The Quiet Ones (2014) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
126 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Plenty of potential wasted in a dull possession movie
Leofwine_draca22 April 2016
THE QUIET ONES is another disappointing effort put out by the new and revamped Hammer Films. It's a generic science-team-researches-ghost type effort, obviously modelled on old-fashioned epics like THE STONE TAPE, yet the material is so sub-standard and predictable that it becomes very difficult to sit through, let alone enjoy.

The entire blame for the failure can be laid on the script, which took at least four people to write; four diverse folk who between them wrote everything from URBAN Gothic and RAMPART to THE UNINVITED and QUARANTINE 2: TERMINAL . Everything else is adequate APART from the script: Sam Claflin is an acceptable lead actor, and Jared Harris is pleasingly old-fashioned in his approach to his role. I liked the idea of the 1970s setting and the film-within-a-film type material is always fun.

Unfortunately, the story boils down to all the old possession clichés, and even a few ridiculous CGI scenes here and there (thankfully they're kept extremely brief). Attempts to build mystery are negated by having an exceptionally dull explanation at the end, plus one of those stupid last-reel twists It's hardly a wonder that Hammer have gone very quiet recently, as none of their new films are remotely like their classics of old.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I Love Just About Any English...
Mehki_Girl4 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
... but this tanks. I recalled that I had actually started watching this before, but barely paid attention and never saw the end.

Now I know why. Boring, trite, done a million times before. The movie couldn't quite make up it's mind what it wanted to be - a true possession story or one about madness.

All the tropes were here - sexy, but "crazy" girl that all the men want, internet doctor who crises boundaries, not as sexy as she thinks vamp, scratchy old films of psyche sessions where the characters say something mysterious on a dead voice and suddenly looks into the camera with a dead scare, bumps in the night, sudden loud nosies, stuff happening in too dark rooms, possessions...

The pseudo science was downtight silly. I kept thinking maybe this was set a hundred years before.

None of the acting was bad or even the special effects. The cinematography was fine.

It was just... Boring.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Brits have at the staples of 21st century American horror
drownsoda9025 April 2014
"The Quiet Ones" focuses on a three students at the University of Oxford who join a research group led by Dr. Joseph Coupland (Jared Harris). The group is working to document parapsychological phenomenon in a young woman whom they believe has created and manifests a presence which she calls Evie. Isolated in the back country outside of Oxford, the group begins to unravel and secrets come to light.

I first off have to say that the primary reason I saw this film was because the poster was breathtaking— Gothic, beautiful, and unconventional. I wasn't even that impressed with the trailer, but the poster had some promise for me. Now, after seeing the film, I have mixed feelings.

It starts off well enough, and maintains a sense of ambiguity in its early stages, keeping the audience at arm's length; this is wonderful during the first act, but the problem is that it never seems to break free of this, even as the plot unravels and the truth comes out in the end— there is little surprise in the film because it never lets its audience in close enough to be affected by it. Clunky pacing and editing is largely the culprit here, which seems to prevent the film from ever really gaining steam. Instead, we are presented with a series of repetitious happenings that fail to build on one another, and the film edges on becoming an unmemorable blur as a consequence. The script feasts heavily on the staples of 21st century American horror films to its own detriment— we have possessed girls in white dresses, Satanic symbols, demons, religious cults, blah, blah, blah. You know the story.

That said, the film does have some strengths. The script is purportedly based on an actual experiment done in Toronto in the 1970s, so the film does have that working in its favor, no matter how ludicrous it is to take the events depicted at face value— the fact that there is at least a shred of truth to this is compelling in a world where every horror film released makes false claims of being based on reality. It is also remarkably well photographed; the interplay between the standard camera and the 8mm footage being filmed by the characters lends the picture a unique mood and sense of voyeurism, and the depictions of the experiments at times recall John Hough's British classic, "The Legend of Hell House." The performances in the film are also solid, with Jared Harris reeling everything in.

I think the overall problem I had with this film was, despite the fact that it roots itself in history as a period piece, the majority of it is just frankly underwhelming because it too often takes the route of 90% of the horror films we see released here in America every month. The premise is intriguing, but the execution leaves us with a relatively well-made film whose main problem is that is just isn't that darned compelling. 6/10.
36 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
ughhh VOLUME SPECTRUM
minnieweathernatalie24 April 2020
I cut it off at 25 min...constantly having to adjust the volume. Loud as hell, characters whispering, loud as hell, characters whispering...SO ANNOYING
37 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Intriguing, enjoyable, supernatural horror that lacks sufficient bite to really scare.
TheSquiss23 April 2014
The Quiet Ones is the latest offering from resurrected horror studios Hammer Films. After the mixed fortunes of The Resident, Wake Wood, Let Me In and The Woman in Black, the studio that was once the spearhead of Great British horror lets rip with a chilling tale, purportedly based on truth, about a psychiatric patient's apparent supernatural abilities.

University professor Joseph Coupland (Jared Harris) and his research students, Krissi (Erin Richards) and Harry (Rory Fleck-Byrne), study Jane Harper (Olivia Cooke) through a slot in a locked door as, alone in her room, she appears able to summon the dead. While Jane torments herself and suffers at the hands of an apparent poltergeist, Coupland and his team endeavour to explain every occurrence with reason and logic. He recruits a young filmmaker, Brian (Sam Claflin), to document the experiment but Brian falls for Jane and her behavior becomes ever more extreme. But everything can be explained with science. Can't it?

We've been here before. The Quiet Ones is not an entirely original idea, but then neither was The Borderlands, and look how unnerving that was! It's a fine idea with great settings (Oxford University, an abandoned mansion) and good performances. The trouble is, for a horror it isn't terribly scary. I sat down for the screening expecting to grip the arms of my seat, scrunch up my toes and wonder again what the hell I was doing putting myself through this. Alas, the hair on the back of my neck remained largely prostrate. Maybe three horror films in a week deadens the impact.

There are plenty good 'jumps' but most are introduced with a rousing score or an obvious lull in activity. There are a few red herrings to build the tension and leave the viewer taut with expectation but at no point could I say I was scared or needed to look away from the screen to remind myself I was safe and in a cinema and not right there and about to be evil's next victim. Being on edge is good, but not good enough.

The special effects work well and there are one or two particularly enjoyable moments where DoP Mátyás Erdély has let rip with the lighting and camera work. Likewise, the props and set dressing set the scene beautifully but, were it not for the cast, John Pogue's film would be merely dull instead of at least managing to be enjoyable.

The last time I saw Jared Harris, he was swinging at the end of a rope in Mad Men and it's great to see him back on the big screen in a role that is less constricting than that of Lane Pryce. His Coupland is a combination of obsessive sleazebag and kindly mentor and the blend is perfect, never veering into the realms of pastiche. Likewise, Richards, most recently seen in Open Grave, draws us in with her determined temptress, the kind of girl you'd want to know but never cross.

It is Olivia Cooke, though, who makes The Quiet Ones worthwhile. It is difficult not to focus on her when she appears, even fleetingly, upon the screen. The other actors are her guests as she commands our attention. Always convincing as Jane the vulnerable waif, acolyte of evil and desperate victim, she manages to be sexy and enticing despite her sunken eyes and bruised skin; a black widow that Brian, unsurprisingly, struggles to resist. Let's hope Cooke isn't merely a saving grace in her next project: screenwriter Stiles White's directorial debut, Ouija.

The morning after, The Quiet Ones remains an intriguing story, true or not, that is well performed. But it lacks guts or real bite and, perhaps, could do with being a lot louder.

Or at least whispering in a very sinister way…

For more reviews from The Squiss, subscribe to my blog and like the Facebook page.
22 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Shallow and plodding
Finalreminder1 June 2014
The film is slow, plodding and lacks any depth. The scares don't scare. It lacks suspense or creepiness. Character development falls flat on it's face; you just don't become endeared to any of the characters, at all. Rory Fleck-Byrne and Erin Richards seem completely redundant in the film. Jared Harris performed well, but even he couldn't save this one. I think the whole possession thing has been done to death, and to pull it off nowadays takes strong characters, a solid story and a bit of a twist. Insidious for example. I personally wouldn't waste time and money on the film. Wait until it comes on TV in a couple of years. Definitely not a must watch movie.
48 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Routine horror.
The_moan_of_all_moans16 April 2014
When one of these films come out, and i categorise it because they are quite simply all the same at the core, i find myself hoping for something new, something shocking, inventive, anything to completely separate it from any other demonic/paranormal film out there. From the trailer this didn't give much away, which was a pleasant surprise. The story was there, yes, but it didn't feel the need to show any of its frightening tricks; rightfully leaving them up the sleeve where they belong. And i was left slightly intrigued by its mystique.

It was a good film, i enjoyed it, in ways it had its own unique vibe, but it is not enough to distance itself from the rest. The typical "jump" moments, where silence is replaced with a sharp, loud noise. The story is re hashed. Cults and Entities. The one thing it tries to do different is instead of just admitting that there is something wrong, the professor is adamant that the going ons are because of the patients mind. Things are flying about and going on fire because the patients mind did it.....

Jared Harris (Professor Coupland) and Olivia Cooke (Jane Harper) are the two who standout the most. The rest are fodder; displaying very poor acting and their characters where very tacky. The film does have its moments (T-Rex soundtrack) and it does have an unusual mellowness surrounding it, but unfortunately, it is just another routine horror.
23 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Almost impossible to watch
lukas-stenger20 May 2020
The implementation is so boring and shiftless that The Quiet Ones turned out as a horrible, instead of a horror movie. What's left of a promising story idea is nothing more than a 98 minutes collection of endless jump-scares which makes it almost impossible to watch.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad but not brilliant
neil-47611 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Cameraman Brian is engaged to document the work of Professor Coupland towards helping Jane: although it is suggested that she is possessed, the Professor believes that the poltergeist-like phenomena which accompany her are actually rooted in her psyche rather than some external agency.

Following the success of The Woman In Black (a film about which I have mixed feelings), the revitalised Hammer Studios produce a possession / supernatural / psychological / partial found footage hybrid which purports to have been based on a true story, even to the point of including shots of the "real" people in the closing credits (good luck if you try tracking down the "true" story).

It's not bad. It's not scary, although it is peppered with "made you jump" moments. But it has a good sense of atmosphere, and it is quite an entertaining story, and is a little different from other entries in the genre.

I was sitting in front of a couple and, as it finished, he said "I thought that was quite good," and she said, "I thought it was sh!t." I think most people are going to either quite like it or be disappointed by it.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Boring Ones would have been a more appropriate title...
paul_haakonsen5 August 2014
"The Quiet Ones" turned out to be somewhat of a dull and boring movie experience. Which was a shame, because the movie did have potential to be so much more, especially given the setting of the movie.

The story is about a college professor and some of his student assistants performing an experiment on a young woman who is either haunted, possessed or suffering from an unknown ailment.

Story-wise then "The Quiet Ones" wasn't particularly impressive, because the aspects and possibilities that the movie had at hand weren't utilized. And instead, the movie just trotted ahead at a very dull and slow pace, without anything even remotely scary happening. Sure there were some nice enough moments here and there, but they were few and far between, and were hardly enough to salvage the movie in any possible way.

The best parts of "The Quiet Ones" were the acting of Jared Harris and Olivia Cooke.

If you are looking for a good thrill or scare, then "The Quiet Ones" is hardly the movie to spend time on, because it doesn't offer that at all.

The movie doesn't bring anything new to the genre and as such it was a much below average movie. I am rating "The Quiet Ones" a mere 3 out of 10 stars, because I wasn't impressed in one bit.
31 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
genuinely surprised by the negative reviews
memoryplague22 May 2014
Aside from The Exorcist, possession films always seem so lacking. They never have enough real, human tension. They focus on predictable jump scares and an even more predictable plot. It's safe to say that, in general, possession films don't have much to offer. Thankfully, The Quiet Ones does not suffer from the same faults of many other similar films.

Rather than simply focus on the dark progression of a possessed being, The Quiet Ones presents the frustrating fears that torment the young, inexperienced scientists, as they struggle with their desire to help a suffering being through the means of science and logic, the underlying threat of possible demonic possession,and the obsessive nature of Professor Coupland.

The performance of the cast is top notch, the effects are subtle, the only disappointing aspect was the very, very end, and the fact that as a whole, the film just wasn't that scary. Still, if the concept of possession interests you, but you've been disappointed with past projects, you might want to give this a shot.
49 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Loud Quiet Loud.
morrison-dylan-fan17 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
After having had my nerves shredded by the revived 'Hammer Horror' 2012 film The Woman In Black, (Which was also my first ever Hammer Horror)I was thrilled to discover that Hammer's newest title has just reached UK cinemas,which led to me getting ready to discover how quiet Hammer Horror could be.

View on the film:

Whilst the title itself contains the word 'Quiet' co-writer/ (along with Craig Rosenberg,Tom De Ville and Oren Moverman) director John Pogue decides to leave any silences behind with a rumbling soundtrack.Despite stopping some of the more subtler chills covering the screen,rattles the bird cages to breaking point which led to me last night having to keep my bedroom light on,thanks to Pogue making everyone of Harper's screams screech across the screen.

Placing the film in 1974, (a time when Hammer was in its last Psycho- Thriller Horror era) Pogue smartly uses Brian's film making as a path to give the title to different,stylish appearance,with the sharp tooth clearness in the discussions between Coupland and the students being counted by Brian's rough'n' ready filming,which helps to give the chilling Horror taking on screen a raw,intensely gritty atmosphere.

For the screenplay of the film (which is very loosely based on some real life tests,which led to not a single 1 of the participants being either cursed or killed),the writers delicately allow for the screws of the movie to gradually turn,as Coupland and his students change from being easy-going to being horrified at what they cause Jane Harper to reveal.

Sadly,whilst the screenplay does very well at creating an icy mood,the 2 twists in the title don't fully hit in the way that they appear to have been planned,due to their having been far too stronger signals to their arrival (with 1 of the twist being something that I correctly guessed about 30 minutes into the title.)

Showing the shadow of Peter Cushing to still be cast upon Hammer Horror,Jared Harris gives a delightfully crusty performance as professor Coupland,with Harris displaying a real determination to cure Harper,despite all of the clear deadly Horror's that he's beginning to face.Placed in the shoes of the audience,Sam Claflin smartly avoids Brian McNeil becoming annoyingly naïve,by showing a warm,natural desire to protect Jane from the tests that Coupland and his students are forcing her to take part in.

Chilling the screen up from the moment she shivers across the screen,the beautiful Olivia Cooke delivers a fantastic,nerve crushing performance with Jane Harper,thanks to Cooke attacking the movies shots of terror with a devilish playfulness which really allows the character to get under the skin,as Harper begins to reveal to Coupland and his team the far from quiet Horrors of this Hammer Horror.
25 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lame, Unoriginal and Boring
claudio_carvalho26 September 2014
In 1974, in Oxford, Professor Joseph Coupland (Jared Harris) invites his introspective student Brian McNeil (Sam Claflin) to film his research about the supernatural with his two assistants, Krissi Dalton (Erin Richards) and Harry Abrams (Rory Fleck-Byrne), and the subject Jane Harper (Olivia Cooke).

Jane is a young woman with no memory from the past that has been abandoned that believes she is possessed by a doll named Evey that gives telekinetic power to her. She is kept awake in an isolated house with a doll, where Prof. Coupland intends that she puts her evil energy in and then destroy the doll to healing Jane. Strange things happen in the house and Brian feels sorry for Jane and he researches her tattoo, learning an evil secret about the past of Jane.

"The Quiet Ones" is a lame, unoriginal and boring movie by the new Hammer. The predictable story is not totally bad, but the screenplay is tedious and the camera work is awful. My vote is three.

Title (Brazil): "A Marca do Medo" ("The Mark of the Fear")
25 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Horror movie defined by loud noises to scare you.
frankblack-7996122 June 2020
This isnt a bad movie. It just really irritates me when they purposely make the dialog barely audible so that you turn your tv up so you can follow the story. Then have all manner of loud noises to get cheap jump scares out of the audience. To me thats the biggest signal of a weak ass plot line or some other difficency the director or writers are trying to make up for. This movie is full of cheap jump scares with some real creepiness every so often.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Professor and team of Oxford University Students undertake experiments on a mentally disturbed girl to cure her of her depression.
alice-houston1429 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
So I went to see this film on a whim, without looking into it or having taken much notice of its publicity since it was released I was completely surprised to see 'HAMMER' as the titles rolled. Hammer Films stand alone and so already my expectations were set high for this film, however I was disappointed.

The qualities of this film that did shine through the vague, sometimes senseless plot were the sound design, production design, costume and locations. The locations were well sourced, however I feel that they weren't used to their full advantage. Due to the time period of this film (1970's) it is easy to spot that the DoP is relentlessly trying to avoid road markings/signs/modern day scenery in order to capture the unmistakable and well known buildings of Oxford. However this ended up in bad composition and dodgy angles in my personal opinion, it was too obvious.

The sound design was what really gave this film the edge it needed, very subtle, a lot of common techniques used but it served its purpose and I truly did jump! However one criticism would be that it was too overpowering at points and the levels were quite unbearable.

The production design and costume were again on par and served their purpose, however there really wasn't any aspect that impressed me throughout.

The plot from the beginning I feel is muddled. Brian (Sam Claflin) I feel is just thrown into the story blindly, we don't have a sense of his life or background (Briefly mentioned in conversation with the Professor). Again with the remaining characters I feel that their persona's are loosely built and lacking. This made me lose interest at points and I felt that the Professor's generic character was overly-cheesy and quite annoying. Over all the plot is almost thrown down and the loose ends don't tie up in places of relationships.

The films basis is clever and the subject it was inspired from is truly interesting. However I feel that the vision was lost through the lack of really engaging with the characters at the writing stage. The passion in this film was lost through the desperate desire to include every piece of information that led to the end reveal.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hotpants Horror
action-man10115 April 2014
Painfully dull horror set in the 70s that should've been called The Boring Ones. Yet another girl-in-a-white-nightdress-is-possessed snorefest. Far too talky and takes ages to get going. By the time something does happen it's too little too late and predictable. May scare some children and easily frightened wimpy adults but nobody else. Some unintentional laughs via the hilarious number of different 70s clothes the blonde hottie wears. Her skimpy hotpants are probably the best thing in this film and stopped me from leaving the cinema early. A disappointment from the newly relaunched Hammer Films and not a patch on the far scarier The Woman in Black.
15 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tense but does not go far enough
cinematic_aficionado25 April 2014
A psychiatrist takes a team of people to a retreat with a mental health patient in order to help her. Part of the process is the conducting of a series of experiments which go terribly awry.

An initial struggle for me was how can a doctor be allowed to take a vulnerable patient away and use as a guinea pig; the ease with which it occurred, caused certain moral thrash. As the story moves on, certain inexplicable incidents occur with seem to trouble the entire team.

Of course these "incidents" have had to take place since this is after all a horror film. The events cause a certain split as the doctor in charge believes there is a naturalistic explanation behind it whilst some of the team hold the view that there is a transcendent reality beyond what we see, feel and understand.

On the whole, it is an effective horror film as the story progresses with good pace, upping the intensity with the passing of time. It is held back by a rather sense of predictability due to a highly worked story/theme (night/dark/silence interrupted by a sudden noisy intervention) and a not very believable initiating incident (the taking of a patient away for experimentation).
21 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring!
dareent-amethyst10 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The quiet ones is more of a psychology thriller movie. It started off quite strong, it kept me guessing and intrigued, but as time goes, i realised the plot didn't really go anywhere, it's confusing and not in the good way. The speeches started to feel too long and the plot is getting more and more boring. The tension started to build again when Brian got all the information about Evey and there was some real potential of the movie to turn out okay, but it didn't, it didn't turn anywhere. I am disappointed because i was excited to come in and see this movie. I give it a 2 for being boring and having so many plot holes. But honestly, the movie isn't too bad, it is clever and it had potential, the actors weren't good but they weren't awful either.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent but forgettable
t-hf18 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
So i saw this British horror flick this Wednesday and it's fair to say that I was surprised by how Britain can still pull off a good horror in an age dominated by American gore-fests and standard jump scares. But despite it's chills, it didn't really leave much of an impression on me hours later. The film has jump scares aplenty and some genuine chills, but doesn't really deviate from the standard "experiment gone wrong", supernatural schtick thats been re-hashed many times.

The film mainly concerns an experiment to force a malevolent spirit out of a young girl who is supposedly possessed by it. The experiment is led by an oxford professor (a brilliant performance by Moriarty himself, Jared Harris) and is see through the eyes of his cameraman (nice to see the cameraman as the hero for once) and the rest of his team. As usual, something goes wrong and the team are endangered, but the plot deviates from the usual slasher, gore-fest cliché which is great. The plot holds some great surprises, chills and some twists but mainly relies on jump scares to freak you out. Another thing is that there seems to be someone smoking in every single scene (just to remind you that you're in 1970s England). Not really relevant but just something I noticed.

All in all, the movie has some great performances and is very scary, but suffers from a re-hashed story and some clichéd slasher elements which is where the "forgettable" comes in. But through the murk, it has an essentially English feel to it and doesn't take itself too seriously.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Quiet AND Boring Ones
dfa12037419 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
University Professor Joseph Coupland, two of his students and a selected cameraman, are participating in an experiment to prove that people who claim they are "possessed" are actually just mentally ill. Coupland already has a patient in his care, a girl named Jane who's been abandoned continuously throughout her life but seems to generate a strange phenomena. This phenomena manifests as negative energy and takes the form of an infant doll-like creature, only Jane sees, named "Evey". The more the students witness, the more convinced they becomes that there is more to "Evey" than meets the eye, but Coupland is reluctant to believe this, and the more he refuses to believe, the more sinister "Evey" becomes.

The Quiet Ones is another of those movies that looks good in the trailers but is actually a pretty boring film overall. For about the first 50 minutes or so, nothing really happens at all, and there are a couple of moments that make you think it's about to pick up, but it doesn't. It does pick up in the last 30 minutes, but not by much.

It's not really that scary either with the scares mainly coming in the form of sudden loud noises and other "jump scares". These moments may make you jump, but it doesn't mean they scare you and the film relies too much on this tactic. The atmosphere is quite decent, but this is about the only real positive in the movie for me.

One thing I noticed is that not long after the movie started, the cameraman - Brian - was told by Coupland not to look into the eyes of Jane or even talk to her as he didn't want outside interference risking the results of the experiment. Queue the next scene and there's Brian chatting away to Jane looking right at her. Now, if a movie like this is to be taken seriously then there shouldn't be such an obvious story hole, and if it's not a hole then it's just really poorly written.

Pretty boring, quite non-eventful, and just a step above a total yawn-fest. This is one that you don't mind missing.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fresh, interesting British Horror
cc_vivalavida4 April 2014
The Quiet Ones is a new British horror movie from the makers of The Woman in Black. Produced by the classic crafters of horror, Hammer Productions, the film follows an Oxford professor (Jared Harris), his tutees and a student cameraman (Sam Claflin) as they attempt to both prove and document the theory that supernatural powers are simply a manifestation of psychological trauma. They begin studying a young girl who believes she is possessed by an evil entity, and a strange relationship begins to develop between her and cameraman Brian as the professor's attempts to create a poltergeist take their toll.

In an era where endless Paranormal Activity sequels, squeezing every buck out of the found-footage genre and reliance purely on cattle-prod jump scares, it's refreshing to see a horror film that seems to have been made by people who understand how suspense works. In the same way that Woman in Black tricked you into thinking that it's going to be a run-of-the-mill horror flick set in a creaky old house but did something interesting, The Quiet Ones uses the 'house in the middle of nowhere' setting in a way that doesn't just turn the lights off and throw furniture around when things go wrong.

While rare (but noticeable), there are still uses of very loud noises out of absolutely nowhere to accentuate the scares, but asides from that, they are achieved through realistic and unobtrusive special effects, a sparing but effective use of a rumbling, mechanical musical score (there is something to be said for music that can make a scene of occult research feel intense) and an unflinching refusal by the camera to shy away from the horror. The camera-work is an interesting mix of live-action and old celluloid stock filmed from the perspective of the cameraman as he observes the increasing number of bizarre and terrifying events unfolding before the investigators.

As far as performances go, Jared Harris is well cast as the physics professor slowly declining into madness in a knowing manner very reminiscent of classic Hammer-horror and Sam Claflin builds a lot on his brief performance in Catching Fire, creating a very believable character struggling with his own beliefs as the absolute horror of the experiment becomes increasingly harder to deal with. Olivia Cooke is also very good as Jane, the tortured subject of the experiment, taking a very over-used character (the silent, unblinking possessed girl) and doing something interesting with it, alternating between an almost comatose recluse and a young woman dealing with adolescence and emerging emotions.

The running time of just less than 100 minutes means that some of the character development feels a little rushed, but it means that the film has adequate time to set up scares, deliver on the suspense, and create an intriguing story without feeling repetitive. Taking unexpected turns, featuring good performances and inciting real fear in the audience, The Quiet Ones is a very welcome breath of fresh air in mainstream horror movies, proving once again that constant scenes of exorcisms and annoying families with camcorders have become tired old tropes and that the best thing to do is wipe that all away and focus on believable characters and more interesting methods to create a genuinely tense atmosphere.
66 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Far from great, yet not the worst.
nitzanhavoc18 January 2015
Like many other devout Horror fans out there (yet unlike just as many) I personally hate seeing the annoying words "based on a true story", "inspired by true events" and the likes in the beginning of Horror films. To me, it means that as long as 0.01% of the film's plot is based on something that is (or used to be) real - the creators can use this cheap trick and make the less intelligent viewer just a little bit (or even more) extra afraid. Don't get me wrong, I happen to be a fan of cheap tricks, jump scares and the likes make for a much better viewing experience for me. I still recognize these tricks for what they are: cheap.

Seeing as how The Quiet Ones boasts having factual origins, I did a little digging (honestly just a little, the second Google result proved to be sufficiently informative) and found out that on one hand this film's plot is actually based on quite a bit of true occurrences (at least more than other films claim to be). On the other hand, these "true" occurrences themselves (better known as The Philip Experiments) turned out to be no more than a hoax.

Having said that, let us focus on The Quiet Ones as a Horror film, and say that in my opinion it is quite alright. Characters and acting are pretty good (with the exception of Olivia Cooke and Jarred Harris who were excellent), and the story is quite interesting and kept me personally curious and guessing until the very end. The twist towards the ending and the ending itself were great, and I myself can't think of a better way the film could have ended.

I've mentioned cheap tricks, and The Quiet Ones definitely uses quite a few jump-scares (which as I've said I quite enjoy). What I don't enjoy are "mockumentaries" and scenes that are presented through the eye of a camera. It's a matter of personal taste and the only film using this method which I liked was the one who made it famous - The Blair Witch Project. One reason I do respect this film is that it doesn't show the "evil spirit' for more than a split second, knowing that lack of creativity, or budget, or both prevented the creators from making a "supernatural evil" worthy of camera time.

All in all, I enjoyed watching this film. I didn't find it to be innovative or original, but it wasn't at all bad. I could think of 10 Horror films off the top of my head to recommend before I'd recommend this one, but I wouldn't say it isn't worthy of watching.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Hammer In Name Only
utgard1423 July 2014
A professor and students head to an isolated house in the countryside where they study a young woman with potential supernatural abilities. Familiar story lacking in any appreciable kind of atmosphere or suspense. From a technical standpoint, it's a perfectly well-made movie of its type. Nothing to write home about but nothing to mock either. The problem is that it's all so terribly boring and predictable. If you've seen possession movies or ghost movies before, and I wager you have, then you will feel like you've seen this movie done before and better. If you do decide to watch it, be prepared that it's slow and dull. It will require commitment on your part to get through it and I doubt you'll find the payoff worth it. The revived Hammer Films continues to disappoint me. I don't expect them to try and replicate the great Hammer of old. But it would be nice if they at least tried to make movies that are fun to watch instead of tired, drab films like this.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
don't waste your time
francesca-lovett27 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I went to see this hoping this would be maybe a bit of "paranormal activity"/"insidious". It really isn't. First of all the acting is very lack lustre and there is hardly any character development so you feel nothing towards the characters. Most of the scenes seemed to focus on the main drippy boy character trying to get in the pants of the troubled haunted girl and the arrogant professor who is evidently sleeping with the so called pretty girl in the film. The only time anything remotely frightening happened was right at the end of the film, in the last 20 mins or so. Even then is was just stuff being thrown about, some characters die very quickly and then its all over, just barely lasted long enough for me to open my eyes. I wont compare it to any other film because I think it would give them a very bad reputation. Do not waste your time or money on this.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unless you are easily scared, this movie just drags on
duckitsbrianwigg9 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
In my honest opinion, this movie was a complete waste of my time. First, it drags on and on. This is the type of movie that builds itself slowly, but it just builds too too slowly to the point where every part that is suppose to be 'scary' is only slightly riveting. Nothing pops at you, even if it is unexpected. Furthermore, there are parts of the story, which are meant to be scary, that just don't make sense; so what hits you as unfolding, just fades away. I don't even know what was going on in the movie, but not for a lack of paying attention. But because the insinuations bounced around. There was a part (don't worry, it's no spoiler), where the music was building and building, and I thought, "uh oh, here comes something", but nope. In conclusion, this movie is not scary.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed