"The Big Valley" The Murdered Party (TV Episode 1965) Poster

(TV Series)

(1965)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A personal Favorite
summerfields14 April 2010
I really dig this episode. Korby Kyles is accused of a murder and Jarrod is called upon to take his place.

The Kyles are the never-do-well types of the Valley who even take to stealing coins from Jarrod's saddlebag: a Kyle's brother 'cleverly' hid them were Mr. Barkley figured: in the rim of his hat!...

The acting is wonderful. There is a scene where Korby is jail and says "Why, thank-you, Jarrod" to which our respectable Mr. Barkley replies "Don't you EVER call me Jarrod!" I'm not going into details here, but this is the type of episode which made this show a baby boomer classic: it's just wonderful, well-written & well-acted entertainment.

An interesting footnote I must include somewhere - so why not here?

Lee Majors was adopted by an aunt and uncle and as a young man had a lot of anger himself: it is safe to say that there was a LOT of Lee in his playing of Heath - and Heath is the most beloved of all the characters. Perhaps the general public could feel empathy for his character.

I know i did!!!!
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Jarrod takes a case that causes conflict with his family
kfo949431 January 2013
Heath just happens to witness a murder of one of the most respected members of the community by one of the most slackest man of the Stockton. Heath gives chase and tackles Korby Kyles and is taken to jail for the murder.

Everyone in town have already made their decision that the louse Korby is guilty and already ready for a hanging. The only ones that believe he is innocent is his deadbeat father and his two useless brothers. With no one wanting to be the lawyer for Korby, it will play heavy on Jarrod's sense of justice.

With Heath as the main witness, Jarrod will cause conflict with the entire town and his own family and defend the man in court. With Heath on the witnesses stand, Jarrod takes a no-hold-barred attitude while cross-examining his brother. And it appears that Jarrod may have made headway on the case.

The courtroom scenes are some of the best in the entire series but the problem was the long story leading up to those scenes. Not to say that this was a bad show but it just seemed to go too long till we finally get to some good action. But with that said- it was a nice watch.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Strong acting makes this a fine episode
mlbroberts27 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I'll put aside for a moment that a lawyer would never take a case where a member of his family was a witness. I am a lawyer - no self-respecting lawyer would do it. But this is TV fiction - people do a lot of things they'd never do in real life.

What makes this an outstanding episode is the very strong acting of Richard Long and Warren Oates. Both very able and respected veterans by the mid 1960s, they butt heads here over and over while Long as Jarrod tries to wrench what he thinks is justice out of a situation his own brother Heath is part of. As a lawyer I generally hate courtroom scenes on TV but the courtroom scene where Jarrod cross-examines Heath and makes him change his testimony is riveting good drama. And I didn't mind the twist at the end at all - though in the denouement the Barkleys were a bit hard on Jarrod IMO.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Maybe ok but maybe not
elvisforever-633-68938429 October 2020
Some of this show was very badly directed as I investigated the scene of the murder and no one could see the face of the killer as his back was to the street when he killed the Colonel and there some light in the alley coming from windows. Jarrod believed what Korby said but would not believe his own brother and even the train engineer could not see anything as he was long gone when the murder occurred. I can not like an episode where a brother does what Jarrod did to Heath on that stand and in the end he was wrong and never said he was sorry. Not a bad episode but probably will not watch it again brother going against a brother is something I do not believe in
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Guilt and innocence
jarrodmcdonald-14 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Other reviewers have gone over the plot pretty well. I just wanted to add that the ending is a bit of a surprise. This is because it leads you to think that Jarrod's faith in his client will be substantiated. I think it frustrates me that Jarrod could be so wrong, and it makes me wonder why the writers spend about 50 minutes having us follow the life of a guest character that turns out not to be redeemable. I suppose there is a point in it somewhere...the west was filled with all sorts of dangerous, shady men..and they couldn't all be good, all the time. Still, I find this story a bit disappointing, and I don't know if it really gives us any clear insights about why Jarrod could be so easily fooled. But what I do like about it is that Jarrod is determined to do his job to the best of his ability, and I think Richard Long is very good in this episode, especially during the jail scenes where he first visits his client and they discuss guilt and innocence.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hey wait! This trial isn't over.
DeepFriedJello8 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
So evidently Heath witnesses a murder in a dark ally, but did he really. Jarrod is the lawyer for the defendant and must cross examine Heath, who is finally convinced he really couldn't've seen what happened in the ally, and it seems that the defendant will go free. But then a surprise witness comes forward; a railroad worker who claims the light from the locomotive was shining down the ally and he could clearly see the defendant kill the victim. Why didn't Heath notice this bright light in the dark ally? Why would this locomotive be headed straight into the ally? Why didn't Jarrod cross examine this witness, and let the trial end, and the show end with much confusion? The defendant needs a new trial with a more competent lawyer.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed