Cerro Torre: A Snowball's Chance in Hell (2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
More than a climbing film
IndustriousAngel28 March 2014
While delivering everything you'd expect from a contemporary climbing movie - vivid first-person-pov, breathtaking vista, vertigo-inducing shots ... - this production delves deeper which makes for a better film. The difference came only with the problems the production ran into - while originally planned as a simple climbing flick, to be finished in a few weeks, in the end they had gone to Patagonia 3 times, had filmed 2 summit climbs and many more tries, had to weather a veritable shitstorm from large parts of the climbers community - and they used all this material to shed some light on the background, the philosophy, the frustrations of expedition climbing and so on. So this became a much richer and interesting project, even if the budget must have exploded. And to top that, they also put in a historical flashback, some interviews or contributions (Reinhold Messner and Jim Bridwell amongst others) and, last but not least, portraits of the camera team and their struggles to catch David Lama's final climb (which would be worth a documentation of its own).

Overall, recommended for everyone with even a slight interest in mountaineering or climbing, and much more interesting than a simple sports movie (as planned) would be.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Obnoxious, but features some good climbing
JurijFedorov7 September 2021
This is an overedited mess that never lingers on an event or part of a story. It tries to rush over the initial Cerro Torre story and Maestri's 2 climbs. It's all presented in an obnoxious way like some over the top TikTok video with noisy music and happy-go-lucky energy. And the climbers don't have much wise to say so it's just random statements.

Yet the bad production and frantic messy way it's all presented doesn't take away from the climb. It also does acknowledge that the Red Bull team ruined part of the mountain with bolts to film the first climb attempt. Then only on the next climb attempts did they use a helicopter to film instead. It's nice that they are honest about it. Unfortunately all this background story is super rushed and you don't get much info at all here. You will need to watch another documentary about Cerro Torre to get all of this stuff. Also, David Lama wanted to rappel down to put up safety bolts so that he could free climb the mountain a known way with those temporary bolts already in place for protection. He didn't do that because of huge internet backlash, the doc never even mentions this.

The climb itself is cool. David Lama wore a head cam and you really got to see the mountain up close. You even saw some difficult climbs he made. All of this is nice and I wonder how cool this documentary would have been if it was only the history and then the climb? Without any of that random stuff they put in to make it "action".

Some interviews are fine som are super cringe. There are a lot of talking heads so you constantly see people just talk about themselves and about how they feel about climbing. Completely pointless stuff. The doc doesn't know what it tries to be as it jumps from Cerro Torre to some old American climber talking about how hippie and cool he was when he was young. What the hell does that have to do with Chile and Argentina and that specific mountain? Why just have random climbers speak to the camera when you could have shown us more history from the mountain or more of the climb itself?

They also skip the death on a mountain nearby when they were there and the Red Bull helicopter filmed a woman, Carlyle Norman, who was left behind all alone try to climb down. They never told the rescue team about her being alive. The rescue team tried to climb up, but couldn't as the storm got too bad. She stood not chance at survival and fell down to her death. This doc tries to be childish and fun so of course they won't even hint at this event that took part days before their climb. But people do die on mountains and it would have been great for them to illustrate that. Hell, David Lama himself later died on a mountain. It's not something you can hide forever.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Good insight into the controversy of climbing
kaurvirunurm20 November 2015
Climbing, especially at altitude, is a controversial sport. How much risk can you take? What style and equipment are fair to use? Should one trust the experts and community, or only himself?

Cerro Torre is an excellent example of this controversy - first with Maestri's disputed ascent, then with his undisputed but condemned one, then with Kennedy & Kruk cleansing the mountain. "Cerro Torre" captures all of this and adds a story of David Lama, a Nepalese wonder boy obsessed with free climbing the peak.

Some interest in climbing is probably required to fully enjoy this movie. If you don't understand the delicate difference between free & aid climbing, or don't know where Patagonia is and why climbing there is special, then you might not enjoy it as deeply as more informed viewers. However the amazing scenery, thrilling climbing sequences and conflicts between the climbers are there for everyone.

Extra kudos to the film crew for getting to the summit themselves!

Highly recommended.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One of the worst films /documentaries I have seen all year
Horst_In_Translation15 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This film tried to lure people into theatres by saying that it is not just another documentary on climbing. Sadly, this proves a lie as that is exactly what it is. Another lie is the title which states roughly translated from German "not a chance at all". Still they manage to make it to the top. And if that wasn't bad enough, one of the team has to strip naked as they actually succeeded. Embarrassment galore. Actually I would even say that they were correct by saying that this is not just another climbing documentary. In fact, it is much worse than the other ones out there.

The action is exalted and the protagonists are arrogant dislikable climbers, who keep whining about the way they are perceived in public. The only thing this film is even worth watching for remotely are the beautiful landscapes of Patagonia. Another amateur aspect is that they never exactly said where Patagonia actually is and I don't think that it is so famous that you could immediately make the connection that Patagonia is in Chile as well as Argentina.

We find out about one member's transformation from a wall climber into a mountain climber and this is accompanied by lots of talk about how cool they are and how manly they must be to dare climb such places. Narcicissm everywhere. Some scenes were very obviously staged with previously written dialog, such as the one where they wake up the main protagonist.

This film is director Thomas Dirnhofer's first work and I'm not sure if I want to watch any future projects after the massive disappointment this turned out to be. It's really only worth a watch for climbers or maybe especially these are the ones that should not watch this documentary at all. I'm not sure. They may hate it even more than I did. Anyway, I am not really interested into climbing movies, but I am interested in films that can makes me interested into climbing movies. This was the exact opposite. Not recommended.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed