I was shocked and appalled that the jurors were deadlocked. That means that someone agreed that killing people (other than in a case of self defense) is a justifiable defense.
And now that the insurance company reversed their decision, coupled with the hung jury the message they are sending to the next person is just to kill the claim adjusters or pharmaceutical employee. Hell, why do we need malpractice -- if your surgeon makes a mistake, just kill them.
Why do we continually value young life over adults. People, children's lives are no more precious then that of adults. If this character had committed the same crime for the same reason but for his 80 year old mother, no doubt the jury would have found him guilty because we don't see senior citizens as having the same value as a 9 year old child.
This is why we need to keep sentimentally and religion out of our laws.
And now that the insurance company reversed their decision, coupled with the hung jury the message they are sending to the next person is just to kill the claim adjusters or pharmaceutical employee. Hell, why do we need malpractice -- if your surgeon makes a mistake, just kill them.
Why do we continually value young life over adults. People, children's lives are no more precious then that of adults. If this character had committed the same crime for the same reason but for his 80 year old mother, no doubt the jury would have found him guilty because we don't see senior citizens as having the same value as a 9 year old child.
This is why we need to keep sentimentally and religion out of our laws.