George C. Scott plays a sculptor named Kermitt Garrison who once fought to bring to power in his old country, (not sure what country that is with a name like that), a man who has now becomes a ruthless dictator, (always a risk when you resort to violent revolution).
He was commissioned to create a heroic statue of the man when he was deemed to be heroic. Now the very people who fought for him have turned against him and demand that Garrison not finish the project. They've raised money to pay him to complete it. But the curmudgeon insists on completing the statue, claiming that it's a work of art and not political.
That's nonsense on the face of it. A statue of a political figure is inherently political. But there's an obvious solution here: use the money to commission a second statue, depicting the dictator as what he became and put the two of them next to each other. That would be an even greater artistic achievement and tell a better political story.
But obvious solutions can get in the way of a good plot.
He was commissioned to create a heroic statue of the man when he was deemed to be heroic. Now the very people who fought for him have turned against him and demand that Garrison not finish the project. They've raised money to pay him to complete it. But the curmudgeon insists on completing the statue, claiming that it's a work of art and not political.
That's nonsense on the face of it. A statue of a political figure is inherently political. But there's an obvious solution here: use the money to commission a second statue, depicting the dictator as what he became and put the two of them next to each other. That would be an even greater artistic achievement and tell a better political story.
But obvious solutions can get in the way of a good plot.