"Monsters" Portrait of the Artist (TV Episode 1989) Poster

(TV Series)

(1989)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Silly yet enjoyable episode.
poolandrews16 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Monsters: Portrait of the Artist starts as Roger Darcy & Lucile Gray arrive at the Barn Galley to confront the curator Hubert (Darren McGavin) about some of the strange paintings & sculptures on display by an artist named Viva Kenanda, several of these paintings & sculptures seem to depict missing people including Roger's missing daughter Penny. Hubert tries to skirt around the issue claiming ignorance but the couple are sure something is wrong & that the answers lie with the mysterious artist Viva Kenanda, however the truth is far more bizarre than either Roger or Lucile could have imagined & in fact you could say it's out of this world...

Episode two from season two of Monsters this originally aired in the US during October 1989, directed by Gerald Cotts as Jerry Smith I thought Portrait of the Artist was going to be a fairly standard House of Wax (1953) styled horror story about a macabre art gallery with exhibits made from human beings but then the episode goes completely nuts for the last few minutes & there's one of the most unexpected twist endings seen in the series so far that does actually increase the overall entertainment value considerably & lifts Portrait of the Artist above average although it's hard to take seriously as a whole. The plot starts out like a mystery then goes into horror mode before finally finishing as a straight sci-fi fantasy & all in only twenty odd minutes. Portrait of the Artist is nothing more than a fun disposable horror short that gets a few chuckles because of an outlandish twist ending, take it for what it is & I am sure most will enjoy it as the fun & silly piece of entertainment that it was intended as.

Again made on a low budget on only one set with only three cast members Portrait of the Artist works well & the makers knew their limitations, some of the art exhibits that dress the set are truly awful though. There's a nifty special effect at the end & the monster in this episode is a fanged alien creature that is seen only briefly but looks pretty good. There's no blood or gore in this episode & overall it plays out more like a fantasy sci-fi than a dark horror. The acting is good with the late Darren McGavin putting in a very good & likable performance as the mysterious curator with a dark secret.

Portrait of the Artist is a fun Monsters episode that starts off as nothing special but ends on a great twist that is both bizarre & rather likable, a good episode that I enjoyed.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Neat episode
Woodyanders15 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Roger Darcy (a sturdy portrayal by Beeson Carroll) finds more than he bargained for while searching for his missing daughter in the gallery of a mysterious reclusive artist.

Director Gerald Cotts not only relates the engrossing story at a steady pace, but also ably crafts an intriguing enigmatic atmosphere. D. Keith Mano's clever script delivers one doozy of a surprise twist at the end. The lifelike sculptures done by the artist are strikingly grotesque. However, it's the typically lively and engaging performance by Darren McGavin as an amiable, yet doddery old guy that makes this particular episode so much fun to watch; McGavin is clearly having a ball with this colorful role and really plays it to the hilt. A cool show.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A enjoyable episode, made by it's crazy twist ending.
b_kite1 April 2019
Portrait of the Artist has art buyer Roger Darcy being introduced to gallery owner Hubert Pocock. The gallery features some life-sized, three-dimensional sculptures of missing people in tormented positions, hanging on the walls. Darcy discovers that one sculpture is of his missing daughter, Penny. Darcy suspects that Pocock is a serial killer, and attempts to play a psychological mind game with him that will induce Pocock to reveal the truth. But the truth is much worse than Darcy knows.

This is the third and final episode directed by Gerald Cotts (as Jerry Smith), he directed the rather comedic, but, still enjoyable "Parents from Space", but, directed "New York Honey" first, if anybodies read that review you will know I wasn't to fond of the episode, but, praised its rather crazy twist ending, this one feels much like that, but, here the first part, builds up the mystery and actually makes you intrigued before hitting you with a completely out of left field twist which dives into sci fi territory. The best thing however is screen veteran Darren McGavin who is committing to his role head on here. As for effects the episode has some pretty impressive makeup in one scene, but, my only real complaint is that even though I enjoyed the ending and thought it was fun, it gets a little to ambitious for its own good, and its here that the cheap production values that this show is obviously known for start to be seen, it's also pretty evident in the sets as we only get one location a art gallery and while some of the paintings used look good, the building itself looks very cheap. It's probably the only thing keeping this episode from receiving an eight overall.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Poor production values
Leofwine_draca11 April 2015
Never has the low budget of the MONSTERS TV show been as evident as in this episode from 1989. PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST, which is the second episode of the second season of the show, sees the late, great Darren McGavin (KOLCHAK THE NIGHT STALKER) playing the sinister proprietor of an art gallery who meets up with a couple of visitors who have some questions regarding the strange paintings hanging up in the gallery.

This one has a mildly spooky mystery narrative but it's let down by the poor production values, like most of the MONSTERS episodes I've sat through. McGavin is by far the best thing in it and seems to be having a ball with his villainous turn, but the other cast members are weak and the story as a whole just doesn't make much sense.
0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed