(TV Series)

(1978)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Heartbreaking, enlightening and poignant
rayoflite2412 September 2015
A Test for Living begins with Lt. Monahan (Garry Walberg) leading a team of police officers searching a hillside for a missing boy who has disappeared from a nearby home for the mentally handicapped. The boy is found dead in a drainage ditch, and Quincy (Jack Klugman) later conducts the autopsy at the coroner lab. Quincy determines that the boy did in fact die from drowning but after further examining his brain, he cannot determine why the boy was diagnosed as mentally impaired. After consulting further with colleagues, Quincy learns that many children with Autism have been misdiagnosed in this manner due to lack of awareness and the rigid testing procedures being administered. Quincy becomes especially concerned over the case of a young boy named Timmy and is determined to make sure that the boy is diagnosed correctly so that he may enroll in a special school program designed for Autistic children.

While I usually tend to favor the murder mystery Quincy episodes over the ones that highlight a social cause, I have to say that this is a very powerful and enlightening episode that moved me. Although there have been great strides in Autism awareness and treatment since this episode first aired in the late 70s, I have to imagine that there was still a great deal of confusion back then which makes the telling of this story so important. Who knows, of the millions of people that watched this episode maybe it motivated some to take their children to see another specialist or seek out a second opinion when they thought there were no other options available. If it helped one child to be reexamined and diagnosed properly, then it was absolutely worthwhile.

As a friend of parents of a special needs child, I found the scenes featuring Timmy to be portrayed in a very realistic manner. Kudos to David Hollander and the rest of the cast for their competent handling of such sensitive material.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sad episode.
wkozak2213 November 2021
I was in Psychology for 20 years. I worked with lots of mentally handicapped people with various disorders. This episode shows how much autism is misunderstood by the majority of people. It presents a message where more training needs to be done with everyone. The families, professional, general public, etc.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Entertaining and educational
jwells9711 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
As the mother of an autistic son, I found this episode to be wonderful. It not only provided a suspenseful story line, but it also educated us about autism in general and its effects on the family. Guest star Lloyd Nolan might have been saying the lines that were written for him, but they must've come directly from his heart as well because, in real life, he, too, had an autistic son. He could speak from experience about the turmoil that results. In the days of Quincy, it took a determined advocate to get our children the help they needed; and this episode had two of them. In today's self-absorbed world, we need more TV like this. Bravo, Quincy!
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Doesn't Quincy ever work?!
planktonrules17 April 2013
This episode is one that really made me wonder when, if ever, does Quincy get the time to actually work?! After all, apart from an autopsy early on in the show, he doesn't work with dead folks at all but is a strong advocate for the treatment of autistic kids. As such, the show definitely comes of as preachy--a definite example of 'Soapbox Quincy'. Some folks will probably like these sort of episodes--after all, they do promote awareness of various topics that were important and just coming to public consciousness (such as domestic violence and autism). Others might be perturbed because the shows really have nothing to do with the work of any coroner. And, because they are just preachy--especially with lines like "...I pledge to see that these injustices against autistic kids be stopped". While I was happy to see the show talk about autism, it did so in a very unrealistic manner. It also had children acting very much like autistic kids BUT supposed professionals didn't recognize them as having the criteria for the diagnosis--which made little sense. Overall, a mixed bag--interesting and a nice public service show BUT also NOT really an episode of "Quincy, M.E."--more like "Quincy, MSW"!
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh no, another awful moral drama one...
poolandrews29 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Quincy M.E.: A Test for the Living starts as Lt. Monahan (Garry Walberg) & the LAPD find the body of an eight year old boy named Stevie who had escaped from a home for the mentally retarded. Los Angeles coroner Quincy (Jack Klugman) performs the autopsy but is puzzled to find no abnormalities in Stevie's brain that would suggest retardation, after investigating he discovers that many autistic children are simply labelled as retarded when in fact they could be taught to learn if given the chance. Outraged & seeing that the same thing might happen to seven year old Timmy Carson (David Hollander) Quincy sets out to save the boy from being put in a home for the retarded...

Episode 3 from season 4 this Quincy story was directed by Ron Satlof & one has to say I really don't like these moral episodes which have no mystery elements. According to the opening credits the story for the script was by none other than Jack Klugman himself, frankly Mr. Klugman I am very disappointed as A Test for the Living is truly terrible. It has an outdated & irrelevant moral message about not pigeon holing kids & trying to give them every opportunity instead of dumping them into a home for the retarded. When this episode finished I sat that & felt somewhat hollow, I mean sure Quincy proved Timmy was autistic rather than just retarded but isn't that like saying someone who has had both their feet cut off luckier than someone who has had both their hands cut off in the sense both alternatives are pretty grim & not exactly a situation anyone would be happy to find themselves in? It didn't do anything for me, I thought it was fifty minutes of total tedium & I just hate the dull moralistic episodes which don't have any mystery to them.

Like a lot of Quincy episode this is competently made but nothing out of the ordinary. Unusually during the end credits for A Test for the Living several real life Doctors & organisations are 'thanked' for the inspiration & technical assistance in making this episode. The acting is alright but there's a truly awful scene when Timmy undergoes some tests & it's just embarrassing to watch.

A Test for the Living is the kind of Quincy that I hate, I think it's awful & don't try to change my mind since I never will. I so much more prefer the murder mystery ones.
6 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed