"Elementary" Bella (TV Episode 2014) Poster

(TV Series)

(2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The ending is very different than what we're used to
zmos991 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I have to agree with the other reviewer who said that this is the first episode of season 3 that really seems to come together in the sense that the characters seem to be working together with a purpose, and it's good to see.

The only issue is the ending. One murderer caught, the other going free. And we are left with Sherlock asking question to a computer only to get the typical response "I don't understand, can you give me more information?" As Sherlock might say, it's quite as Sherlock might say, it's quite vexing.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
theatre-worthy
A_Different_Drummer14 August 2016
I Confess (a word you should not really use in reviewing a detective show) that I was having trouble with the early episodes of Season 3.

I "get" that the writers for contemporary TV have stumbled onto the fact that you can keep a series fresh, and keep viewers intrigued, by periodically purging even the most established long arcs and starting anew.

I was having trouble making adjustments to all the Season 3 changes when this episode popped up and .. nirvana! Not only did all the characters suddenly seem comfortable again, and all the loose ends tie up, but the story of the AI computer that talks through a doll was engrossing and almost hypnotic.

Leaving aside some possible technical issues (raised by another IMDb member) I consider this episode one of the best in the series for pure entertainment value.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
From a drop of water... One could deduce the depth of Bella's ocean.
omero-omero17 November 2022
Bella is beautiful, deep, creepy, complicated. There are indeed a few instances of artistic license occurring here and there, mainly related to some technicalities as exposed in several other reviews and especially in the goofs section. However, Sherlock's attention is immediately attracted by the significant dilemma that Bella represents. A mind. A truly different kind of mind. Sherlock's interest, in this case, is triggered by the potential that Bella truly represents. A deductive mind that from a single drop of water can infer the existence of an ocean even when never having "seen" one in his life, in Sherlock's own words earlier on in the show. In this respect, I value very much the apparent non conclusive ending. It is quite the opposite of non conclusive. Bonus points for one irrelevant character implicitly being put on an airplane and another not so irrelevant being introduced, one character that indeed represents the original and sole spirit of what a hacker truly is.

Once more: Bella is Beautiful.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
flash warning
carrionblu1 May 2022
There's not a flashing warning for this episode. Want to let people know. It happens several times. Decent episode but should have the warning bc extreme flashing.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really???
lovhurts3 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Not what I'm use to. Feels like the writer hardly tried. Didn't feel like an ending. I was waiting on a "to be continued". Bell asked the suspect who confessed to prove she could write code. She said no....and they left it at that? Then Holmes tried to blackmail a man into confessing....and then doesn't follow through? It seemed like they couldn't figure out a solution so the episode was just dropped.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No knowledge by the writer!
dshell10216 December 2014
When Sherlock becomes an idiot because of a poor writer, it totally ruins the credibility of the story. There's a lot, but I'm going to keep this simple. It would be very easy to disprove the lady who claimed to have written the program. How did she get it? Uh... Did she write it? Yes. Really? Because you have no programming skills, as I believe was earlier stated in the show while they checked her out, and if she doesn't know the first thing about programming, which is easily proved, then they have their conspiracy and murderer. It's how they knew she didn't do it alone in the first place, but they weren't smart enough to prove it? It would be like saying the defendant knows Spanish. Okay, speak a little Spanish like "no creo" - I don't believe. Easy to prove. Also easy to show the professor's background in computers. It was REALLY poor writing and destroyed the ending taking away all intelligence from the story, the plot, the moral conundrum....everything, because they made the usually knowledgeable Sherlock less than intelligent - stupid. Sad.
23 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Weak episode with several plot holes and inconsistencies.
phoenixnl-1664719 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
1) Could you even call sending someone a CD with a program that flashes images a murder? Especially seeing as the recipient would have had to willingly run the program himself in the first place. 2) Bella is running on what appears to be a mainframe computer. It's very unlikely that that server would run a windows operating system like the computer they tried the program on when they found it on the CD. It's much more likely that that computer ran either a custom OS, a UNIX variant or an IBM mainframe OS. 3) The executable is playing a video. There are video editing programs that will create a standalone executable from video footage. So it could be done without any programming expertise. 4) Playing a data CD in an audio player, and I know from experience having accidentally played the data track on a cheap portable CD player, you either hear absolutely nothing at all, or you just hear a kind of white noise as the raw bit data from the data track is being interpreted by the drive as audio data.

All in all a lackluster episode best forgotten as quickly as possible.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
NYPD Detective Bell and an A.I. program called Bella, coincidence?
CrimeDrama115 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Just a thought.

Anyway, the review by "lovhurts" is troubling. I agree that an unresolved ending was unexpected and confusing. The review mentions two problems but here is my take. The woman who confessed all but admitted that she is not a computer programmer but that doesn't mean she wasn't part of the conspiracy to commit murder so it wasn't up to Bell. Captain Gregson will always seek charges with that type of confession. Sherlock bluffed Dr. Pike to get him to confess and it took a minute but Dr. Pike called his bluff. He made Sherlock think about being publicly humiliated which could end his tenure as a consultant or worse if Dr. Pike's brother was charged under the felony three strikes law. I didn't like the unresolved ending but I think the point is that there was no obvious solution to hold Dr. Pike accountable, ever.

In terms of the original question posed to Sherlock, Kitty and Watson, it is reasonable to think that information about the internet was programmed into Bella so it asking to be connected to a network is not a big deal. Information IS useful, after all. If this episode was more recent, they would have to talk about misinformation on the internet, which adversely affects the potential for it to be useful.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Show killer
koohii9 April 2022
This episode is just overwhelmingly bad. The writing is piss-pour, and the story goes no where. I'm seriously considering just not watching any more of the show beyond this point. Kitty continues to be the Scrappy Doo character. Watson and Holmes are both immense idiots, and no one can figure out basic problems. Who could have put that file on the system... I don't know... Maybe... The person who copied the files in the first place? No, no one even considers that.

I wonder if the writer maybe watched a single episode of "Person of Interest," as the basis of this episode, only they didn't understand the show, so they dumbed it down. Maybe? Or someone's idiot cousin wanted a SAG card, so said idiot cousin was allowed to write this episode?

There was no enjoyment in this episode.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed