Wedding in Bessarabia (2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
My Big Fat Bessarabian Wedding
josephsyu9 September 2012
This is a totally enjoyable movie that gives international audiences a look at Bessarabian wedding traditions while still being universal enough to be appreciated by general audiences. The two leads give strong performances that make you empathize with the difficulties they're encountering during the ceremonies while at least one or two of the supporting cast will remind you of relatives you've met at weddings you've actually attended.

Although this film does not seem to have the mainstream distribution it deserves and is mainly playing at specialized film festivals, if you get the chance to check it out I highly recommend that you do so. It's a fun movie that will make you feel good while still giving you just enough substance to talk about with your friends at the end.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
the differences that bring us together
dromasca4 March 2018
Weddings are sometimes odd gatherings that bring together people from different backgrounds, nationalities, identities. Films about weddings have been used too describe not only the folkloric aspects of tradition, but also to deal with rather serious issues beyond relationships - social and national gaps, stereotypes, fear of 'the other'. The best of them succeeded in mixing the 'easy' and relaxed approach with attentive description of the characters and of the truth beyond the appearances. I can now think at examples as Mira Nair's "Monsoon Wedding" or Joel Zwick's "My Big Fat Greek Wedding". In 2009 the fashion reached Eastern Europe when Romanian and Moldavian cinema studios got together to make "Wedding in Bessarabia" (or "Nunta in Basarabia") directed by Nap Toader.

There are many ways this film can be see and commented. One can start at the historical metaphor level, with the Romanian groom marrying the Moldavian bride which is also more ore less openly courted by the Russian pretender. The history of Bessarabia, the Eastern half of historic Moldavia fallen at the beginning of the 19th century under imperial Russia rule, unified and becoming part of the Great Romania exactly 100 years ago, only to fall back under the Soviet rule during World War II as a result of the pact between Hitler and Stalin, could fit well the scenario. However, director Nap Toader chose to focus on contemporaneity and more exactly on the cultural, language and morality differences between the different classes of characters: the relatively 'westernized' Romanian from the West of the border, the Moldavians torn and divided themselves between their (long time oppressed) Romanian identity and the Russian influence. All characters are living at their own pace the process of transition between the Communist rule and democracy and modernity which are slow to show their benefits in this part of the world, with corruption, demagogy and even crime putting pressure on life at national and personal level. The wedding itself has its own dynamics, and the Romanian cinema has its own tradition of using the theme as a metaphoric space where tradition is invaded by reality and sometimes small history meets big history - see as example Horatiu Malaele's "Silent Wedding" ("Nunta muta") made just one year before this film.

The identity problems of Bessarabia and the political issues related to the possible re-unification in the future are complex and certainly cannot be dealt with all in one film. They even become more complicated in the years since this film was made, as the Republic of Moldova stepped back on certain respects from its path of getting closer to Romania and joining Europe. I am not familiar with other works of Moldavian cinema or literature that deal with these issues - they may exist but I do not know them. In their absence, I would take this film as what it is - a snapshot of the identity crisis of the Moldavian society and of the relationship with the rest of the Romanian nation, treated in a light manner, without making any definitive judgments. The film succeeds to entertain and without eluding the tough questions, and without pretending to provide solutions. Certainly the stereotypes are present, but please show me any ethnic comedy that can completely avoid them. The older and younger actors make a great job, and it is sufficient to see Vlad Logigan and Victoria Bobu looking at each other to understand that their love is genuine and this is a marriage to last, despite all the difficulties. Maybe here lies the optimistic message of this film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why do we avoid Romanian movies ?
keanu_sad8 November 2010
The movie has a simple format made for the public taste,yet its message is so important. From the mingle of comic and melodramatic adventures the theme of xenophobia arises overlapping the historical past. As you might read in the summary the movie develops on a wedding of a Romanian boy and a Basarabian girl. The director brilliantly brings humor to the rather serious historical grudge between those who now represent different nations(though speaking the same language).

In private, the director stated that he feels that through this movie he accomplishes his destiny: to make the two nations know each other better and hopefully bring them together through love.

Critics agree that this movie can become the backbone of professional Romanian cinema. Don't miss it !
39 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
More like Confusion in Basarabia
calinn_g13 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, i must say i'm romanian and live very close to the border with Basarabia (Republic of Moldova), in the north east of Romania. I feel the need to mention that, to be sure that people won't omit that i'm romanian and accuse me of being harsh with the movie just because i don't understand the culture. I do, i've lived in it for most of my life.

Now the movie: there's more confusion in this film than i've seen in any film before. We have all kinds of confused, undefined characters, mixed characters, characters with doubtful allegiance and confused views on basically anything discussed in the movie. They're all a bit on this side, a bit on the other, no one has a firm and decided view on anything.

The movie is basically about a young couple (he's romanian, she's moldavian) that were officially married in Romania and go to Moldova's capital city, Chisinau, to celebrate the wedding with her family's relatives. They are accompanied by the grooms mom and his uncle (probably the only family he's got, cause normally if he had more relatives, they would be at the party too). They are traveling by train and the first scenes are shot during the journey. The initial mood is very relaxed, suggesting the viewer they're watching a comedy. But they are and they are not at the same time. They arrive in Chisinau and as they knock at her parents' apartment door, you would expect to see happy faces behind it. Instead they are received by sad, unenthusiastic figures. You think "OK, maybe her parents are mad at her for not asking permission to get married or not presenting the groom to them before doing it or something". No. They are all sad because the family dog just died. Very sad. Ridiculously sad, given the circumstances. In fact so sad, that the father of the bride, an obscure poet, reads a poem dedicated to the dog at dinner. No toasts for the newly wed, no "let's get to know each other, after all we're relatives now". A freaking speech in the memory of the dog. In the next scenes we are confirmed that the family of the girl is also a bit suspicious about the boy. And they are both suspicious regarding his love to her, but also about his political views. Although the father seems a romanian partizan, he seems to dislike the boy's family for ... being romanians. By now we realize that this is not only supposed to be about a wedding, the makers want to maker other points too (remember the words "they want"). Almost all the characters we meet later have a similar attitude. And the romanian side seems to dislike the moldavians too and see themselves as superior... Well at least except when they don't dislike them. They like them now, dislike them later, then like them again and so on.

In this whole soup of mixed opinions and conflicts, a character stands out: the husband of the brides sister, a mob like figure, well dressed, well groomed, apparently wealthy etc. He pays for what the couple needs, he makes arrangements for the party etc. He looks like the caring big brother. Except that he's not. He also loves the bride. Not like a brother. He constantly chicanes the groom on all kinds of matters: his love for his bride, his political views, his origins. By now you start to believe: OK, this is what the movie's about. It is. And it's not. Only if it were about this, but every time the movie focuses on this aspect, something happens and shifts the focus towards the political again. Then comes back to sentimental and family relationships, and back again to the political, it's like a ping pong match. And it's annoying, confusing and damaging. By the end the film seems to be heading nowhere. You see there are 30 minutes left and you have the impression that the real plot, the real conflict is yet to be revealed. And it never is revealed. They go to the wedding party, all kinds of shenanigans happen without pointing the action to any direction and suddenly the film ends. And that's it.

If you read the review first and then see the movie, you'll probably don't understand much of what i've written here. If you watch the movie you'll probably see what i meant.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a step
Vincentiu1 December 2013
a wedding in Basarabia. a young couple and a web of traditions, past shadows, traumas. and the humor as unique form to say a story of this borders. so, it is not a great movie. only reflection of deep roots and images about the other. and it is not easy for a not Romanian/Basarabian public to understand many of its references or nuances. a cause - the role of exercise to present sides of a reality by director, not perfect but full of good intentions and useful for remember old differences. Victoria Bobu and Vlad Logigan make decent roles but out of the slices of mentality projections, it seems be a film about nothing. so, less than a construction, the film is , rather, a step. interesting, beautiful and good start for new projects about borders between two similar - different cultures .
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
the collision
Kirpianuscus24 July 2016
a wedding. Bessarabian bride. Romanian bridegroom. the families. and ... the collision between traditions, clichés, past vs. future, truth and myths. a nice comedy. only at the first sigh. because the message is bitter , the acting - seductive - especially Vlad Logigan, the stereotypes from Romanian and Russian way to discover the reality - useful for give new perspective about the story. because it is more than a Bessarabian Big Fat wedding. it explores, in smart manner, the cultural bridges and walls between a province under long Russian/Soviet occupation and a country who seams be model, ex invader, motherland and the ambiguous other. a crazy film. at the first sigh. useful, for Romanian public as good entertainment. and not only.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed