(Note: This is a review of the entire story)
Missing Doctor Who episodes turning up is an exciting time for fans, especially a story where we've had little to judge a story on. The Enemy Of The World, for which we previously had only episode three and its soundtrack, is a good case in point. Now, for the first time in decades, we can finally see the entire story is back and it's out for all (or at least those with iTunes) to see. So what are we to make of it?
To date, this story has been remembered for two reasons. The first is that it was the story that gave Patrick Troughton the chance to play a dual role by also having him play the role of the villain: the would be dictator of the world Salamander. Perhaps nothing about the story has been better served by its rediscovery than Troughton's performances. We get to see all sorts of little moments he has as the Doctor such as running into the sea for a swim or the toothy grin he gives when Astrid calls him wonderful and how it drops when she asks him to do something potentially dangerous for example.
What really stands about Troughton is his performance as Salamander. On audio, all we ever had to judge was his vocal performance though the surviving episode three hinted at more. With the entire story back it is far easier to judge and the results are surprising. As with David Tennant in Human Nature/Family Of Blood, playing a dual role can give an actor playing the Doctor a chance to shine and reveal just what else they can do and Troughton clearly milks this for all its worth as he presents a man with many faces: the charming and likable public figure, the politician who manipulates and schemes and lastly a combination of the two who keeps a group of people underground by claiming a nuclear war has taken place who he uses as puppets. By the time we see Salamander lighting up a cigar towards the end of episode four, there is no doubt he is the villain we were told he was and it's Troughton's performance that really sells that. Between the two, this is one of Troughton's best stories from a performance perspective at least.
The other thing this story has been known for is a strong James Bond influence. With the visuals of the story returned, we can be in no doubt about it from the many action sequences in the story, some of which have a strong James Bond feel. The extended action sequence on the beach and in Astrid's bungalow in episode one could have come out of a James Bond film of the period and indeed has interesting pre-echoes of On Her Majesty's Secret Service while the underground base can't help but bring to mind the SPECTRE volcano base of You Only Live Twice, released earlier in 1967. Weirdly the plot of the Doctor and companions infiltrating the organization of a Central American leader, sowing seeds of doubt and ultimately being responsible for his downfall echoes a Bond film not made until 22 years later: Timothy Dalton's Licence To Kill. It seems that what we're ultimately presented with then is Doctor Who's attempt to do a somewhat futuristic pseudo-James Bond film as a six part serial on a 1960s TV budget.
Moving on from those points, there's more to this story as well. It's got some good performances from the companions with Jamie in particular getting plenty of good moments while Victoria is also given some good moments especially comedic ones yet is also plagued with moments such as her odd parlaying fear about getting into a helicopter in episode one. The supporting cast are strong as well from Mary Peach's feisty heroine Astrid to Bill Kerr's Giles Kent (a character best served upon multiple listens/viewing of the story) and the first of three strong Doctor Who performances from Milton Johns. Meanwhile the direction from Barry Letts, who made his first contribution to Doctor Who when he directed this story, can be superb at times, especially when it comes episode one's action sequence on the beach (and a fantastic POV shot from the helicopter looking back as it flies away) or the final scene in the TARDIS. His choice of stock music tracks though lets the story down (no pun intended) as they often come across as too loud and a bit over the top.
Where the story is let down most is by a key selling point in 1967-68: it's futuristic setting. It's odd to watch a story set in 2018 (not the 2017 as was previously thought), a point just five years away, as depiction by 1960s thinking. The costumes in particular are laughably dated and actually don't serve a couple of the actors well at all while the idea of people taking rockets from one side of the world to the other in two hours speaks more of 1960s optimism about the course of spaceflight then about our world where the space shuttle has been retired for a couple of years now. Much the same can be said of the underground bunker and its inhabitants kept there by a "nuclear war". All of which makes the story an interesting artifact from a time that seems increasingly removed and yet feels clumsy and dated today.
So with what's literally a new look, what are we to make of this story? It certainly features Troughton in one of his best performances, the James Bond feel suits the story well, there's a good cast and some good direction despite the issues caused by its setting. Is it the best story of the era? Perhaps not. What it is though is a welcomed return, a chance to see more of an era that has seemed by and large lost to us.
2 out of 2 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink