On Fire (2023) Poster

(2023)

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Watchable, but...
paul_haakonsen24 March 2024
Yet another movie that I had never heard about, "On Fire" from directors Peter Facinelli and Nick Lyon immediately caught my attention when I saw that cover. I am a sucker for natural disaster movies, despite the majority of the movies being questionable. But I had never heard, much less seen, "On Fire" before, so of course I opted to give the movie a chance.

The storyline is pretty straightforward, and I will say that it is a fair enough watchable movie, though hardly anything outstanding. So writers Nick Lyon and Ron Peer didn't really deliver something out of the ordinary here. And yeah, it was essentially also a very predictable and somewhat generic storyline actually. But hey, if you enjoy natural disaster movies, "On Fire" is definitely well-worth sitting down to watch.

There are a couple of familiar faces on the cast list, with the likes of Peter Facinelli (whom also co-directed the movie), Fiona Dourif, Glenn Morshower and of course the iconic Lance Henriksen. So I will say that the the cast ensemble in the movie was definitely good. The acting performances in the movie were good.

Visually then "On Fire" was good. The effects were fair and looked real enough, though I have to admit that I had a hard time buying into the characters ever were in any real danger. And that sort of took away from the overall impression of the movie.

Watchable for what it was, "On Fire" is hardly a movie that warrants a second viewing, as there isn't enough contents to the storyline for that. But it definitely is a movie worth sitting down to watch if you enjoy natural disaster movies.

Ultimately, then the movie's cover/poster over-sold the movie by a landslide. The cover/poster was way more interesting than the movie turned out to be. A sad fact, actually.

My rating of directors Peter Facinelli and Nick Lyon's 2023 movie "On Fire" lands on a five out of ten stars.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The fire is the star
okpilak30 March 2024
The fire was done very well, and showed the real dangers of living in the woods and how fire can spread so fast. And with featuring the 911 staffing, showed how quickly things can change when fire spreads from strong winds. What seems couldn't happen becomes what does happen. The weakness is the script, as the actors do a good job showing their skill, their danger and the ability to think quickly. And the father Dave, risked everything for his family. Rated PG-13, it was watered down into too much of a formula driven script. But that is more the reality of what is necessary than the fault of the execution of the production. It needed to be acceptable for family viewing. It seems to be a lot of real fire, along with some CGI fire, but maintained the tension.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One of the worst movies I have ever seen.
sam-104559 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This was the goofiest thing I have ever watched. The CGI was awful, the mother was the most annoying character I have ever seen that needed a pep talk every other minute to walk more than three feet, and for some reason the family consistently did smartest possible thing in the stupidest possible way.

I had 0 sympathy for any of them, and the only character I felt close to was the grandfather as I was jealous he got to leave halfway through the movie and I could not.

So many scenes that could have been emotional were deafened by a cacophony of cheesy 80's victory lap music, and the ending was a rocky workout marathon scene that ended with some nerd taking up valuable time from a woman trying to help fire survivors just so he could say thanks. Maybe wait until there are no more people on fire.

I can't believe the bill they chose for the father to fall down looked like it had a 2 degree slope after they ran from a fire that inexplicably exploded (possibly from the Micheal Bay particularly in the forest) and the dad needed a "you can do it" speech to walk 40 feet with the help of two people.

If this movie is based on the struggle of a real family, this movie has forever shamed them by showcasing them as the goofiest goobers to ever fumble through a forest being chased by the Human Torch's CGI farts.

Do yourself a favor and see this movie. It was so horrible that me and the entire theater laughed through the whole thing. Wonderful comedy movie, I'm looking forward to On Fire 2.
33 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well..
ts-00005 February 2024
It was good however,feel a few changes might of made this better.. It had clichés,plotholes & parts might feel contrived.

Although love Fiona in past work,she was miscast for this part.

The CGI was decent enough to draw you into the fire storyline,however some dialog & such failed occasionally.

The cinematography felt low quality,but have seen worse in productions.

Overall acting & casting was ok,was hoping Lance H would of had a more pivotal role.

This movie was poorly marketed & considering enjoy Peter F movies,plus him having major involvement such as directing that's unfortunate.

This movie is worth seeing-even once.. It brings family,faith & survival during a desperate time.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cinematographer Philip Roy does a great job capturing the beauty and danger of fire.
trinaboice12 October 2023
IN A NUTSHELL: The film was inspired by true events and is certainly timely, as so many devastating fires have destroyed homes and cities around the globe.

On Fire was written, directed, and produced by Nick Lyon. Peter Facinelli stars in it and also directed and produced the film.

THINGS I LIKED: The cast does a good job and includes Peter Facinelli, Fiona Dourif, Asher Angel, Lance Henriksen, and Glenn Morshower.

Cinematographer Philip Roy does a great job capturing the beauty and danger of fire.

It's too bad it takes an emergency before people think ahead to get prepared. You should always keep an emergency backpack in each of your cars and one at home for each member of your family. Inside the backpack should be food, water, medicine, diapers, a change of clothes, a list of phone numbers of your loved ones, flashlights with extra batteries, and other crucial items. If you Google "72-hour kit" or "emergency preparedness kit", you'll see tons of websites that offer helpful lists. I've done this for years and can tell you it definitely has given me peace of mind, knowing I had what my family needed in case of a sudden evacuation. Only time I needed to use it. I was driving with my baby about 40 minutes from my house in Georgia when a tornado warning suddenly hit. I was stranded and so grateful I had food and diapers in my backpack so I could take care of my baby until we were able to get home safely. Trees were downed and we escaped into a stranger's basement for a couple of hours while the storm blew over.

In the film, we see the featured family make both good and bad decisions. If you see this movie with your family, talk about those things and make a plan for what you would do in an emergency.

The movie absolutely demonstrates how quickly a fire can spread and even change directions.

At the end of the film, we see words on the screen that tell us how millions of acres around the world are destroyed in wildfires, affecting the lives of humans, animals, and plant life. We also see words of gratitude for all of the firefighters who risk their lives trying to save others.

THINGS I DIDN'T LIKE: Some of the CGI doesn't look very real.

Other than just caring for the well-being of other human beings, we don't learn much about the family to truly become endeared to them and care.

The movie is pretty simple and straightforward.

TIPS FOR PARENTS: Young children will be frightened by the fire and dangerous situations.

People die.

Some profanity and 1 F-bomb.

!
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good production
oliveira-74 February 2024
Perhaps the best thing about this film is that it will convince many people that it is really necessary to keep those 50 or even 100 meters without trees around the houses. And even then... the example given here of the ingenious care taken by the owner of that house literally going up in smoke was interesting: you're never safe from the recklessness of your neighbors.

The story of a family of 3+1 who survived a forest fire provides the pretext for a production in which we are placed inside the burning forest, in a terrifyingly realistic reconstruction of the scenario that someone in those circumstances has to face - with virtually no chance of survival. Great value is placed on unity, as each element of these three will contribute in its own way to an improbable outcome.

The production (pyrotechnics and everything else) is stupendous, the actors very convincing and the filming impeccable. But there are a few problems, namely the script, which is too formulaic and predictable, and with inconsistencies: there's the manslaughter of two old people, with no culpability and (almost) no remorse, and there's the final shock of seeing those trees, so green, on the shores of Lake Chilton...
3 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I Want My 80min Back
MissedHerE27 March 2024
Awful in every regard.

Acting: Atrocious.

Writing: Wow.

Do NOT waste your time with this. I don't want to write anything more about this because there's not much to say and it isn't worthy of any more of someone's time, but I'll continue typing in order to help save even one person from wasting another minute of their life thinking whether they should watch this or, God forbid, actually watching it.

I hated all of the characters and laughed at every terrible piece of dialogue and story that came along to the climax of this terrible film.

I beg you to please not waste your time with this.

There. Done.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Based on true event
ilovefoodcoma7 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I always enjoy watching a movie based on true event. After watching it, it is just like a Hollywood movie! I couldn't believe how they went through this horrible incident. The ending was such a relief. Great directing as well. I always enjoy watching a movie based on true event. After watching it, it is just like a Hollywood movie! I couldn't believe how they went through this horrible incident. The ending was such a relief. Great directing as well. I always enjoy watching a movie based on true event. After watching it, it is just like a Hollywood movie! I couldn't believe how they went through this horrible incident. The ending was such a relief. Great directing as well.
2 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What happens when Christian productions cross with bad melodrama
info-9070122 March 2024
Oh goodness. Why didn't somebody stop them!

The story in its essence was very good, however the delivery is idiotic. Over directed in the most silly, childish ways; melodrama past any point of sanity, and poorly written so that it loses all sense of reality. In fact, this should have been fantastic because the essence of the survival story is extraordinary, but because the writing is so lacking, and the direction is horrifically childish, over the top and silly, they lost all the power it should have had. They should have studied Ron Howard's Backdraft to understand the power of a "fire" movie and what it could have been, not whatever they looked at as their example.

This was embarrassingly bad, and for no good reason other than too much ego to go hire a real, decent Director, and Writer. Even an excellent Director could have worked with this idiotic script and made it work. It would have been an entirely different film. Sad they didn't do that.
20 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
How did I not know about this movie?
christianamdavis1 October 2023
So I decided to go see a random non-franchise movie and this looked interesting. I was the only one in the theater which is sad but great for me bc I legit OPENLY SOBBED at how moving it was. It's a simple premise that personalizes a family conquering insurmountable odds. Script and acting had some great dialogue between action to make you truly connect with each character- nonfat to be trimmed imho.

I truly feel like the dynamics of the family- mom (8 months pregnant), dad, their teenager, and dad's father are relatable whether you have been in that exact position of relationships or not. The dad (Peter Facinelli) just embodied this character- the fear a father faces trying to protect his family while also trying to stay strong and hopeful for them. And the mother just embodies what women can and will do to keep their children safe. The teenage son shows vulnerability while also stepping up to the plate despite his fear.

I also love how they acknowledged the impact these disasters have on first responders. Can't get over how good this was. Highly recommend! Please go see it!
8 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not worth it
emilymerovich3 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I had high expectations for this film. It was such a letdown. Bad acting. Bad directing. But storyline. So unrealistic. The characters would have died in the early moments of the film if it was a real life scenario. Why did they go back to their home where the fire was??? That's what you should not do. And why didn't the fire touch their house? They used a sprinkler to put out the fire... yeah okay, like that would do anything. The lines were so dumb too... like couldn't the writers provide the actors with better things to say/ do? I did not have the strength to finish it. I'm sorry, but find a different movie to watch😂.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hard Nope!
dschreib6720 April 2024
This was the worst disaster movie I have ever watched, and I've seen them all. It is not even possible for not only one, but pretty much every single character to be so effing stupid in everything they do. From running to the fire to a random neighbor in flames, one hundred yards from the nearest blaze. The poor lady must have spontaneously combusted while her whimpers sounded more like she bit her lip than if she were ablaze. Nothing about this movie would make sense to anyone with an IQ over 50. If you want to see a decent forest fire movie or tv show, watch "They want me dead" or"Fire Country". Or watch this To see for yourself and be compelled to write a review like me for the first time in a decade.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A riveting story
audreyblanche3 October 2023
Although this movie is rated PG-13, I brought my young children along to see it and feel it is suitable for families. We all thoroughly enjoyed the story and sat at the edge of our seats as the protagonists moved from one ordeal to the next in their harrowing fight to survive the wildfires that raged around their home. Considering the increase in serious wildfires worldwide, I feel like this topic is top-of-mind for many, and the film showcased personal experiences of those who have experienced such terrible nightmares firsthand. The effects made you forget that you were watching a film and pulled you right into the story. Go check out this film and tell your friends and family!
5 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Devastating wildfires
rockydoggie23 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The movie was good, worth watching, easy to get wrapped up into as so many people have been sadly impacted or killed in these wildfires, and it continues to happen, so a lot this can't be dismissed. I'm not gonna get bogged down by CGI as I don't imagine the film's budget can afford it, but it was good enough to let the story carry my interest. The only thing I couldn't understand which is something everyone is missing on (spoiler so stop here) was the ending. How could the family afford to rebuild a new home considering how much in debt they were at the beginning of the film on top of them losing both their vehicles and their home which had no insurance? Where would this magical money be coming from? Sure, they inherited land, but they have no money for anything. All they could do would be to sell the land (not build on it) and I don't imagine who would buy it from them. Good movie, but the ending made zero sense.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed