Five Minutes of Heaven (2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
60 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Acting which goes through the canvas
OJT12 July 2010
James Nesbitt and Liam Neeson are making this film a great and heartfelt story of reconciliation, as well as telling about reasons for both hatred and acts of terrorism.

All this in one film is difficult enough, and this is all made in 80 minutes. Liam Neeson is of course the one getting the prizes, but actually this is Oscar-material by James Nesbitt. So strong, it actually seems impossible that he can have a life beside it all. He's done well, but is still nagged by what he saw as eleven.

The story is about an 11 year old Joe (Nesbitt) watching his brother being assassinated by a 17 year old Protestant youngster (Neeson) wanting to be a terrorist during the civil war in Norther Ireland. 35 years later it's time to settle what has ruined the lives of both of them. They are not living, but merely existing, and not a day goes without being haunted by this killing.

The film is intense, and several times you wonder where it'll end. For some the end might not be what they ask for, but I think it makes the story strong. However - it's not the end that makes this movie, it's the ideas and the acting. Also some of the filming is superb, and is recognizable also for director Oliver Hirschbiegel and his work on Der Untergang (Downfall) describing the last days of Hitler. Very impressive from the whole team!
21 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
My five minutes of heaven, how can that not be good for me?
hitchcockthelegend27 June 2009
An estimated 3720 people were killed as a result of the conflict in Northern Ireland.

This film is a fiction inspired by two men who bear the legacy of one of those killings.......

That is the opening salvo from the makers of Five Minutes of Heaven, I would personally like to add, since no other reviewer here has said it thus far, that the two protagonists never met in real life.

Five Minutes of Heaven was first screened at the Sundance festival in 2009 and won awards for Directing {Oliver Hirschbiegel} and for screen writing {Guy Hibbert}. It stars Liam Neeson as Alistair Little and James Nesbitt as Joe Griffen. The story is about how a young wannabe hero of the Ulster Volunteer Force {Little} gunned down the brother of Joe Griffen {Nesbitt}, purely because he was of Catholic religion, all witnessed by young soccer ball kicking Joe out on the pavement in front of the Griffen house. After the build up and execution of the crime, we forward to the future after Little has served 12 years prison for the murder, and here we now have a television company led meeting between the two after the Good Friday Peace Agreement.

It's only now that the film really kicks in as a powerful piece that has something to say. Too many third rate productions caricature their characters in films involving the British/Irish troubles, but the makers here are keen to avoid that-hence the appearance of Neeson, who wouldn't have come cheap one feels. Both Nesbitt {ranking along side George Best as most talented thing to come out of Northern Ireland} and Neeson then shift gears to ram home the point of the story. This is about forgiveness, pertinent questions about if that is possible under the most trying of circumstances. Would you be able to move on? And at what cost? Both sides of the coin are deftly rubbed by Hirschbiegel and his terrific cast.

It would be stupid of me to not say the piece has problems since it clearly isn't perfect. Both sides of the families involved are not formed at all, and that is without a doubt a very big misstep. Probably a victim of course of the TV movie production value and the sadly inept running time afforded it. But that annoyance aside, and in the context of the final product.....well it works out rather well I feel. There's some smart points of reference in there, note the young Little handling his gun amongst a sea of childhood toys, while there's a dolly out shot involving a church that nails that particular scene with maximum poignancy. But really, as is normally the way in this type of production, it lives or dies by its ending, and the question is answered as to if the actors involved have involved us enough to actually carry it off?

We are OK here, because we got Nesbitt and Neeson, point made, acted accordingly, yep, see this if you can. 8/10
46 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very good film, I enjoyed it and it tells a story that needs to be told
fergaloshea16 April 2009
Its probably pertinent I mention that I'd watch Liam Neeson reading the phone book - and walk away content. Having said that this is a story that needs to be told. People delude themselves if they think the formal end of a conflict ends the collateral damage thats a product of conflict.

The two primary characters are very engaging; The emotion expressed and the reasons for it are carefully and sympathetically explained. There is a gentleness to the story amid the unforgiving violence. In no other historical or fictional portrayal have I heard so simply but properly explained why people got involved in violence in the six counties of Ireland.

I found it "cute" to hear Neeson speaking in his own accent for once.
43 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not a bad movie
maximkong24 November 2012
For this movie, some parts of the plot seem to be a bit over-dramatic and off-the-mark in that sense, which compromise a little bit off its credibility. However, I still note that the core subject is being elaborated with meticulous detail, and the ending is i find very much quite appropriate...

Because, as highlighted in this film, the question of forgiveness is not about erasing or escaping from the past but rather embracing it and find where the things left behind from the past, doesn't matter whether they were sweet or sour, fits to help bring out the most in life. The acting performances by both lead roles are commendable.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strong, simple, sometimes even slow, but never irrelevant, and some great acting
secondtake6 August 2012
Five Minutes of Heaven (2009)

I have a confession--when the movie started I thought, okay, another pro-IRA movie with a heart. And it's not--it's a beautifully balanced movie about the personal horrors of the Northern Ireland bloodshed and the longterm aftermath as participants struggle to keep going.

The two main actors are both from Northern Ireland. Liam Neeson plays a Protestant who as a teenage killed a Catholic worker as part of the tit-for-tat violence of the time. James Nesbitt, a Roman Catholic, plays the brother of the man who was killed, and as a witness to the crime he holds a deep grudge about the murder. And in a key act of political insight, the actors were born on the opposite sides--Neeson was raised Catholic and Nesbitt raised Protestant.

The theme of the film is reconciliation in the mold of South African leader Nelson Mandela. The core of the movie is shot in a fancy Irish mansion where television crews are going to watch as the two men, mortal enemies decades before, make an effort to somehow move on, in public, on t.v.

How it goes is for you to see. The murder in the 1970s is fact, easy enough to believe, and the meeting of the men is fiction. Nesbitt is utterly terrific. You might think he's overacting (he is, of course, overacting) but it's appropriate, and gives this non-action film some intensity. Neeson is strong in his restraint and in the one main scene where he gives a well-written speech about how to understand these horrors he is also terrific.

The filming is extremely simple and in fact the whole scenario is relatively linear, even with all the flashbacks. There are some turns to the events by the last half hour, and in a way this is both the dramatic high and the disappointing low of the film (it resorts to somewhat corny and not quite smartly filmed sequences I won't elaborate). But overall the point is so strong and well meant it's hard to worry too much about whether it's a masterpiece.

It's not. It's sometimes slow, it says stuff we probably have absorbed pretty well by now, and it isn't very complex. But what it does do it does with compassion and conviction.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
five minutes of power
SnoopyStyle6 July 2016
In Northern Ireland, Alistair Little (Liam Neeson) joined the Ulster Volunteer Force at 15. In 1975, he killed Catholic Jimmy Griffin in his home in front of his younger brother Joe. Thirty three years later, Alistair has been released from prison and a TV show is bringing him together with an adult Joe (James Nesbitt) for the show. Joe is racked with guilt and anger. Vika (Anamaria Marinca) is a TV production assistant.

It's an intriguing way of tackling this troubled era. Nesbitt brings out his energetic acting. Neeson is stoically powerful. This culminates into five minutes of power. It's a bit hit-and-miss for the most part. It doesn't always flow but it has a few great scenes.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Five Minutes of Heaven
jboothmillard27 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I had no idea what the film itself was going to consist of, I guess I was attracted more by the two leading Irish actors, from director Oliver Hirschbiegel (Downfall). Basically the film opens in 1975, where nineteen-year-old Jim Griffen (Gerard Jordan) is murdered by seventeen-year-old Alistair Little (Mark Davison). Jim's eleven-year-old brother Joe was witness to the murder, and even though Alistair went to prison for twelve years, it seemed like Joe's Mum (Paula McFetridge) was blaming Joe for not stopping him. Thirty three years since these events, in the present day, a television documentary crew has set up a meeting between older Alistair Little (Liam Neeson) and Joe Griffen (James Nesbitt). Alistair does not know that a volatile Joe plans to avenge his brother's death, while Alistair seems calm and wanting redemption and forgiveness. When Joe gets emotional just before the meeting, he changes his mind and refuses to be filmed face to face with Alistair, and they both discuss their pasts in their own places. Then they arrange to meet in an old house, where Joe tries to stab Alistair, and in a tackle they both end up crashing through the window, lying together on the pavement. Injured, Alistair checks Joe's pulse, they have both survived the fall, Alistair tells Joe he is going back to Belfast, but then he tells Joe to get rid of him and go back to his daughters. He of course means to forget about him, and after shakily lighting a cigarette and picking himself up he limps away down the road. The next day, Joe attends a group sharing problems and cries about wanting to be a good father, and in the end he calls Alistair up and says, "we're finished. Also starring Anamaria Marinca as Vika, Juliet Crawford as Cathy, Niamh Cusack as Alistair's Mum, Gerry Doherty as Joe's Dad and Paul Garret as Alistair's Dad. Both Neeson and Nesbitt excel in this drama that is a little of an original in the way that it is executed, no wonder it was a hit at the Sundance Film Festival. Very good!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
It Lives Long After
Hitchcoc13 October 2010
I really had a hard time knowing what to make of this film. The opening is striking as a group of young Irish men plot the killing of another because you have to do something in the hornet's nest they are living in. Not only do they accomplish the killing, they destroy the life of a boy, the victim's brother, who witnessed everything. The most unfortunate thing is that this boy is blamed by his mother for not doing something to stop things. It then moves many years in the future. The two men are to meet on a kind of talk show. Incredible tension builds as the killer (played by Liam Neeson) gives some testimony and awaits the man whose life he pretty much destroyed. The outstanding thing about this film that there are no sides. As Neeson's character said, at the time he was proud. He went to bars and was hailed as a hero. He also knows that there is no forgiveness, no sorrow that can change anything. We await their confrontation. I will not comment on the events that follow. Suffice it to say that they are extremely intense and, I thought, satisfying.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Revenge and Redemption
claudio_carvalho17 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
In February, 1975, in Northern Ireland, the seventeen year-old UVF member Alistair Little kills the catholic Jimmy Griffin in his house in Lurgan in front of his younger brother Joe Griffin. Alistair is arrested and imprisoned for twelve years while Joe is blamed by his mother for not saving his brother. Thirty-three years later, a TV promotes the meeting of Alistair (Liam Neeson) and Joe (James Nesbitt) in a house in River Finn expecting the truth and the reconciliation of the murderer and the victim that actually seeks five minutes of heaven.

"Five Minutes of Heaven" is a fictional tale about the effects of violence in the lives of the survivors, the victim that seeks revenge and the killer that seeks redemption and spiritual peace after thirty- three years. The pacifist story uses a terrorist act of a young man blinded by the environment of violence in Northern Ireland to disclose the powerful drama, but could be any other sort of violence or fanaticism that are frequently displayed in the headlines of the news and is not specifically about terrorism as mentioned in some reviews. James Nesbitt has an awesome performance in the role of a man that has his family destroyed due to a senseless crime only because his brother was Catholic. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Rastros de Justiça" ("Trails of Justice")
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Average
mikey187-818-89962026 March 2015
After reading some reviews on this film i was really expecting a lot more than what I got. It felt more like a itv programme than a film.

The film deals with guilt and forgiveness, and shows the harsh reality of how both of these feelings effect people. After a long, dragged out piece of the film the two finally meet and I suppose acceptance from both of them happens where they can both move on.

Before they met i just expected more tension, and it was all a bit of an anti climax.

I suppose it shows that the innocent person can become the more angry and aggressive one out of the two, while the one who committed the murder was full of gulit and remorse for his actions, the victim was very bitter and angry, but the film went to show that meeting actually did them both good and gave them both the release and acceptance to move on with their lifes.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Compelling film and a must see
jakeh10 April 2009
Just viewed this tonight and thought it was really an excellent commentary on the difficulty of forgiveness, the helplessness of letting go, and, of course, how hate and regret can meet and be resolved (many times with misgivings and myopic single mindedness). It is said that forgiveness (whether of oneself or another) is the hardest endeavor a human being can face. This film brilliantly portrays the anguish of two men, one who hates and can't forgive another, and one who regrets and can't forgive himself. The brevity of the film (121 minutes) and the abrupt ending belies the volumes of emotion that permeate almost every scene. The movie is both compelling and enjoyable while also being very disturbing.

A part not to be overlooked is played by Anamaria Marinca (Vika), a 'gopher' for the film crew. Her character added quite a bit of depth to the film. Neeson and Nesbitt should both be recognized for their riveting performances.

In most films today the focus is on revenge, blood, and murder. "Five Minutes.." includes these vices but, contrary to the blood and gore in many movies today, this film's focal points are, indeed, letting go, finding your life and living it, focusing on what means most to you, demolishing the demons that haunt you, and, most importantly, discovering that elusive human effort which leads to forgiveness. It's hard...very hard, and most of us can't bring ourselves to that end because forgiveness is many times viewed by society as weakness when it is, in actuality, strength.
68 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Controlled and responsible and well delivered by all involved
bob the moo30 December 2010
More than thirty years after he saw his older brother gunned down by a teenage "member" of the UVF, Joe Griffin's wounds are still fresh and the memories of that night still vivid. For this reason he sincerely doubts his decision to do a one-to-one interview with the killer. For Alistair Little it is a more familiar process as he has done much public soul-searching since his "rehabilitation".

I came to this film attracted by it being set in Ulster, place of my birth and first 18 years alive. The big names in the cast and directing duties also had a part to play and I envisaged this being a raw two-handed between the two men with plenty for both of them to get their teeth into as they play off each other – not sure why I thought this, but I did. The reality is that the two men barely share a scene, and when they do it is brief and ironically not as good as when they are apart doing their own thing with their own character. In the majority of the film we come to understand (well, in a simple way at least) the two men and who they have become as a result of that one shared event in their lives. How things appear are not necessarily the way they are and where the power lies is equally blurred. This continues as we learn about the two men.

Many viewers may be disappointed about how the film plays out, because there isn't really a handful of "big" actorly scenes but rather a slow and steady development which speaks more of a numbing and long-lasting pain on all sides – which is convincing and befitting the situation in the region. It doesn't offer easy answers and, although some of it can be interpreted as pat, it mostly manages to avoid being obvious or clichéd in what it is saying. Both Nesbit and Neeson are on good form and, in hindsight, the lack of showboating material is only a good thing. They play it subtle and they play it very well. Nesbit impressed me the most because if I'm honest I expected less from him but he does very well. Neeson is solid and controlled but reveals much with the delivery of key scenes. Beyond the two of them there may as well be anyone since they are the focus, but supporting turns from Marinca, Orr and a few others don't distract.

Overall Five Minutes of Heaven is not an earth shattering film nor is it a firey one. Instead it is a controlled study of the impacts beyond the bullets on two specific characters. While it tends towards cliché the manner of delivery from all involved mean it doesn't ever become pat or obvious but rather remains natural and convincing. Well worth seeing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
NOT a one sided view of Irish Terrorism.
vitaleralphlouis28 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Almost every other movie I can think of concerning terrorism in Ireland takes the "politically correct" position that Irish terrorism is just fine, but the British victims of the Irish terrorism are evil. This movie takes no sides.

Personally, I'm a firm Catholic, but in the Northern Ireland conflict it's the British Protestants that are on the right side, the Irish Catholics are 100% wrong. The citizens of Northern Ireland are Protestants by a wide margin, and they strongly want to be a part of the UK, yet many Americans support a violent minority which blows up women and children at will in order to support overthrow of a majority elected government. Shame on these immoral ninnies.

The two men in this film were on opposite sides, and the devastation to both men is clearly shown. With Liam Neeson portraying the Protestant loyal to the UK, you might notice a large number of Union Jack British flags all over his neighborhood. In fact, such neighborhoods usually have 10 times as many Union Jacks as shown here; sometimes hundreds everywhere you look. They wear their British loyalty on their sleeve.

The theme of the two men coming together to settle their differences years after violent events is contrived, a message for "peace" -- another agenda movie. Not bad, but I'd score 6 out of 10.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Decent
gavin694220 February 2014
The story of former UVF member Alistair Little (Liam Neeson). Twenty-five years after Little killed Joe Griffen's brother, the media arrange an auspicious meeting between the two.

Kirk Honeycutt of The Hollywood Reporter called it "very good at stating the obvious but fails to bring new insight to this age-old morality tale". That seems like a fair opinion to me. The film is good, topical, and Neeson is a great casting choice. But it does not seem to add anything new.

Sadly, I am not sure if this film had much impact outside of the United Kingdom, because the Irish problem is something Americans are only vaguely aware of.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
POWER-HOUSE ACTING...DOWN-BEAT & RELENTLESSLY TENSE
LeonLouisRicci12 August 2021
To Make "The Troubles" of Civil Conflict in Northern Ireland, that Dates Back Hundreds of Years, Identifiable to Outsiders,

it's Necessary Somewhat for a Reduction of Scope.

"Based on True Events" the Movie Zooms-In on a Murder and the Repercussions.

On the Murderer and the Murdered Man's Younger Brother who Witnessed.

Liam Neeson Served 12 Years for the Crime.

James Nesbitt is the Guilt-Ridden Victim of His Mother's Hate (berating the 10 year old insisting He should have intervened).

Neeson is Now Haunted but has Redefined His Life as a Peace-Activist.

Nesbitt is a Wreck of a Man Hell-Bent on Revenge against the Murderer.

The Second-Act is a Look at just How Ludicrous "Reality News" Awkwardly Tries to Present Gut-Wrenching Confrontations of Real-Life Situations.

They Stage a First-Meeting of Neeson and Nesbitt and it is a Disaster.

The Final Act Brings the Two Together and the Fireworks Commence.

An Honest Effort to Shed some Light on the Violence and Devastating Aftermath that Takes its Toll

Grim, Down-Beat, and Nerve-Racking.

For those Interested in the Conflict's Personal Struggles, or to See 2 First-Rate Performances, its...

Worth a Watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Character Study
ThomasDrufke9 June 2021
A film that focuses solely on character development like Five Minutes of Heaven usually isn't something that particularly stands out among others, but this film contains fantastic performances, a unique study of revenge, grief and forgiveness. It's not perfect nor is it for everyone, but it's well done.

7.1/10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Truth and Reconciliation
Eumenides_030 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Oliver Hirschbiegel is slowly carving himself a niche as a political filmmaker. After giving Nazism a human face in Der Untergang, he tackles the IRA and the difficulties of reconciliation between Catholics and Protestants.

Liam Neeson plays Alistair Little, former member of the Ulster Volunteer Force. As a young man he killed a Catholic and become famous amongst his people, but also haunted by the image of the victim's brother looking at him as he made his kill.

James Nesbitt plays Joe Griffen, the brother of the victim, who grows up tormented because his mother blamed him for not having done anything to save his brother.

Decades after the fact, these two men are invited to meet in a TV show to discuss truth and reconciliation. Little goes to exorcise his ghosts; Griffen goes to kill him and get his 'five minutes of heaven'.

For a ninety-minute movie, there are a lot of ideas in this movie. Besides raising questions like whether it's possible for enemies to come together, it also displays the media exploitation of grief and misery, and how society can be kinder to a criminal who shows regret than to a victim that lives all his life with his feelings bottled up.

However the movie is no masterpiece. In spite of the stellar performances by the leading men, the resolution of their life-long conflict is ridiculously (perhaps insultingly) done through a brawl. Also not enough time is given to develop their lives: we see so little of who and what they are in their day to day existence.

Nevertheless the movie has many strong parts, especially the first sequence set in 1975, as see the slow build-up of the murder. It's fascinating to watch all four killers starting the day and preparing themselves, as they go through fear and excitement. Many of these young men wanted to kill someone just to prove they were men, and one can't help feeling sorry for their illusions. Furthermore, the victims were people they knew and spoke to, making the whole conflict ridiculous. It's disturbing how people can be killed for so little.

As a reconstruction of the way life was in Ireland in the '70s, this is a fine movie. As an exploration of reconciliation, it was a noble but failed attempt. This should not keep people from watching it.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
i'm with charlie perry from Australia on this
noramcloughlin20 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The content is important to me, my dad having grown up on the Falls Road in Belfast. But really my comment falls in with charlie perry's from Australia on this film. Everyone except charlie have commented on the content but the film's weakness is in the craft of the screenplay.

Catharsis is necessary in a film no matter the content. This is the problem here. In order to set the audience up (spoiler ahead) for the ending you must take care to carefully review the script to prepare us to accept that ending. Didn't happen here.

Instead, Little is a slick, arrogant dude whose assumed experience with grief counsellors and self-help groups has made him fail to need anything at all including transformation within himself in meeting Griffin. He has "been there done that" with grief on this topic. He is too well defended in his meetings, too media-savvy in his prepared, fancy speeches, etc. so that the viewer never gets to know what the heck he needs from Griffin. Why meet?

There was a moment ...at the climax of the film, in the Lurgan house, right before they fought, when I thought I understood why the writer made this choice (of having Little so slick, talking in bumper-stickers about grief, as if he knows ahead of time what Griffin wants and therefore is "above" Griffin in his mind). I said "oh I see: Little wants Griffin to put him out of his misery." But I was wrong.

In the end there was no cinematic reason for Little being a know-it-all, predicting to the TV people what Griffin would want, etc. This viewer found herself wanting to slap him. And at the end I was hoping Griffin would take him out! Now don't get all touchy feely on me here. I am simply talking about building characters evenly in screenplay format. Obviously, if the writer wanted to keep the know it all in Little, that's fine, but as charlie Perry in a comment above says, you need to present scenes from the personal life of Little that balance or explain his know it all non-humble attitude and provide a reason why he wants to meet Griffin. he never does apologize and just seems smug. Hence the catharsis just doesn't happen.

The viewer is left puzzled by Little's collapse on the street at the end: why is he so upset? He was a smug bugger before this. Why did he even want to meet Griffin if he knew all the answers beforehand?
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The film that could help to end terrorism
UncleTantra5 May 2009
Tonight I saw one of the best films I've seen in years. You might have to search for this one to find it, because it's probably not going to show up in your local multiplex, but if you can find it, you're in for a moving experience.

"Five Minutes Of Heaven" won the Directing award for Oliver Hirschbiegel and the World Cinema Screen writing Award for Guy Hibbert at the most recent Sundance Film Festival, and was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize. That, and the fact that Liam Neeson is in it, were the reasons I decided to watch it. I didn't even know what it was about.

It's about violence, and how violence shatters lives, and about how the shattering does not stop when the violence stops. Set in Northern Ireland, it is nothing more, nor less, than the meeting, 25 years later, between the man (Neeson) who in his youth murdered a Catholic for nothing more than being Catholic, and the murdered man's brother (portrayed so powerfully as to bring the audience I saw it with to tears more than once by James Nesbitt). As a child, he watched his brother murdered, and then was blamed by his own mother for killing him because he did nothing to stop it. He was nine.

Both men are shattered, 25 years later. One is seeking redemption and resolution by meeting the brother of the man he killed, and the other is seeking only revenge. I cannot spoil the film for anyone by saying more. All I can say is that this film would bring the Dalai Lama to tears, or Yasser Arafat. It's that powerful, and that well done.

This is the film that young people whose culture is pushing them into terrorism should be shown, before it's too late for them. And this is the film that those who feel no compassion for the terrorists should be shown, before it's too late for them, too.
48 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Flawed Northern Ireland drama
wisewebwoman3 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This film had great potential and missed the mark widely. Too much repetitive dialogue, too many 2 x 4s which ruined the subtlety.

This is based on a true story: In 1975 Alistair Little murdered Jimmy Griffin with a young witness, Joe, Jimmy's little brother. Alistair would have murdered Joe also if he had known of the relationship.

The script hypothesizes a reconciliation on film between the two main characters Alistair (Liam Neeson) and Joe (James Nesbitt).

The Troubles of Northern Island are well captured: the coldness of a killing to achieve manhood and heroism, with differences in religion being the only excuse.

It is when the film shifts to today that a clunkiness sets in where a lightness of touch is called for. James Nesbitt, a brilliant actor, overplays scenes that should have been far more subtle, case in point being the shiv he keeps taking out and fondling. Yeah, we really get it. And are smart enough to make the connection to Alistair fondling the gun previously the first time.

A fight scene falls (no pun intended) completely flat. As does the 'are they dead?' of the fight at the OK Corral. This is where a psychological war of words would have really played well. I didn't believe it for a second. And a rather forced key role of a 'runner' stole from the tension between the two men. Stark "show don't tell" moment would have worked very well here. Instead we are offered the gossip of the runner commenting on her interactions with the two leads.

The ending was way too over the top for me. Liam Neeson on his knees in the middle of London while on a cell phone. No! Understatement would have worked way, way better.

6 out of 10 for the leads, and an F for the script. Liam and James were great.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ultimately flawed
ignore-kevin8 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is a drama concerned more with the medias preoccupations than with the conflict or people involved.

The fictional main characters reduce the real people behind them to caricatures seen many times before, for example in the 1985 'No Surrender'. The imposition of characters such as the immigrant runner are totally unnecessary and cheapen the production to the point of propaganda. Singling out the immigrant member of the production team involved in monetizing victimhood, as some angelic, innocent, arbiter is silly.

The depiction of the victims brother as a knife wielding neurotic juxtaposed with a suave, righteous, murderer was equally hamfisted. Its almost as if the writer is reinforcing, rather than criticizing the idea that victims have no means to express their rage until the media gifts them a forum. Some of the accusatory dialogue against the medias laziness and cyphers (catholic v protestant etc.) when misrepresenting the conflict was fruitful but given the hype, an overall disappointing effort.
10 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Truth and Reconciliation
gradyharp17 January 2010
When friend Vika (Anamaria Marinca) asks Joe Griffen (James Nesbitt), the brother of a man killed in 1975 by one Alistair Little (Liam Neeson), if killing Alistair would not be good for him, Joe replies ' Not good for me? My five minutes of heaven!' And so runs the razor sharp dialog and acting and power of this little film from the UK that relates the story of a 1975 event in Northern Ireland when Catholics and Protestants were at war and the young Protestant Alistair Little (Mark David), as a UVF member (Ulster Volunteer Force), gathers his friends and 'kills a Catholic' - but the murder happens in front of the victim's 11-year-old brother Joe Griffen. Flash forward to 2008 when Alistair Little (now Liam Neeson) has served his prison term and is set up by the media to relate the story of the incident and supposedly meet and shake hands on camera with the now mature Joe Griffen. It is a film about youthful involvement in terrorism and the sequelae that haunts or obsesses the victim's family and the perpetrator. The confrontation between Alistair and Joe is a devastating one.

Guy Hibbert wrote this excruciatingly visceral screenplay and Oliver Hirschbiegel directs a first rate cast. Though Liam Neeson is billed as the star, the film belongs to the powerful acting by James Nesbitt as the vengeful Joe Griffen. The cinematography is dark and dank like the atmosphere in both the warring fog of 1975 and the attempt at reconciliation in 2008. There are subtle pieces of thoughtful enhancement, such as the use of the Mozart 'Requiem' in the near hidden score. In all, this is a moving film about truth and reconciliation that deserves the attention of us all, especially in this time of random acts of terrorism and their possible imprint on our minds and on society.

Grady Harp
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great but flawed by writer's deviation from the truth
charlieperry17 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I really think that the writer made a mess of this story. Just as background I ought to explain that this story is based in part on fact. In 1975 Alistair Little murdered Jimmy Griffin in front of Jimmy's little brother Joe. The writers takes this as his starting point and then hypothesises a current day meeting between the two characters, Alistair and Joe played by Nesson and Nesbitt.

The opening segment of the film set in the 70's are brilliant. For someone like me who grew up in the UK in the 80's it really brought home to me the horror of what went on in Northern Ireland during the Troubles. Young men incited to murdered each other with absolutely cold brutality just because they were a different religion.

Then the film skips forward to the present day and the problems start.

Firstly, both these men must have gone through years of torture over what they experienced. We as viewers see almost none of that torture other than what we see in the faces and hear from the mouths of the characters in the present day. This is a movie, not a play, the writer should be showing us their pain.

Also, we see almost no context around their current lives. Nothing around how they spend their days, where they work, who they hang out with, what they do for fun. All these little details are so important in a film like this. They're important for understanding and empathising with the characters.

My biggest criticism is that this very serious story is ultimately reduced to a run-of-the-mill movie fist fight. It's tacky. It demeans the subject matter which it's treating. If Joe Griffin really told the writer that this would have been his reaction then they should have cast someone different to Nesbitt.

Having said all this I'd recommend everyone to see it. It's quite affecting despite its flaws.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Love both actors, this was just an average film, waste of their talent!!
joiningjt13 May 2021
It was just ok nothing new nothing really creative or thought provoking. Dont buy it in any format it's not worth owning which is hard for me to say cause we pretty much own everything these actors are in. This is a movie you watch on a Sunday afternoon to watch a non action documentary type film. I will say if you haven't seen 2007s Jekyll with Nesbitt BUY IT or do whatever it takes to see that limited series!!!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gripping and convincing
MikeyB179322 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
An interesting and well-intentioned film on the nature of violence, sorrow and guilt on the two individuals involved.

Basically a terrorist act is committed in Northern Ireland. The terrorist kills a man but is seen by the younger brother of this murdered man. The terrorist is jailed and the younger brother is tormented the rest of his life by this brutal act.

After about 30 years there is a face-to-face between the two – they have never met since the day of the murder. This encounter is sponsored by the TV media and we are to bare witness. This is very well done and we can feel the anguish of both. The film-makers do give us a lasting view that the victims of crime can never hope to completely recover – the scars remain. So this is not a film about reconciliation between oppressor and victim or that revolves entirely around the feelings of guilt of the protagonist.

The later encounter, after the media one, was somewhat less satisfying. Nevertheless this film has a strong psychological grip and the acting of the two main characters makes this very worthwhile. And towards the end there is hope for the two of them.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed