Jud Süss - Film ohne Gewissen (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Third Reich is not to be trifled with.
ulf-635-52336714 May 2017
German films about Nazism often face the evil eye from reviewers. No exception in this case. Director Oskar Roehler clarified; "Our aim was to enter the innermost sanctum of Nazi high society, and to portray how seducible artists were in the Third Reich". The Third Reich is not to be trifled with. Not now, when we finally have mapped and interpreted Nazism forever. This film delivers a different message and conclusion. De- demonizing the clowns and incarcerating the followers. Many have been outraged by the unabashed rough sex between Gudrun Landgrebe's and Tobias Moretti's characters. Not to mention the brilliant scene where the merrymaking German locals whines about the crumbs that the American liberators hands over to the surviving camp inmates. "Jud Süss" is played out as the war operetta it was. Blind, boisterous, excessive, orgastic, self-indulgent, greedy, in curling pastel colors. Much like Fassbinder's "Lili Marleen" or Szabó's "Mephisto". Nazism and its demons is still a moneymaker in the media world.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Jew on that
kosmasp28 December 2010
This is a very delicate subject and the filmmaker at hand might not have been the best choice. His directing (Moritz B. as Goebbels would have needed some guidance), his poor choices in staging some scenes and other flaws become very apparent.

On the other hand, he is not afraid to go places, that others might not have dared (an intercourse that is so absurd, it's almost funny, if it weren't tragic ... and a scene you will either love or hate). Of course the faux documentary style tries to recreate a feeling of what happened back then. But the fact, that he was just a director for hire, seems to apparent.

He did not really check or confront himself too much with the story. Instead opting on doing what he got from the script (or his interpretation of it). And it's a shame that some powerful scenes such a the one in a tent, were the movie is shown, with reactions, is getting sidetracked and completely dismissed by the next set-up outside the tent, when it seems to be a completely different movie, with no class or style attached to it.

Moretti on the other hand (as most actors), try their best. You cannot fault him (or his "wife" in the movie) for any shortcomings of the end result. With a subject matter like this you could expect a better movie. Some parts are really good and it's ambiguity is still something I cherish (that's why I rated it so "high"). Still there is no constant flow and the mood is all over the place ... same goes for Bleibtreus Goebbels ...
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
poor Goebbels
caspare23 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The movie was rejected at Berlinale for a good reason. Moritz Bleibtreu, an – in my eyes overbooked yet middle class actor – played Dr. Goebbels as badly as a character can be played. There are basically three ways he could have approached his role as Dr. Goebbels: precisely sticking to the historic figure (e.g. Bruno Ganz in "Der Untergang"), a parody / mockery (Charly Chaplin in "The Great Dictator") and his own independent interpretation (Robert Carlyle in "The Rise of Evil"). He was not capable to choose any of them and attempted a rather embarrassing mix. As we know from the few YouTube movies showing the real Goebbels, this man was able to speak very clearly and well accentuated, carefully pronouncing each word with his slight "Rheinland" accent. Bleibtreu is attempting to imitate this accent, but since he obviously never has learned to pronounce clearly (a talent now too often missing at modern German actors) it only sounds funny, but not like Goebbels. It is also a well-known fact that Gobbels limped slightly, the accent is on "slightly", yet Bleibtreu plays him as an almost invalid! At other times he forgets to limb at all! The third and in my eyes most despicable fact is Bleibtreus "over-acting" in a movie which is about the very magic of not overacting! (like Marian as Jud Süß). He is shouting, playing a roaring and rampaging moron who tries to appear devilish and only makes himself a laughing stock as an actor. By the way, the blow-job Britta is giving Gobbels was cut out in the German cinema version. Historic facts have been "klittered" (German word, meaning "gluing together what every you can find") in an extreme way. Too many wrong mistakes for writing them down. The movies deserve 2 stars at max and only for the fact that Ferdinand Marian was so exceptionally well played by Tobias Moretti. I can only recommend buying the real "Jud Süß" at Amazon.com to compare.
10 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Almost perfect
Karl Self26 September 2010
German movies about the Nazi dictatorship are usually heavily subsidised, but nothing to write home about (which actually goes for most German movies these days). "Jud Süß -- Film ohne Gewissen" by Oscar Roehler stands out because it tries to go beyond the simplistic message that "the Nazis were evil". Instead it honestly tries to explore the fact why an actor who didn't sympathise with the Nazis nevertheless chose to play lead in Veit Harlan's antisemitic "masterpiece". We witness Ferdinand Marian getting sucked deep into the heart of darkness. Oscar Roehler also takes a good look at the sexual life of the fascist bohème, with an impressive performance by Gudrun Landgrebe, who looks unbelievably foxy despite her sixty years of age.

This was also the only movie I can think of that displays survivors of the Nazi death machine not as saintly survivors but as brutalised human beings.

That said, I take umbrage at four aspects of this movie:

* the -- pardon my French -- overly drastic fellatio scene between Goebbels and housemaid Britta, who wears a golden swastika pendant to hammer home the fact that she's a Nazi slag (and while I'm at it, the actress playing her, Anna Unterberger, is far to blonde and svelte for a realistic housemaid)

* in the movie, Ferdinand Marian's wife Anna is a "semi-Jewess" who is eventually murdered by the Nazis while Marian lives the high life of a Nazi A-list actor; in reality she wasn't Jewish (although she had previously been married to a Jew and in consequence her daughter was "half Jewish"), and survived her husband by three years; in my book, that alteration was hammy and unfair game

* unlike displayed in the movie, Marian probably died in an "ordinary" traffic accident and didn't commit suicide

* I didn't get the scene where Marian is in a nightclub in Prague with a transvestite; also, in that same scene we see a German soldier firing into the crowd with his Luger, a histrionic scene which would have resulted in carnage plus a court martial for the shooter

You have to view these criticisms in the light that this movie was booed at the Berlinale, ostracised by many critics, and the highest Jewish representative in Germany even called for it to be banned. Of course everyone is free to dislike and criticise this movie, but I simply don't understand what caused this massive rejection of a serious, well-made and captivating movie.

PS: for reference, if you want a movie that really deals with Nazism in an inappropriate manner, check out "Der Vorleser".
30 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing given the premise
Horst_In_Translation3 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"Jud Süss - Film ohne Gewissen" is a German movie from 5 years ago written and directed by Oskar Roehler. Roehler is one of the most successful German filmmakers right now and here he adapted Friedrich Knilli's book for this controversial movie. It runs for almost 2 hours and features Tobias Moretti (Kommissar Rex) as the title character. This film will do absolutely nothing for you if you do not know already about the events that are depicted in there. You so not necessarily have to have seen the original "Jud Süß", but it helps. However, you really need to know about the film's contents and also a bit about Marian, Harlan, Goebbels... And even if this applies to me that I do know about all of this as I am particularly interested in the Nazi years and World War II, I was still disappointed by the movie. It is tough to point a finger on what exactly went wrong. It may be the script. The actors exclude many big names, at least here in Germany. I will not list the names, but you can check the cast to see them. Roehler, once again, works with 2 actors who I am a bit surprised to see in here (Bauer, Stadlober). He has a tendency of casting popular actors that do not have that much talent really. But as long as they are just in smaller roles, it's fine for me.

Anyway, the premise here is excellent. It was a really interesting time for movies in Germany and, as despicable as propaganda films may be, it's still interesting to watch them and figure out how they could alter people's minds back then. It's a film about a film. But it's also a film about Ferdinand Marian's life around that time. We find out about his wife and how that relationship made things really complicated in every regard. But we also find out about his thought process and how Goebbels basically forced him to accept the role. Still, his doubts were mostly not because he despised the propaganda, but because people would see him as a Jew. Back then films were something entirely different. Audiences thought frequently actors would also personify with their characters in real life, even if that may sound absurd by today's standards. Anyway, all in all, I was pretty disappointed here. This film has not many interesting scenes really and it also drags and should have been kept a lot shorter. They certainly missed a chance here of turning a truly interesting story into an interesting film. I was particularly disappointed by Bleibtreu who offered absolutely nothing as Goebbels here apart from over-the-top face expressions and screaming. This was a disappointing work. Not recommended.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
New Jud Süss strikes a sensitive German nerve in Berlin
Barev201316 November 2014
JUD Süß ("Jew Sweet") was the title of a film commissioned by Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels in 1940, to be made as an anti-Semitic vehicle intended to inflame the German people against the Jews of Germany and set the stage for their extermination. "Jud Süß — Film ohne Gewissen" ("Jud Süß — A Film Without a Conscience") is the title of a new film by ace German director Oskar Roehler, which goes back to 1940 to tell the story behind the making of the most notorious film in German cinema history – which in his own title he calls "A film without a conscience".

The original "Jud Süß" is still considered to be so racist and inflammatory that it is legally banned from public screenings in Germany, and prints of the film can be seen only at rare special screenings for academic personnel under strict supervision, the picture being regarded even now as an an evergreen piece of racist propaganda which might still incite neo-Nazis in Germany to violence against Jews.

Surprisingly this clearly well-intentioned film by a leading German director of liberal persuasion was greeted with boos of hysterical outrage by elements of the German critical establishment at the general press screening. No other competition film this year was booed –clearly a still highly sensitive Germanic nerve was struck. Those who were against the film didn't just dislike it — they HATED it –and surely not on esthetic grounds alone. Jud Süß -Film ohne Gewissen' is essentially a film about a film, and to some extent a film within a film (as extensive portions of the reconstructed original film are shown), which basically follows the rise and fall of the actor Ferdinand Marian, who was forced to play the leading role in Josef Goebbels' fiercely anti-Semitic 1940 film 'Jud Suess'. No cliché goose stepping soldiers are to be seen in this picture which is set among the elite-polite society of the Nazi era, providing an unusual view of the period and the people behind the scenes.

At the very beginning of the film Goebbels (a highly manic but extremely savvy Moritz Bleibtreu )spots Marian at a rehearsal of Shakespeare's "Othello" playing Iago, and concludes that he will be perfect for the title role of his planned anti-Semitic propaganda film Jew Suss. Marian balks fearing the role might actually injure his career, but Goebbels cannot be dissuaded and Marian is compelled into playing the title role of the film which becomes a gigantic hit and makes him an overnight star. However, his beautiful half-Jewish wife (Martina Gedeck) senses danger, and begs him not to return to Germany when they attend the Premiere of the film at the 1940 Venice Film Festival in Italy. (They could go to Casablanca, says she, and from there take a boat to America — shades of Rick's Cafe!) And here, a cute insert –we are informed that the film has been highly praised by a young Italian critic with the remarkable name of "Michelangelo Antonioni"!

Marian does go back to bask in his new found glory, but as the war progresses Jewish wife Dora is carted off to Auschwitz and He finds himself in a position much the same as that of the actor in "Mephisto", who was manipulated by the Nazis against his will to promote the aims of the Third Reich in Hungarian Istvan Szabo's 1981 Oscar winning film of that name. Austrian actor Tobias Morreti, plays Ferdinand Marian much as Klaus Maria Brandauer, also Austrian, played actor Hendrik Hoefgren in Szabo's "Mephisto" -- as a puppet manipulated by the Nazis and finally destroyed by them. Many German critics found Moritz Bleibtreu's Goebbels way too over the top but the actor defended himself saying that this Goebbels was meant to be a satire, not a documentary portrait, and this is precisely what rubbed the Nazi still lurking in the bones of many of these critics the wrong way. ("How dare you make fun of such a key figure of German history!") — I personally found Bleibtreu's Goebbels extremely effective and satirically hypnotic — arguably the best thing he has done to date.

Perhaps another point that didn't go down too well with the hyper-sensitive anti-Nazi German critics, was the fact that Goebbels is presented not as a madman, but as an extremely clever master of propaganda who knew that propaganda has to be subtle in order to be effective. No dummy he the notorious Nazi propaganda minister, and a very canny portrayal by Herr Bleibtreu, indeed one that, in this writers's humble opinion, should have won the Best Actor Silver Bear by a mile.

Katja Nicodemus, main critic of the intellectual German weekly "Die Zeit", came right out and called a Spade a Spade the day after the controversial Press screening saying, "As a German — I am shocked by the reaction of the German press to this film". What all this means in terms of collective German guilt feelings over the role of Germany as Genocide Inc. during WW II is really hard to sum up nicely. There are clearly many Germans still around who would prefer to see the whole thing swept under the carpet, or at least portrayed in a more "savory", documentary manner. Maybe some politically over-correct Germans didn't like the fact that Roehler took the liberty of having his actors sing the banned Nazi anthem "Deutschland Über Alles" in full, at a Christmas party near the beginning of the film — too realistic, nicht wahr? (Und, isn't this supposed to be a VERBOTEN song!) —

One thing that can certainly be said, however, without making any bones about it, is that Oskar Roehler's new film is definitely a film WITH a conscience, about a film with a purely Nazi conscience. And if they don't like that — well, one can only wonder about the Collective Unconscious of the booers.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A fascinating film
discount195724 October 2010
This is a fascinating and gripping film. I heard it was discredited at the Berlin Film Festival, but I cannot understand why. Whoever says it's a bad movie, is some sour critic with a bad taste, and when these are together, they infect one another mutually with their moods (or they think it chic to have this view). Nobody should avoid this film only because of their view of it. Nobody but you yourself knows your taste, and the way in which something enters your mind in the strongest way.

And nobody really knows the details that happened to Ferdinand Marian, the exact words that were said, the exact situations. A historical piece like this is never absolutely correct,the real proceedings are lost to us, and therefore different angles of view are allowed, and should be seen as such. And this one was a very fascinating interpretation, that held me captive until the end. This means especially the view on Goebbels, and I'll never forget the color that Moritz Bleibtreu gave him.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent film about Nazi propaganda!
petarmatic25 November 2013
Why was this film talked against at Berlinale? I find it excellent. It is very interesting story about what happened to actor Marian who acted in Jew Suss. We are still not sure, but I heard that some soldiers of some country who occupied Germany at that time killed him. Nobody is sure.

It is very important to explore Nazi propaganda films, it was an interesting time in the history of film making in Germany at that time. I wished Nazi period never happened, but it did and left a legacy in film making that Germany and UFA should not be proud of.

I would definitely recommend this film for all people who want to know about what happened to film making during Nazi period. We should explore further what happened to the actor Ferdinand Marian.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
useful and brave
myriamlenys14 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The Nazi's produced "Jew Süss", a vile piece of anti-Semitic propaganda. After World War II, the movie was taken out of circulation : as far as I know, showing and distributing the movie is still illegal in Germany and Austria, or at least subject to draconian restrictions. (However, it's a pretty safe bet that there are neonazi's around who keep and venerate an illegal copy, next to a photograph of the Great Guide kissing a darling child with a bouquet of wild flowers.)

"A film without a conscience" tells the story of how and why the "Jew Süss" movie was made. It does so by focusing on the life and times of the actor who played the title role.

When "A film without a conscience" was made, there was a fair amount of controversy : people feared that it would revive interest in "Jew Süss", thus creating a new audience. I understand and respect this position. However, after having seen "Without a conscience" I think that this fear is misplaced, since "Without a conscience" slowly and carefully explains, with admirable didactic clarity, that "Jew Süss" was created as a weapon against the innocent and inoffensive. As a result it's very hard to imagine a sane and decent person watching the credits and saying : "So there's a lying piece of Nazi propaganda out there ? Quick, I want to enjoy it, share it, embrace it ! Or even better, let's watch it with the whole family, so that we can all indoctrinate ourselves. It's high time we became hate-filled fanatics".

Personally I give "Without a conscience" high marks for bravery and usefulness : confronting and condemning the errors of the past is the best way of preventing their come-back.

There are other things to admire about the movie, such as the intelligent dissection of the Nazi propaganda machine : the Nazi's had such a need for industrial-strength propaganda because they told such industrial-strength lies. (But then, how could it be otherwise ? The truth is such a radiantly beautiful maiden that she can afford to show herself in the nude ; the lie is an old prostitute, who needs shawls and feathers and make-up and fur coats in order to hide her sores.) "Without a conscience" also does a good job of capturing the venality and decadence of the Nazi brass : these people may have talked a lot about ancestral virtues and moral rectitude, but they were not averse to mistresses, dirty weekends and casting couches - on the contrary. Give Caligula a blonde rinse and a uniform, and he would have fitted right in.

Finally there is a memorable performance by Mr. Bleibtreu. His Goebbels is deeply, deeply frightening : a coldhearted creature of whim and calculation both, born in order to deal out carrots and sticks and capable of switching from debonair benevolence to vicious threat (or back) in five seconds flat.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"JUD SUSS" Rise and fall, 2010: UNA PELÍCULA DE CONCIENCIA
udimaretriec14 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"Jud Suss, film without conscience", original title, year 2010, German director Oskar Roehler puts us basically to the question of the role of art and the artist, in a crucial historical juncture social, political and time. Is it possible that art is dissociated from the ideological and achieve the premise of "art for art"? I think not and this clearly happens here in this recreation of the circumstances, the process of making and receiving the original film of 1940. The Original Jud Suss, of Veit Harlan, within the framework of the 2nd World War, was fervently praised and applauded by critics and public.Implementada as anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda, in an aesthetic, beautiful and seductive form, such as the film forming thought and values.La film Roehler (2010) also shows the human drama, personal drama, the actor who must embody the role of opportunistic lapidary and climbing Jew, lacking any ethical or moral.Ese actor in the historical reality was Ferdinand Marian (1902-1946) .It leads to the inner conflict of the character, which it becomes a kind of Faust to a Mephistopheles (Goebbels, Nazi minister of propaganda), which has to offer the role of her life, catapulting him to success and fame. The character is not a hero, is an anti-hero and so the film leads us through the process of doubts, questions and misery to fall in most despicable.Film-player turn out to be mirror projection each other: film and its consequences on a massive scale, man / actor before himself, his ethics and family. The performance of the entire cast is very good, to highlight its protagonists: Tobias Moretti as Marian F., Martina Gedeck as Anna, his wife and Moritz Bleibtreu as Goebbels. Identification by spectators and empathy between central character does not occur, it is not intended to be so. Tobias Moretti ("Inspector Rex", "Speer and Er", "Io, Don Giovanni," "The Dark Valley", etc.) Gives an interpretation of many quality.Trained in the theater, seems here to be in it and it does not dislikes. Oskar Roehler with a very good accomplishment and bold poses the rise and fall of a film, which in turn represents the rise and fall of a political regime and in that context, the fullness and sinking of a subject who is also an artist. The originator scene of controversy, achieved its provocative role, shock (though erroneously interpreted by some critics of the Berlinale), then left exposed in all its dimensions, as an allegory, all this decay and human misery of the elite in the middle a world devastated by war.Y finally makes us reflect and gives us a movie with a lot of awareness.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed