User Reviews

This is a story based on real events and it revolves around a gruesome case of a teenager in Germany by her step-father who is a renowned physician. Daniel Auteil is excellent in his performance as the girl's biological father, André Bamberski who begins a crusade in order to find the truth about his daughter's rape and murder. His quest for vindication covers a time-span of almost thirty years, from 1974 till 2009 and it takes place to both France and Germany. Sebastian Koch is equally splendid in the role of the shady doctor who takes advantage of his patients' trust and steals André's wife.

I found the movie to be quite distressing as the audience knows that it is -partly- true and its relatively short running time (almost 80 minutes in total) makes it a viewing experience that at no time becomes tedious or uninteresting. The director, Vincent Garenq, has great thriller movies such as "Présumé coupable" and "L'enquête" in his filmography. This movie is on the borderline between two genres, crime fiction, and true crime. To sum up, "Au Nom de ma Fille" is a rewarding artistic experience, very well-shot with some really great acting. Not to miss!

In AU NOM DE MA FILLE, Director Vincent Garenq pulls off a convincing work despite obviously limited funding resources, observable through minimal period recreation, done mostly through the use of cars.

The human element, man vs justice system, draws your interest from the outset, when you wonder why André Bamberski (superbly portrayed by Daniel Auteuil) is being arrested. A flashback of close on 30 years follows, with some parts more interesting than others, starting off in Morocco and meandering through France, Germany and Austria.

Almost constantly on screen, Auteuil delivers an immensely credible performance. He is not a good looking man, married to a beautiful woman, played by Marie-Josée Croze, who falls for the charms of a German medical doctor (Sebastian Koch, in a short but penetrating display of deception, mendacity, neighborly evil).

Sadly, Croze's part is thankless: no character development, never any explanation as to why she never questioned Dr. Krombach's decision to administer drugs and injections to her teenage daughter, clearly causing her demise - even after she had separated from the evil doctor. Other than aging convincingly, I found nothing to remember about Croze's performance.

Albeit in the background most of her on-screen time, I liked Christelle Cornil's role as girlfriend Cécile. Facially, she is not as eye-catching as Croze, but she looks like someone who enjoys life and loves with honesty. She has a most elegant figure and lovely legs, too. She stays loyal to Bamberski for many years, even though he lives almost entirely to see justice done by his murdered and raped daughter. Inevitably, Cécile runs out of patience and leaves him, and that is when a side of Bamberski emerges that suggests his justice-seeking quest may conceal a vindictive streak too: he will not have children with her. He has wasted her love and her time without any apparent remorse.

That obsession over his daughter's case clearly carries selfishness, too - not of a materialistic nature, but of the type that fails to heed the advice of his lawyer, of his father, the growing distance from his son who is fed up with his father's difficult relation with his mother, and of friends that see him losing his marbles... and a good woman to boot, whom he bafflingly refuses to have a child with.

Still, that complex vindictive facet helps explain why he contracts a trio to beat up Krombach and so see some justice done that the justice systems of Germany and France - acting in collusion to dismiss the case - keep turning a Kafkaesque blind eye to. The effects of that indifference at the top of the legal system are clear: it destroys lives and relationships as surely as the murder of an innocent teenager. And it forces one to take justice into one's hands, which the very same legal system is much quicker to act on and punish.

I liked the way Bamberski found a way to circumvent such legal callousness by getting Interpol involved, resulting in the application of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) when Krombach illegally resumes his medical practice in Austria, which in time (much, much later) permitted his extradition.

Convincing script and dialogue, competent cinematography despite jarring narrative breaks in which the screen turns black, what stayed with me was Daniel Auteuil's superior performance, with Koch the shifty nemesis who steals his wife and his daughter's life.

Despite its flaws, AU NOM DE MA FILLE is thought-provoking and involving from beginning to end.

This is not a bad movie, but the 27 years legal battle is just too weird and ridiculous. The Germans already admitted their former Nazi Germany did murdered 6 millions Jews, why their legal system would have protected a common practice family doctor even the evidences were so intact? Just because it was a French father of the murdered daughter accusing a German doctor? Then when this sex predator was sued by other girls raped by the same doctor, why the German court exonerated him again? I just couldn't comprehend why this German doctor got so much power to influence the German court. He was not a political person, so why the German legal system protected him? This kinda injustice could only happen in one Party or one strong man controlled authoritarian countries, or the democracy and the legal system were both corrupted, so it could be manipulated by the people in power. The living example: The thoroughly corrupted government in Taiwan. The majority Party controlled judges, prosecutors....They can rewrote Constitution and common laws to suit themselves. They could let a dirty former president and his dirty family out of prison. And I thought such ridiculous case could only happen in Taiwan, but this movie which claimed to be based on a true story simply proved how naive I am. I just couldn't imagine the German legal system is so biased, ridiculous and so corrupted exactly like that of Taiwan.

Disturbing film about the true case of Bamberski. He was lucky enough to have a couple of sidekicks: the good lawyer who works alone, like him, the German translator, and faithful Cécille, who withstands a lot. His dad in his alpine retreat is also understanding, gives him the best advice.

André had a life as a businessman, not very kind to his employees as we see in the first scene, but has his life transformed by the death of her daughter. The film doses the truth very well, and doesn't' shy away from showing the darker aspects of André. He is shown speaking alone while working, attempting acts that are not very lawful, and with a single- mindedness that could end with somebody at any moment. My favourite moment is him eating and resting alone in his car, a homage to "L'adversaire" in my humble opinion (one of the best films I've ever seen). The differences between the two roles are stark, nevertheless. Daniel A. can pull off basically any role he's thrown at, with a lesser actor this film would have been just stock material.

The director succeeded into making Marie-Josée Croze an unlikable woman ;). Her character could have more character development, I didn't understand much her (lack of) reactions and why did she never react to André's truths, not even at the cemetery when they cross paths with A.

I didn't feel much like going to Germany after watching this film ;). It looks like a foreign country, cold, with a difficult language, a juridical system that protects people like Dieter K. and rather absurd legal decisions. Hadn't it been for Andre's stubbornness, Kalina's case would have been buried. The German system doesn't come off very well in this film ;). It may have to do with French-German relationships, not always loving, but it's for Europeans to give opinions on that.

Overall, a great film. Not entirely pleasurable to watch but, given the material, a well told story, without melodrama or demagogy.

Recommended!

Just watch this movie, for the real story, for the cast, for everything. The persistence of a man in seek of justice where the system, most of the times, fails. Outstanding performance of Auteuil, one of the best actors in Europe. Also my thumbs up for Koch.

Absolutely brilliant movie!Once again,bravo to European cinematography! Without any embellishments or Hollywood style bull-dang,simple touching ,true story of grief,sacrifice,father's love and fight for justice... To anybody, who liked this film and has a strong stomach for extreme violence and disturbing story strongly advise to watch another film on French language, but made in Quebec:"7 jours du Tallion" Anyhow, one of the few films, I happily give a 10!!!

Vincent Garenq is the new André Cayatte: apart from his first effort which dealt with gays who wanted a child ,his next three works " Presume Coupable " "L'Equipe " and "Kalinka " aka " Au Nom De Ma Fille " have seen him champion causes.

Unlike Cayatte ,a former lawyer who used fiction-and sometimes widely talked about affairs -,Vincent Garenq bases his films on real facts ;but like him ,and in spite of occasional flashbacks, he favors firm screenplays, linear story- telling .His style may seem jerky,telegraphic ,but his account covers 30 years (of fight against a blind justice which releases a criminal ,leaving him free to commit other horrors .)And this succinctness helps the director sustain the interest through the whole film.

Daniel Auteuil is ,as usual ,convincing as a father who devotes his life to do his beloved daughter justice ;and hats off to the make - ups: the principal is in his late thirties when he begins the task,and a sexagenarian when he finally wins the case ,and it's credible!

Even Hercules was not asked not such a labor :to clean the Augean stables of justice .That was what André Cayatte would do, that's what Vincent Garenq do today.

Actually it's a real story of life.As am writing this review so much considered what am going to write here.It was my first movie experience in the theater with out my family, I was bit panic too.When the story starts on the silver screen really i lost some where with the movie.No much words about this great movie! it was a real story experience in my entire life!

Autueille plays the father of Kalenka murdered by Krombach. She was raped then injected with an overdose of iron. It took Berneski three decades to get a conviction. The story is very interesting with Krombach first having an affair with Autueille's wife. When the affair is discovered, they marry and move to Bavaria, Landau. The children are there when Kalenka,15, is murdered. She was about to return to Toulouse when she was killed. Other victims surface. Wives of Krombach die or get sick. German officials cover up. The autopsy is a cover up. The body is dug up and the vagina is missing. The French court tries him without his presence. He is found guilty, but Germany does not recognize that verdict. This is a fascinating case which exposes corruption. The court scenes are also interesting. This case is one where a doctor does terrible harm over decades and gets away with it. He died in 2020.

The documentary reduced me to tears having been a mother myself but Barmberski, in my humble.opinion, should receive all of France's medals, awards and recognition of his outstanding persistence bravery and courage. I only wish I had had a parent like him and my life would have been so different. Kudos to you Monsieur Barmberski. I hope you take up the lecture tour as people would flock to you despite the harrowing events. Kalinka was beautiful 😍.

"In Her Name" ("Au nom de ma fille") is a very difficult film to watch. It's about a child who was raped and murdered. Amazingly, the German legal system seemed to do its best to prevent a thorough investigation and prosecution of the perpetrator...and ultimately the father of the dead girl felt compelled to take justice into his own hands. Worse yet...it's a true story. So, think about this before you decide to watch the film...it's a tough film to watch even though the filmmakers were exceptional in presenting the story well and without showing or sensationalizing the sexual violence.

The story begins with the arrest of Andre Bamberski (Daniel Auteuil)...so there's no suspense in the story. You KNOW he broke the law and was arrested....and what drove him to that is then shown through the course of the movie.

Andre and his wife split up early in the story. She's having an affair with some doctor and so the marriage is dissolved. Years later, Andre is shocked to hear that his now teenage daughter has died. And, when there's an autopsy, there's clear indication her step-father, at the very least, killed her through incompetence...but there's also indications she was raped! Amazingly, the prosecutors in Germany (where the ex and her family now live) refuse to do anything. Years later, he is able to get a court order for a new autopsy...and when the body is examined, the genitals are MISSING!!! Clearly this is some sort of attempt to hide the crime. But again, nothing really happens...the German officials stymie Andre's attempts at justice. What's next and why was Andre arrested? And, how long, if ever, will he see justice?!

See the film.

As I expected, Daniel Auteuil was excellent in the lead. He's a truly gifted actor...one of the best French actors alive. It also seems that the people making this film had a real passion to bring this case to light, as it shows the public that sometimes to get justice you might just have to break a few laws...which is incredibly sad. Overall, an extraordinary movie.

If you do watch this film, be forewarned...it's a tough thing to watch. Have some Kleenex nearby and be sure to take care of yourself, as the movie is unrelentingly sad.