Sure; it is an arbitrary point in one's Star Wars journey to get annoyed by this, but watching this episode, I guess its mediocrity along with the consistency of the concept, it finally got very annoying: what sort of Galactic Republic is this, where so many of the representatives are unlected monarchs? An assortment of Kings, Duchesses, Princes, Queens, and in the end democracy seems to exist only as a facade at the top-tier of this political system. And if Padme was somehow an "elected Queen" at 14 years old (go figure but ok, I accept this), this fishy fellow here is just one more ruler by right of blood.
What annoys me here is not so much that the Republic is barely a republic, it is just a general frustration at the fact that not just SW but many, many science fiction settings insist that a majority of space-faring, extremely advanced technologically civilisations will resort to hereditary monarchy as a system of government. Is this a bit of a weird analysis for a cartoon episode about alien squid people? YES, of course it is, but you know what, it's a necessary conversation to have. This is why Star Trek fans revel at their preference.
Obviously the episode overall doesn't help one who falls into this rabbit hole get out and look past these issues - it is another in a long series of generic 'planet's ruler has to choose between allegiance to the Republic and obviously nefarious separatists' plots (notice how it is always the ruler who has to be swayed. The people have no say in this), peppered with shark-people (they are evil, they are sharks), and underwater lasers.
An obvious step down from the strong second half of season 3, but hey, gave (sea)food for thought.