Modest Reception (2012) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Another display of Iranian cinema's irrepressible originality
Radu_A25 February 2012
This was by far the best film I saw in the Berlin Film Festival this year, which surprised me given the tense situation in the country. Like the much lauded 'A Separation', it's chock full of allusions to the unique state the people in Iran are living in, but instead of veiling this in a character study, Mani Haghighi creates (and acts) an absurd world.

Given the panache of the story, it comes almost as a shock that 'Modest Reception' was screened in the Tehran Film festival: a rich city couple confront (and confound) a number of poor border-region mountain folks, offering them bags of money in return for increasingly humiliating actions. Throughout the film, it is unclear why they are doing this, and even the final explication remains far from satisfactory; what is evident though is that they are at odds with their own lives, and use the situation to wield absolute power over the people they meet, a behavior that switches to its exact opposite at the final climax, which somewhat redeems their earlier behavior.

Having been in Iran, I would say that it helps to know the country from the inside rather than news reports. If you only know these, this film will take you completely by surprise, and you'll find it hard to understand the sub-tones. As Haghighi said during Q&A upon the question if the film had any political message: 'You know, I think everything has a political message these days'. Let it suffice to say that there is a fundamental class division in Iran (as elsewhere) between city traders (or 'basaris', for which the leading couple may stand) and rural or migrating laborers (for which their various encounters may stand for). Afghan refugees, crooks, hermits, village teachers and impoverished soldiers feature among the types presented here, all of them acting with a humility towards the arrogance of the couple that may symbolize the superceding power of money over status; that may be why the movie wasn't touched too much by censors in spite of its critical tone. However, Haghighi also admitted that the absurd story was intended to deliberately mislead any expectations by authorities and audiences alike. That may also explain why the film moves at a very fast pace and features an acid jazz theme.

'Modest Reception' is a baffling mix of social criticism and sardonic comedy, defying any expectations on Iranian cinema, and as far away from Kiarostami as you can possibly imagine.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Provocative & Challenging
corrosion-223 July 2012
An urban couple (Mani Haghighi & Taraneh Alidoosti) who may be husband & wife, or Brother & sister, or something else; drive around in remote mountainous villages in Iran distributing bags of money to people with no apparent motive or explanation. In some cases, in return for the money they request unusual, and at times humiliating and painful deeds.

Paziraie Sadeh (Modest Reception) is a major departure from Haghighi's last work Canaan which was a mainstream story driven film. Paziraie Sadeh is obviously meant to provoke and challenge. It is a film that can be, and will be, interpreted in a variety of ways. Whether Haghighi had a specific message to convey with this film is not clear.

Paziraie Sadeh may not be to everybody's liking but it is a very well acted film which will challenge many of our conceptions.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Something unexpected from Iran
Red-Barracuda29 June 2012
A Tehran couple Leyla and Kaveh drive about a mountain region somewhere in Iran and offer bags of money to the poor people they encounter in return for these folks carrying out actions that increase in inappropriateness.

The thing I thing that struck me most about Modest Reception was the way in which it went against my pre-conceived ideas about Iran. It surprised me that a film with such immoral central characters would have been permitted to have been made there in the first place. My ignorance I admit. Secondly, the way the female character Leyla was portrayed was much unexpected. She was very liberated and assertive. She was the one who did the driving, she was more than a match for her husband in the fiery insults and she looked quite atypical in her cool little feminine woollen hat. My ignorance at work once again obviously. But it just goes to show that the perception of Iran from a western perspective can be somewhat skewered.

The star and director Mani Haghighi said that there was no real message to the film and that people have interpreted all kinds of allegorical meanings into the narrative; which he found a little tedious. It is an odd film and I certainly felt I was probably missing something, in terms of overall understanding. But perhaps there isn't as much to understand as you imagine. Maybe it is simply a strange and surreal tale about a couple who decide to rock the boat a bit to see what will happen.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The cruelty was depressing
satxfan18 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film today as part of the Global Lens series. Although the photography was wonderful, the story was very depressing and didn't seem to have a point. The two lead characters were despicable people who seemed to take pleasure out of degrading the residents of a remote Iranian region. The money they are distributing comes from their mother who used to live in that region. Are they doing paybacks for wrongs she may have suffered? Hard to know. If it's their mother's vendetta, then why are these two treating people so horrendously? If every "donation" is supposed to be recorded for their mother to later see, then why was some of the money left in a restroom, out of view from the cell phone recording? The inconsistencies in the story line and the cruelty of the two lead characters made the film less than a good cinematic experience. I give a 5 for wonderful photography and beautiful locations, but that's it.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Couldn't like the firs Character
muhammadjrahpeyma28 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Everything was normal unfortunately, i don't think if i have seen a movie with this idea. Helping people and the hardship of doing it. i couldn't feel the characters. especially Mani Haghighi's character.. the dialog-es were not my interest. they were like a Moto.Dialogues were one-side dialog-es. poor people were not Writer's favorite, and they do everything for money.at the end they betray u. Story was normal. but acting,acting was good. camera and other things were normal too.u know it's a better idea that u create a character who loves people and who doesn't think that he understands and other people don't and if u wanna make a character like that u must make him more understandable, more reasonable. not a obstinate boy.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Absurd movie
jbrugge-23 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Watched this movie yesterday on the Rotterdam Filmfestival, and still wondering what I have seen and why all these provocative aspects were in this movie.

The director, also one of the two main characters, tried to explain some aspects about this movie afterwards, without giving very clear answers.

But what I saw, was a display of people, willing to do a lot of things for money. For example, selling a dead baby to feed the wolves, instead to bury it in 24 hours (which succeeds). Helping an alcohol smuggler with his sick donkey, to avoid getting it killed (but later they will kill it anyways). Asking around for marijuana, which is eventually delivered. A lot of other, even more shocking stories and social behaviour are being displayed, while nobody in this movie seemed surprised or offended by it.

And last but not least, there is a lot of display of western brands, like the cigarettes, the car...

Not the things I would imagine in a country like Iran. I think it's a protest story about the regulations in Iran: despite all the rules, everything is possible and accepted. By the absurd screenplay most people will consider it a joke, but I don't think these themes were meant to be a joke.

The movie made a huge impression to me and fills my mind all this day.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretentious misfire, just short of unwatchable
Andy-2964 August 2014
I tend to like Iranian cinema, but this tale of an urban middle class couple (Kaveh, played by Mani Haghighi, who also wrote and directed the movie, and Leyla, played by the lovely Taraneh Alidoosti, who has starred in several films of director Asghar Farhadi), going through the impoverished countryside, throwing bags of money to poor peasants, seems contrived and pretentious. Their motives are never made clear, in fact neither it is whether they are in fact a couple or a brother and a sister. Leyla comes across as a particularly loathsome character, always irritable for no reason, not a mean feat as she is portrayed by the lovely Alidoosti.

This is a one idea movie, and a confused idea at that. If the best Iranian cinema is characterized by its humanistic, compassionate view towards its poor subjects, this movie is instead awfully and painfully condescending towards them. Add to that the incredibly pretentious and unbelievable dialogue, and this is an almost unwatchable film.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed