, to me it seems too contrived. "I want to make a movie about..." is what it seems to say, rather than actually managing to do what Crash did - involve you with the characters. I was interested in the characters in TAiB, but could not feel for them. Kevin Bacon's story was shoe-horned in, too quick, not enough time to empathize, Forest Whitaker was doomed from scene 1, and Trista? Well, just being young and cute is not enough reason to feel for her. Worth watching, but NOT inspiring or particularly thought-provoking - unless you find the National Enquirer stimulating.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The New Cliché
brianholder21 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Some people might think filmmakers are starting to abuse the coincidentally intertwined multiple stories told in a jumbled time line format we've watched in the likes of 'Pulp Fiction', 'Crash', 'Babel' and 'Vantage Point', 'Amores Perros', etc. etc. etc. etc. I think it's becoming a cliché of sorts.

What sets this movie apart, however, are two inappropriately hilarious scenes, both involving Sarah Michelle Gellar's character, namely SPOILER: Trista's father tap dancing to death and Trista's attempted suicide (I felt I'd been suddenly transported to a Harold Lloyd movie).

I was very sad to see talent like Andy Garcia, Kevin Bacon, Julie Delpy and Forrest Whitaker wasted in this film.
22 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed