"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" Listen, Listen.....! (TV Episode 1958) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Could go either way
glitterrose2 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, I like the episode. It kept me interested and that's what I look for in whatever I'm watching. BUT I can also see where people might think this episode is slow and the plot is stretched out too long.

Our episode is centered on a man that's desperately trying to tell people in various professions that the person they think has went on a killing spree isn't responsible for all the deaths. It's the third murder that he's so focused on. He tries telling the police, newspaper reporter and even a clergyman his 'theory' but he's either flat out mocked or brushed to the side. He goes back home absolutely defeated and he laments something he never truly got out to anybody. The third victim is the daughter of this man and woman. Nobody would believe a mother could be capable of doing this to her own daughter.

The episode sorta leans into another episode...the one where a little boy is trying desperately to tell that there's a man outside of the train and he's out there in the snow. His mother obviously isn't the best parent in the world and just wants her son to shut up. This little boy tries his best but he keeps being shushed and no doubt the poor man outside will end up freezing to death as the train is pulling away. The man in this story believes in taking the long way and never gets to a person where he says 'My wife killed our daughter.' Ah, but you wouldn't have an episode if he said that to the police and was listened to right off the bat!

So yeah, this is an episode that could go either way. It's worth a watch at least once so you can decide if it's worth watching again or if you'll skip this episode during the next airing cycles.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Listen! Listen! Before it's too late!
sol12182 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Old man Herbert Johnson, Edger Stehli, is sure that the third victim, 17 year old Hellen Jamerson,of the notorious "Stocking Killer" wasn't killed by Mr.Schultz the man arrested for the two previous murders. Schultz a woman stocking salesman freely admitted to the first two killings but not the third one. Herbert is very sure that the third murder of Miss. Jamerson was the work of a copy cat killer who's still on the loose! Yet try as he does to convince the police as well as a crime reported of the "Daily Chronicle" he's fluffed off as a silly old man trying to make a name for himself as an armature sleuth.

It's seems that the local police are satisfied with having Schultz hang or fry for the three stocking murders and clear their books on the case but old man Herbert is more then sure now that he didn't kill Miss. Jameson and with good reason! He as well as his wife, Edith Evanson, knew the girl and her family for years and knows that her free swinging lifestyle was more then her parents good upright and God fearing people, like himself & Mrs.Johnson, were very against! And it was very possible that someone very close to Hellen Jameson used the cover of the stocking murders to punish or murder her for what she was doing!

***SPOILERS*** Made to look like a silly old fool by everyone Herbert's hair brained theory that the killer of Hellen Jamerson wasn't the person arrested for it becomes a fact in a way that he never suspected! Not in just that Mr. Schultz was innocent in her murder but, the very last person that he suspected, who in fact did murder her! And with tasting blood for the first time and feeling invincible may very well murder again!

P.S We didn't get to see the usual witty epilogue from "The Master" Alfred Hitchcock in what exactly happened, off screen, to Hellen Jamerson's killer since he was at the time suffering from an extreme case of laryngitis and was in no condition to tell us!
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
They Got the Killer!
Hitchcoc8 June 2013
This is the Cassandra plot. The old man has the information but won't be believed. He goes to every possible end to convince anyone who will listen to him that they have the wrong man, a person who uses scarves to strangle his victims. Most of the episode has him encountering one disinterested authority figure after another, from police to reporter to priest. We have the element of dramatic irony on our side, but the writer has a surprise for us. Now the question remains: How much is the old guy willing to give up if the real killer is found. This is a passable episode with interesting questions. It does portray those in authority to be incredibly shortsighted and dense. On the other hand, he is an emotional old guy whose track record isn't that great.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
So What's With the Old Guy
dougdoepke17 June 2010
Good suspense. Old Edgar Stehli has a theory about three stocking murders. Trouble is no one will listen to his "theory". He keeps getting brushed off since he's old and rather addled. We don't know what to think since he may be hiding something and does keep using a different name with each interview. So what's with this old guy. He looks too old to be the culprit himself, but then looks can be deceiving.

Some good character sketches. Stehli's excellent at winning our wary sympathy. Lummis is especially good as the harried police sergeant—just the right amount of impatient indulgence. Note too how his scene ends with his taking a pill, done casually, but a nice character touch. In fact, each encounter is well handled, a credit to actor-director Don Taylor. However, what I most want to know is the location of the bar. The barfly blonde, Jackie Loughery, is an absolute knock-out. No wonder she was the first Miss USA, and even Dragnet's tough-guy Jack Webb came under her wifely spell.
30 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Listen up
TheLittleSongbird25 February 2023
Don Taylor directed three 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes prior to "Listen, Listen", the best being by far "The Right Kind of House" due to it being the only great one of the three. The other two, "The Deadly" and "Fatal Figures" being decent and above average if unexceptional. This reviewer has always had a thing for good premises, with that and talented casts being my frequent main reasons for seeing anything, and "Listen, Listen" did have that despite the trap of being potentially silly and over-stretched.

"Listen, Listen" is one of the high middle episodes of Season 3. It doesn't waste its premise, while also not quite living up to it with it not escaping properly the potential traps it had. It is well done and has a lot to like, but for me there were also a few quite major issues that stopped it from being more than very good. When it comes to comparing it with Taylor's previous 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes, "Listen, Listen" is not on the same level of "The Right Kind of House" while also being better than "The Deadly" and "Fatal Figures".

There are plenty of good things here. It is well acted, with Edgar Stehli being not too hard to get behind and Dayton Lummis being delightfully indignant. The chemistry also compels and intrigues. Hitchcock's bookending is droll and amusing as to be expected and Taylor's direction is assured enough and generates enough suspense.

Also did find the story very interesting on the whole, with some nice suspense and a twist that was a surprise and quite well done. It is not too simple while not being convoluted either. The dialogue provokes enough thought, while it is atmospherically made and the theme tune deserves its classic status.

On the other hand, there are things that could have been done better. Didn't like how short sighted and idiotic the police were portrayed. Or that the script tended to over explain too much and at times too early.

Furthermore, did feel that despite liking the premise on paper the execution did become too on the over stretched side when what is revealed could have been said more directly a good deal earlier. So the pacing had a padded feel later.

Concluding, a lot to admire while not living to full potential. 7/10.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Listen Listen explained
karaperrio24 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Ok so i write this review simply to explain the story as i do not believe the other reviewers have pointed out the obvious correct ending.

Its a nice creepy little story with a nice old man worried and getting no help from the authorities or even the church.

The key reason why he wants the police to investigate more is that it was his daughter who was murdered, the Jameson girl had changed her name from Johnson and been disowned by her disapproving religious parents.

The last line "no one would believe a mother would do it" makes that obvious.

The scary Corollary however is the lipstick and scarf in the drawer and the smile on the mothers lip which suggest she has more dissolute girls she can enjoy punishing, she enjoys being a serial killer too much to stop at one.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This should have been better.
planktonrules1 April 2021
I hate stories which rely on folks behaving atypically and strangely for the show to even work. In this case, you have an old man who goes to the police and reporters trying to talk about his theory about a recent string of murders...when he knows dark well what really happened and it isn't a theory at all. But each person he sees he talks about 'his theory' and he comes off as a nut...when had he simply talked about what he knew and why, then there would have been no need for the episode in the first place. I truly don't like a plot with such a glaring plot hole...though the acting was good enough to at least merit a 6.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"They listened alright, but they wouldn't understand."
classicsoncall25 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
If you scratch just below the surface of this episode, you have to ask yourself why the old guy (Edgar Stehli) doesn't just tell the authorities what he knows about the third murder victim being done by a copycat killer. One other reviewer before I came here apparently 'got it' the same way I did. Okay, you could say that for any kind of intrigue or suspense, Herbert Johnson's actions were designed to keep the viewer baffled about his intentions, almost making it seem like he was confessing to the murder himself in a roundabout way. But that didn't seem very likely. There's not so much a twist to this story as there is a portrait of people in charge who don't have the patience or willingness to hear out what a senior citizen has to say. And when Mr. Johnson, sporting all those aliases makes it home, we're not really given any indication who the woman in his apartment is. Could be his wife, could be a sister, like in the "Kill With Kindness" episode. But for all that, what I liked about this story most was it's noir feel, more so than any Hitchcock story I've seen so far. I guess that had to do with the barroom scene and the leggy patron named 'Slats' (Jackie Loughery). Her IMDb bio states she's still alive ninety one years old today as I write this. With her figure, you would want to see this story twice!
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"WHAT THE ........??!
melnfolly12 January 2021
Are we to believe that he or his wife extinguished the last young woman?
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed