Arctic Ascent with Alex Honnold (TV Series 2024) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A spellbinding 2-for-1 led by Alex Honnold
paul-allaer17 February 2024
As "Arctic Ascent With Alex Honnold" (2024 release; 3 episodes ranging from 45 to 50 min each); opens, Alex "Free Solo" Honnold and 5 others are about to embark on an extraordinary expedition in Greenland: march 100 miles toward one of the largest remaining unclimbed cliffs in the world. The team also includes a glaciologist, Heidi Sevestre, who will performs various tests to better understand how quickly ice is melting in Greenland. At this point we are 10 minutes into Episode 1.

Couple of comments: this is the latest National Geography documentary by director and cinematographer Richard Ladkani ("Sea of Shadwss). While theoretically this plays out in 3 episodes, it's really just one long documentary of about 145 min. Comparisons to "Free Solo" are inevitable and let's just get it out of the way: this is not as good as "Free Solo" (which won Best Documentary Oscar for good reason). But let's also say this: "Arctic Ascent" is very good, and at times spellbinding. We get a 2-for-1: another climbing exploit by Alex Honnold, and also a another cautionary tale about the devastating effects of climate change. It's all wrapped up in an irresistible packaging called Greenland. Has Greenland ever look this menacing yet beautiful, intimidating yet inviting? The photography (aided by the generous use of drones) is pure eye-candy from start to finish.

"Arctic Ascent" premiered on the National Geographic Channel, and is now streaming on Hulu (where I saw it last night in a single setting) and Disney+. If you liked "Free Solo", I'd readily suggest you check this out and draw your own conclusion.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
lessons on teamwork and risk
happy_quadruped17 March 2024
This was somewhat better than I was expecting. I felt the first episode started a bit slow, and I was worried the thing would be a bit formulaic and corporate. However by the second episode it's clear that they're facing a challenge of significant scale, and Alex starts becoming Alex.

Without giving anything away, I think the season holds some important lessons about teamwork and risk management. How do you know when you're taking on too much risk? Are you the type of person who would actually notice that when it happens? How do different members of a team respond to it differently?

I enjoyed the Artic setting and the science stuff as well. Learned something new about how to check glacier health, which also made for some cool visuals.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another climate change documentary
john-ostrander2 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Growing up I did a lot of bouldering and wanted badly to rock climb and do what Alex Honnold does. I also wanted to play for the NY Yankees, but we all have dreams. I have to live vicariously through people who do rock climb, and play pro sports.

Which is why this film was something of a let down. I own a copy of "Free solo" and have seen several snips of free climbing by this man. The ascent in Greenland is a first ascent, and a very exciting idea but it falls a little flat. The narrative was on clear display with climate scientist on the trek and more dialog about saving the ice, than mountain climbing. If I had to guess, it was 63% climate discussion and the rest a blend of climbing and some reality-TV style drama where they sit in a circle and complain in a passive aggressive manner.

SPOILER- Honnold to my surprise is a rather un-courteous climber. This was all about him and the other two climbers were treated almost like hired help. This was also on clear display. The wall is not very solid, and he was dropping rocks on the other climbers (not intentionally) but was very dismissive about it. This is the kind of behaviour that ruins friendships permanently.

Here are my thoughts about the climate discussion on the part of the scientist in the show. These are the points as I remember them:

1. This glacier has never been explored, nor have the rock faces 2. The rock faces were once encased in 100s of feet of glacial ice 3. For the first time, we are studying these rock samples, and glacier samples directly.

Given only these three points, how can they determine effects of climate change without a comparison? They expressed very worrisome concern about the melting glacier, which in the same breath they say has melted in the last 100,000 years to expose the rock faces. They then double back and say how nobody has ever studied this before. As a long-time student of science I wondered why they were taking rock core samples from the cliff face to "study the effect of climate change" when they were boring in about 4 inches. There is no study I can think of where climate is examined by rock cores. It can however tell you loads about how the rock formed.

Likewise, the scientist person expressed shock when the big glacier she was looking at "is not melting fast, in fact is melting less than we thought" and went on to say that just couldn't be.

If you focus on the climbs, this is about a 75 minute video.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
More climate change religion, less rock climbing documentary
crystalannenevins19 February 2024
I've been a climber for 6 years and enjoy watching documentaries of awesome climbers that are better than I could hope to be, climbing in places I will never have the money or grit to go to. Very cool cinematography and gorgeous terrain. However, the first 2 episodes are 90% climate change religion and 10% climbing. "If we save the Arctic, we'll save ourselves". The glaciologist practically weeps over floating icebergs and indicates that the ENTIRE Greenland ice shelf will completely melt someday. Almost no science is offered to explain how this could possibly happen, thus assuming viewers are climate change experts. Since we're not, claims of any kind can just be made without any explanation and we are just supposed to believe them since they are being made by "an expert". If this were a scientific documentary, it no doubt would offer some explanation of the science so that we could all at least have some way to evaluate the claims being made. But it's not, so it doesn't. Which means that they should just stick to climbing. Show more footage of Hazel. Heck, show more footage of the non-climbers jumaring up the big wall. Do something. Anything but shove climate change religion down everyone's throat.
9 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Documentary but Why Two Titles?
Greg-Turnbull18 March 2024
I am quite enjoying this new NG 3-part documentary on glaciers & Climate Change in Greenland, but wonder why it hs two titles: On the Edge and Arctic Ascent? Anyway, it's a bit of strange mixture of climbing from Alex Honnold and Hazel Findlay (who does not get enough credit on the net for her efforts in this expedition) and science.

It was interesting to see them rappel down into a crevasse to test the water depth, plus trying to get two non-climbers over a 500m cliff must have been tough. The tension rises from the potential dangers of falling rock & ice, so I am looking forward to the third part on climbing the really huge wall at the end of the trip...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed