Walking with the Enemy (2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
A movie that is entirely not necessary
cfcurrie10 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Walking with the Enemy is a well conceived melodrama that sheds light on issues that Hungary and its Jewish population faced coming into the final year of World War II. But it is not a movie I would recommend. At its heart, it is a movie about a man who loses everything during the Nazi invasion, and goes to incredible risk after stealing a Nazi SS officers' uniform to save many of the Jew's in Budepest. Jonas Armstrong plays Elek Cohan, a fictionalized version Pinchas Tibor Rosenbaum, in a well woven narrative that allows Cohan, and thus the viewer, to experience many of the atrocities the Hungarian Jews experienced. It never delves deep into the politics, but when it briefly does, it employs Ben Kingsley to navigate those issues. But all aspects of this movie are wrought with sentimentality and pierced with careful consideration on how war atrocities are portrayed on screen, leaving a relatively lackluster final product.

As a war movie, there is a sense of nostalgia the creeps into every corner of Walking with the Enemy. This is a double edged sword as it makes the movie a somewhat pleasant watch, but it applies cliché after cliché to tug at our emotions. First, a pet-peeve of mine; This movie relies on a wide variety of poor to non-existent accents instead of just subtitling Hungarian. Perhaps this is because the selection of actors that can both act and speak Hungarian is slim, but it's lazy. Next, the love interest Hannah Schoen (played by Hannah Tointon with no dynamic, just a constant pouty prettiness) is introduced in opening scene and carried to final frame. The courtship manages to be rigidly structured, she is always played off Cohans concerns. I admit I even found it offensive that how the SS uniforms are acquired results from Schoens attempted rape. It's a sexual assault that is both projected and eye-rollingly constructed to allow Cohan to save the girl.

The knavery of the Germans are clear (with the redemption of one, of course), as is the presentment of the home grown Hungarian fascist Arrow Cross party. They all look very stern and act accordingly. Townsfolk take to stealing the houses of relocated Jews as well as take to chasing survivors with fire pokers. The love interest drapes over the hero when a friend dies, reminding him gently He is a hero. Cohan forges on in the face of other survivors defiance, to almost always wins. The orphan plays his part in the end. The final confrontation between Cohan, the Arrow Cross and the SS feels shocking only for a moment, then it loses all its weight.

The cinematography is also less than stellar, as the movie feels small. Locations are filmed tightly, on street level. Its riddled with television production values. The only sweeping scene comes from the allied engagement at the bridge, which is nicely done but still suffers from a level of claustrophobia that stifles the entire film. When the Russians invade in the third act, they feel tunneled, pressing in waves through one single building to the next.

Jonas Armstrong does an excellent job with the material. The script offers him a lot of range and he covers the ground solidly. At times he channels the intensity of Christoph Waltz yet can just as quickly tun heals and invoke the vulnerability of Haley Joel Osment. Its a wonderful performance, and holds the center of this film. Around him, Simon Kunz as Jozsef Greenberg brings a true sense of moral obligation and second-guessed heroism to his character. As the love interest's uncle, Simon Dutton's Miklos Schoen manages to steal every scene despite his one dimensional character. He is also center to two of the more interesting directoral decisions. Schmits chooses to fade out during a discussion on how to handle the orphaned child, as it seems he is at a loss to add another emotion level to this Schoen. The second is how Schmidt choose to resolve Miklos Schoen's arc. It feels more frustrating and out of step than any other death in the movie.

Shane Taylor is a surprising scene stealer, playing the son of Kingsleys Regent Horty. As a member of the Hungarian Regency government, he stands shoulder to shoulder with his father to save the country in a what is portrayed as politically impossible situation. Ben Kingsley does do a decent turn in his role, but he is not given lot of screen time, so he never develops a compelling presence. It should be noted that the Regency Government, through father and son, are played quite sympathetically to their situation with the Nazi's. The viewer is given the impression that it is only in the twilight hours of the war that Hungary were forced to deal with the Nazis, as it is hardly beneficial to screenwriter Kenny Golde's narrative that Hungary had been an ally of the Axis and profiteers of Nazi power since the late thirties.

By and large this is a film that hints Mark Schmidt can direct. It certainly shows that Jonas Armstrong can act. Its a shame he displays these chops in a movie that is so pedestrian. Golde's screen writing is riddled with cliché, but he can look forward to a career writing Lifetime movies. I have serious questions as to why it was decided to fictionalize Rosenbaum to such an extent. While it is nice to have a film that explores Hungary's involvement in WWII, changing significance elements (such as, Rosenbaum stole Arrow Cross uniforms to save fellow Jews) wouldn't be necessary to a better writer. And the final scene is a faux tear-jerker of the worst variety. While it is always important to reflect on the horrors of WWII and the Holocaust, this crew decided to rehash too many tropes done better and with more impact in earlier films.
25 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Horrors of the Arrow Cross Terror
lavatch26 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Inspired by a true story, "Walking with the Enemy" relates the horror of the deaths of 500,000 Jews in Hungary in the final year of World War II. The film's focus is on the attempt made by Pinchas Rosenbaum and a close friend to impersonate Nazi officers in order to save Hungarian Jews from certain death.

In the film, Rosenbaum's character is the fictionalized Elek Cohen, whose daring raids while in disguise as a Nazi officer rescued Hungarian Jews in the process of deportation to the death camps. While the film was earnest in the depiction of the brutal killings and mass deportations, the scenes of impersonation were not very credible, especially when Elek would simply show up on the scene and assume command of other Nazi officers.

Another shortcoming of the film was in the depiction of Regent Milos Horthy, on whose watch hundreds of thousands of Jews perished. As played by the actor Ben Kingsley, the filmmakers made Horthy a one-dimensional character, assigning the decision-making process more completely to Ferenc Szalasi, the chairman of the Arrow Cross party.

The historical Milos Horthy required a much more nuanced approach. After Horthy caved in to pressure from the Germans and a puppet government was installed in Hungary, the Germans moved with lightning-fast speed to round up and deport nearly 300,000 Hungarian Jews in less than three months in the spring of 1944. When Horthy finally ordered the deportations to cease one month later, 437,402 Hungarian Jews had been transported to the gas chambers. This sequence of events was radically compressed and far too vague, as depicted in the film.

One of the most interesting characters in the film was that of the Swiss envoy Carl Lutz, who made the courageous attempt to rescue Jews by giving them false Swiss visas. The efforts of Lutz and Rosenbaum were indeed heroic and were well-presented in the film. But the epilogue that moved the action forward to New York in the year 1980 seemed too tidy and romanticized in contrast to the visceral content of the film. "Walking with the Enemy" was nonetheless successful in dramatizing an important yet often untold story of the World War II and the Holocaust.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Noble Effort
mojoguzzi-879-6849824 July 2017
If you enjoy movies about WW2 or the Holocaust then you might find enough in this movie to make it worthwhile. It's a bit schizophrenic. Luckily the good parts outweigh the bad.

There's plenty of wartime action and suspense, and for the most part it's fairly well directed. It's the personal dramatic parts that occasionally fall flat, usually dragged down by some expository dialog that might as well have the actors holding up signs that read "here's a little bit of the history." Ben Kingsley's first appearance in the film is a good example. His hairpiece looks great but he delivers an uncharacteristically leaden balloon as he "converses" about the situation in his country. In his later scenes he's excellent.

The coda offers an equally clunky wrap-up of the story. It also left me scratching my head, wondering why -- since they acknowledge at this late point that it's based on a true life hero -- why they didn't just make it about that person. Was it perhaps a literary rights issue? If so, why bother mentioning the real person at all?

The direction and editing are also uneven, generally good but occasionally terrible. The big action or suspense scenes are very effectively staged and edited, but the "fade to black" transitions at times are more appropriate for a TV movie needing to break for a commercial than for an (alleged) 80 million epic.

And while the costumes and hairstyles are generally authentic, the lead actor's hair and the little boy's are way too modern, a constant reminder that we're watching a movie and these are only actors playing a role. If the whole story didn't depend on the lead passing himself off as a Nazi soldier, his millennial 'do might have passed muster. Note to future filmmakers: if directing a period piece, check out some old stock footage or paintings to make sure your hair department is on the ball... and don't hire actors who refuse to cut their precious locks.

Don't expect The Pianist or Saving Private Ryan but it's also far from the disaster some of the reviewers here report.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A good film, but with some flaws
peterich-7563411 September 2020
Based on true story, 'Walking with the Enemy' is a gripping tale of WW II Hungary. However, a couple of characterisations seem awry. In the first place, Otto Skorzeny is turned into a nasty Adolf Eichmann type character, when he was in fact a combat commando who was acquitted of war crimes charges. Also, Ben Kingsley's portrayal of Regent Horthy is probably too noble - Horthy may have been basically decent, but he was also opportunistic, particularly in the earlier stages of the war. .
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good, watchable WW II movie
geohaber-218 July 2017
Film critics and too many ordinary movie goers have been much too hard on this film, which comes across as an exciting--if at times unbelievable-- tale of an ordinary Jew trying almost single-handedly to wage a losing war against the Nazis and their partners in genocide, the Arrow Cross (Hungarian Nazis.) It's a fast-paced film that war movie lovers will definitely enjoy. If you're looking for Gone With The Wind, you took out the wrong flic!
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Important Story of Resistance
ETO_Buff13 September 2018
Early in the film, resistance fighter Cohen (Jonas Armstrong) and one of his friends have the opportunity to steal a German officer's uniform to enable Cohen to infiltrate areas that he would not normally be able to go. It's actually a concentration camp guard uniform, because it has the insignia of the SS-Totenkopfverbände (Death's Head Units - the administrators of the concentration camps), which ALL German WWII officers wore according to many film and TV producers. The film itself has the feeling of a made-for-TV-movie, but IMDb doesn't give any indication of that being the case. There are places with clear demarcation between acts, as if to enable commercials to be inserted for television. Additionally, I'm used to watching Jonas Armstrong in the BBC series "Robin Hood". Armstrong maintains two to four days of beard growth throughout the film, including when he is wearing the SS uniform, even though the SS were required to be clean-shaven daily, and maintained a high standard of grooming and appearance. I'm guessing that the filmmakers are counting on the vast majority of people not knowing that so Armstrong can use his "rugged good looks" to help win us over, in case we weren't already on his side as the film's hero and Nazi fighter. That's probably also why his hair was longer than the SS would have allowed. The film is based on the true story of Pinchas Tibor Rosenbaum. The film's producers must have felt that a name like Elek Cohen would be a little easier for us goyim to handle than Pinchas Rosenbaum. It's a well-produced film, other than Armstrong's grooming, and an important World War II story about resistance to the Germans. I recommend it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good Idea But Not a Great Movie
lorisloan16 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I really like movies about WW2 Europe because I am fascinated by lack compassion the Nazis had... that they couldn't see the Jews as people. That having been said, the story line is great... Ben Kingsley is in it... it would have to be a good movie, right? Nope. Ben isn't in it too much and a lot of the acting seemed over the top to me. It isn't always clear what is going on... the accents are thick and at least for me, hard to understand. Also, everyone looks a bit too clean... I mean, none of it is in a concentration camp, but they still look a little too pulled together. It wasn't a horrible movie... just not great. I almost paid $4 to watch it on Amazon, but I thought to check to see if my library had it, and they did, so I saw it for free. If I'd had to pay for it, I would have given it a much lower rating.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Compelling Story
emailme01525 April 2014
Walking with the Enemy is a gripping tale of a horrible time in history. This emotionally wrenching movie is a unique re-telling of a real life story. I recommend watching this movie but caution you, if you do watch the film, please make sure you have plenty of Kleenex on hand to wipe away the tears you are sure to shed. This movie was interesting because it reveals the courage it took to impersonate a Nazi in order to save the lives of innocent people. It is sad to think of the heartache people had to live through and the lives that were lost due to demonic acts of inhumanity committed because of hate and a false sense of importance.
33 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
great story, poor execution
swbaw7 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Melodramatic, historically inaccurate to the degree of slapstick comedy.

Not even the participation of venerable Sir Ben Kingsley could pull that one out of the mug.

The story and setting is fascinating and has not been covered extensively. Hungary is attempting to switch sides as the impending doom can no longer be ignored. Hungarian Regent Admiral Horthy turns his back on Hitler and secretly negotiates a surrender to Russia in exchange for being spared large scale destruction.

Hungary's alliance with Germany has so far spared some of it's Jewish population and until this point somewhat protected them from large scale deportations.

When Hitler learns of the impending "defection" of his Hungarian Ally he sends one of his most capable Special Forces Commanders (Otto Skorzeny) to Budapest in an attempt to prevent Hungary's departure from the Axis.

Skorzeny, that has won fame with his daring raid to free Mussolini from his mountain prison, true to his reputation manages to kidnap Horthy's son Miklos and uses him to successfully blackmail Horthy into staying put.

Hungary remains in the Axis, however Hitler makes sure that continues to be the case by sending German contingents to secure Budapest.

Horthy abdicates and goes into exile. Without his protection the Jews of Hungary now become subject to Eichmann's "Amt IV" (office handling Jewish affairs) and subsequently lead to mass deportations to various concentration camps.

Acts of heroism of the Hungarians saved many a life during that time period and with the Russians bearing down on Budapest the deportations eventually cease and Himmler actually begins negotiating with the Red Cross.

So you can see the historical setting and dramatic events lend themselves for compelling storytelling but "Walking with the Enemy" fails on virtually every "front".

The major historic characters involved then are shown and turned into caricatures. The usual stereotypical stiff, evil and inhuman template is applied to all Germans involved, the real personas completely ignored.

Haircuts are atrocious, uniforms while overall not bad looking are worn incorrect (peaked caps pulled down over the wearers ears good god) with conflicting rank insignia and major front line awards galore on SS-Soldiers doing policing work for local SD (the SS internal and external security service) administrations (who were lucky to have earned a sports proficiency badge).

A combination of brutality and ineptitude in the depiction of German forces which belie the complex struggles of anybody that opposed them and insults the super human efforts of the Allies to defeat them.

The brilliant (and bloodless) operation of Skorzeny (the depiction of Skorzeny himself, a man with considerable intelligence and charisma, couldn't be further from the truth) is depicted as a raw, mindless and brutal takeover when it was anything but.

NOTE to directors/producers/writers: Depicting war criminals in a human light, showing that they are people and not mindless killing machines, makes them all the more terrifying! The narrative and dialogue overall is cheesy and unrealistic and reminiscent of a badly made soap opera.

They had all the tools, great locations, access to (halfway) accurate vehicles, uniforms and weaponry, a number of accomplished actors and decent special effects and they wasted them all.

Not a tribute to history or the agonizing journey of the Jewish People during the Third Reich.
21 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Loved this movie but it has some flaws
lpatterson8311 November 2013
I loved this movie, loved the story, though the lead was great. I was pleased with the rest of the cast, they were all good, and Ben Kingsley, is always amazing.

I liked learning a bit more about the history of what happened in Hungary and Austria and their relationship with the Natzi's and Russians.

The story was captivating, exciting thought at points seemed to be a bit of a stretch, as if it were too embellished and had gone 'too Hollywood'.

This is a highly polished movie, and while that should not be a criticism, it is allegedly and indie film. Someone or group has highly funded this movie to push it through. It will be in theaters in a few months as it has been scooped up for distribution.

It's not your typical hollocaust, it has a very different story, but be prepared for the usual graphic depiction of the horrors of war.
39 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A disaster
fendy636 June 2020
Living in Hungary, I wondered what Hollywood had created about my country's history, making it in Romania! Well, they created a disaster. The characters are always calling each other's name, sometimes three times within a minute, just like in poor South-American soap operas. The Hungarian soldiers seem to wear Romanian uniform! When the Germans invade Hungary, they parade with Russian T-34 tanks! The hictorical facts are raped for the sake of making this movie. For example, military labour service for Jews is announced on posters, but in reality they were offically drafted. or the certificate of baptism is printed in English too in a small town in Hungary in '44 or they portray the deportation of the Jews from the countryside as if they had taken men to work camps first so they could depart women and children more easily, which is nonsense as all of them were transported to Nazi lagers. They show Skorzeny (probably because he had an ugly scar on his face) calling on Governor Horthy in the summer of '44 along with a Nazi-symphatizer Hungarian politician, Ferenc Szálasi, which is also nonsense because Skorzeny was a leader of a German comando which kidnapped Horthy's son in October.

The list could go on. All I feel sorry for is the waste of my time and Ben Kingsley.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Walking with the Enemy
simon-950-87106517 March 2014
I was captivated from beginning to the end with Walking with the Enemy--Although it clearly shows the horrors of the Holocaust taking place in Hungary, it also is a true story of hope and is ultimately a hero's journey. For this reason, it had me cheering until the end. Far too few films about the Holocaust focus on the Jewish resistance--kudos to the producers who carve out a place for one of these Jewish heroes in the history of the Holocaust. This is a true story of a young Jew brave enough to stand against Hitler's horror machine by dressing as a Nazi SS officer, rescuing men, women and children from extermination. The film opened my eyes to this little known fact --there were some Jews who stood strong against evil. What an incredible story and tribute to an amazing young man. The editing and storytelling were seamless which made the film both entertaining and yet meaningful. The cinematography was excellent. Although painful to watch, Walking with the Enemy finds a balance between hope and the truth of horror. The ending brought tears to my eyes, wow..brilliant..a slice of life story of the Holocaust I otherwise wouldn't know about. Overall , I recommend this film to a wide audience from 18-64, men and women interested in a story about an unsung hero.
39 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unbelievably Bad movie -an $80 million waste
c185772419 December 2014
It is hard to believe that Mark Schmitt spent $80 million making this pathetically inadequate piece of film-making. According to the film's website this is what he spent (wasted). It is evident from the website that this movie was a vanity movie given all the attention on where various family members appeared in the movie. From what I have heard from the industry the movie was already in the can when they decided to add Ben Kingsley to try and save it. This explains the disjointed flow. The dialog is worthy of a high school junior. The good reviews can only have come from family members and friends. Now this is the kind of movie that the North Korean's should keep out of the movie houses
14 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent!
lynnette-3-75640218 August 2017
A powerful retelling of a time in history where standing up for what was right often meant sacrificing your life. The acting was excellent, the lead of which Jonas Armstrong carried off brilliantly. I tried to see this in the theaters but my local theater only showed it for a couple days. By the time I heard it was playing and got there they were no longer playing it. Too bad because we need more movies like this in our theaters. If you haven't watched it, do so. It's a very touching movie about the value of all human life.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible Film
e520147 February 2014
I'm usually a big fan of World War II movies since my grandparents were killed in the Shoah, but this film offered nothing but disappointment.

The plot was extremely disjointed and it hardly told a coherent narrative, nearly everyone I watched it with was extremely confused throughout the movie. But, he plot wasn't the only issue, I expect movies about the Shoah to be historically accurate, but this was about 80% fiction with only minor fragments of truth here and there.

I would honestly say that the low quality of this film is an insult to the 6.5 Million Jews murdered by Adolf Hitler. The producers should be ashamed of themselves.
33 out of 130 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
no punches withheld about a cruelty and the courage to defy it
kimbleperry12 September 2021
The film brought an unknown narrative of Jewish resistance in a country with a checkered history of political alliances to public awareness. The shift from the Jewish being integrated in a liberal way to the unexpected invasion by German troops was shocking. The human interest narratives were compelling, including how the smallest of gestures could turn into disaster or salvation. We saw this on TV, so seamlessness is not easily evaluated. Some of the scenes were big and, i believe, purposefully overwhelming, as one would be if caught in the middle. This film is worth the time, ready to inform us of what we really do not want to know about WWII. Not for the faint of heart.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
What other liberties have been taken?
gcoregistrar30 May 2018
I only watched about 20 minutes of the movie, before I finally quit. Why is it that directors and producers take such care with costumes and with women's hairstyles, then botch the whole thing up by having the men wear 21st century haircuts? The only men who had long hair in the 1930s and 1940s were those who were in no condition to do something about it, like those in concentration camps and in prison. Men did not wear long hair, did not wear their hair thick on their necks, and not touching their collars. But I see it time after time in modern WWII movies. Just look at photos from that period.
6 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very interesting true story about heroic Hungarian Jews in WW2
phd_travel3 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
It's not that often there is a victorious movie about resistance in the Holocaust so it's quite a change to watch this well made and clearly written exciting true story. Just when you think there were no more interesting movies to be made about the Holocaust. The story is sometimes so hard to believe it has to be true. A Hungarian Jew disguises himself as a Nazi officer to help save Jews. His story from student to labor camp escapee to undercover fighter who saves many people is an engrossing tale of heroism and audacity.

The story of Hungary in World War II isn't that often shown on screen so it's interesting to see how they went from one side to the other. Ben Kingsley plays the Regent of Hungary at the time and is portrayed sympathetically as being caught between a rock and a hard place. The movie clearly shows the role of the pivotal bad Germans and Hungarians and their fates.

The cast apart from Ben Kingsley isn't that well known which makes them all the more convincing and they are all quite good. Unlike Defiance where there was James Bond acting as a partisan - the actors here look right for their roles. The production values are high and the locations and battles look quite good especially considering it wasn't a very big budget movie.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Jolly good yarn - very exciting
phd_travel22 August 2018
This is an exciting action WW2 movie based on real events, some of which feel too unbelievable to be have happened. A Jewish Hungarian escapes a labour camp and wears a dead Nazi uniform to rescue many Jews. The action is gripping without being too over the top. The actors are all very suited to their parts and act well. The production isn't cheap either.

Interesting look at what happened to Hungary during the last year of the war.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Compelling
loveallnations16 September 2017
Not having any connection with Hungary I never knew of its history during WW2, though I did know that thousands of Hungarian Jews and Roma were murdered by the Nazis. So this was very interesting to me from a historical perspective. This story is from a real-life hero, a Hungarian Jew whose courage -chutzpah - saved hundreds of his own people. There are many other heroes, the Catholic priests who forged baptismal certificates; the nuns whose convent sheltered Jewish children, the Swiss diplomats, and ordinary people willing to befriend their Jewish neighbors. Unfortunately, we also see the worst of human nature. I found it very compelling. Giving it a 10 because the film makers wove the politics of Hungary into the story, perhaps recognizing that unlike war movies about France or Italy, people needed to be told what was going on at the Government level in Hungary during the War. After the War it was closed to Western eyes and therefore not many stories of resistance came out of it. It could have been very confusing trying to figure out the moves by those in power, particularly the delicate balancing act of the Regent as he tried to protect Hungary and her people, all of them, from bloodshed.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Story
Lwhite-2416 September 2017
Although the film has some weaknesses, I found it worthwhile to watch. The history of Hungary in World War II is not often told and this film helps to understand that history and document the war crimes committed there.

My only comment is a casting error. Although I like Burn Gorham as an actor, he (5'9") should not have been cast to play the 6'3" Skorzeny.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant cast, great film, but very poignant. Two Thumbs up, Way up.
KATO-SUBZERO22 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Saturday, 21 November 2015: Today, I went to see a period war movie titled "Walking With the Enemy". The entire movie is wonderful and the cast of good and evil characters are excellent. I wonder why this movie is not in more theaters instead of just a select few in way out of the city places.

This movie reminds me of "Shindler's List" and the role of the young hero is liken to Liam Neeson's role in Shindler's List. The movie is great from start to finish, but it is also very poignant story to watch the horrible mistreatment of beatings and cold blooded murder by a race of people so full of hate.

I watched so many sad scenes of horrible abuse such mid way into the film, the Nazi German soldiers tell three Jewish women that they are not allowed to have a radio in their homes. They take it from the women and then tell the women they are free to go.

The women sadly walk away and then like someone taking a drink of water, these women are shot dead in the back without even a flinch by the German Nazi soldiers. This is the same way African slaves were treated in America, just shot dead like someone taking a puff of a cigarette.

No race of human beings deserve to be mistreated so badly, but Satan and hatred brings out the worst in people and God, El Shaddai, Elohim Always brings out love and good in people. This is why in the Holy Bible it says that "satan comes to kill, steal and destroy, but God and Yeshua have come to give life and life more abundantly." "Racism and hate is something kids are taught, not something they are born with."

This very sad to watch the same way as it was for me to watch the mini series "Roots" many years ago of the horrible abuse and murder of African Black Americans or the same way as Jesus Christ / Yeshua was beaten and killed on a cross in the movie "Passion Of Christ".

There has Always been good and bad in all human races. Case in point there is one Nazi soldier that does not kill Jews, but he actually helps them. There were Caucasian White people who helped Black Americans escape slavery many years ago.

I give this movie two thumbs up, way up high. The lead actor deserves to nominated for an award.
4 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
WALKING WITH THE ENEMY
magical-kingdom4 September 2020
Such an incredible accounting based on a unique true story and tribute to an amazing, courageous young man brave enough to stand against Hitler's horrible killing machine by impersonating a Nazi SS officer in order to save the lives of innocent people. Rescuing thousands of men, women and children from extermination. A powerful time in history when protecting other's often meant sacrificing your own life. So very sad to think of the suffering and heartache people had to endure due to such inhumane acts committed because of hate, desire for importance and world denomination. Gripping horrible time in history. Excellent acting by entire cast. Brilliant performance by lead actor Jonas Armstrong.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Ungarian Schindler
GianfrancoSpada3 August 2023
From a cinematic standpoint, it is undoubtedly an excellent production that spares no resources in staging all the necessary elements for the proper development of the plot.

Certainly, it is also true that this is a cinematic fiction, and as in any fiction, some characters may not be portrayed entirely faithfully. I think, for example, of that cunning character Otto Skorzeny in roles that are probably not entirely faithful.

These and other small liberties, which are clearly of a narrative nature and serve to make the storytelling more fluid and comprehensible, should not be perceived as historical errors and therefore invalidating. In such a complex production, it is nearly impossible for every minute detail to be kept under control, and sometimes, even with the intention and the necessary means, it proves impossible to have accurate military vehicles for the events being narrated.

It's evident that the film Schindler's List opened up a narrative vein that is easy and convenient to explore, but in this case, despite the underlying story being akin to that of the Hungarian Schindler, the events of a series of characters are actually recounted, enriching the narrative. The result is a portrayal that is more or less faithful, more or less debatable, of a Hungary under Nazi occupation and the consequent "liberation" by the Russians.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great Storyline But...
tylertubisjr31 July 2023
I think the movie has its own potential, Storyline alone is great but it is mostly touched by persons outside of its own country of origin thus making the film lesser accurate, let the people from their own country of origin create a biopic for their own country, either way the acting is great just a little bit more german language should been showed whenever thet will talk to a nazi soldier thus making it more believable, sometimes i felt confused for the flow of situation maybe im not familiar with the history or its just over mixed with romatic fillers throughout the movie, still the movie is great and enjoyable..
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed