Tears of Gaza (2010) Poster

(2010)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Great but Profoundly Disturbing
rtbd25 January 2011
I saw this film at the Toronto Film Festival and was very moved by it. There's nothing happy about it, though, so be warned that it is an exhausting emotional experience that will leave you feeling somewhat angry and helpless.

The likelihood of this film ever seeing a general release in the US is remote to non-existent. It's just too politically charged and will probably be viewed as anti-Israel (which I don't think it is). I'm hoping that at the very least it will be available for download on the internet or, heaven forbid, it will be released on DVD. I think this is a very important film for the general public to see because it looks at the conflict between Jews and Palestinians in very human terms. Yes, it's true that the perspective we see is that of the Palestinians, but what's wrong with that? It's called "Point of View" filmmaking. Not everything has to be a balanced piece of journalism, especially when deeply human stories are involved. Anyway, I hope you get a chance to see it.
48 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Thought Provoking, Controversial, and Disturbing--and very real
beastlee7 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
A piece i did for a human rights class at the screening at UCSB in 2011:

Vibeke Lokkeberg's Tears of Gaza attempts to capture the horrifying atmosphere during the 2008-2009 assault upon Gaza by the Israeli military. The footage is raw, disturbing, and yet meaningful. Present at the screening, Lokkeberg states her goals were simple: to capture the Palestinian victims in the 22 day conflict because no journalists were allowed inside Gaza at that time. At times you cannot help but feel certain scenes are staged, and this only hurts the film because it allows those that do not want to like the film the ability to discount it entirely. Both the director and producer came off as unbiased towards the political setting of the film, arguing that both sides are victims of a war that started hundreds of years ago or which they have no "part" of or answer to. But they did come off as big proponents of human rights, and it showed as an underlying theme in Tears of Gaza.

The film uses video from the citizens of Gaza as evidence of what took place, and all the footage is very personal and hand-held. In one scene the camera is running towards a house after a bombing, and citizens are digging through looking for survivors. They slowly find one body after another of toddlers, 4 of them, decapitated, bloodied—lifeless. In another scene that I personally found upsetting there are 3 babies, not more than 2 or 3, each with an execution shot (close range, precise, kill-hits) to their head or chest.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict relates to themes in class on multiple levels. There is an argument, especially recently with the information leaked by Wikileaks that there is a large element of exclusionary ideologies sanctioned by the Israeli government. In addition, there claims that Israel violates multiple agreements adopted in the Geneva conventions, particularly when dealing with the treatment of civilians— the film made it clear that, at times the Israeli military fails to make the distinction between combatants and civilians. The film did specify its documentation on the innocent, and in that sense I do believe that there is also a call for international intervention, or at the very least, knowledge of the true situation. What is clear in Tears of Gaza is that there are things happening to Palestine that should happen to no one, even in times of war—the Israelis indiscriminately kill children, fathers and mothers, and maybe intentionally, the future generations of Palestine.

Both Israel and Palestine committed war crimes by killing civilians. The only distinction is the capability of each side. Israel uses a realism argument saying that Palestinian militants fired from civilian areas, and thus their systematic attacks on these areas were justified. Israel is a military powerhouse, containing one of the world's strongest militaries, effective intelligence, and advanced technology. They knew where they were firing, and what each shot was going to do. The Palestinians are still decades back in killing capability—firing rockets and mortars. The fact is ~1400 Palestinians were killed in the conflict, ~300 of which were children—Israel lost 13 people, of which 1 at the most was a child (numbers vary depending on your source). A life is a life, and there is no argument that each side violated various human rights from this war, but the sheer numbers should say something regarding the magnitude of these violations. I gathered a lot from the film due to the American media portraying are Israeli allies biasedly—I can better than before empathize with the Palestinians. Tears of Gaza did not show me who was wrong in this on-going struggle between the warring states, but it did show me the harsh reality that neither side is right.
21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A great war film! No lies of F/X
solanojohn553 August 2011
This is one of the purest films I have ever watched, I recommended highly! First of all it is 100% pure footage of what is it like to be on the ground as a witness of what Israel claims to us all over the world as a military targets. A user of IMDb wrote in a review by moacow" we did not see the other side justification for this type of bombing" What a numb-skull user moacow is…How in the world can you or any one justifies bombing a civilian home or a hospital or a school or even shooting with a sniper rifle babies and more. MOACOW YOU CANNOT! that is why you did not see it in the film. Israel does not explain its U.N. and international courts condiment actions to anyone in the world.

As an English now American and married to a lovely American Jewish woman, I hope one day soon I will witness peace in Israel! We as people with understanding to life, we cannot let Israel continue the mass murders of Palestinians. Bloody hell! Did you notice the Israeli in-discriminant bombing of Palestinians? What kind of Army men with sniper rifles that shoots at babies and civilians? My grand fathers did not fight the criminal Hitler so Israel can take over his criminal role now they act exactly like if not worse than Hitler. My wife is ashamed of Israel and its despicable treatment of people. That is why we all must not allow Israel to enjoy our hard earned money taxes going to support their criminal behavior. We must pressure Israel to sign the 1948 agreement with the Palestinians. If they do sign it all troubles in the East will stop and maybe for once the world will not look down at our policies regarding the world. Please join me and write to your congressman and senator to pressure Israel in to signing the 1948 agreement with Palestine and stop the bloodshed of innocent people. One cannot claim to be a human being and agree with Israeli violence!
29 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I will never forget Tears of Gaza
moholt-valland21 August 2012
Gazas tårer/ Tears of Gaza by Vibeke Løkkeberg is up there with other Greate documentaries like Bowling for Columbine By Michael Francis Moorend,Farenheit 9/11 and Arnas Children By Juliano Mer Khamis and Danniel Danniel!

Its a disturbing documentary who presents the terror and the impact of the terror,by and on the traumatized children of Gaza in Palestine.

The scene that struck my heart, and that I shall never forget is showing a little girl who is standing inside his room and agitated tells the cameraman that gas bombs have destroyed all her clothes and favorite things. "What is she supposed to wear? everything is ruined! "She is 4 or 5 years old!

It is a documentary that will make you feel! And it may also cause you to act! I wish you a great viewing experience! This movie you will not forget!

With lots of love frame Norway! ..Peace!!!
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
excellent film
adammcadam16 August 2019
You can see it made some evil zionists mad and they are lying claiming that by slaughtering children that the zionist colonialists are "just defending themselves and their homeland against attackers, murderers, terrorists". How evil these zionists are to try to justify their war crimes. Justice will be done one day.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An intensely illuminating but extremely graphic documentary about Israel's destruction of Gaza during Operation Cast Lead
bandersonggc24 March 2024
Watching this documentary is like watching people who are stuck in bad dream.

And the most terrifying part is: They know they're dreaming but are unable, try as they might, to jolt themselves awake, trapped forever in a permanent nightmare.

What struck me most about this film is the mood and atmosphere. As documentaries go, this one contains very few frills or embellishments. Music is used sparingly, punctuating extended periods of eerie silence. And yet the atmosphere is haunting and surreal, seeming to blur the line between fantasy and reality.

This documentary is shown through the eyes of three children in Gaza whose family members are killed during Israel's 22-day assault from late 2008 to early 2009, known as Operation Cast Lead.

The "operation" killed 1,400 Palestinians, more than three-quarters of them civilians, including 350 children. Some 6,800 homes were completely destroyed and tens of thousands of others damaged by Israeli bombing, which left behind 600,000 tons of rubble.

Gaza is a tiny strip of land, about 25 miles long and five miles wide, and is widely regarded as one of the most densely populated places on Earth. Nearly half of its 1.5 million inhabitants (the total population at the time of Cast Lead) are children.

"Tears of Gaza" is told primarily through the eyes of three of these children, who are mourning the deaths of some of their family members killed by Israeli airstrikes.

The feeling of hopeless and destitution colors almost every second of this film. Even when people seem to be enjoying themselves - watching TV, building sand castles on the beach, dancing and singing and clapping during a nighttime bachelor party - an eerie gloom hangs palpably overhead, permeating every moment of existence.

The use of the term "open-air prison" to describe Gaza is routinely derided by Israeli apologists as hysterical propaganda, but after watching "Tears of Gaza," it begins to seem more like a cruel euphemism.

The activities of daily life are frequently interrupted by drones and helicopters buzzing overhead, the Israeli wardens keeping an ever-watchful eye on their Palestinian prisoners. Israeli boats patrol the seas and fire warning shots to ensure that Palestinian fishermen don't travel more than three miles off shore. Take a moment to imagine what it would be like to gaze out at the horizon of an infinite ocean and yet feeling - knowing - that you are trapped. As scholar Tareq Baconi puts it in his book "Hamas Contained," daily life in Gaza is characterized by "endless motion in stillness."

The film doesn't show it, but a giant "security" fence surrounds every inch of Gaza's perimeter, with Israel studiously controlling what goes in and what goes out, even going so far as to calculate the calories of the food allowed into Gaza at just above starvation-level.

The somber scenes are violently punctuated by the whoosh and crash of an Israeli bomb, followed by extremely graphic close-up footage of the aftermath - mass panic, sirens wailing, throngs of people shouting and converging at the site of a demolished home, the lifeless and bloody bodies of children being pulled from the rubble, rushed into the hospital on stretchers, their tiny bodies writhing during intubation, half-conscious infants gurgling on their own vomit, their mothers and fathers sobbing uncontrollably and cursing their fate.

In one scene, a little girl recounts the deaths of her family members in an Israeli airstrike. "Life is hard," she says. "Really hard." She gives the impression of being mature and hardened beyond her years, but then she suddenly collapses to one knee and buries her head in the crook of of arm, sobbing. Her mother has to help her to her feet. She can barley stand, her head drooping, all the life drained from her body. She is led into the family's tent to lie down.

These are the "Tears of Gaza."
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Tears of Gaza = 90 minutes of slaughter
moacow18 February 2011
You can compare Tears of Gaza with Passion of the Jew by Mel Gibson in South Park. It is only 90 minutes of people getting slaughtered. I understand that the world should see how horrible Palestine got it, but is it really necessary to show it for 90 minutes? This film does nothing but show one perspective of the conflict, that is OK, but we do not get any briefing on why they are being bombed, we don't even see who the bombers are nor hear anything from them at all. I believe that the film would express more sympathy for Palestine if they i confronted Israel with the photos the got; how can this sort of action be defended?

During the film we get three stories from three different children. Yet we also get stories from others during the film, I believe they try to create more sympathy when they hear stories from children. This does not work for me, the stories are also mixed with others and the storyline in this film is... well... a pathetic attempt to get sympathy.

I agree that the world should see how they have to live day by day, but this is not the way.
13 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One sided Islamic view of Palestinian/Israeli conflict
rrcharpe31 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This film is propaganda and not objective in any respect whatsoever. It does not bring in the endless rocketing of Israel. It does not bring up the effect of Hamas on Gaza and how the Islamic terrorist organization has continually rejected peace and advocates the destruction of Israel and the wiping out of the Jewish people. When you only show bombs landing and do not show why those bombs were dropped (Islamic terrorist acts by Hamas and the other terrorists in Gaza) it simply perpetuates the antisemitism inherent in movies/documentaries of this type. To say that this film is one-sided (Muslim and Palestinian point of view) is accurate to a point: however, there is a larger and more insidious agenda here. That is to use Palestian children as pawns in a fight for survival by the Jewish people who have continually wanted to end the fighting between themselves and the so-called Palestinian people. I say so called because there never in the history of the world was a country called Palestine. There was a territory governed by Jordan, before WWII, that listed the territory as Palestine but it could have equally been called Israel as it was the exact same geographical area. Oh well, in movies one cannot expect to get an objective view and this movie stinks because it is so one sided and only highlights the plight of Palestian children but not that of the Jewish children who live in daily fear from Islamic radical terrorists coming over the border from Gaza or shooting rockets into their towns day and night for years on end. StocktonRob
4 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed