Priest of Evil (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Very close to good Scandinavian lonely-cop films
BeneCumb4 July 2013
In the world, Finns are known to be sluggish and calm people - and we see plenty of them in most Finnish films. Harjunpää ja pahan pappi is a nice exception, thanks to talented Peter Franzén and Sampo Sarkola, above all, whose characters' reactions to injustice and violence are not insensitive or arid. Although being on separate sides of the law, their "psyche" types are rather similar, but the reasons to act are still different... The plot has several twists and turns, some issues are explained via flashbacks; the ending is trivial, but not annoying, and when the credits appear you realise that you have seen a decent psychological thriller, in the line with good similar films from Sweden or Denmark.

In short, the film in question is one the best 21st century Finnish crime films. Moreover, I as a Finnish-speaker and having visited Turku/Åbo several times, had a nice joy of recognition.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very good crime thriller
kosmasp26 November 2012
The setting reminded me a bit of a game called "Heavy Rain". It's not the same, but the vibe has some similarities. The main actor is really good and we have an interesting interaction between him and other characters. The main bad guy has a great motive: Plus he doesn't see himself as a bad guy (a thing that other movies have also explored).

Interesting themes (redemption, revenge and more) get tangled in a complex but still pretty reasonable scheme of things. It never gets too complicated and some people might feel this is too predictable (which it sort of is). Not everyone might like the way it ends, but it seems inevitable to me. A more than decent effort and a very tense movie
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unrealistic and overplayed
airsnob22 April 2014
I'm not sure why this movie got great reviews. It's a big budget film, that is for sure. For me, movies have to make sense. Even when Zombies are running around; the key is I BELIEVE it for an hour and a half. Even with the large budget, the great actors , kinda a cool plot, the holes were enormous. Way too stylized, like this movie is trying way too hard to be cool. For instance, the police department. Have you ever seen police men that look like the metal version of GQ magazine covers? No. Either have I. Other holes? No police officer has a radio. Like to call in for back up. Oh ya. They are finding out where the serial killer is- and- going after him alone, with never a call in to say, " hey. I found the most wanted man in Finland. Ya. I'm in his living room. He just disappeared somewhere in this house, and I'm gonna go try to find him." Nope. This detective, in his leather pants is going after him alone. The movie is filled with extreme examples of idiocy like this through out. Also- way too much character development. The movie is about a serial killer. Not a distraught wife ( who by the way, also makes no sense. She apparently is holding into a major two year grudge against her super awesome husband for being a total hero the night he was supposed to pick up his daughter at a concert and was a little late , which that also was never said, I just read it in the synopsis and was like " OH!!! That's why she was so mad!" ) the whole thing just wasn't believable, the motives, the arguments, the snobby daughter, the daughters vicious murderer, who was just some metal head on a RACE BIKE , who while hanging out with ten other complete metal head psychopaths , decided to rape and brutally murder the daughter at a concert, for absolutely no reason, and THEN, gets out of prison, a mere TWO years later. Then, the husband/ father / detective follows him and kidnaps him and takes him back to the exact spot his daughter was murdered, to kill him ( I guess?) but mysteriously, his faithful and beautiful partner ( who he never has sex with , even though his wife hasn't had sex with him since his daughter died, figures out by osmosis exactly where he is and what he is doing by finding an article on his desk about the release date of the daughters killer and goes and saves him from making a huge mistake at the last minute. Ya. Right. I pretty much think that everyone who liked this movie is a total moron, or was smoking something when they watched it. Skip it. And I love Scandinavian film. I was more than disappointed.
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
God is almighty.If Satan is in me-then that is God's will.
elsinefilo23 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Timo Harjunpää (Franzén Pahat Pojat) is a detective in the Helsinki police department.He loses his daughter in a murder when he happens to be late to pick her up. The family tries to come to terms with the loss of their daughter but Timo becomes estranged from his wife (Irina Björklund played Ingrid in "The American (2010)") when he sees that his wife is blaming him somehow. At the same time,the city is in the throes of inexplicable multiple killings in the subway system. The deeply agitated, embittered Harjunpää is put on this case but he finds himself torn between between doing his duty and seeking for vengeance when the release of his daughter's murderer is on the horizon. In a way, the movie promises some gory violence, action and tension. I can't really say that it fulfills it properly. First of all, the plot sounds so predictable. The movie does not really trot out of the old clichés. The homicide detective who's been assigned to the case is an embittered cop whose marriage is falling apart. The murderer has to have had a traumatic,agonizing childhood to feel embittered against life. His father had to be a preacher, a drunk, a fornicator and a violent man so that his son would turn out to be a some vigilante who could avenge the plight of women who are beat up by their abusive husbands. "Priest of Evil" may be the movie for those viewers who like anything about murderer vs. cop stories but it's not really the movie you would look into if you are into a smart,unpredictable storyline, memorable quotes and dynamic, creative tension.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Of course there were holes
laduqesa11 March 2022
There always are holes in crime thrillers and police procedurals. A couple of them grated but in the main, they could be overlooked.

I'm not going to make this a long review. The film is not profound in any way and has enough of a plot, in fact a couple of strands, to hold the viewers attention. In reality, no serial killer such as this one would not have been caught before. But then, in films, murderers have the ability to disappear into thin air just like that.

I have to say the ending and final scenes were sick-making and saccharine but it's hard to see how else the scriptwriters could have finished on an optimistic note.

It's worth a watch to while away part of an evening. I have the series to look at next.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
First 10 minutes review..
Anastas-Sharko5 October 2021
That's right, I saw 10 minutes , and i knew that it could not get any better,.... lack of expression, and wanna be action "thriller" movie,,,,
1 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed