Wild Things: Foursome (Video 2010) Poster

(2010 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
The franchise ran out of gas long before they made this
MBunge20 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I can just imagine the pitch meeting for this movie.

"Why don't we make a sequel to Wild Things?"

"Uh, doesn't that movie already have 2 crappy, direct-to-DVD sequels?"

"Yeah, but I got a great idea! Instead of a scene where a guy has sex with 2 women, we'll have a scene with a guy having sex with 3 women!"

"You're a genius! When can we start shooting?"

I wish I was trying to be funny, but an extra chick in the orgy scene is literally the only thing that differentiates this from the previous 2 substandard follow ups to the trashy classic where Kevin Bacon and Denise Richards get naked but Neve Campbell doesn't. Pretty much everything else is the same, from the false accusation of rape to the ridiculous number of double crosses and the utterly unremarkable direction and cinematography. Hopefully, the fact that this film only has one actual sex scene indicates the franchise is running out of steam. None of the sequels have any of the style or cleverness of the original. All they have to offer is naked chicks and simulated sex. Wild Things: Foursome can barely be bothered to do that, so we may be spared a fifth edition which somehow involves a bisexual sheep.

The plot, which has all the complexity of a Rubix Cube where all the sides are the same color, concerns a rich man's douchey son (Ashley Parker Angel) with a moderately hot blonde girlfriend (Marnette Patterson) and the very hot poor girl (Jillian Murray) who supposedly comes between them, only for the audience to discover the three were in cahoots all along. Since that's exactly what happened in the previous Wild Things flicks, I don't think I'm spoiling anything. Besides, I've always wanted to use the word cahoots in a sentence.

Anyway, the douche's rich dad dies, the poor girl accuses the douche of rape, a marginally seedy detective (John Schneider) investigates and so on and so forth. To be fair, this thing isn't atrociously written to the point where nothing makes any sense, but it is flat, stupid and uninvolving. If you find this story to be at all interesting or surprising, that means you've got a low wattage bulb in your lighthouse.

The only folks in the cast who look like they have any business being professional actors are John Schneider, Jillian Murray and Josh Randall, who plays a red herring so obvious he might as well have been wearing a crimson fish costume. For the other actors, Wild Things: Foursome will be the highlight of their alleged careers. And by the way, somebody needs to tell Ashley Parker Angel to change his name. I don't care if it's on his birth certificate, a dude can't have a name like a Playboy Playmate. Ashley Parker Angel sounds like the latest poor girl to hook up with David Spade, not a guy who'll ever have a major part in a decent, non-pornographic motion picture.

Unless you're related to or dating somebody in the cast, there's no reason to watch Wild Things: Foursome. Either go rent the first movie and watch Campbell and Richardson make out again or ram your head through a plate glass window. Both would be a better use of your time.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The least of the Wild Things
BandSAboutMovies13 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Each Wild Things movie seems like a remake of sorts. This installment has Andy Hurst, who wrote the second and third, directing and a script by Howard Zemski and Monty Featherstone, the team who wrote Sharkman.

The major difference is that this time, we're talking about twenty-year-olds and not high schoolers. Carson Wheetly (Ashley Parker Angel, who was in O-Town) is the rich and spoiled son of NASCAR car racer Ted Wheetly (Cameron Daddo). He thinks his dad may have killed his mother, but first, let's get to this movie's other main difference.

Whereas every Wild Things is built around a threesome, this one goes one better and has, as the title spoils for you, a foursome between Carson, his girlfriend Rachel Thomas (Marnette Patterson), Brandi Cox (Jillian Murray, Cabin Fever 3: Patient Zero) and Linda Dobson (Jessie Nickson).

Within a few days of that MFFF miracle -- surely Carson is some level of science fiction character or at least a former boy band member -- his father dies in a car crash that Bruno Mattei's some Days of Thunder footage. That death is suspicious, so Detective Frank Walker (John Schneider, who may know a thing or two about car crashes) starts to investigate just as the will is announced, which states that Carson cannot inherit his father's money and estate until he turns thirty or marries.

That means a quick marriage to Rachel, but they had a deal with everyone in the foursome, so Brandi and Linda seem to be dead meat, except that Rachel and Brandi are also working together to kill Carson. Once the girls end up -- spoiler warning -- using sex to kill Carson, they start conspiring to keep making love and attempting to murder one another.

This is the sort of movie that keeps the twists coming after the credits roll. All I have to say is keep your eye on lawyer George Stuben (Ethan Smith).

I miss the swamps of the other movies, but appreciate that this one is all about death and sex, which let's face it, all giallo should be. It doesn't get to that level, as it needs more fashion and better music, but it certainly has the sleaze -- well, homogenized 2000s sleaze -- going for it.

I kind of wish there was a fifth movie just to see if they'd get a fiveway into it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Improvement
kosmasp28 September 2010
The detective in this is one of the better things in this, but also one of it's weak links. Then again, I don't think anyone will watch this, trying to figure out, which one is the better actor in here. Still pretty decent acting going on overall (that does not include everyone in the cast), even though the cast does not wear that much during the movies duration.

Of course, I'd advice you to watch the first one. This is already the 3-rd cash-in, though as I've said, it seems as bit of an improvement to the other two "sequels" (they are not, just re-telling the story of the first one). I wonder if a fifth part, will top the "erotic" scene with a fifth member. Then again, it was pretty obvious that one actress had a "no nudity" clause in her contract. But I don't think that will put you off.

While pretty silly (no pun intended), it might be funny at times for you, depending what you expect.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One , two , three , four aaaaaand enough
Maziun10 September 2018
The first "Wild things" was hardy a classic . Nobody really wanted a sequel, but Hollywood still made 2 crappy straight to DVD movies. The sequels were INCREDIBLY LAZY. They were basically remakes of the first movie only with small changes in script and of course anonymous cast . I guess they did make some money , because Hollywood made one more.

What's the difference between this movie and the earlier ones ? Hint: it's in the title. Yep, guy has a sex with 3 women this time , not with 2. The rest ? EVERYTHING ELSE IS JUST THE SAME. If you find this movie to be clever or surprising , well , then clearly something is wrong with you.

The first movie had Kevin Bacon , Bill Murray , Denise Richards and Neve Campbell. Good actors and hot women. The sex scene was great and there was quite a lot of erotic tension too.

Here the direction is unremarkable , the screenplay is flat and predictable. There is only one sex scene here (the foursome) and although it's nice it can't hold a candle to the original threesome from the first movie. The girls are quite pretty , but when it comes to acting ,wait , what acting ? The only actor from this movie that interested me was a guy named Ashley Parker Angel. This dude should seriously change his name , unless he is interested in making career in porn.

I don't remember too much from this movie. The whole movie is so uninspired and uninteresting that I can recommend it only for sex maniacs (who probably were the main target for this movie anyway). I give it 1/10.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The seven deadly sins
vampyrecowboy1 October 2010
Greed, lust, envy, anger, pride, gluttony, sloth, anger Sex...more sex and more sex.

Short of being porn, this is just enough to make the movie solid without making it porn.

Along the lines of the other Wildthings and very similar to the first movie, this tells the story of pure lucid greed and how they go to get more.

Entertaining, but not memorable.

However, you may learn a thing or two from watching this...

Beautiful women in Florida are everywhere and always after one thing...

Don't trust a lawyer.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
THERE IS A FOOSBALL TABLE
nogodnomasters16 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
A rich man dies in a race car accident and the cops think there is foul play. Meanwhile there is a twisty plot going on involving the son and three beautiful women...and yes we do get a "foursome" with nudity.

The plot twists without clues and does so simply for the sake of twisting...Oh look at us, we are clever script writers. Except for the eye candy scene, the film was boring, as if it came from a TV script.

F-bomb, sex, and nudity (Jillian Murray, Jessie Nickson)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
End of an era
Floated213 June 2023
With the last entry in the beloved Wild Things franchise, this fourth film sees this seemingly similar to the previous. At this point, had you watched the previous three films or only even the original, you would know the first major twist of the film (they all essentially follow the same basic formula) where by this point nothing is surprising. We are simply just waiting for it to occur.

Wild Things: Foursome, as suggested but its title would include another woman in its recurring and predictable famous "scene". This time, the director does include more skin in the scene and for a longer running time than at least the previous two instalments. Around 32:00 - 35:00 were it occurs.

This film of course isn't as good as the original but it is an improvement over the third film. The lead actor is solid enough and the leading women show stronger acting and have more character development and overall interest than the leading women in the third film.

The end final twists get a little messy and convoluted and by that point we don't exactly care but it was slightly enjoyable watching the post credit scenes with the flashbacks.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I did not care for this
jordondave-2808525 July 2023
(2009) Wild Things: Foursome THRILLER/ DRAMA

You know a movie is bad when it starts off with a bunch of teens getting excited over a couple of yuppies playing foosball on a sunny resort near a pool! And like the other "Wild Things" films known for it's twists, it's still quite bad with it's mediocre acting from a bunch of wannabes and a fake making out scene involving a single guy and three other girls, hence the title! Centers on a father who was killed in a racing accident and the spoiled brat of a teenage son finding a way to collect it's inheritance. Even after showing the film's credits making everything to make sense, one still has to go through all the bad acting and idiocy that makes things that turn out the way they do possible.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Entertaining Sequel
marquisderon31 May 2010
Let's face it. The "Wild Things" films are never going to be confused with serious, art house cinema. They are lots of fun to watch though and if you are in a mood for escapist fare, they fit the bill just fine. The latest entry "Wild Things: Foursome" follows the formula of drop dead gorgeous women, eroticism, double crossing, slick production, and moody music. I rather liked this entry. The performances are pretty good, especially by veteran actor John Schneider, and I got a kick out of the multiple twists in the plot. The Florida location is also put to good use. It's not surprising that all of the "Wild Things" movies have been shot there. It will be interesting to see if they come up with a fifth film. Recommended.
27 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wow, I'm the first person to see this ???
sb-2921 May 2010
Saw this on a "pre-screening" it seems. Wasn't really expecting anything, but hoping for some kind of titillation, having seen the first in the series.

Well, the movie started with some bikini babes and a poorly edited speed boat race which didn't really give me high hopes, but as the movie progressed I found myself getting more and more sucked in.

There was at least one scene to satisfy the sex maniacs, but overall the movie concentrated on beautiful people, and a murder mystery type plot with some nice twists and turns. Along with nice Florida weather and scenery.

Overall the movie was very entertaining and nicely photographed. The stars, although pretty much unknown, seem like they could all continue on to bigger better things, especially the girls who've all obviously been spending a lot of time in the gym in addition to their already having gifted gene-pools.

Definitely worth seeing, but don't expect too much needless to say. Its like a very good TV movie.
32 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great entry into the series
TdSmth522 August 2011
Ted Wheetly is one the richest men in Florida. When he dies during a car race, his irresponsible and partying son Carson stands to inherit it all, as the wife died mysteriously. But old Ted knew about his son so he put all the money in a trust fund that Carson can access when he becomes 30, unless there is a medical emergency or a wedding. That gives Carson's girlfriend Rachel ideas. Yet, Carson doesn't want to get married. Until his hand is forced. Rachel and another girl he met during a party named Brandi devise a plan where Brandi accuses him of rape. That forces the executor of the will to free up some cash to buy her off. Once she drops the charges, Carson and Rachel marry.

This being a Wild Things movie, things aren't gong to stay just like that. Everyone is scheming to get the money. But they didn't count on a persistent cop who keeps digging into the strange car accident, on the relationship of all the kids, who to avoid drawing suspicion have to pretend they don't know each other all that well. That leads the cop to the discovery that Rachel and Brandi were childhood friends living in the swamps who always dreamed of moving up north and meeting a rich guy. Things get complicated for the cop until both girls walk into his office to implicate the other. And just as you think things have sorted themselves out, there are more twists.

Wild Things: Foursome keeps the tradition of having an attractive cast in beautiful Florida doing all sorts of naughty things to get a lot money. Jillian Murray, Marnette Patterson, Jessie Nickson are the pretty wild things this time around, and they are gorgeous to look at. Performances are very good, Marnette does a superb job and so does John Schneider, yes, THE John Schneider, who plays the cop. The story is interesting and you really do get into as you want to find out just how it all turns out. There is one highly erotic scene that give the movie its subtitle. Very worth seeing.
5 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wild Things: Foursome on 4k ultra hd
jucsetmai20 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Plot Synopsis: Hotel magnate Ted Wheetley is tough on his arrogant hard partying son, Carson, who believes his wealthy, womanizer father drove his mother to her death. When Ted is killed in a speed boat accident, Detective Frank Walker is assigned to investigate the case. As he digs deeper into the death, he becomes more and more suspicious of the scheming, seduction, greed, double-crossing and possibly even cold blooded murder now on upgrade Native 4K and Dolby Vision coming soon on Sony pictures 4k ultra hd release February 2021
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wild Things: Foursome
allmoviesfan25 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Five long years since Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough. How have we survived without another instalment of a franchise that shouldn't probably have progressed past the Neve Campbell/Denise Richards film, but has instead churned out now four - yeah, count 'em, FOUR - sequels.

Pretty much every film is the same. Blue Bay is a hotbed of sex, murder, corrupt cops and double-crossing. Oh, and some triple-crossing. In this one, as always, there's a girl from the right side of the tracks, one from the wrong side, a dogged detective (this time played by John Schneider), trumped-up rape charges and a love triangle. Except this one is a quadrangle.

The originality in this franchise left with Neve and Denise. Each successive franchise stretches the bounds of credulity. This one is no different.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed