User Reviews

We really like Danica McKeller, and we've liked the male lead in a couple of Christmas films too, one of which was also with Danica.

They have great chemistry in the film, both showing personality and charm ... just what you need for a successful romance. Plus, there are plenty of clever lines and a few funny moments.

Normally I'd call this an 8-star Christmas movie. So why did I dock two stars?

The premise is just silly. LOL A "Historic Drive-In"?? And showing that a failing drive-in has more value to the town than a new distribution center that would certainly provide dozens if not hundreds of jobs?

Ridiculous.

I often say that this kind of movie does not deal well with reality. This premise is one of the more ridiculous in that way that I can remember. So let's try to get over it.

Now the premise is that two old high school flames have to work together on a Christmas (sort of) project. That is one of the more common ones. In other words, the story is just a platform to allow a romance to develop.

There is some decent dialogue including some funny lines. The acting is good. Based on the set-up, the lead protagonists should be about as antagonistic as they could be. While there is some residual friction over business matters and personal history, they get awfully friendly awfully fast and soon the friction turns to nostalgia. Danica McKellar and Neal Bledsoe do have very good chemistry.

There are some little mysteries that unveil later in the movie. Early on, both Sadie and Holden tell their side of their breakup in high school, but it's obvious that something is missing. About half way through we learn more about both backstories since high school.

I said let's try to get over it. Unfortunately, the movie keeps bringing the ridiculous premise up, like rubbing it in the viewer's face. It is central to the story all the way through. And the miracle is even more ridiculous. I really wish the premise hadn't been so stupid. I might have been able to see this as a slightly above average movie despite being entrenched in overused tropes and with no real surprises. But as is, the ridiculous story just takes away too much.

You get exactly what is expected - run of the mill formula, story, and production that's comfortable and bland - a good feeling filler of time that will make most any Lifetime or Hallmark watcher very happy. The actors had a fair amount of personality and chemistry. I personally tuned in because I've seen a number of other Danica McKellar Christmas projects over the years - so it's kind of tradition! Everyone did a decent job except with the graphics people and continuity - at one point the drive-in screen displays -

"Come Join Our Caralers Tonight!"

No - seriously. Uh Oh. Someone can't spell carolers!!!!!

It was quite a distraction from the movie.

Back to which - they wrote a mind numbing "twist" resolution to wrap up every loose end in one shot during the last few fleeting minutes of the run. BAM - it was over! That's how these things always go though. Would it be so hard to leave the formula behind and be a little more creative? Unfortunately the execs have to rubber stamp projects - and if it doesn't fit their mold, it becomes too frightening to green light. This one's worth a watch for an easy going holiday film.

6.7 stars.

There is one thing the audience really wants to know and eventually it's revealed why they parted so many years ago. They were two teenagers in love, and he saw something, and she did some thing...the rest of the story is just filler as I'm anticipating the conversation where she sheds light on why she did it.

So I continued to watch the movie, which is about a woman who wants to save a drive-in, and a man who wants to sell it. The drive-in is his, it was owned by his father, a wonderful man who passed away some years ago. The drive-in has been a money pit for many years. It appears that it's been closed for sometime, but preserved as an historic site.

The plot is so very plain and uninspired, but the acting and chemistry is the opposite. I suppose this would be the most any director could make of a story about a drive-in.

And finally about an hour into the film, he asks: "why did you let us end?" She replies: "what, um, no you're the one who...". You'll have to see it for yourself, no spoiler here. Ok, I got my answer to the mystery of why they went their separate ways. Oh what fickle creatures we are.

Ah, it's Christmas time which means the occasional watch of the Danica McKellat Christmas movie since I was a fan of hers on the Wonder Years. I've actually found the ones on Hallmark to be a bit entertaining but his one (I know it's a different network) was by far the most boring and predictable of the bunch. Last year's wasn't much better, feels like her Christmas fare is going downhill. Christmas at the Drive In made zero sense for these two people to grow a relationship even with the lazy writing of having them been school mates. The relationship felt a bit forced and hopefully they find better writers for Danica's next Christmas adventure.

Together again.

I'm reading the reviews here (including the one for the Candace movie :-) ), and I'm struck by how seriously everybody takes these movies. I've learned over the years what to expect, so I'm not going to complain about it.

Right up front, this movie is not as good as Coming Home for Christmas.

For those who haven't seen that or don't care, this is a story about a businessman who inherits a drive-in and intends to sell it for development. Danica plays an attorney who has lots of memories there, and therefore decides she needs to save it.

She and Neal are tasked with putting forth a good-faith effort to make a go of the drive-in... in Winter in the snowbelt.

What's not realistic about that (sarc)?

Danica and Neal did not have the supporting cast they had in Coming Home, and they certainly didn't have the script, but I remain hopeful that GAC will resolve these things in time.

Six.

Apparently since I wrote this, Neal Bledsoe has stated he will no longer make movies for Great American because of what Candace Cameron Bure said about only portraying traditional marriage in their movies.

Docking a point for Neal and his politics.

Five.

This was a light hearted and fun little movie that I really enjoyed.

Danica and Neal Bledsoe have a great on screen chemistry. They were both very good in this movie as well as the rest of the cast.

The premise may seem far fetched and maybe it is, but everything they did to try and save the drive-inn from making cake pops to putting up all kinds of beautiful festive decorations, I found lovely and charming.

I did take off a few points because something kept sticking in my craw, did she not say she came home to help his dad get historical status for the Drive-in? If that were the case than he could not sell it nor could they demolish it! Also the ever handsome Neal Bledsoe's hair annoyed me they dyed his gorgeous dark/salt and pepper hair some kind of yellowish brown and it appeared he didn't comb his hair through the entire filming of the movie. This may sound superficial to some but it was very distracting to me and it detracted from his very good looks.

This was a fun little movie if you don't take it too seriously, a great way to relax and wallow away a few hours. I would definitely watch again!!

But with a little bit of hope and magic...Harry Connick Sebastian Stan will make me believe he wanted to be there. He approached this movie with all the enthusiasm of a teenager at his in-laws holiday with no ther kids his age around to hang with. There's aloof and there's a this. I've seen him in other stuff so I know he can sell me on bs. I watch these movies for comfort dealing with S. A. D. But I need you to sell it to me. Winnie was great though. Lol. Also I want to say maybe three of these actors are in another Christmas movie. Just out of curiosity, does everybody want a second chance with their high school sweetheart or is it just Christmas movies?

It's not that this movie is offensively bad, it just would be fully forgettable, were it not for the improbable premise: fight for saving a "historic drive-in" over jobs for regular folk? Where the supposed antagonist is for no reason made to help his rival?

However, it was refreshing that there were no cartoon bad guys as such. And I liked both of the leads and enjoyed watching them. It just didn't seem believable they would be a couple: one with that bad boy energy and the other one rather wholesome. Sure, sometimes the whole opposites attract situation creates great sizzle, but here the leads felt more like bickering and bantering siblings.

One big issue for me is that I enjoy, nay, demand beautiful visual and set design in Christmas movies - somehow this just wasn't visually very impressive. It was a bit bland a little unwarm, and e.g. The shop with Christmas decors looked more like a Goodwill store.

So: if you're looking for sumptuous Christmas movie with fiery romantic chemistry, keep on driving.

Danica McKellar has done better work. Her second outing with GAC Family is not a strong one, despite the presence of Neal Bledsoe, whom she has worked with before, over at Hallmark.

If I were asked to describe 'Christmas at the Drive-In" in one word it would be 'formulaic'.

You can tick the boxes on this: small town. Teenage sweethearts. Important town location in danger of being destroyed. Said location (a drive-in, as you probably gathered from the title) being saved by the two protagonists and sparks fly along the way. Devious entity tries to stop it. Said entity is defeated. Protagonists fall in love.

This sort of movie has been done before and done better. Didn't seem to be all that much chemistry between the leads and the storyline was pretty weak.