Satyanweshi Byomkesh (2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The story is good
shovonbhattacharjee4 September 2020
I have to tell, the story of this movie is not very much good this is an average, but the acting are amazing, IT should be better.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One time watch for spy movie lovers
bijoyds203 April 2020
The story could have been more thrilling and the characters have done an average work on their characters except Porombrata ... Overall it has able to deliver a decent thrill in the conclusion
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Brilliantly Executed Movie
abhijit_dutta9 October 2019
Byomkesh Bakshi stories have always attracted many readers over time. The film Satyennashi Byomkesh has been exceptionally made and the actors' performance, art design, cinematography are great and direction given by Sayantan Ghoshal is awesome. A must watch film for everyone.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst Byomkesh film; Wrong casting of lead characters
arunangshu_pal22 July 2020
This film is clearly the worst of all Byomkesh Bakshi films. Parambrata Chatterjee is not good enough and does not look like Byomkesh Bakshi. He does not have the required screen presence. The actor cast as Ajit is horrible, and this makes one wonder how in the world the director Sayantan Ghosal (or whoever might be the casting director) thought of casting a poor actor like Rudranil Ghosh as the iconic character of Ajit. Ghosh does not also have the looks to play Ajit, a character who is a writer and a gentleman with grace and kindness. The film does not hold the attention of the viewer in any way. Finally, calling the nationalist and philosopher Sri Aurobindo a "terrorist" does not help. The producers, the director and the screenwriter (and the actress who said the line) are lucky that no one sued them in court for defamation, blasphemy and gross historical inaccuracy.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed