The Day the Earth Stopped (Video 2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
58 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Still, it's bad luck being sued
neil-47629 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Aliens arrive complete with giant robots - plural - to deliver the message that humans need to get their act together and prove their worth, or else higher galactic powers will pull the plug. Mankind's response is, of course, to break out the machine guns, so said higher powers turn off electricity to show they mean business.

If this all seems strangely familiar to you, then that is probably because it is, of course, The Day The Earth Stood Still - the plot is the same as both the original and the remake. Even the title...

Given the film industry's propensity to rip off ideas (viz. the familiar phenomenon of similarly themed films coming out at nearly the same time), the makers of The Day The Earth Stopped probably felt a bit hard done by to be sued by 20th Century Fox (per IMDb's trivia page) just because this, er, inexpensive film came out shortly before Fox's expensive TDTESS remake. However, this isn't a case of copying an idea. It isn't even a case of plagiarism - it's outright larceny.

My mate C (for so my mate C. Thomas Howell likes to be known), as hack-for-hire, does as good a directing job as you can do with a budget of ninepence. He and the rest of the cast say their lines in the right order. There is a pretty lady with bare boobs. I do not recommend this film.

Incidentally, note and marvel at the way that the military personnel often have no insignia of any kind on their uniforms.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Well, I've seen students do better work
hell-on-toast12 December 2008
Within the first ten minutes I was thinking hard about if this was a very elaborate Youtube spoof or a serious film. The acting is so undeniably awful it makes you cringe. The camera work is cheap and amateur while the sound and lighting could be done by an undergrad making their first drama. You think I'm joking? Look for the massively over exposed shot at 00:09:98.

It just gets worse from here. Very low budget, poorly written and astounding that it made it this far. There is a weird mix between shots that blew the budget and money saving stuff that makes things look just plain nasty. How many times have you seen a government agent jumping from an expensive black truck only to start setting up a fold out table for his equipment? Mix this with cheap CGI and you have an instant looser. Should have been killed in pre-production. Watch if you want to know how not to make a feature film.

*shakes head*
33 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
How bad can a bad movie be?
kilkul12 December 2008
I've seen some bad movies in my days. I'm also quite a big sci-fi fan, so my tolerance level was high enough. But this is one of those movies I really DISCOURAGE people to watch. The performances are lame, the storyline is ancient history, the sets are lame, and, except SOME computer graphics, the movie is just pure crap. Everything is big and shiny (the cars, the actors), but I can't shake the feeling of a high-school medium-grade film project. Why do directors, producers, etc., feel the need to create such junk? I would REALLY love to see less (if any) such "movies"... Just donate the money to less fortunate children or throw a party or something, but stop wasting people lives and nerves!
29 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible Movie, Don't bother.
HoPeFuLLL12 December 2008
Terrible, terrible, what were they thinking? Bad Acting. Bad Directing. Bad Story Line or Script. Made me wonder if they get someone to watch what they've made prior to releasing a movie. I actually sat through nearly half this movie for a laugh, then I just fast forwarded in big chunks.

Oh, we two Aliens, we wont let them talk to anyone important and we'll keep them in an old abandoned warehouse and let a low ranking officer beat them up a bit. First 2 minutes of the film look promising, don't let it fool you.

Nothing good about this movie sorry.

Did I mention this was terrible?
62 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
B Minus - but not a total failure!
intelearts26 January 2009
Some solid ideas save this from being a total washout.

Have to be honest and say that production values for the average 5 year old birthday party are higher than this - yet it is strangely watchable - it has moments that make you wonder what will happen next and how it will all end...

All in all if Sci-Fi wasn't your thing before you sat down to watch it won't be after either - but if any Sci-Fi is better than none at all you might be surprised at the fact that is is, despite a very low budget, actually watchable....

And it does kind of deal with apocalyptic themes head-on, all in all B minus.
17 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Oh no! We're being attacked by giant muppets!
mark.waltz23 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
That's exactly what the huge robots look like in this wretched sci-fi movie from the studio known as Asylum which apparently cries over the bad reviews on their way to the bank. As long as there are suckers born every minute like me, they'll continue to do so because these films are hideously fun, mainly to laugh at, and this one is no exception.

So maybe I'm not quite right about a muppet, but maybe a giant rock em' sock em' robot or some other battery operated boy's toy, as well as a man and a woman, found naked in the woods, obviously creatures from another planet in human form. Sinead McCafferty, in the worst case of monotone acting, warns the military that the world is in danger of being destroyed unless they can prove that human life has value. Joining 80's favorites C. Thomas Howell and Judd Nelson, McCafferty and Bug Hall leads the cast of mainly unknown non-actors in developing this rip-off of much better science fiction classics.

With Asylum films, you realize within 20 minutes that this is just going to be a series of action filled but plotless noisy scenes where the script tries to fool the audience by sounding intelligent utilizing scientific terms while all the time, it is making itself prove to be really dumb. Who needs character development when you have all this action? This is the type of film that you sit back in the comfort of your own home since these are not theatrical releases and enjoy for the pure cheese. Unfortunately, this ends up being a pungent limburger rather than a mild Camembert.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Crappy Asylum film is still better than crappy Keanu Reeves blockbuster
movieman_kev4 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Six hundred and sixty-six huge robots from outer space land in strategic locales all over Earth wanting humanity to prove it's worth in the grand order of things or face certain annihilation. The robots don't ever say this outright (other then a few reactive strikes, they don't really do much of anything truth be told), but two other alien visitors, a guy & girl, let the military (as well as the viewer) know what's going on.

As far as movies from The Asylum go, this is among the cream of the crop. This isn't because the film is any good whatsoever, mind you, just that the other swill that the company usually makes is so mind-numbingly God awful that the bar for them has been so vastly lowered as to make this seem better than it is. C. Thomas Howell continues his descent into sub-mediocrity with his continued part in these awful films, while Judd Nelson should've really known better. Really the only saving grace is Sinead and after her nude scenes are done (she has two very early on in the film) there's really no other reason to keep watching the movie.

However it's STILL better then that crap big blockbuster Keanu Reeves travesty

Eye Candy: Sinead McCafferty provides the T&A (there's also some man ass)

My Grade: D

Where i saw it: Instant Netflix via X-box 369
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Horrible in practically every way
bwdude15 December 2008
Blinded by the (formerly) not so bad rating, I decided to give it a chance.

At least it could have been some nice foreplay until "the one" with Keanu comes out. (pun intended) But it wasn't.

Where do I start ... bad BAD acting of almost everybody in the movie. Especially bad editing, sometimes there are cuts that have absolutely nothing to do with the current scene. Like near the beginning when you hear two people talking and at the same time see shots of people working silently on their computers. And don't get me started on the script.

Then there's the "logic factor" once again. 666 giant robots are landing on major cities on earth, yet there are NO people on the streets, no hysteria, not even simple curiosity. Everybody is rather calm, like this would happen every day. It's like we (the unfortunate viewers of the movie) get to see them, but nobody else, apart from the principal actors.

Like other people already mentioned, the superior aliens (in human form) are landing on earth. They have great powers and great knowledge. But a simple sedative knocks them out and an even simpler cell can hold them?

In general this *could* have been a nice variation on the original theme, that's why I gave it two instead of one points.

It may have been due to budget restrictions, or that they wanted to kick it out before the Keanu-movie. Either way, it did not do it any good.

As I said in the title: It's horrible in practically every way, don't waste your time on it.

Watch the original or wait for Keanu.
21 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
At Least It Also Rips Off The Plot As Well As The Title
Theo Robertson12 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I think Asylum are finally getting getting the hang of the mockbuster genre . Not only do you need to rip off the title of a big budget cinema release but you also need to rip off the plot of the similarly titled film too . The film is called THE DAY THE EARTH STOPPED and that sounds suspiciously like THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL . Both films feature spaceships landing , giant robots and an alien who states if mankind doesn't start behaving itself then the giant robots will give mankind a fatal beating . Yes indeed at this rate David Michael Latt will find that the films he's producing will be widely advertised - after appearing in a Hollywood court charged with plagiarism . It can only be a matter of time before some bored lawyer flicks the channels on his remote only to discover the schedules for the Syfy channel and decide that there might be a good chance of a law suit

TDTES starts with a hot naked chick exiting a spaceship . When I say that most of my interest for the film disappeared when the character found some clothes it indicates the only reason I watch films is to see naked hot chicks or that the film in question is very tedious , and no naked hot chicks is not what I watch films for . In fact not only does the character Sky , played by Sinead McCafferty , ruin the film by putting her clothes on but she ruins the film by opening her mouth . Actually all the characters contribute to the disintegration of any potential by opening their mouths . That's what most of the film consists of - people sat in a room talking . It's like a senior citizens tea party with the occasional shot of a giant robot thrown in or a car chase

Of course this shouldn't necessarily be enough to condemn a film because the original THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL ( 1951 ) was very talkative but that has an average user rating of 8.0 on this site and spent a considerable number of years in the IMDb top 250 . Maybe that's because the original had memorable situations and intelligence in depth ? here we see mawkish situations and plot turns that don't even begin to make sense along with a very obvious lack of budget

The world won't stop and I have a very bad feeling Asylum and David Michael Latt won't either . I just wonder when the company and its producer might end up in court though ? Not that I'd like to see this happen but they're sailing closer and closer to the wind
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A not very good Sci-Fi flick
JRmf14 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
As a SF freak, I'd have to admit the best I could say about this movie is that it had its (brief) moments, and showed promise, but failed miserably to deliver.

An armada of 666(!) giant robots arrive on Earth and position themselves in capital cities worldwide. Apparently they are the executors of Earth's death sentence - they are somehow slowing down the Earth's core and that will mean FINIS by sunset. Something to do with tilting its axis but otherwise never discussed, elaborated or otherwise given any credence.

Along with the robots comes a Woman and a Man, who show up wandering naked in the woods. The Woman is "The Destroyer", though why is never elaborated. The Man's role is never described but presumably he supplements the Woman somehow. They both can manifest awesome force-projection powers (enough to knock a squad of soldiers off its feet) but nevertheless are easily tranquilized and kept captive, sedated etc.

The people of Earth have been judged and found wanting as too destructive. But if they can show their "humanity" to the Woman, they might be saved. It's left to Myron (Howell), who forms a bond with the Woman, to do this, incidentally through helping a woman in childbirth. The Woman says she can't intervene in human affairs but does so to save the woman who has just given birth. In the end it's this action/these events which seems to convince Her that humanity contains some value and should be spared (whatever..)

SFX are not bad, unlike the rest of the movie. When the robot armada arrives, there's no warning. No radar centers plotting their arrival, or crowds gawking at the spectacle (the robots are some 20 stories high). It's just PLONK and they're there. Even with a small budget, a lot can be done if there's careful thought, which is sadly lacking here.

The "command center" (on which the destiny of the world hangs) particularly grated. It's a dingy room with a few even dingier benches on which sit a few PCs with CRT ("fat") monitors, with a kid's telescope on some filing cabinets in the background along with a few arc lights, for good measure. Blueprints are several times rolled out - I am no architect but I'm pretty sure they went out with slide rules in the 70's.

Character development is sketchy and unconvincing at best, or simply non-existent. Only Myron's approaches acceptability.

The 5 min end-credits roll in ultra slow motion, with a big "The Day The Earth Stopped" occupying the last 30 secs, to conceal the fact that there simply isn't much to show as to what went into the film's production.

One can only assume this movie was timed to release at the same time as, and capitalize on, "The Day The Earth Stood Still". I for one was sucked in. But frankly I would be embarrassed to watch it in the presence of non-SFers who had any sort of discernment at all.

A very generous 3/10
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad, but a bit better than other Asylum productions
Wizard-819 June 2010
Once again, the direct-to-DVD movie studio The Asylum blatantly rips off a major Hollywood movie not just with its title, but with its story. Of course, the movie being ripped off is "The Day The Earth Stood Still". Make no mistake, this is a BAD movie, but I found it a little better than Asylum's other mind-numbing movie. There are a few okay special effects sequences, which come across even better when you know this was a REAL low budget movie. And star/director Howell really does seem to be trying on both sides of the camera. While his performance ends up just being adequate, he does at least score a few points with his direction, giving the government base interiors and a few outdoor locations a moody, somewhat creepy feel. But ultimately, the low budget and the screenplay defeat his efforts. Much of the movie looks really cheap, with little to no set dressing and few extras. The opening of the movie is somewhat confusing, starting at what seems to be chapter two. But the biggest problems the movie has is its tone. There seems to be no sense of urgency or panic, and although the running time is just 85 minutes, it feels like it runs at least a half hour longer. It's sad that Howell and Judd Nelson's careers have gone so low that they are working for The Asylum. Won't someone else with real Hollywood power give them another chance?
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Movie Underrated
vicky_renee25 May 2022
This movie was great and had a good plot.

Please do not listen to the bad reviews!!!!!!!

It is definitely worth watching.

I find it disturbing when I read the bad reviews on movies like this. It's like those people do not know how to have imagination or something. They think movies have to be perfect.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
well written attempt at something deeper
asinyne21 February 2016
there is really no reason to trash this film. Plot wise, its pretty solid with a nice tale. The effects are about what one would expect of a rather low budget film but they are OK. The cast is pretty solid, tho not Oscar worthy. The story revolves around a mysterious alien invasion that no one can figure out. There are religion undertones, and not so subtle ones at that. The aliens turn out to be powerful, God like entities that have come to determine the worth of the human race. Plan B it to knock the planet off its axis and destroy us. C Thomas Howell is fun to watch and he is a promising director. The movie moves along at a decent pace and never hits any truly boring stretches. I felt reasonably entertained and no, its far from the worse movie ever made like some sniffy Star Wars nerds commented here.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Better than expected
imd-5110 June 2009
I believe one of the reasons why so-called "A" movies have in general better ratings than "B" movies is the marketing campaign that helps to brain wash with delicious trailers the audience long before they even get to see the movie. "The Day the Earth Stood Still" was no exemption, but after all the movie was not really that good, was it?

Now "The Day the Earth Stopped" is IMHO much better than what you would expect from a "B" movie. Maybe the overall acting isn't that brilliant but you still develop an emotional connection with C. Thomas Howell and classic beautiful actress Sinead McCafferty. She reminds somewhat on Sophia Loren, or Brigitte Bardot but is still herself. How can one criticize on too much make-up? Cleopatra in Ancient Egypt or the Ladies in the 50ties utilized generous make-up as well. I did not think for a second about too much make-up. And, the role requires to portrait a mysterious perfect being from a different planet!! Sinead McCafferty knows how to act without saying too much, and it comes naturally, convincing, what else could you possibly want?

Also, I strongly disagree with the critique on bad film music. The score may not be perfect in all scenes, however, the composer produced several beautiful tunes that make me reach out for the soundtrack.

Cheers, TC
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Good, Not Bad, Watchable
clauzy8217 April 2020
OK this film is getting a lot of unjust hate here. I think a lot of reviewers on IMDB should give up watching B-Movies and stick to blockbusters. I mentioned B-Movie, I wouldn't really class this as a B-Movie it doesn't have any of the qualities you'd associate with traditional B-Movies exploitation, grindhouse, pulp, cheese, slasher or any raw or over-the-top vibe to it. I would class it more like a TV Movie as it is squeaky clean, apart from the nudity at the beginning. Not a film your gonna want to watch again, but it is definitely watchable. Some of the acting is goofy but most of it pulls through good, the story line wasn't too bad except for random fillers that took away from the film rather than add anything, obviously filmed in a rented office somewhere and the car chase and baby scene are pretty poor. CGI was good and for a low budget film not bad at all. The addition of the beautiful Sky (Sinead McCarthy) was a nice touch. Overall not great or good but not bad either, watchable.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Remarkably bad
gis_planner19 March 2009
My grade-school aged children confused this with the similarly named Hollywood movie. I tried to warn them, but they insisted this looked good. The acting was so bad I left the room about 30 minutes in. My son called me back a few minutes later to point out how bad the *lighting effects* were. He's never critical of acting, let alone of lighting. Honestly, if a 5th grader is able to find serious flaws everybody involved with this film should be ashamed.

I'd like to say something good about this film, but I can't think of anything. At least in my case it was a free rental, so I didn't waste any money on it.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
about as crappy as it looks - if it quacks like a very quick get-rich rip off, it is
Quinoa198415 February 2009
C. Thomas Howell used to be an actor that seemed to be a next-big-thing kind of deal in the 80s, with roles in ET, The Outsiders, The Hitcher and Red Dawn... then something happened: he became a common garden variety character actor. And then something else in the past several years: he took whatever job he could get, or could try and drum up quick. In this case The Day the Earth Stopped is not only a rip-off, it's a rip-off of a *remake* of the 1951 Robert Wise The Day the Earth Stood Still. And make no mistake this is about as clear a get-some-quick-money-quick s*** going on here, no more no less. It's got a plot about as thin as an anorexic twig and less brains than I could think to count. It sometimes sprouts a moment of odd clarity among the many, many dumbs scenes (one of them definitely not being a 30 second birth that happens in the back of a van during a chase and then an immediate resurrection of the dead-from-childbirth mother by McCarthy's hot Klaatu rip-off alien - or is it her male counterpart that's Klaatu?)

Who keeps track when a totally clean baby is born thanks to bit-part-but-MAIN-CHARACTER-on-video Judd Nelson? It's directed with the flair of a 4 year old finger-paint from an AIDS infected oil derrick. Crew lights pop up constantly in a shot (sometimes as an "intentional" effect, other times it's just plain damn laziness), the roof of the set can be seen many times, the crew is seen running up to a black truck (me and my friends just had to chuckle at the lack of any money to fix something like that), and the beginning and opening credits alone spell what certain doom awaits with the *slow* crawling. The robot aliens and nuclear fall-out scenes are, to say kindly, completely unrealistic when compared to other baffling and stupid alien-robot-nuclear-fallout movies.

Did I mention the acting? Good Lord! Maybe the most random reference to Angelina Jolie EVER, plus, um, Judd Nelson? What did Howell do to drag you into this? Maybe a cookie? This is tripe, but maybe not the worst ever made.... just bad enough to leave that "horrible" taste in your mouth. Howell could've done worse, and I'll be damned to an undisclosed circle of hell if I live to see it. Maybe it's just worth picking up the video box at Blockbuster to read the back and see a "quoted" review (I put quotes on quoted since it was probably the director who wrote this blurb) which says "In the epic tradition of Transformers and Independence Day." Can you say yikes sandwich with a side of WTF/ha-ha dressing?
13 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another awful film from Theasylum
Bovski11 December 2008
Terrible acting, special effects & Script

A waist of an hour and a half that I cant get back

P.S. Don't trust comments from guestar57

They either works for Theasylum.cc or is a fan.

Rated Death Racers as 10, Summary "NOTHING against JASON STATHAM..."

Others thought differently 1, Redefines the word Terrible 1, Worst film ever made total rating 2.1/10

Rated War of the Worlds 2: 7, Probably The BEST of Theasylum MOCKBUSTERS ! Others rated it 2, Disgraceful To The First 1, Absolutely awful! 1, A bloody dumb movie 1, H G Wells would be turning in his grave! 1, I was for the aliens - to kill all those TERRIBLE actors 1, One of the worst! 1, Not worth spending an hour and a half 2, Almost unwatchable
32 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cheesy but watchable
rlange-34 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
First, it was an Asylum flick. If you went in with high expectations, you must be new to movie watching.

The acting varied from passable to downright horrible, leaning more toward the latter. The casting wasn't good either, with the Bimbo from Space supposedly a vastly superior creature steeped in wisdom and making complex moral judgments. Others have commented on the lack of reaction to giant robots suddenly setting down near cities -- no mobs, no panic, no nothing actually. The nerve center for the response had to be the cheapest building for rent in LA, with dated computers, anachronistic blueprints, card table props -- it was more funny than anything else.

And some of the scenes were just flat out horrible, especially the baby being born. One second the woman looks about 13 months pregnant (heh), the next second here's the baby, dry (you can even see hair on its head, dry as a bone), no fuss, no muss. Then Mom dies, sort of, but she looks like she's asleep. No sweating, pearl necklace in place. They do "cpr" but never breath for her, and instead of pressure over the heart they are nearly at her neck. Hadn't anyone in the production taken a basic course in first aid? But toss in a few decent special effects, a decent if unoriginal science fiction plot and theme, and it was watchable. The only thing that was really unforgivable was that it dragged interminably in places. The unexciting car chases lasted too long, too much time was invested in 'poignant moments' that weren't, and it was hard not to reach for the fast forward. Not a good movie, but I've seen a lot worse.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A train wreck in slow motion
haigm20 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This film was kind of compelling to watch, just see how crap it could be.

Acting? Do me a favour! The kids in a pre-school nativity play can act better than that.

Special effects? Ha! The effects in the 1951 movie from which this was ripped off were much better. Even the screens in the control room were CRTs instead of LCD panels - bear in mind this was made in 2008! Plot? Please! Find out why humanity is worth saving by tea time, otherwise the planet is going to be zapped.

I thought they had finally cracked how to show new born babies. Apparently not, as we're shown a clean six month old toddler that had just been born.

I probably have seen a worse science fiction movie, but I can't remember when.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Word Awful would be a compliment
rpkearns-112 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
If Human Beings Find This Movie Entertaining then there is No Hope For Mankind. This is the greatest load of brown-stuff I have ever seen. C. Thomas Howell??????? Nahhhhhhhhhhhh. It should read "C The AUDIENCE Howell". Somebody please tell C. Thomas Howell To make Popcorn. He can't make movies. I watched his attempts at "War of the Worlds" and thought I was having a bad dream. Turns out this one is a night-mare. How can a being from another planet crash land, walk out of her ship totally naked and yet have lipstick and make up on...Ahhhh Come on America....Is this the best that you guys can produce???.. What's happening to movies???
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Educational
mike-171613 July 2019
I'm giving it 10 because I now know that space aliens have lip-filler and wear skimpy space bras.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated
jacobjohntaylor120 August 2019
This is not an awful movie. This is a good movie. People just do not know good science fiction. This is has a good story line. It also has good acting. It is a funny movie. It kind of scary.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another 'Mockbuster' stinker from The Asylum.
poolandrews18 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The Day the Earth Stopped starts as hundreds of huge robots descend from space & land on Earth in hundreds of different locations, the authorities refer to them as 'Megaliths'. Then in Los Angeles a much smaller spacecraft lands & two naked aliens (Sinead MacCafferty & Bug Hall (!?!)) start wandering around, local army dudes including Private Josh Myron (director C. Thomas Howell) set out to capture the aliens which they do. After a while the aliens begin to talk & the woman nicknamed Sky says that the Megaliths have been sent by a distant alien race to wipe out humanity before it becomes a threat or something like that & that in order to stop them she must be shown the nature of humanity & why it must be saved. The evil authorities want to torture & drug Sky which doesn't go down well so Myron breaks her out & takes it upon himself to convince her that humanity is worth saving, well I feel a lot safer already...

Directed by & starring C. Thmas Howell the IMDb would have you believe The Day the Earth Stopped was a homage to the classic sci-fi film The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) but in actuality it's one of The Aslum's terrible 'Mockbuster' rip-offs, this time it's the big budget remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008) with Keanu Reeves & in fact Twentieth Century Fox got their lawyers onto The Asylum but unfortunately they couldn't stop this terrible film from being released which is a shame as it would have saved me 90 odd wasted minutes. The Day the Earth Stopped is an absolutely awful film on every level, the script is terrible with awful character's & dialogue & a story that just makes no sense. If these aliens see us as so much of a threat why not just destroy us, why give us a chance at all? It's never really explained who the model like alien woman is or what power she has & that bloke alien basically does nothing the entire film & I struggle to see hwy he's even there. At 90 odd minutes it drags & is really boring with a predictable & lacklustre plot that has no momentum or excitement. Are we to believe when aliens land & threaten the very existence of all humanity the people trying to solve the problem will amount to about half a dozen soldiers & a guy in a suit? Then there's the supposed moral message about behind all the bad things in the world there's lots of good & we should never forget our humanity which is as subtle as a baseball bat round the head & very heavy-handed in a preaching moralistic sort of way that patronizes & induces tedium in equal measure. This whole film is a mess, it's boring, poorly thought out, moralising in the worse possible way & just plain rotten to sit through.

If the story wasn't bad enough there's not even any fun to be had here, there is absolutely zero blood or gore & even when Sky gets shot while wearing a white top not one drop of blood is seen & the part when that woman gives birth in the back of Myron's car is ridiculous as it's got hair, totally clean & that bloke must have been a doctor since the umbilical cord was cut as well, the makers didn't even attempt to make the baby look like a new born child. There's the scene where someone remarks that all the cars have stopped working yet seconds later a car is clearly seen driving past in the background & then there's the usual awful CGI computer effects the least said about the better. Also while trying to save the world from complete destruction by gigantic alien robots the best we have have to work in what looks like an abandoned warehouse with about two computers & one table at their disposal. There are no action scenes, all the aliens look human & apart from a bit of nudity at the start this is PG rated stuff all the way.

With the usual low budget of probably about $250,000 this looks awful with rotten CGI effects & terrible production values, the whole thing basically relies on fooling people into thinking they are going to watch the big budget version that came out at the same time & it's just wrong. Filmed in California. The acting is awful & are we really supposed to believe that model like woman is an alien who the very existence of humanity depends? She just looks so wrong for the part it's untrue.

The Day the Earth Stopped is a terrible rip-off 'Mockbuster' from The Asylum, a company who quite simply make the worst films around & try to con people into buying or renting them by associating them with bigger better films out at the time. Have they actually made a good film? Watch the original The Day the Earth Stood Still or the remake instead as this is not worth your time.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"The creatures weren't talking."
hwg1957-102-2657048 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Giant robots descend around the world and also two naked aliens, one of whom must decide whether earth should be destroyed or is worth preserving by getting to know what people are really like. The alien has only one day to do it! Not an exciting film even though it has a ticking clock kind of plot and the acting is not engaging. C. Thomas Howell gave his usual dour performance. I liked the look of robots though (strangely called 'megaliths' by most of the characters) but they didn't do much.

Based on but far inferior to the great 'The Day The Earth Stood Still' from 1951 it was still better than the dire 2008 Keanu Reeves version.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed