With a perfect last name amid imperfect circumstances, Richard and Mildred Loving made history when their fight for the state of Virginia to recognize their interracial marriage made it all the way to the Supreme Court in 1967.
Now, their love story is making headlines again, with a screen adaptation of their odyssey, simply titled Loving, generating early Oscar buzz after earning rave reviews in this year’s awards circuit.
But just who were Richard and Mildred Loving (portrayed onscreen by Australian actor Joel Edgerton and Ethiopian-born Ruth Negga)? Here are five things to know about the reluctant civil rights heroes...
Now, their love story is making headlines again, with a screen adaptation of their odyssey, simply titled Loving, generating early Oscar buzz after earning rave reviews in this year’s awards circuit.
But just who were Richard and Mildred Loving (portrayed onscreen by Australian actor Joel Edgerton and Ethiopian-born Ruth Negga)? Here are five things to know about the reluctant civil rights heroes...
- 10/26/2016
- by kathyehrichdowd
- PEOPLE.com
Washington (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that a copyright lawsuit over the 1980 Oscar-winning movie "Raging Bull" can go forward, a decision that could open Hollywood studios to more claims from people seeking a share of profits from classic films, TV shows and other creative works. In a 6-3 decision, the justices said that Paula Petrella, daughter of the late screenwriter Frank Petrella, did not wait too long to file her lawsuit against Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer claiming an interest in the film. Petrella's father collaborated with legendary boxer Jake Lamotta on a book and two screenplays, which inspired the movie directed by Martin Scorsese and starring Robert DeNiro. The elder Petrella died in 1981 and the copyrights passed to his daughter. She sued MGM in 2009 seeking royalties from continuing commercial use of the film. But a federal judge said she waited too long because she had been aware of the potential to file...
- 5/19/2014
- by Sam Hananel (AP)
- Hitfix
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding the Broadcast Networks suit against Aereo Tuesday, April 22.
Broadcast Networks vs. Aereo
Aereo is a new company that combines free antenna television access to public networks with the facility and perks of streaming video and a DVR. Essentially, Aereo uses antennas to transmit television broadcast signals directly to individual subscribers. Subscribers can record certain shows, which will be stored in the cloud (internet storage) and be accessible to any connected mobile device.
Aereo may sound like an extension of Netflix Instant Watch or Hulu, or even a regular cable or dish subscription, but what makes it different is it’s use of free antenna signals. Because Aereo uses antennas to receive broadcast TV signals, the company doesn’t pay the broadcast networks for their content, as cable companies do. As a result, the broadcasting networks, NBC, Fox, CBS, PBS, Univision, Telemundo and ABC...
Broadcast Networks vs. Aereo
Aereo is a new company that combines free antenna television access to public networks with the facility and perks of streaming video and a DVR. Essentially, Aereo uses antennas to transmit television broadcast signals directly to individual subscribers. Subscribers can record certain shows, which will be stored in the cloud (internet storage) and be accessible to any connected mobile device.
Aereo may sound like an extension of Netflix Instant Watch or Hulu, or even a regular cable or dish subscription, but what makes it different is it’s use of free antenna signals. Because Aereo uses antennas to receive broadcast TV signals, the company doesn’t pay the broadcast networks for their content, as cable companies do. As a result, the broadcasting networks, NBC, Fox, CBS, PBS, Univision, Telemundo and ABC...
- 4/23/2014
- Uinterview
Grappling with fast-changing technology, Supreme Court justices debated Tuesday whether they can protect the copyrights of TV broadcasters to the shows they send out without strangling innovations in the use of the internet.
The high court heard arguments in a dispute between television broadcasters and Aereo Inc., which takes free television signals from the airwaves and charges subscribers to watch the programs on laptop computers, smartphones and even their large-screen televisions. The case has the potential to bring big changes to the television industry.
There was a good measure of skepticism about Aereo’s approach, sometimes leavened with humor. Chief Justice John Roberts...
The high court heard arguments in a dispute between television broadcasters and Aereo Inc., which takes free television signals from the airwaves and charges subscribers to watch the programs on laptop computers, smartphones and even their large-screen televisions. The case has the potential to bring big changes to the television industry.
There was a good measure of skepticism about Aereo’s approach, sometimes leavened with humor. Chief Justice John Roberts...
- 4/22/2014
- by Associated Press
- EW - Inside TV
If you thought that the legal dispute between Aereo and the broadcasters was combative, it paled compared with today’s one-hour hearing at the Supreme Court. In oral arguments before the nine Justices, both sides took some heavy blows, but the Barry Diller-backed streaming service definitely took one to the jaw from Chief Justice John Roberts. “Your technological model is based solely on circumventing legal prohibitions that you don’t want to comply with,” Roberts told Aereo attorney David Frederick during the presentation before a packed chamber. “There’s no reason for you to have 10,000 dime-sized antennas except to get around the Copyright Act,” he said. Added Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: ”You are the only player so far that pays no royalties whatsoever.” Coming after arguments from the broadcasters by former Solicitor General Paul Clement and current Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, Frederick started off his presentation by...
- 4/22/2014
- by DOMINIC PATTEN
- Deadline TV
The Supreme Court will hand down two eagerly sought decisions on civil unions on Wednesday, the last day of the court's current term. At the close of Tuesday's court session, Chief Justice John Roberts announced that all remaining cases will be announced at Wednesday's session. Also read: Prop 8 at Supreme Court: How TV Helped Clear the Way for Same-Sex Marriage One of the civil union cases challenges the Defense of Marriage Act, defining a marriage for federal purposes as being between a man and a woman. The other covers the fate of Proposition...
- 6/25/2013
- by Ira Teinowitz
- The Wrap
Salman Khan gets partial relief from 1998's notorious blackbuck hunting case. The Supreme Court has exempted the actor from appearing at the court. The star will not face trail on charges of rioting under the Wildlife Protection Act. Justice P. Sathasivam heading the apex court refused the Rajasthan Government appeal that Salman Khan and four others (Saif Ali Khan, Neelam, Tabu and Sonali Bendre) accused in the case should also be tried for uprising under the provisions of the Ipc. “The charge under the Wildlife Protection Act has been retained against all the five accused. The Sessions judge discharged them of charge under sections 146 ...
- 1/25/2013
- Bollywoodmantra.com
New Delhi, Jan 24: The Supreme Court Thursday declined the petition by Sohan Roy - the producer and director of film "Dam 999" - challenging a ban on the screening of the film in Tamil Nadu.
Even as the court was told that the constitutional rights of the petitioner producer-director could not be violated by the ban, the apex court bench of Justice P. Sathasivam, Justice J.S. Khehar and Justice Vikramajit Sen said that it needed to "see things from the point of law".
The court declined the plea by the producer-director and told his counsel Deepak that already one month has passed since the imposition of the three-month ban, and it was just a matter of another two months.
The Tamil Nadu government said the film centred.
Even as the court was told that the constitutional rights of the petitioner producer-director could not be violated by the ban, the apex court bench of Justice P. Sathasivam, Justice J.S. Khehar and Justice Vikramajit Sen said that it needed to "see things from the point of law".
The court declined the plea by the producer-director and told his counsel Deepak that already one month has passed since the imposition of the three-month ban, and it was just a matter of another two months.
The Tamil Nadu government said the film centred.
- 1/24/2013
- by Meeta Kabra
- RealBollywood.com
One of the most prolific and indispensable character actors of the last 30 years, Luis Guzman is a walking time capsule of our generation. But did you know that Arnold Schwarzenegger's trusty co-star in "The Last Stand" has lived a sort of Paul Bunyan-esque life? We've compiled some fun facts about Luis that you may not have known.
In the time it takes you to read this sentence, Luis will have acted in nine different movies. In the time it took you to just say "Really?," he was in five more. You can hand Luis your script and he'll have it memorized by three days ago. Some high schools have assigned Luis' IMDb page as summer reading and even the better students find it difficult to finish because of its length. He took all of 2010 off from movies to prove he could do it. When he did, Luis...
In the time it takes you to read this sentence, Luis will have acted in nine different movies. In the time it took you to just say "Really?," he was in five more. You can hand Luis your script and he'll have it memorized by three days ago. Some high schools have assigned Luis' IMDb page as summer reading and even the better students find it difficult to finish because of its length. He took all of 2010 off from movies to prove he could do it. When he did, Luis...
- 1/16/2013
- by Nick Blake
- NextMovie
Birthday shoutouts go to Jeremy Renner (above), who is 42, Nicolas Cage is 49, out David Yost s 44, and Kenny Loggins is 65.Bette Midler is returning to the Broadway stage for the first time in 30 years. She'll star as the late Hollywood superagent Sue Mengers in I'll Eat You Last. Prospect Park has officially announced plans to resume All My Children and One Life to Live So what would prevent them from resurrecting Kish? At least Debbi Morgan is coming back to AMC.The Supreme Court announced they will hear arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry on March 26 and United States v. Windsor on March 27.In ratings news, the return of Revenge was down, Once Upon A Time was flat, and as for Happy Endiings? Let's just move on to happier ratings news. The premiere episode of Downton Abbey Season Three quadruples the average PBS primetime rating.Below you can see the newest...
- 1/7/2013
- by snicks
- The Backlot
Tags: GLEEThe SimpsonsLost GirlPretty Little LiarsEllen DeGeneresKate McKinnonFortune FeimsterSara GilbertThe FostersRachel MaddowBatwomanGo OnArrested DevelopmentSkinsNurse JackieSally KohnTrue BloodBomb GirlsCriminal MindsArmy WivesIMDb
2012 was such a remarkable year for lesbian and bisexual women that we're already psyched on 2013. Here are 50 reasons why.
1. Gay weddings
Photo: David Ryder/Getty
With marriage equality becoming a reality in more and more states by the minute, it's going to be a good year for the men-loving-men and women-loving-women who have been waiting to say "I do." Some of them for their whole lives.
2. Homophobia isn't profitable anymore
Photo: Kenzo Tribouillard/Getty
This fact was learned the hard way by Boy Scouts of America when they lost funding from both the federal government and big businesses because they refused to accept gay scouts and leaders.
3. Kyrsten Sinema
Photo: Bill Clark/Getty
The Arizona Democrat was the first openly bisexual woman to be elected to Congress. She will begin her first term this year.
2012 was such a remarkable year for lesbian and bisexual women that we're already psyched on 2013. Here are 50 reasons why.
1. Gay weddings
Photo: David Ryder/Getty
With marriage equality becoming a reality in more and more states by the minute, it's going to be a good year for the men-loving-men and women-loving-women who have been waiting to say "I do." Some of them for their whole lives.
2. Homophobia isn't profitable anymore
Photo: Kenzo Tribouillard/Getty
This fact was learned the hard way by Boy Scouts of America when they lost funding from both the federal government and big businesses because they refused to accept gay scouts and leaders.
3. Kyrsten Sinema
Photo: Bill Clark/Getty
The Arizona Democrat was the first openly bisexual woman to be elected to Congress. She will begin her first term this year.
- 1/4/2013
- by stuntdouble
- AfterEllen.com
It's hard to define a breakthrough-- like The Supreme Court famously said about indecency, you know it when you see it. It's not the same thing as a debut, to be sure; a breakthrough is what happens when somebody has been around for a while, maybe even moderately successful, but then suddenly goes supernova. Or when somebody has had a handful of small roles but suddenly gets one or two that make them impossible to ignore. The key here is "suddenly"-- a breakthrough is what happens when, in a single calendar year, a person goes from "nobody" or "washed-up" or "unreliable" to a big star or someone on their way getting there. Among the big successes of 2012, not many of them have been breakthroughs. Joss Whedon had his first huge hit with The Avengers, yes, but he was already a major name in the industry. Jennifer Lawrence proved both...
- 12/18/2012
- cinemablend.com
New York -- The Supreme Court used to be called Nine Old Men. That's nothing compared to the ageless Rolling Stones. The justices on average are the kid brothers and sisters of the forever young rock n' rollers.
The average age for the four living members of The Rolling Stones is about two years older than the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Charlie Watts and Ronnie Wood have an average age of 68 years and 297 days, while the Supreme Court justices' average is 66 years and 364 days. That makes the rock band one year and 10 months older than the members of the highest court of the United States.
The Rolling Stones are celebrating their 50th anniversary this year with a five-date tour in New York, New Jersey and London, where the first show kicked off Sunday night.
___
Rolling Stones:
Mick Jagger, 69
Keith Richards, 68
Charlie Watts, 71
Ronnie Wood,...
The average age for the four living members of The Rolling Stones is about two years older than the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Charlie Watts and Ronnie Wood have an average age of 68 years and 297 days, while the Supreme Court justices' average is 66 years and 364 days. That makes the rock band one year and 10 months older than the members of the highest court of the United States.
The Rolling Stones are celebrating their 50th anniversary this year with a five-date tour in New York, New Jersey and London, where the first show kicked off Sunday night.
___
Rolling Stones:
Mick Jagger, 69
Keith Richards, 68
Charlie Watts, 71
Ronnie Wood,...
- 11/27/2012
- by AP
- Huffington Post
Morgan Freeman has loaned his signature voice to documentaries, commercials and the Obama campaign. Now, it's appearing in a new ad for marriage equality.
The actor is narrating a new TV spot in support of same-sex marriage released by the Human Rights Campaign. The commercial, titled "Dawn of a New Day for Marriage Equality," will begin airing nationally on Sunday, according to The Advocate.
"Freedom, justice and human dignity have always guided our journey toward a more perfect union," Freeman says. "Now, across our country, we are standing together for the right of gay and lesbian Americans to marry the person they love. With historic victories for marriage, we've delivered a mandate for full equality."
Human Rights Campaign president Chad Griffin issued a statement in conjunction with the ad heralding a new turning point for gay rights.
"As we continue the march toward full equality in legislatures and the courts,...
The actor is narrating a new TV spot in support of same-sex marriage released by the Human Rights Campaign. The commercial, titled "Dawn of a New Day for Marriage Equality," will begin airing nationally on Sunday, according to The Advocate.
"Freedom, justice and human dignity have always guided our journey toward a more perfect union," Freeman says. "Now, across our country, we are standing together for the right of gay and lesbian Americans to marry the person they love. With historic victories for marriage, we've delivered a mandate for full equality."
Human Rights Campaign president Chad Griffin issued a statement in conjunction with the ad heralding a new turning point for gay rights.
"As we continue the march toward full equality in legislatures and the courts,...
- 11/25/2012
- by Alana Horowitz
- Huffington Post
Madhur Bhandarkar can finally heave a sigh of relief. The Apex body of the country - The Supreme Court has dismissed rape charges against the National award winning filmmaker. It may be recalled that in 2009, starlet Preeti Jain had accused Bhandarkar of raping her multiple times. In November last year, the Bombay High Court had granted bail to Bhandarkar on a bond of Rs. 30,000 and two sureties while in April this year the court had stayed criminal proceedings against the filmmaker. With this verdict being announced by Supreme Court, Madhur can surely now afford to smile and take it easy.
- 11/5/2012
- by Bollywood Hungama News Network
- BollywoodHungama
Katy Perry, who I think has a rather dubious relationship with the gay community, is set to be honored with the Hero Award from The Trevor Project. “Everyone deserves a wonderful, fulfilled life. Our sexual orientation or gender identity doesn’t change the spark and beauty within. I’m honoured that The Trevor Project has selected me to receive the Trevor Hero Award. Their work has inspired me since 2010, and I know they help save lives.”
ABC has given full season orders to shows I don't watch, with Scandal and The Neighbors getting the nod.
Justin Beiber wants to the world to know he's a good boy, a role model. Even though he's hanging out with One Direction and The Wanted, he doesn't drink. I still want people to think I’m a good person, a good influence. I want to be around tomorrow.”
For Halloween, Raising Hope is headed to a gay bar.
ABC has given full season orders to shows I don't watch, with Scandal and The Neighbors getting the nod.
Justin Beiber wants to the world to know he's a good boy, a role model. Even though he's hanging out with One Direction and The Wanted, he doesn't drink. I still want people to think I’m a good person, a good influence. I want to be around tomorrow.”
For Halloween, Raising Hope is headed to a gay bar.
- 10/30/2012
- by lostinmiami
- The Backlot
What is that sound? Oh, that’s the sound of panic. The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision opened the spigot for unlimited spending on candidates by Super PACs and...
- 10/24/2012
- by Sasha Stone
- AwardsDaily.com
Taylor Momsen and Connor Paulo have been spotted on the set of Gossip Girl, leading some to speculate a family reunion for the series finale. Maybe Eric will come home with a husband?
Scientists have discovered a planet in Alpha Centauri, only 4.3 light years away, and it's earth sized. Who wants to hop on a 10 year spaceship with me?
Chick-Fil-a says that the infamous ad from the Georgia location referencing fruitcakes isn't a gay slur, but a five year old holiday campaign. Or it could be a five year old gay slur.
Khloe Kardashian and Mario Lopez have been confirmed as the hosts of The X Factor. Can we make him do it shirtless?
Buzzfeed talked to Ryan Andresen, who was denied his Eagle Scout badge because he was gay. When asked what he might say to other closeted teens, Andresen admits there are no easy answers. "My advice is...
Scientists have discovered a planet in Alpha Centauri, only 4.3 light years away, and it's earth sized. Who wants to hop on a 10 year spaceship with me?
Chick-Fil-a says that the infamous ad from the Georgia location referencing fruitcakes isn't a gay slur, but a five year old holiday campaign. Or it could be a five year old gay slur.
Khloe Kardashian and Mario Lopez have been confirmed as the hosts of The X Factor. Can we make him do it shirtless?
Buzzfeed talked to Ryan Andresen, who was denied his Eagle Scout badge because he was gay. When asked what he might say to other closeted teens, Andresen admits there are no easy answers. "My advice is...
- 10/17/2012
- by lostinmiami
- The Backlot
In last night's (Oct. 11) Vice Presidential debate, Joe Biden and Paul Ryan spoke out on their completely different viewpoints and policies on abortion. If elected, their policies will affect You. Here's where they stand. Read and tell me what you think. Vice President Joe Biden and Paul Ryan, the Representative for Wisconsin's 1st congressional district who is Mitt Romney's running mate, were grilled about their stances on abortion, by moderator Martha Raddatz during their Vice-Presidential debate, and it turns out that, their policies couldn't be more different. Now Hollywoodlifers as women, you could be seriously impacted by their policies if they're elected so it's important to know what they'll each do. Here's what Paul Ryan, who believes that "life begins at conception" had to say at the debate: ' The policy of a Romney administration will be to oppose abortion with the exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother,...
- 10/12/2012
- by Bonnie Fuller
- HollywoodLife
ABC Family's The Fosters has cast the biological son of the lesbian couple with David Lambert, and the troubled teen they take in will be played by Maia Mitchell.
It looks like Bryan Fuller's Mockingbird Lane will not be going forward as a series. It evidently came off as too "high concept."
The reddit effort to have Taylor Swift play a concert at the Horace Mann School for the Deaf has a happy ending, with the school being disqualified, but Swift is donating $10,000 to the school, and her sponsors are chipping in another $40,000 in donations.
The Supreme Court declined to take up the National Organization for Marriage's appeal in the case of Maine's financial disclosure laws, meaning they'll have to reveal their donors per state law.
Teen Wolf has just announced an open call for two hot male actors to play twin werewolves on the show next season,...
It looks like Bryan Fuller's Mockingbird Lane will not be going forward as a series. It evidently came off as too "high concept."
The reddit effort to have Taylor Swift play a concert at the Horace Mann School for the Deaf has a happy ending, with the school being disqualified, but Swift is donating $10,000 to the school, and her sponsors are chipping in another $40,000 in donations.
The Supreme Court declined to take up the National Organization for Marriage's appeal in the case of Maine's financial disclosure laws, meaning they'll have to reveal their donors per state law.
Teen Wolf has just announced an open call for two hot male actors to play twin werewolves on the show next season,...
- 10/2/2012
- by lostinmiami
- The Backlot
New Delhi, Sep 17: The Supreme Court Monday issued notice to the Punjab government on a petition by film producer Prakash Jha seeking compensation for banning the screening of his 2011 film "Aarakshan".
"Aarakshan", starring Amitabh Bachchan, Saif Ali Khan and Deepika Padukone, deals with caste-based reservation in the education system.
An apex court bench of Justice R.M. Lodha and Justice Anil R. Dave issued the notice.
"Aarakshan", starring Amitabh Bachchan, Saif Ali Khan and Deepika Padukone, deals with caste-based reservation in the education system.
An apex court bench of Justice R.M. Lodha and Justice Anil R. Dave issued the notice.
- 9/17/2012
- by Ketali Mehta
- RealBollywood.com
Large-scale entertainment and seriously good film-making have no business being mutually exclusive.
It’s odd how this mindset has pervaded our culture over the years, but it’s undeniably become a mistaken assumption among large swaths of the general movie-going audience that entertainment doesn’t have much business being a seriously good film. The “I just want to turn my brain off” line of reasoning. Obviously this is wrong, but on the flip side, film enthusiasts, critics, and Oscar voters seem to have gotten it into their heads that a movie can’t be “seriously” good if it’s also wildly entertaining.
And that’s ridiculous.
It’s also a fairly recent development. Looking back into Hollywood’s history, elaborate spectacle and expensive entertainment was not only every bit as common (especially during the Golden Age of cinema) but there was once even a version of the modern Best Picture...
It’s odd how this mindset has pervaded our culture over the years, but it’s undeniably become a mistaken assumption among large swaths of the general movie-going audience that entertainment doesn’t have much business being a seriously good film. The “I just want to turn my brain off” line of reasoning. Obviously this is wrong, but on the flip side, film enthusiasts, critics, and Oscar voters seem to have gotten it into their heads that a movie can’t be “seriously” good if it’s also wildly entertaining.
And that’s ridiculous.
It’s also a fairly recent development. Looking back into Hollywood’s history, elaborate spectacle and expensive entertainment was not only every bit as common (especially during the Golden Age of cinema) but there was once even a version of the modern Best Picture...
- 9/17/2012
- by Brendan Agnew
- Obsessed with Film
A while back, there was a huge hue and cry about smoking scenes in films. Now we hear that the government would shortly be permitting smoking scenes on the condition that one of the actors in the scene warns viewers that 'smoking kills'. The Supreme Court bench of Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice Ranjan Gogoi ruled that films would be permitted to portray the said scenes. However, apart from the warning that will have to be done by one of the actors within the scene, the film will also have to feature a warning at the start of the film, in between and after the interval, while a static message would be displayed in the course of the scene showing smoking. The said notification that will supersede earlier notifications prohibiting smoking scenes would be issued on September 14.
- 9/5/2012
- by Bollywood Hungama News Network
- BollywoodHungama
W. Kamau Bell is a comedian, and he's not afraid to admit that he's absolutely, 100 percent, totally freaking biased.
"Totally Biased with W. Kamau Bell" (premieres Thurs., Aug. 9, 11 p.m. Et on FX) is FX's newest late-night, stand-up, current events chat show experiment. Think Russell Brand's "Brand X," but much more topical and -- dare we say it? -- a whole lot funnier.
You may not know Bell, but with a mentor like Chris Rock ("He's like foul-mouthed Yoda") and a show title like "Totally Biased," you have to bencurious about his new show. I caught up with Bell to hear a bit more about the weekly, 30-minute series and to get a taste for what topics he'll cover (any hot-button issue, basically) and what's off limits (nothing). Keep reading for more ...
The show is called "Totally Biased," which makes me wonder ... how biased is it really?
Totally biased.
"Totally Biased with W. Kamau Bell" (premieres Thurs., Aug. 9, 11 p.m. Et on FX) is FX's newest late-night, stand-up, current events chat show experiment. Think Russell Brand's "Brand X," but much more topical and -- dare we say it? -- a whole lot funnier.
You may not know Bell, but with a mentor like Chris Rock ("He's like foul-mouthed Yoda") and a show title like "Totally Biased," you have to bencurious about his new show. I caught up with Bell to hear a bit more about the weekly, 30-minute series and to get a taste for what topics he'll cover (any hot-button issue, basically) and what's off limits (nothing). Keep reading for more ...
The show is called "Totally Biased," which makes me wonder ... how biased is it really?
Totally biased.
- 8/9/2012
- by Maggie Furlong
- Huffington Post
A legal battle is heating up over whether using the "Like" button on Facebook is protected under the First Amendment as an exercise of free speech. In April, U.S. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson in the Eastern District of Virginia ruled against six former employees of a sheriff who had been fired for "liking" his opponent's Facebook campaign page.
The judge maintained that because no words are used when clicking the "Like" button, it is not an expression of free speech. His ruling made a distinction between using the button and making a wall post or a comment, which use words and are therefore protected as free speech.
Since the April ruling, both Facebook and the American Civil Liberties Union have jumped into the legal battle. This week, Facebook filed its amicus curiae legal brief, in which the company says that Judge Jackson does not understand the world of social media.
The judge maintained that because no words are used when clicking the "Like" button, it is not an expression of free speech. His ruling made a distinction between using the button and making a wall post or a comment, which use words and are therefore protected as free speech.
Since the April ruling, both Facebook and the American Civil Liberties Union have jumped into the legal battle. This week, Facebook filed its amicus curiae legal brief, in which the company says that Judge Jackson does not understand the world of social media.
- 8/9/2012
- by editorial@zap2it.com
- Pop2it
Tags: 2012 London Games2012 OlympicsPush GirlsTiphany AdamsThe Real L WordIMDb
Good morning, Brewbies! Let's check in with our lesbian Olympians, shall we?
The Dutch field hockey team — a.k.a. "The Gayest Team Ever Assembled" — pulled down another win yesterday, besting Japan 3-2. As I mentioned in Brew on Monday, the team is comprised of four lesbian ladies: Marilyn Agliotti, Maartje Paumen, Carlien Dirkse van den Heuvel, and Kim Lammers.
Photo credit: Daniel Berehulak/Getty Images
In her doubles tennis match, Lisa Raymond (and tennis partner Liezel Huber) beat their Polish opponents in straight sets.
Megan Rapinoe and the Us Women's soccer team clinched first place in Group G 1-0 win over North Korea. They advance to the quarterfinals where they'll meet New Zealand on Friday.
Photo credit: Stanley Chou/Getty Images
Sweden's women's soccer team — led by lesbian ladies Hedvig Lindahl , Lisa Dahlkvist, and Jessica Landstrom — tied with Canada 2-...
Good morning, Brewbies! Let's check in with our lesbian Olympians, shall we?
The Dutch field hockey team — a.k.a. "The Gayest Team Ever Assembled" — pulled down another win yesterday, besting Japan 3-2. As I mentioned in Brew on Monday, the team is comprised of four lesbian ladies: Marilyn Agliotti, Maartje Paumen, Carlien Dirkse van den Heuvel, and Kim Lammers.
Photo credit: Daniel Berehulak/Getty Images
In her doubles tennis match, Lisa Raymond (and tennis partner Liezel Huber) beat their Polish opponents in straight sets.
Megan Rapinoe and the Us Women's soccer team clinched first place in Group G 1-0 win over North Korea. They advance to the quarterfinals where they'll meet New Zealand on Friday.
Photo credit: Stanley Chou/Getty Images
Sweden's women's soccer team — led by lesbian ladies Hedvig Lindahl , Lisa Dahlkvist, and Jessica Landstrom — tied with Canada 2-...
- 8/1/2012
- by stuntdouble
- AfterEllen.com
The Supreme Court of Canada came out with five big copyright decisions Thursday that will shake up licensing of entertainment content in the country. The rulings deal with music used on TV shows and in movies, music and video games downloaded from the internet, music previewed via services like Apple's iTunes and excerpts of books and magazines for educational use. But perhaps the decision with the biggest impact deals with whether video games offered for sale online are "communicated" to users. That's important because the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada applied for a tariff to collect
read more...
read more...
- 7/12/2012
- by Eriq Gardner
- The Hollywood Reporter - Movie News
Mitt Romney's campaign has been having a bit of a messaging mixup regarding the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate. Is is a tax? Top adviser Eric Fehrnstrom said it's not. Then Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said it is. Now it's Romney's turn to say, and it he did, to CBS News. The Supreme Court said it's a tax and "therefore it is a tax," he said.
- 7/4/2012
- by Meenal Vamburkar
- Mediaite - TV
The Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act was about a bazillion years ago. However, some people are still angry about it. Shockingly (Shockingly!!!), the man who once wrote a book called "Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America" is one of them. That man, of course, is conservative radio host Mark Levin. Levin is furious at the recent CBS News report that Chief Justice John Roberts may have been swayed by the media. Levin is so furious at this kind of media tomfoolery that he went on Fox News and called for Roberts to lose his job. Shockingly (Shockingly!!!), it would appear that some media pressure is better than others.
- 7/3/2012
- by Jon Bershad
- Mediaite - TV
The parties behind The Bachelor and The Bachelorette have filed a motion to dismiss a class-action lawsuit that claims the dating shows discriminate against people of color.
The Hollywood Reporter has a deep-diving update on the case, but because we at TVLine know you legal eagles like to stay abreast of the action but don’t want to spend a lot of time doing it, here’s a summary of what’s happened so far:
Background | Defendants ABC and Warner Horizon Television (which produces the shows) want to stop a suit brought by Nathaniel Claybrooks and Christopher Johnson, two African-American...
The Hollywood Reporter has a deep-diving update on the case, but because we at TVLine know you legal eagles like to stay abreast of the action but don’t want to spend a lot of time doing it, here’s a summary of what’s happened so far:
Background | Defendants ABC and Warner Horizon Television (which produces the shows) want to stop a suit brought by Nathaniel Claybrooks and Christopher Johnson, two African-American...
- 6/30/2012
- by Kimberly Roots
- TVLine.com
The Supreme Court has done us all a kindness. Obamacare shows the human community working at its best. For me, that's what it finally comes down to. If all of us, even the least fortunate, have access to competent medical attention, isn't that a wonderful thing? The poor, the old, the unemployed, those with pre-existing conditions? It is useful to keep the focus on the good that Obamacare will bring about. If you read the papers or watch TV, you can get caught up in a blizzard of confusing claims and statistics and political ideology. You might somehow get the idea this is all about raising taxes, or taking away your freedom, or that it's an assault by the federal government on states' rights. Those complaints are not about Health Care. They lead directly back to the controlling beliefs of the Obamacare opponents--that government is not to be trusted, that taxes are bad,...
- 6/29/2012
- by Roger Ebert
- blogs.suntimes.com/ebert
The Supreme Court's recent ruling on Medicaid is extremely confusing, even for people who pretend to know what they're talking about. So, for those of you who want to know why the ruling undermines the Affordable Care Act but feel too bogged down by the details, here’s a little summary:
Many sources differ on some of the basic facts of the Affordable Care Act and the new provisions laid out by Scotus. "Under the law," Noam Levey of the Los Angeles Times writes, "the federal government plans to spend nearly $1 trillion over the next decade to help states cover all Americans who make less than 138% of the poverty line, or about $15,400." That seems fact-ish. But, then, The Wall Street Journal's blogger Anna Wilde Mathews writes, "The Supreme Court's decision throws into question a key one: the growth of Medicaid to include everyone making incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level.
Many sources differ on some of the basic facts of the Affordable Care Act and the new provisions laid out by Scotus. "Under the law," Noam Levey of the Los Angeles Times writes, "the federal government plans to spend nearly $1 trillion over the next decade to help states cover all Americans who make less than 138% of the poverty line, or about $15,400." That seems fact-ish. But, then, The Wall Street Journal's blogger Anna Wilde Mathews writes, "The Supreme Court's decision throws into question a key one: the growth of Medicaid to include everyone making incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level.
- 6/29/2012
- by David Barnett
- Celebsology
Washington -- The Supreme Court on Friday morning officially relieved CBS of a $550,000 fine over Janet Jackson's infamous "wardrobe malfunction" during the 2004 Super Bowl Halftime Show.
The justices denied the government's petition in Federal Communications Commission v. CBS to review a lower court's decision that the hefty penalty for the brief moment when cameras caught Jackson's accidentally exposed breast constituted an unlawfully arbitrary departure from the FCC's prior policy of looking the other way when network censors failed to catch fleeting expletives.
Last week, the Supreme Court had dodged a First Amendment challenge brought by Fox and ABC against the Bush administration's more aggressive policing of broadcast indecency, instead throwing out the fines because the FCC had given "no notice to Fox or ABC that a fleeting expletive or a brief shot of nudity could be actionably indecent." The decision in FCC v. Fox Television Stations came as a surprise,...
The justices denied the government's petition in Federal Communications Commission v. CBS to review a lower court's decision that the hefty penalty for the brief moment when cameras caught Jackson's accidentally exposed breast constituted an unlawfully arbitrary departure from the FCC's prior policy of looking the other way when network censors failed to catch fleeting expletives.
Last week, the Supreme Court had dodged a First Amendment challenge brought by Fox and ABC against the Bush administration's more aggressive policing of broadcast indecency, instead throwing out the fines because the FCC had given "no notice to Fox or ABC that a fleeting expletive or a brief shot of nudity could be actionably indecent." The decision in FCC v. Fox Television Stations came as a surprise,...
- 6/29/2012
- by Mike Sacks
- Huffington Post
Washington — The Supreme Court decided Friday not to consider reinstating the government's $550,000 fine on CBS for Janet Jackson's infamous breast-baring "wardrobe malfunction" at the 2004 Super Bowl.
The high court refused to hear an appeal from the Federal Communications Commission over the penalty.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals twice had thrown out the fine. The second time came after the Supreme Court upheld the FCC's policy threatening fines against even one-time uses of curse words on live television.
The appeals court said FCC's policy of excusing fleeting instances of indecent words and images appeared to change without notice in March 2004, a month after Jackson's halftime act. The judges said that made the agency's action against CBS "arbitrary and capricious."
But now, the FCC clearly has abandoned its exception for fleeting expletives, Chief Justice John Roberts said.
"It is now clear that the brevity of an indecent broadcast...
The high court refused to hear an appeal from the Federal Communications Commission over the penalty.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals twice had thrown out the fine. The second time came after the Supreme Court upheld the FCC's policy threatening fines against even one-time uses of curse words on live television.
The appeals court said FCC's policy of excusing fleeting instances of indecent words and images appeared to change without notice in March 2004, a month after Jackson's halftime act. The judges said that made the agency's action against CBS "arbitrary and capricious."
But now, the FCC clearly has abandoned its exception for fleeting expletives, Chief Justice John Roberts said.
"It is now clear that the brevity of an indecent broadcast...
- 6/29/2012
- by AP
- Huffington Post
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to review a lower court decision that threw out the Federal Communications Commission's $550,000 fine for CBS over Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" during the network's live coverage of the 2004 Super Bowl. The high court's rejection of the Obama administration's appeal means the agency now may have to come up with a refund for the network -- which already paid the record fine. The court Friday also declined to review a lower court decision that threw out an FCC ruling that would have allowed companies to...
- 6/29/2012
- by Doug Halonen
- The Wrap
The Supreme Court decided Friday not to consider reinstating the government’s $550,000 fine on CBS for Janet Jackson’s infamous breast-bearing “wardrobe malfunction” at the 2004 Super Bowl. The high court refused to hear an appeal from the Federal Communications Commission over the penalty.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals twice had thrown out the fine. The second time came after the Supreme Court upheld the FCC’s policy threatening fines against even one-time uses of curse words on live television.
The appeals court said FCC’s policy of excusing fleeting instances of indecent words and images appeared to...
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals twice had thrown out the fine. The second time came after the Supreme Court upheld the FCC’s policy threatening fines against even one-time uses of curse words on live television.
The appeals court said FCC’s policy of excusing fleeting instances of indecent words and images appeared to...
- 6/29/2012
- by Associated Press
- EW - Inside TV
The Supreme Court finally ruled on the Affordable Care Act. Hallelujah! They went my way!
Now I don’t have to worry about that chance the court might strike down the individual mandate, which would mean my premiums would have gone up – in New York, if one is self-employed, one pays gigantic premiums. My worrying didn’t make the difference, however, so let’s consider something really important.
Can super-heroes get health insurance?
Barry Allen was already working for the police department when the lightning bolt caused those chemicals to drench him and made him The Flash. Usually, public employees get good insurance. He should be okay. We can only hope that Tea Party pressure hasn’t weakened his union’s negotiating power and force public workers to take a worse policy.
Bruce Wayne not only has enough money to pay any medical bills he might have out-of-pocket, but he also has Alfred on staff,...
Now I don’t have to worry about that chance the court might strike down the individual mandate, which would mean my premiums would have gone up – in New York, if one is self-employed, one pays gigantic premiums. My worrying didn’t make the difference, however, so let’s consider something really important.
Can super-heroes get health insurance?
Barry Allen was already working for the police department when the lightning bolt caused those chemicals to drench him and made him The Flash. Usually, public employees get good insurance. He should be okay. We can only hope that Tea Party pressure hasn’t weakened his union’s negotiating power and force public workers to take a worse policy.
Bruce Wayne not only has enough money to pay any medical bills he might have out-of-pocket, but he also has Alfred on staff,...
- 6/29/2012
- by Martha Thomases
- Comicmix.com
The Supreme Court surprised more than a few observers today with the news that they found the individual mandate to buy health insurance constitutional because a fine for not buying insurance was tantamount to a federal tax, except when it is not. Among the pundits getting this decision wrong was Bill O'Reilly, who in March said there was no way the mandate would be upheld and, if so, he would apologize. He phoned into the program at the top of the hour, but no apology was in sight.
- 6/29/2012
- by Frances Martel
- Mediaite - TV
The Supreme Court upheld President Barack Obama's health care law on Thursday -- just don't tell the cable news networks. The high court's ruling initially flummoxed CNN and Fox News, as both cable news channels reported that the Court struck down the law. Whoops. That left only MSNBC to get it right on the first try. "Supreme Court strikes down individual mandate portion of health care law," CNN's Breaking News account tweeted. The account issued a correction noting that the court "backs all parts" of the law 13 minutes later. CNN also said the mandate had...
- 6/28/2012
- by Lucas Shaw
- The Wrap
The Supreme Court largely upheld President Barack Obama's health care law Thursday and within minutes of the historic decision celebrities and media personalities used Twitter to voice their joy or outrage. A few, such as Albert Brooks, took the opportunity to make a few jokes about the impact of the wide-reaching ruling, saying he planned to get ill in order to celebrate. Also read: Supreme Court Health Care Ruling Confuses CNN, Fox News While media outlets tried to press the pause button for a moment to digest the densely worded decision, everyone from Sarah...
- 6/28/2012
- by Brent Lang
- The Wrap
Washington -- Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) pulled out a secret weapon on Wednesday to talk about the Arizona immigration law and potential for racial profiling: Justin Bieber.
In a speech about the law, Sb 1070, the pro-immigration reform congressman showed pictures of Bieber, who is Canadian, along with other celebrities, journalists, athletes and Supreme Court justices who are children of immigrants or immigrants themselves and asked who looks more like an immigrant.
"For our young C-span [viewers]: Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez," he said on the House floor. "These young people have overcome their very different national origins and became apparently a happy couple. I’m sure Justin helped Gomez learn all about American customs and feel more at home in her adopted country."
"Oh wait a minute, I’m sorry," he continued. "Because I’m not a trained Arizona official, I somehow got that backwards. Actually, Ms. Gomez, of Texas,...
In a speech about the law, Sb 1070, the pro-immigration reform congressman showed pictures of Bieber, who is Canadian, along with other celebrities, journalists, athletes and Supreme Court justices who are children of immigrants or immigrants themselves and asked who looks more like an immigrant.
"For our young C-span [viewers]: Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez," he said on the House floor. "These young people have overcome their very different national origins and became apparently a happy couple. I’m sure Justin helped Gomez learn all about American customs and feel more at home in her adopted country."
"Oh wait a minute, I’m sorry," he continued. "Because I’m not a trained Arizona official, I somehow got that backwards. Actually, Ms. Gomez, of Texas,...
- 6/27/2012
- by Elise Foley
- Huffington Post
The Supreme Court delivered a mixed response to controversial Arizona immigration law Sb 1070 this morning, striking down many of the laws provisions but not ruling on the most controversial one-- allowed law enforcement officers to check for identification during stops. In Arizona v. United States, the Court's decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, has overturned most of the law-- the parts that allow for warrantless search and arrest of those suspected to be illegally in the country-- but not the Arizona police's ability to now contact the Ice and check the immigration status of anyone they stop on other pretenses.
- 6/25/2012
- by Frances Martel
- Mediaite - TV
Earlier this year, MSNBC pundit Lawrence O'Donnell defended a "Modern Family" episode in which a four-year-old learns the F-word and can't stop saying it -- bleeped out, of course. "The real parenting responsibility in America is not to try to hide your child from the real language, but to prepare your children to hear it," he said in a segment on his show "The Last Word."
Now, he's throwing support behind the Supreme Court's recent ruling that ABC and Fox could not be fined by the FCC for a scene with brief female nudity and some F-bombs dropped by celebrities during awards shows.
"Today, the United States Supreme Court officially and unanimously rewrote what we could say and do and show on television. Now, profanity is okay and nudity is okay, all thanks to Cher," he said on Friday's show. Then, in celebration, he decided to air the scene from...
Now, he's throwing support behind the Supreme Court's recent ruling that ABC and Fox could not be fined by the FCC for a scene with brief female nudity and some F-bombs dropped by celebrities during awards shows.
"Today, the United States Supreme Court officially and unanimously rewrote what we could say and do and show on television. Now, profanity is okay and nudity is okay, all thanks to Cher," he said on Friday's show. Then, in celebration, he decided to air the scene from...
- 6/23/2012
- by editorial@zap2it.com
- Zap2It - From Inside the Box
The war isn't over, but the FCC drops a battle. The Supreme Court ruled today against $1.24 million in fines handed down to ABC and 45 affiliates through the years. Though the Court ruled that spontaneous profanity and extremely brief nudity weren't nearly the severe no-nos the agency claimed, it declined ruling against the overall indecency policy the agency holds over broadcasters' heads....Read more...
- 6/21/2012
- by Yidio
- Yidio
The Supreme Court on Thursday vacated key FCC enforcement actions based on "fleeting expletives" and brief nudity, saying the commission had not given networks adequate notice of changes in its policies. The broadcasters could not have known in advance about the fleeting expletives and nudity and that they would give rise to sanctions, the court said. It did allow that the FCC is free to address its policy, thus avoiding the question of whether the rules were allowable under the First Amendment. The vote was 8-0, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor recusing herself because...
- 6/21/2012
- by Doug Halonen
- The Wrap
Washington -- The Supreme Court ruled Thursday against the Federal Communications Commission's policy on fleeting expletives over the airwaves, vacating the lower court's decision on due process and fair notice grounds. It ducked the larger First Amendment issues about regulating broadcast indecency in Fox v. FCC.
The Court took issue with the fact that the FCC did not fully articulate its rule against fleeting expletives until 2004 -- after the Fox and ABC incidents at issue. "A fundamental principle in our legal system is that laws which regulate persons or entities must give fair notice of conduct that is forbidden or required," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the seven-justice majority.
"[T]he Commission policy in place at the time of the broadcasts gave no notice to Fox or ABC that a fleeting expletive or a brief shot of nudity could be actionably indecent," he continued. Accordingly, the FCC violated the broadcasters' rights...
The Court took issue with the fact that the FCC did not fully articulate its rule against fleeting expletives until 2004 -- after the Fox and ABC incidents at issue. "A fundamental principle in our legal system is that laws which regulate persons or entities must give fair notice of conduct that is forbidden or required," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the seven-justice majority.
"[T]he Commission policy in place at the time of the broadcasts gave no notice to Fox or ABC that a fleeting expletive or a brief shot of nudity could be actionably indecent," he continued. Accordingly, the FCC violated the broadcasters' rights...
- 6/21/2012
- by Mike Sacks
- Aol TV.
The Supreme Court will rule on healthcare reform any day now. Their ruling will be followed by endless discussion of what it means, why it matters for the New Deal, who it hurts or helps electorally in November, how it’ll help fundraising for Romney or Obama, etc. But politics and law should not be the chief consideration when analyzing the decision; the most important factor to consider is what it means for healthcare itself. If the law stands with the individual mandate, we’ll get a chance to see if Obamacare works and then tailor future legislation to the expected growth in healthcare spending.
But the most likely outcome is the removal of the individual mandate, which will entail a political reordering. Without the individual mandate in Obamacare, spending will be an even bigger problem. The moral imperative behind healthcare reform demands that policymakers don’t bow to the whims of the unelected branch.
But the most likely outcome is the removal of the individual mandate, which will entail a political reordering. Without the individual mandate in Obamacare, spending will be an even bigger problem. The moral imperative behind healthcare reform demands that policymakers don’t bow to the whims of the unelected branch.
- 6/19/2012
- by Joe Hines
- Celebsology
Justice Anton Scalia, the funniest, crankiest and all around third-most infuriatingly awful Justice on the Supreme Court (don't worry, Thomas, you're still number one to me) has indicated in his new book that he no longer agrees with the precedent on which the gummiment's arguments on Obamacare are based.
The case in question is Wickard v. Filburn, which expanded Congress' authority to regulate commerce to include powers that don't directly fall under the interstate purview of the Commerce Clause. In Wickard, the gummiment had ordered a farmer growing more than the allotted amount of wheat to destroy the excess crop, even though he was growing it for personal use, not for sale. The Supreme Court sided with the gummiment, arguing that the farmer's excess wheat meant he would buy less on the open market, which affected the national wheat industry, thus placing the action under the Commerce Clause.
"Even if appellee’s activity be local,...
The case in question is Wickard v. Filburn, which expanded Congress' authority to regulate commerce to include powers that don't directly fall under the interstate purview of the Commerce Clause. In Wickard, the gummiment had ordered a farmer growing more than the allotted amount of wheat to destroy the excess crop, even though he was growing it for personal use, not for sale. The Supreme Court sided with the gummiment, arguing that the farmer's excess wheat meant he would buy less on the open market, which affected the national wheat industry, thus placing the action under the Commerce Clause.
"Even if appellee’s activity be local,...
- 6/18/2012
- by Evan McMurry
- Celebsology
The Supreme Court is set to hand down its decision over Obamacare as early as next week, and everybody's going to be talking about it (unless Beiber (Bieber?) breaks his eyebrow again). If you haven't been paying attention, or need a refresher course, here's a handy guide to faking your way through a convo about the Affordable Care Act, complete with a glossary, useful links, handy phrases, drink recommendations and warning lines that you need to make for the exit.
Topic: What will Democrats do if it's overturned?
Read:
The card every Democratic legislator is carriyng around in their pocket, with all the people who have already benefited from the health care law.
Why The Supreme Court Can Only Help Obama, New York Magazine. Money lines:
As James Carville correctly pointed out this week, the Gop “will own the healthcare system for the foreseeable future.” The Democrats can heap the...
Topic: What will Democrats do if it's overturned?
Read:
The card every Democratic legislator is carriyng around in their pocket, with all the people who have already benefited from the health care law.
Why The Supreme Court Can Only Help Obama, New York Magazine. Money lines:
As James Carville correctly pointed out this week, the Gop “will own the healthcare system for the foreseeable future.” The Democrats can heap the...
- 6/15/2012
- by Evan McMurry
- Celebsology
The Supreme Court is set to hand down its decision over Obamacare as early as next week, and everybody's going to be talking about it (unless Beiber (Bieber?) breaks his eyebrow again). If you haven't been paying attention, or need a refresher course, here's a handy guide to faking your way through a convo about the Affordable Care Act, complete with a glossary, useful links, handy phrases, drink recommendations and warning lines that you need to make for the exit.
Topic: Did Liberals Intimidate The Supreme Court?
Read:
Lobbying The Supreme Court, Balkanization. Money lines:
One thing's pretty clear: John Roberts isn't going to be affected by these articles. He knows his own mind. Maybe he's concerned about his reputation in history or the Court's legitimacy, maybe he isn't. But he's going to vote -- or has voted -- the way he thinks correct.
Are Liberals Trying to Intimidate John Roberts?...
Topic: Did Liberals Intimidate The Supreme Court?
Read:
Lobbying The Supreme Court, Balkanization. Money lines:
One thing's pretty clear: John Roberts isn't going to be affected by these articles. He knows his own mind. Maybe he's concerned about his reputation in history or the Court's legitimacy, maybe he isn't. But he's going to vote -- or has voted -- the way he thinks correct.
Are Liberals Trying to Intimidate John Roberts?...
- 6/15/2012
- by Evan McMurry
- Celebsology
IMDb.com, Inc. takes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the above news articles, Tweets, or blog posts. This content is published for the entertainment of our users only. The news articles, Tweets, and blog posts do not represent IMDb's opinions nor can we guarantee that the reporting therein is completely factual. Please visit the source responsible for the item in question to report any concerns you may have regarding content or accuracy.