"Gunsmoke" The Good People (TV Episode 1966) Poster

(TV Series)

(1966)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Great Acting Lifts a Fairly Standard Story
wdavidreynolds13 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Lynching stories are fairly commonplace in the oeuvre of the Western, but this is a well-done example.

The Ruckers -- Ben, the father, Gabe and Seth, the sons -- manage a ranch near Dodge City. When they begin having trouble with rustlers, they set out to remedy the situation using their own vigilante justice, as was often the case during the time period. No one will blame a rancher for protecting their own property.

The Ruckers see four rustlers stealing their cattle and begin chasing and shooting at them. Two are quickly killed. As the remaining two thieves head in different directions, Seth takes off after one. Ben and Gabe come upon Jed Bailey, a poorly regarded resident of the area, who is running away from the shooting. Seth loses the rustler he is chasing, and he sees the fourth join the one he was chasing in the distance. Meanwhile Ben and Gabe capture Bailey, who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Bailey tries to tell them he was not involved in the rustling, but Ben and Gabe are convinced otherwise. They quickly hang Bailey just as a shocked Seth rides up to see the hanging body and tells his father and brother two of the rustlers managed to get away.

Later, Silas Shute, a well-known, aging bounty hunter, finds Bailey's body hanging. Since Bailey resembles the picture of an outlaw for which Shute has a wanted dead-or-alive poster, Shute decides he will cut down the body, shoot the corpse, ride into Dodge, and claim the easy-money bounty. Shute doesn't count on the townspeople of Dodge City knowing Bailey and knowing he is not the outlaw on the poster. Shute is charged with murder and placed in the jail to await trial.

Of course, the Ruckers all know what REALLY happened to Bailey. The subsequent story is about the Ruckers dealing with their consciences while Shute faces a trial where the verdict appears to be a foregone conclusion. After all, Shute foolishly boasted about killing Bailey when he brought the body into Dodge.

I find it mildly fascinating to view this episode in light of the science of the times. Today, forensics would easily prove that Bailey did not die from the shooting. One wonders how many people have been wrongly convicted of a crime based on the lack of better science to prove their innocence.

A couple of things lift this episode above standard fare for me: the fact that we get to see so many of the Dodge regulars--Halligan, Percy Krump, Nathan Burke, Lathrop, and Sam Noonan, plus many of the familiar, unnamed, uncredited actors that appeared in numerous Gunsmoke episodes as townsmen (for example, actors Max Wagner, Chuck Hamilton, Rudy Sooter, Bert Madrid, and Sailor Vincent). There are also quality performances by frequent Gunsmoke guests Morgan Woodward and Tom Simcox. Shug Fisher as Silas Shute is essentially the same character Fisher always played in every show where he guest starred. Some of the interactions between Shute and Festus help to lighten the episode and help us feel more sympathy for Shute's situation.

The writers could have taken the ending of this episode in a few different directions. It is interesting to see the way they chose to end it. I will only say it is not predictable given the way many episodes of Gunsmoke ended.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Matt Dillon meets Perry Mason...
grizzledgeezer22 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Does that make Festus Della Street?

Though this is a decidedly Mason-ish story, the audience knows from the start exactly what's going on. Matt suspects the accused man really is innocent and the Ruckers are involved in some way. He therefore asks Seth Rucker to sit on the jury, on the assumption that a not-guilty vote from Seth will be virtual proof of the Ruckers' involvement.

If there's a problem, it's that the bruises on the victim's neck easily justify "a reasonable doubt", especially as they confirm the accused man's second story. Why wasn't Doc put on the stand to testify accordingly? It simply isn't plausible that no one else on the jury sides with Seth.

The ending is heartbreaking.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting characters made this show watchable
kfo949417 September 2012
Silas Shute, an aging rough bounty-hunter, brings in a man that he claims has a price on his head. Tells Marshal Dillon that he was going to bring him alive but things went wrong and he had to shoot the criminal. Marshal Dillon informs Silas that the man he claimed he shot was actually a local rancher and not a wanted man. Then Silas changes his story and tells Matt that the guy was actually dead hanging in a tree and he cut him down and then shot him.

Silas takes Matt and Festus out to the Rucker's property where he said he cut the man down from the tree. There was no evidence of anyone ever being hung from the tree. Matt has nothing else to do but lock Silas up and wait for trial.

Matt tends to believe the ornery bounty-hunter and believes that the Rucker family is hiding information. Ben Rucker (Morgan Woodward) has two sons, Gabe and Seth. Ben and Gabe had mistaken the rancher for cattle-rustlers and hung the innocent man where Silas had found him.

Silas goes on trial for murder and it just so happens that Seth Rucker is on the jury. With the trial looking like Silas will be convicted the verdict goes to the jury.

Even though there was nothing really remarkable in this episode, the viewer does get a nice interesting story. I won't say that it was one of the best stories but the characters were enough to hold the show together. Nice watch.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The cause of death...
streetlight223 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It should be pretty obvious to Doc that the dead man was not shot to death but hanged. As one reviewer noted, the marks on the necks might be indicative but an autopsy of the broken neck and windpipe as well as an after death gunshot wound should prove the man died by hanging. It would also have been interesting if Mat had climbed the tree to see marks from the rope from the hanging, though pm an old dead tree they might not have shown up.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed