Mandrake (TV Movie 2010) Poster

(2010 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Better than most syfy productions, but not saying much
TheLittleSongbird13 April 2011
As far as these syfy movies, which range from adequate to terrible, go this is better than most. It does have an intriguing premise, and starts off very well. And for a syfy movie it actually looks quite good, with the scenery quite nice, the photography not looking completely slip-shod and the monster creepy-looking and giving an adequate sense of menace. As for the attacks, two or three were nail-biting and quite gory, but some of them are quite tame.

Despite the cool premise and twenty-five minutes of genuine atmosphere, Mandrake quickly becomes repetitive and predictable. The dialogue is fairly unimpressive mostly, with a number of cheesy moments that never ring true, and the direction while better than you would expect is patchy particularly towards the end where the film unravels in credibility. The film's pace is uneven, the beginning is very well-paced, but some of the middle drag and the end feels rushed. I didn't find myself connecting to any of Mandrake's characters, and in all honesty I don't think the actors did either.

In conclusion, better than expected but that's not saying very much. 4/10 Bethany Cox
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pretty good...but not scary
miraquin10 December 2011
Mandrake is about an expedition group funded by a very rich guy named Henry to retrieve a dagger...little do they know...a great evil lurks in the jungle!!

The film was surprisingly good...the acting was decent...CG was bearable and the storyline was original. It isn't your typical syfy for those reasons I'd say.

Although it was an above average syfy type movie...I found it not the least bit scary...maybe one or two parts during the film stood out for "frightening" but, other then it was somewhat boring.

The movie was also very predictable. What you think would happen...happens. So at times it would become hard to watch and hard to get into the movie.

All in all, it was not a total bust because the monster was original and the acting was pretty good. But other then that it's your typical syfy predictable not scary film.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Jungle Feeds on the Blood of Invaders
claudio_carvalho15 September 2012
In a fictitious Latin American country, the soldier of fortune Sgt. McCall (Max Martini) leads the Vargas Expedition sponsored by the powerful Harry Vargas (Benito Martinez) and formed by the archaeologists Dr. Felicia (Betsy Russell) and Lin (Wayne Pere); the local Santiago Zavala (Nick Gomez) and a baggage carrier through the jungle. In the base, Carla Manning (Jon Mack) gives support to McCall's team and is the liaison with Harry, who is obsessed for a dagger.

When they reach a tomb facing south in a sacred ground, they open the tomb and finds a dagger with a ruby craved in a skeleton and Lin removes weapon from the grave, accomplishing the objective of their assignment. Dr. Felicia advises them that the tomb has a warning advising to not remove the dagger. Soon they discover that nature and the Yamballi tribe are chasing them; further, the previous expedition sent to the forest to retrieve the dagger has been slaughtered.

"Mandrake" is a TV movie released in Brazil on DVD. The story is absolutely predictable and the adventure of the expeditionary team is not scary. In the end, watching this film was a waste of time in a Saturday afternoon. Better off if I had taken a nap. My vote is three.

Title (Brazil): "A Raiz do Mal" ("The Root of the Evil")
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than Average Production Values Don't save this turkey
elliott7821213 September 2010
I wanted to like this movie, filmed in Shreveport, La. including a better cast than some of these SyFy movies have, but NO. Andre Stevens of Dallas fame and b-movie star produced this film it has some good special FX, and production values, yet the script never works, the actors never capture their characters. Watch it you sit thru the whole thing thinking wow this looks better than most Saturday Night flicks, even the monster is fairly cool looking, and when its over you'll think what happened to my last two hours. The actor from the Unit isn't bad but you just can't seem to connect to anyone in the film. A few inventive moments nothing more.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Barely watchable, but watchable.
krachtm28 February 2011
The beginning of this made-for-Siffy movie starts out with a lot of promise, as far as Siffy Original movies go. The production values are high (comparatively speaking), the acting is good, the sound is synchronized with the video, there aren't any glaring, amateurish CGI effects, and the actors' names may tug at long-forgotten memories of low-budget movies you've seen in the past. Usually, in the first two minutes, I can tell if made-for-TV movies are worth watching or not, and, frankly, most of them aren't. The production values and special effects maintain their comparatively high standards (approaching the quality of a ST:TNG episode), but the acting, directing, and, especially, story end up dragging down the score substantially. I can't really blame the actors, because their characters were written to be really stereotypical, barely-developed fodder for CGI monsters. There isn't much you can do with that. I'm not sure how much of the blame lies on the director, either, because he, too, probably did the best he could with the material he was given. How do you make a movie about a CGI monster that hunts down a ruthless CEO and his nameless mercenaries, without it becoming one huge, boring cliché? I'm surprised the CEO didn't try to personally burn down the Amazon rain forest just for laughs, like a Captain Planet villain. Seriously, this movie is a live-action Captain Planet episode, with the same heavy-handed moralizing and 2D villains.

Oh well. With a better script, maybe this movie could have been good, but it's still watchable. Barely.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
mediocre SyFy flick
trashgang24 April 2012
After have seen a production from The Asylum, The Terminators, it was back again time to see a SyFy production. If you ever have seen a SyFy flick you will never forget it because they are mostly really bad. This one here was an average flick but again the cheap CGI teared it down.

As always the beginning is rather good and I thought, hell, this is going to be something in the Predator genre. But no, once the creature attacks it's just cheap CGI. The whole cocoon scene looked promising but of course they always did the killings off-camera. You do see some blood splattering here and there but it is never that frightening. Overall it looked like a flick to watch with the family on a Saturday night.

But this time they added a big name on the list, Max Martini from The Unit. The second main lead was by Betsy Russell, another big name from the Saw franchise but I was never involved with their characters. I couldn't care less if they were hurt or going to die. Storywise it was also a bit simple and you could see clearly what was going on.

I have seen worse, especially from SyFy but still, not a good movie.

Gore 1/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 0/5
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The very definition of 'low budget'
bowmanblue2 October 2014
This film opens with a woman running through woods (being chased by a mainly unseen being). This is never a good sign. If you've watched pretty much any handful of random horror films, you'll know that 'woman running through woods' is possibly the most overused cliché of the genre (with perhaps the teenagers having sex and dying being a close second).

That opening is a kind of warning of things to come. Some films thrive on having a low budget. The lack of money behind the picture forces the film-makers to use new and more subtle techniques to tell the story. Not here. This film has no budget and it shows in every scene.

It's about a team of archaeologists, sent somewhere in South America (like the location really matters!) to retrieve something for someone (again, such details are kind of pointless in the scheme of things). However, this 'South American' jungle looks suspiciously like some nice grassy fields in America. Plus the 'natives' also look a little Caucasian, considering they are supposed to have lived in the hot jungle all their lives.

The acting isn't all bad, but the dialogue is. Just because the film is set in a wood (sorry, jungle), the writers seem to want to make the characters talk like they're out of Predator. Yes, there's something hunting them, but whereas Predator used a monster that was actually there, the makers of Mandrake spent the entire $2.50 budget on some 'creepy' CGI tentacles. Woo.

If you like cheesy monster-munching movies, then you probably know plenty out there which will amuse and entertain (try things like Deep Rising, Tremors, or Grabbers to name but a few). Mandrake is not one of them.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Who keeps watching these Sy-Sy Channel creatures features? Besides me.
poolandrews11 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Mandrake is set in the hostile jungles of deep South America where a team paid for by rich businessman Harry Vargas (Benito Martinez) has orders to locate & take a centuries old dagger from an ancient burial ground. Soldier for hire McCall (Max Martini) is the brawn while shapely archaeologist Felicia (Betsy Russell), the small team of explorers find the burial ground, find the dagger & remove it from a pile of old bones. Straight away things go to pot, they are attacked by a local tribe who believe that dagger should not be removed from it's rightful resting place & a huge tree monster who has been released from it's banishment once the dagger had been removed. Stuck in an isolated jungle with a huge tree monster after them the explorers find themselves easy prey & soon the survivors realise that the only way they will live to see civilisation again is to send the tree monster back from where it came...

Edited, co-written & directed by Tripp Reed this is yet another made for television Sy-Fy Channel creature feature, personally I am getting sick of them as usually they are terrible but I suppose I can watch them for free on television so it evens itself out a bit. Hey, I said a bit. Well, someone must still be watching these things otherwise they wouldn't get made, would they? Having said all that I suppose Mandrake isn't as bad as some of the crap the Sy-Fy Channel show, I suppose the monsters which is a possessed tree monster is a bit different & there aren't quite as many dumb moments here as one might expect. I mean even all the mobile phones, radios, communications equipment & GPS locator's work throughout which is maybe a first. The reason for our heroes to go back into the jungle to save missing friends & the idea of sticking together rather than splitting up is reasonable enough motivation although it's harder to understand why the rich Vargas would risk his life in search of this dagger, he goes into the jungle himself only a few days after the previous expedition was slaughtered. Look, everything is alright, the character's are alright, the plot about ancient curses, treasure hunts & tree monsters is alright if undemanding & predictable & even the special effects are alright but I can't really muster up any more enthusiasm for Mandrake other to to simply say it's alright & not as bad as I expected but that's not really that much praise. At just over 80 odd minutes long Mandrake moves along at a decent pace, is never flat out boring & doesn't outstay it's welcome.

To be fair the tree monster made up of trees, branches, vines & roots looks quite good & is something a bit different from the giant animal/insect/fish films the Sy-Fy Channel usually churn out. The CGI computer effects won't exactly impress anyone but they aren't too bad either although why doesn't the tree monster attack people using all of it's vines & roots rather than just a single one while the other's uselessly just wave in the air in the background? There's a bit of gore, the tree monster impales a few people with it's root & vine tentacles, someone is ripped in half & a pair of severed hands are seen but overall most of the attacks are fairly tame.

Filmed in Shreveport in Louisiana the locations look more like woods rather than deep jungle & I half kept expecting to see some houses or a road in the background. The acting is OK if not particularly special.

Mandrake is a slightly better than usual Sy-Fy Channel creature feature which isn't really saying that much to be honest, it's a passable time waster & nothing more.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"If it's got a heartbeat I can kill it"
hwg1957-102-26570427 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The dialogue in 'Mandrake' is hilariously bad which means you can never take any of the characters seriously. I presume it wasn't written by a ten year old, but one suspects it may have been. The characters themselves are thin cardboard cut-outs and none of them are likeable from the start, or throughout. None of the cast stand out except for Wanetah Walmsley as 'Red Woman' who was creepy without saying a word. The movie is mainly people running around woods in Louisiana (laughably supposed to be a South American jungle) and shouting and shooting a lot. The film was about a dagger with some '-ologists' after it and a hidden tribe and a tree monster thrown in. Did like the CGI tree monster when it was fully revealed and the sound scape had eerie moments in the background. A dull movie nevertheless.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Never get too impressed with the cover picture. But not a worst movie...
PentagonDark23 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This movie reminded me again that never be too impressed with the cover photo of a movie. You may expect much more from cover pic. But about this movie, just don't expect much. You may not if you see the rating. But it not too bad at all.

Also the movie name is much much big crazy. "Mandrake", it is so weird. but never mind. The name has no role in this movie. It is not even mentioned anywhere. Just watch the movie with some potato chips. Thats it.

There is nothing much to explain in this movie. The Jungle Feeds on the Blood of Invaders. Sound little crazy, isn't it? The jungle is alive. Yep. the trees are alive and they catch human and eat them.

Some expedition team goes to dig a family heir and realizes that the jungle is alive and well connected to the dagger, which why they are here. the forest goes totally crazy when the dagger is pulled out from dead body buried separately in a tomb.

And the natives shows up and kill the team members. Few survives and realizes that stab the dagger through the heart of an invader is the only way to stop the jungle.

And they stab the sponsor( the so called villain) and escape from the jungle.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Evil Treebeard
nogodnomasters28 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
There really isn't a mandrake in the story. There is a plant that kills people, a cross between Treebeard and that thing on "Evil Dead." A rich man sends out a team to recover a dagger, a family heirloom that is 500 years old. They are able to find the grave and the dagger easily. Upon removing the dagger they release a curse which includes an evil tree creature. There are also natives in this area that sacrifice trespassers. Everyone fights everyone.

Betsy Russell provides the token eye candy in this made for TV movie. Some blood, some killing, a little horror. No bad language, sex, or nudity. Great movie to let the kids watch before going out on the nature trail. Otherwise, you might want to avoid.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than expected with a few minor flaws
kannibalcorpsegrinder11 October 2017
Sent into the jungle to find a long-lost Spanish treasure, a rescue team finds that it's tied into a supernatural creature intent on wreaking havoc in retaliation for its disturbance and forcing them to battle both its human guardians and the creature itself to get away alive.

This wasn't a bad film at all, but one that could use a lot of work. What really works here is the film's typically high-energy scenes which are usually found in the Sci-Fi Channel features which are in this one pretty frequently. The opening chase through the underbrush gets this one going nicely with a rather thrilling moment, the resurrection of the creature at the tomb is incredibly effective as the cracking trees and vines gives this a great start to the frantic battling of the tribe who come out of the jungle or the stalking scene where the team gets wiped out by the jungle vines who take care of the troops in a rather great scene really giving this one a really nice amount of action. Likewise, other really great action parts come off with even more involved scenes here including the scenes of the captured group in their village which is quite different from the creature feature style action of the other scenes by going for the creepiness of the tribes' primitive look and strange customs in their preparations and the ceremony with the sacrificial altar for the beast to take advantage, as combined with their exotic look which makes them quite creepy looking which is all counterbalanced by the cheesy action when the creature's on-screen, which isn't that often. That comes into great play in the finale where it's quite a fun ride getting some really fun and energetic brawling as the tribe's stalking and encounters in the jungle lead this into the big final battle that occurs here, and along with the creative finish it's got a rousing final half. The other big part to this, in that the creature's design is cool and unique, there are some rather fun and exciting parts of this one. Among the biggest issues here is the creature's limited screen-time that we hardly even get to see it, let alone get a glimpse of it. This here is mainly due to having too much time is spent away on other ideas including the explorer leader engaging in all the different double- crosses and general treachery that he attempts or the fact that there are all the extra scenes of them wandering around the jungle not doing anything which really lowers the amount of time for the creature. That also ties into the usually lame CGI present which gives this the same overall flaws as to be expected here. These are enough to hold it down, but it does have a lot anyway.

Rated R: Graphic Violence and Language.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Surprisingly Good for SyFy!
bpoprocker16 April 2011
I had no I idea if this movie would be worth watching or not, but me and my mom decided to get it. When she was reading to me what it was a bout at the Red Box I told her to get it.

The cast was amazing! Top notch acting I believe. They all had my attention and I found there characters all very likable, even the ones that I didn't think I would like eventually I found likable. Not to say there ain't ones you may not like.

You'll see the scenery in the movie is beautiful. It takes place about in mid South America, but was really shot in Louisiana. This creature you will see in the movie looks pretty amazing. This wasn't no typical SyFy movie. Give it a watch, its worth it!
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Don't expect anything
kosmasp14 September 2012
A really silly little movie that I might have liked more as a teenager I guess. It has the wife of Jigsaw in it, that's a plus, no? Of course it's not, although I really do like her. Another character is pretty neat (imho), but the whole plot is a mess. It doesn't make much sense, the CGI isn't helping either.

But since this is a Syfy production (and you probably know them from their other mostly creature feature ... features), you should know what to expect... and what not to expect! With that in mind, you can enjoy the silliness of it all or just stop watching after the first couple of minutes, because you ain't going to like it any better along the ride.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Attack of the Forest!!
BakuryuuTyranno19 July 2011
An obsessed millionaire hires archaeologists, anthropologists and mercenaries, one of which does not exactly belong. But unfortunately, ancient tribesmen, some plant monster(s) and even their own boss eventually stand in their way.

Apparently Syfy films have been around for long enough for nostalgia as the natives will seem familiar to those who only hoped they could forget "Snake King"

But it doesn't end there! Because they added another villain; those who have witnessed such why-couldn't-it-be-forgettable films as "Cerberus" and "Raptor Island" will non-consentually feel a familiar feeling with the introduction of a heartless rich man, willing to murder his troops should they even consider getting in his path, slowing him, or on occasion not being the closest to the monster!

Ultimately many people die as you would expect, and naturally everyone you'd expect to die dies. The plant monster itself is an interesting idea but didn't contribute much more than, say, another giant or crocodile.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Jungle mad film
NuttyBaby29 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This was quite a popcorn entertaining film. I enjoyed watching it. Its a shame it didn't focus more on the magical side of the dagger and the plants coming to life. They could've shown a flashback of the conquistadors when they first appeared. It would've been spicy if they included more showings of the monstrous trees instead of noises and crawling vines. We only got to see the beast mandrake right at the end. Also one of the workers was dragged into the bushes but it's unclear by what or whom. It made inhuman jabbering noises and couldn't have been the tribe members, and the creepy plants didn't speak!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Ecellent Sci Fi Channel Production
gray1937-14 October 2010
"Mandrake" (a ridiculous title, about as ridiculous as SyFy, and no more so than IMDb's "Top Billed Cast") is such a superior Sci Fi Channel production as to make me doubt that being the origin. The lead actors, despite the aforementioned "Top Billed Cast" are Max Martini (from "The Unit) as McCall, Jon Mack as Carla Manning, Nick Gomez as Santiago, and Benito Martinez (from lotsa shows, including "The Shield" and "Saving Grace") as Harry Vargas. Basically the plot has Vargas sending Manning and others, including Santiago as guide and McCall as bodyguard, to recover an ancestral artifact from some place in a Central or South American jungle. Mayhem obtains as natives and a "protective" entity object to the recovery. The players, including the females, are attractive, but not gorgeous, get with the action in a reasonable, human -- not superhero -- fashion, get dirty, and in some cases dead. I found the movie superior for the genre, and as I said, excellent, for a Sci Fi Channel production -- if in fact it was.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed