Fire from Below (2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Another B-movie stinker from Jim Wynorski
Leofwine_draca29 March 2015
FIRE FROM BELOW is a rubbishy disaster movie with a rubbishy story and some very bad script writing. Unsurprisingly, it was directed by Jim Wynorski, a man not known for the quality of his productions, although Andrew Stevens (the actor from '70s fare such as THE FURY) also plays a big part as producer and co-director and has a cameo as a TV journalist to boot.

The film sees a band of miners accidentally hitting a vein of liquid fire which has the ability to react with the air and cause some truly explosive disasters. Cue various scientists as they end up racing around the country and trying to figure out a way to stop the disaster from escalating. Inevitably there's a ruthless businessman trying to cover it all up. There are a couple of good CGI scenes here of the fire snaking through the air before attacking its victims, with the speedboat chase being my favourite moment, but for the most part this is a bore.

Inevitably some extraneous characters find themselves trapped underground and have to be rescued. Kevin Sorbo shows up as the hero and looks tired and stressed in equal measure. Maeghan Albach plays his girlfriend but the two stars share zero chemistry and she's a rubbish actress to boot. Alex Meneses, who is brought in for glamour value, is much better and should have had a more prominent role. B-movie actor Alex Cord shows up as a military character. That is all.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A good idea that never catches fire
TheLittleSongbird7 November 2012
I was dubious of whether it would work out due to it being SyFy and that it was directed by Jim Wynorski. However I was very intrigued by its idea, and thought to myself if done in the right way Fire From Below could be halfway decent. Unfortunately while the idea was neat, the film's ineptness in almost every single department means that Fire From Below is a rather lukewarm experience rather than a flaming hot one. Kevin Sorbo does have likability and an easygoing charisma which you can see in this film. Glenn Morshower also manages to ooze authority, though his role is one that we've seen so many times. On the negative side, Sorbo's performance is the only thing about Fire From Below that works. None of the rest of the cast come close to matching him, ranging to bad to non-existent acting skills. In all fairness though, their characters, if we forget for a second that they are walking clichés, are nowhere near developed or likable enough to really connect to the viewer, and their dialogue will make your teeth grind together at the sheer banality of it all. The special effects look half-finished and colourless, managing to look cheap against everything else that's going on, while the editing is very choppy especially in the action sequences. I'd say the worst asset is the story, here logic and science gets thrown out of the window(not uncommon actually with SyFy), leaving repetitive underground scenes, lamely choreographed action sequences that look as though they were actually improvised on the spot, unintentionally hilarious killings(teens exploding while taking a leak, really) and the needless and stupid inclusion of having news on and I think over-explaining things that we have seen before that are only there to pad out the running time. In the end the running time actually feels too long for the thinness of the story structure here as well. All in all, had potential but chose to ignore it. 3/10 Bethany Cox
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not good at all...
kalash-723 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The overall concept of the movie is simple - a mining company wanting to profit from military contracts after discovering a vein of a special isotope of Lithium (known for its violent reaction with water) causes the vein to be exposed to the atmosphere. This leads to a nonsensical plot of "smart" lithium that chases water (as that is what lithium reacts to) that can come out of the ground, through pipes, etc.

The insanity continues as these "smart lithium" things begin chasing and burning people to death nearly instantly. First, the concept that a mineral can actively seek out something else - while calling for a leap of faith - is novel. You get a point for creativity. The problem with the concept is that in chasing "water" to react with, the "smart lithium flames" (which resemble a fireball attached to an octopus leg, with an inferno for a body) chase people through foliage (wet plant matter) and even across an open lake. If you have something that "seeks water" actively - why doesn't it ground itself into the lake? Why does it chase the boat (and skier) and blow them up - only to dissipate and vanish immediately after? Why not go after the wake, spray from the boat, or the lake itself? While a reasonable expectation to suspend belief is reasonable, anyone past 3rd grade science can see how ridiculous it is to have "water seeking" flames ignore bodies of water in order to chase the emotionally charged humans.

The scenes underground get incredibly repetitive - and while there isn't much you can do with a rock, it seems like the same 50ft of cave is used over and over throughout the movie. The emotional sub-plots are muted by the ridiculous effects and low-quality acting (mostly from non-lead parts - the worst line in the movie being near the end, "Sir, the fire's going out. The dam's holding" It was so bad, I felt compelled to register on this site simply to comment on it. Everything about that line is terrible - from the obvious green-screen background, camera angle, and the head-bob at the end of the line.)

While it can pass the time, there are a million better things to be doing with your life - and millions of better movies that you could be watching. The lead actors do a decent job, the action keeps things going, but the movie is ruined by some lousy acting and special effects that literally look like unfinished computer animations (particularly the smoke from the explosions under water). The worst part of the movie is the inconsistency with the action of the lithium - not heading towards bodies of water, but chasing people instead.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad that it should be entertaining... but it's not.
kristoffer-lance21 May 2013
I have seen a great deal of movies in my day. This is the worst one. The train wreck of it all kept me watching until the end and I was upset with myself for it. You would think that something so unwatchable would somehow become a cult classic. This won't. The acting quality is so pathetic that you just end up feeling sorry for the cast. I would venture a guess that most of them have other full-time jobs. I would recommend this movie to anyone who feels the need to calibrate the audio/visual sensors in their brain to default settings by watching something so ridiculous that it forces a master reset. I watched Kalifornia directly after this film and it was the best movie I had ever seen in my life.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's Not That Bad...
alicedick23 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, I will admit that the SciFi Channel (I refuse to call it SyFy) has become a veritable cheese factory of bad movies. I will further agree that "Fire From Below" is a classic specimen of scifi cheese, what with its bad CGI effects and logistical plot holes. But it's all in good fun and I found it a pleasant way to waste a couple of hours on a Sunday night.

What really saves the movie is its two stars: Kevin Sorbo and Glenn Morshower. I'm a fan of Mr. Morshower's from years of watching "24" and here he plays his usual authoritative military character in his usual way. He's fun to watch as always. Kevin Sorbo is not looking as Herculean as he used to, but he comes across well on screen as a nice-guy character thrown into a disaster situation. The scene in which he and his girlfriend discover that the town has been totally wiped out is atmospheric and pretty effective. Also, the military personnel are portrayed as brave and competent instead of as fascist clods - a welcome change. Basically this is an update of a 1950's disaster flick. Think "Them!" with lithium instead of ants. If you're in the mood for a slice of scifi cheese, you could do worse than this movie.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Combustible Crap!
zardoz-1317 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
"Fire From Below" gives new meaning to the term 'potboiler.' This predictable 84-minute disaster feature about a mining company that exposes a vein of pure base Lithium qualifies as a below-average made-for-television feature. In this case, it was produced for the SyFy Channel. Co-directors Andrew Stevens and Jim Wynorski have concocted nothing but pure claptrap. Apparently the Lithium loves to breathe and seek out water so it takes the form of a flaming finger of swirling fire that chases people over water or in the mine cavern and burns them up. We're talking flaming cheese. No, nobody gets burned on screen so that they turn into screaming French fries. One scene shows the fire trailing after a recreational speedboat on Lost Lake hauling a woman on skis. Indeed, the fire torches her and then the boat and its occupants. As it turns out, our hero and heroine, seismologist Jake Denning (Kevin Sorbo of TV's "Hercules") and his fiancée Dr. Karen Watkins (Maeghan Albach of "Rockabilly Baby"), are vacationing in rural Lost Lake when they discover a corpse floating in a lake. Karen leans on a wooden railing that collapses. She falls into the water and a dead man rises to the surface. Meantime, the Lithium has killed everybody in the mine and is slowly killing everybody in Lost Lake, most prominently Sheriff Griffith (James Hampton of "The Longest Yard") and garage owner Bubba (Burton Gilliam of TV's "Evening Shade"). Naturally, the military shows up and a crisis meeting is organized at the Pentagon where our hero shows how combustible a Lithium battery is when torched in the water. The Army evacuates citizens in the surrounding area while our heroes plunge into the fire to confront the out-of-control science project. Suspense is virtually lacking and the fires are all generated by computer graphics. Nothing in "Fire From Below" is remotely believable. Again, this is a paycheck movie for the actors and actresses involved and nobody gives what could be called a genuine performance. They utter throwaway lines from a shallow script based on William Langlois' story and written by the two directors. I hate to start watching a movie and stop it at the half-way point, but I should have made an exception with "Fire From Below." Nobody gets naked. Nobody is turned into a flaming pizza. Nothing!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Get some water too.
nogodnomasters7 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The Drake Mining Company is set to make a fortune with discovery of isotope L6 while deep cavern mining. The problem with L6 is that it is explosive with water and seeks out wet items such as people, even people on top of a lake of water...just saying. Only Keven Sorbo, now a seismologist, can save Nevada...or wherever.

This is a formula disaster film, one of the lesser quality and lesser known films of prolific writer Jim Wynorski. It barely keeps you engaged.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not a good movie, but... Maybe worth a watch.
Lionheart-41229 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
First off, this is not a good movie. Period. It is not a good movie at all. A lot of the acting is sub-par, and some, if not most of the logic is pretty flawed (I'm no scientist, so don't quote me on that...) though the idea of almost-intelligent flames is somewhat neat, and seeing Jamal's fate was actually fairly funny to tell the truth. The very best part of the movie is Mr. Sorbo, (Literally my reaction upon recognizing who it was was to shout "IT'S HERCULES!") and honestly his acting was quite good, but even that isn't enough to bring this movie up beyond a 4. But, still, I have to say that it's not a ~terrible~ movie, but it most definitely is quite bad.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Figured if rated 2.7 how bad could it really be?
tfmiltz11 May 2019
Well - the 2.7 rating is HIGH.

REAL nice special effects with the fire, someone clearly imported some computer graphics effects processing to the project, but short of that?

You will want to skip this one, it's not even so bad it's good.

I didn't recognize any of the actors, but the shaky camera on opening scene was a hint to me this is amateur hour.

I struggle to figure out who would make a movie like this.

It's worse than bad.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
hahaha - it is funny at all
r groth4 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Wow, haven't seen that kind of trash awhile. For the usual TV-consumers it might be better than TV-spots, but it is so simply build that I can't resist to see it to its own end. Intelligent Lithium - why not? In the world of movies it happens so often that ridiculous incidents happen all the time but that is = huuuh. Just stupid. A Bathroom in the middle of nowhere. In a City some wears soldiers gas masks and the actors who are next to the dangers wear none? A plot that it might come from a drunken geologist dream. But my best laugh was two minutes before end: The dam officer reports now flame bursts and is answered by....haha "a good job". He done NOTHING!!! It is thats the way Americans are motivated...? Just silly at all. Mr. Sorbo - Next time please read see script first. Then put your money in it. Even me could do this better. Really.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun Grade B disaster opus
Woodyanders11 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A vein of highly unstable and volatile pure Lithium gets unearthed by a team of miners and wreaks all kinds of destructive havoc on the small town of Lost Lake. It's up to nice guy seismologist Jake Denning (a likeable performance by Kevin Sorbo) to save the day.

Directors Jim Wynorski and Andrew Stevens keep the enjoyable story moving along at a snappy pace, generate a good deal of tension, maintain a generally serious tone with a few amusing touches of humor (one poor guy gets blown up while taking a leak!), and stage the exciting action set pieces with considerable panache. The sincere acting by the sturdy cast helps a lot: Maeghen Albach as the perky Dr. Karen Watkins, GiGi Erneta as the spunky Toni Nelson, Matthew Tompkins as greedy and unscrupulous industrialist Taylor Drake, Alex Meneses as Drake's fed-up partner Reign Palmer, Glenn Morshower as the no-nonsense General Cook, and Alex Cord as the rugged General Mark "Stonewall" Jackson. Popping up in nifty bits are James Hampton as folksy sheriff Griffith, Burton Gilliam as sleazy gas station attendant Bubba, and Stevens as newscaster Todd Moiyer. The robust score by David and Eric Wurst hits the rousing spot. Ken Blakey's slick cinematography provides an impressive polished look. The CGI effects are acceptable. An entertaining flick.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
VERY poorly acted, but I enjoyed it...
AndyVanScoyoc4 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
As an Environmentalist, I appreciate the story,the lesson and the warning about man's continued meddling with Mother Nature, when we'd be better off leaving things alone.

Neat concept, good special effects, and let's just hope something like this is never possible.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's close to, but misses being good
danzeisen16 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I wnated to like this movie. It has a really good premise, and Kevin Sorbo. The topic is really relevant today, as lithium is the prime ingredient needed for modern electric vehicle batteries. And there were some really tense and even a few frightening moments in the film. Plus Kevin Sorbo, who almost alone is a believable character who seems to have more than one dimension.

Alas, sometimes the whole is NOT the sum of its parts. The burning lithium is the worst actor of the whole movie, with flames spreading impossibly long distances and seeking out people to fry. It does so in a way that seems more comic than frightening and the one boat chase scene goes on interminably. I finally started to yell at the flame to just eat the poor people. (IT did) Characterizations are generally vapid and one dimensional and follow a lot of comfortable stereotypes and are thus not very believable or involving.

The burning lithium puffs out flames from a lake and unbelievably a soldier radios the general that a dam is going to give way because its too damn hot. Come on dude, water BOILS at 212 degrees and there is NO boiling or even steam. Are we expected to believe the concrete and steel gateways are going to melt as he said? And it goes on.... What should have been, and could have been a good movie is undermined by aspects that really should have been thought about for more than one beer.

They can't all be Citizen Kane, but with a little more effort this could have been a really decent movie. Missed it by "That" much as Maxwell Smart used to say.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Interesting cast
Worth watching for Alex Meneses. She shines in a somewhat intriguing cast. Familiar faces Burton Gilliam and James Hampton have bit parts, but both make quick exits. Sorbo being the main star power, is a bit too laid back here. He was about 50 years old when this was filmed. Meneses was 44, and would have been better cast playing opposite Sorbo, than than the much younger Maeghan Albach who was just 34 years old. Sadly, Albach died of complications from alcohol use in 2019, ten years after filming Fire From Below. The idea for the story isn't without potential. It's just not very well done, and the computer generated graphics of the fire chasing them are frankly just very silly. The movie was shot in different locations, and that always irks me in movies when its so noticeable. Imo it should have all been shot in Texas, and the computer generated crap cut out. So to sum up, I like Sorbo, but his performance here was a bit disappointing. Would have liked to seen more of Meneses. The movie doesn't ever really connect and draw in the viewer. We did have fun watching it though and looking up members of the cast.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed