Lady Macbeth (2016) Poster

(2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
125 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Lust and loneliness
rubenm17 April 2017
If I were the producer of this film, I'd have chosen a different title. I'm sure lots of moviegoers are going to be misled: this film has nothing to do with Shakespeare. It's an adaptation of a novel by the Russian author Nikolai Leskov, set in early 19th century England.

The film seems to be a pre-feminism manifesto for women's rights. It shows Katherine Lester, the submissive wife of a wealthy but abusive landowner, living in a secluded manor in the British countryside. During a prolonged absence of her husband, she rediscovers her freedom and starts an affair with one of the stable boys. Not willing to give up her newly acquired status, she starts a series of increasingly extreme actions.

The interesting thing is how Katherine evolves from victim to culprit. She seems to have learned from her husband how to use and misuse power. The lack of social conscience of which she at first is a victim, becomes a driving force for her own behaviour. Her selfishness and lack of morality is so extreme that, in the end, she betrays innocent servants. The viewer has to shift his allegiances: at first, it's impossible not to sympathize with Katherine, enjoying a free life without her heartless husband. But halfway through the film, it becomes clear that Katherine is just as heartless, as soon as she is in power.

The story is filmed in a very effective, sober style with beautiful cinematography. The lack of any music is remarkable: some elongated scenes are striking because of the silence. The oppressive atmosphere in the manor is emphasized by the camera work. The camera repeatedly shows scenes from exactly the same viewpoint. Four or five times, we see the servant Anna entering Katherine's bedroom in exactly the same way.

As much as 'Lady Macbeth' is about gender, it is also about class. It is striking that Katherine, who as a woman is considered a lower form of human life by men, herself considers the servants to be a lower form of human life. She shamelessly uses them for her own purposes and enjoyment, but doesn't care at all about their fate afterwards.

'Lady Macbeth' is a beautiful film, about issues that even nowadays are worth thinking about. But I would have named it 'Lust and loneliness' - after all, it's set in the same period as the Jane Austen novels.
179 out of 212 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You Make Your Bed...
Xstal8 November 2022
You've been sold off into a marriage, not made in heaven, to a man who sees you only as possession, life has ended now for you, you should do, what you're told to, that's sit all day, a little pray, absorb oppression. But desires are on fire and you need passion, there are shackles that you need to have unfastened, and Sebastian's the key, can unlock all misery, by removing all unsatisfied frustration. It's not just clothes that are discarded and come off, soon the wheels of the carriage are all troughed, discretion lets you down, but you're tough, and don't bow down, although your actions may make one or two souls scoff.

Brilliant, Florence Pugh is absolutely fantastic!!!
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The contagion of evil
Horst_In_Translation23 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Lady Macbeth" is a British 1.5-hour film from 2016 and this is the first full feature film by director William Oldroyd. It is based on a novel from the 19th century and for writer Nikolai Leskov it is probably at this point the most known adaptation of one of his works. Said adaptation comes from Alice Birch and for her it is the first career effort too, so really a great deal of "rookieism" to this work and for that the outcome is surprisingly positive. A lot of that has to do with lead actress Florence Pugh who was apparently only 20 when this was made and with her great portrayal here, I am genuinely curious what the future brings. I am positive we can expect a lot of quality from her in the coming years, probably decades. Her looks aren't hurting either. She really gives a defining performance when it comes to period piece femme fatale characters. I am glad to see this movie already received a great deal of awards recognition since its release. Looking at the first showings abroad at film festivals, it took far too long for this film to finally reach Germany.

A lot of what made this film so good is what happens below the surface: the subtlety, the hidden and the characters' shades make it a strong watch. It's tough for me to believe that neither the director nor the writer have come up with a full feature movie yet. Extremely positively surprised as a consequence. Now I want to talk a bit about the title of my review as this stroke me as one of the film's most important aspects and biggest strengths. Of course we don't know much about the character of Katherine early on, but the way she was thrown into this world that was entirely new to her speaks for itself. Discrimination, sexism and physical violence against weaker people are nothing out of the ordinary. And the more Katherine is confronted with all this abysmal stuff, the more she turns evil herself. Her first killing is already not an act of self-defense at all, it is far more intentional than the second in fact, even if you can justify both to some extent from a psychological perspective, probably not a legal perspective. The second then is probably more gruesome, but also more on the spur of the moment and not really 100% planned. And well.. the infanticide? It shows pure evil as the victim is really 100% innocent, but I'll get to that later in detail. As for the contagion of evil, there is always a personal component to it and with the protagonist's love interest, that limit is reached when it comes to killing the kid as the guilt overwhelms him eventually and he has to let it all out, even if I somehow expected a suicide too. But he is the one who can be blamed the least. He may be boastful, but he is not rotten.

And finally, another reference to the infanticide. It is the most shocking moment, but also perhaps the best moment because it shows how evil had totally conquered her by then. Graphically. And with that I don't mean the face, but I mean the fact that the camera position is in a way where we basically see her black clothes only and almost nothing of her head and it looks like a black spirit creature kills the boy, the personification of evil. Sure that's free to interpretation too, but it is what ran through my head that very moment. I also somewhat like films with realistic happy endings and I think from that perspective the film is a winner too because it did feel pretty authentic. Pay attention to how absolutely everybody is a loser here. Some died, some lost their privileges, some went to jail and the central character ends up alone, at least for a while, and she said at one point she hates being/eating alone, so the cat may be the only company to stay for her for a while. All in all, a good film with occasional moments of greatness. Yes it is sometimes tough to stomach, but without having read the book this is based on, I would say here we have the prime example of a film that proves that there are actually strong novel adaptations out there if you just approach the matter open-minded instead of whining à la "no no all films based on books suck". This one you really wanna see, a definite thumbs-up from me.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a ruthless woman will do
Gordon-1123 August 2017
This film tells the story of a young woman who is sold into a loveless marriage with an older wealthy gentleman. She has a passionate affair with a servant of the house. The promise of a happier life eludes her, until she takes full control of the situation.

Initially I thought the film was really about Macbeth's wife, but I soon learn that it is not the case. The title comes from the similar ruthlessness and cold bloodedness that the leading woman and Lady Macbeth have. It is engaging to see how Katherine transforms from a timid woman into a sociopathic woman who will stop at nothing to get what she wants. The pacing is a little slow, with artistic shots lasting 10 or even 20 seconds but does not really help story telling. Overall, the story is good and Katherine's character is very interesting.
35 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A woman in a cruel world
Prismark109 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Lady Macbeth is like a Victorian Gothic noir with more than a hint of Lady Chatterley's Lover.

An adaptation of a Russian novel which is inspired by Shakespeare's Macbeth.

The film is set in 19th century north east of England. Katherine (Florence Pugh) is a young teenager married off to Alexander (Paul Hilton.) He is much older than her, cold and maybe even sexually inadequate.

Alexander is the son of a wealthy mine owner, Boris (Christopher Fairbank) who is brutish and cruel.

Trapped in a cold, loveless marriage with only the black maid Anna as company. When both men are away, Katherine takes an interest in Sebastian (Cosmo Jarvis) a mixed race young estate worker and they have a passionate affair.

When Boris finds out of the affair, Katherine does not shy away from what she has done. When Alexander returns, she flaunts Sebastian in front of him. Katherine becomes crueller as she desptaches both her father in law and husband.

However both Anna and Sebastian find out that Katherine is willing to get more darker to get what she wants.

Lady Macbeth features a mesmerising and beguiling performance from Florence Pugh. It is far away from these slushy chocolate box romantic period dramas. Katherine is steel edged and deadly.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too Restrained for the Kind of Story It Tells
evanston_dad7 August 2017
"Lady Macbeth" is like a Charlotte Bronte novel if the main heroine were a psychopath.

Florence Pugh plays a young woman saddled with a marriage and an estate that she did not choose for herself, who gets a taste of what it is to give in to her own passionate urges when she shacks up with a hunky stable boy and then decides that she will have a life with him no matter what or who she has to eliminate to make it happen.

"Lady Macbeth" sounds dark and juicy on paper, and it could have been a fabulously lurid spin on the Victorian Gothic template, but as treated here it's far too restrained to take advantage of the pulpy subject matter. The whole film, from the direction to the performances, really needed to go for it and not hold back. Instead, it's too quiet and slow by half, and though Pugh does an admirable job, one can't help but wonder how much more memorable a character she might have been able to create had she been allowed to really go off the rails. Maybe an odd and random thought, but the whole time I was watching this movie I was thinking what a younger Naomi Watts could have done with it.

Not a total misfire, but nowhere nearly as good as it could have been.

Grade: B
47 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's Grim up north
markgorman30 April 2017
I'm not familiar with the Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk short story by Nikolai Neskov (not to be confused with Lady Macbeth by William Shakespeare) which he wrote as a novella in 1865, although it is inspired by the famous play.

the book inspired Shostakovich to write an opera based on it.

Now we have a British film that feels incredibly French (incredibly Michael Haneke, who I think is actually Austrian) to add to its cannon.

It features a career defining performance by Florence Pugh in the title role; although the men are magnificent too (most notably Christopher Fairbanks as the intolerant Father in Law).

If you like Christopher Fairbanks through his Guardians of the Galaxy fame this is not the movie for you as it moves at glacial pace with very little dialogue, virtually no music and a LOT of fixed frames where you are invited to enjoy the cinematography in its most bleak and spartan Northernness.

"It's grim up north" might have been the poster slogan for this movie because, set as it is near the North East of England's colliery land, albeit on the moors (North Yorkshire I'd suggest), it is most certainly grim.

The story is murderously grim too and I'd expect this BBC Films production to be in the running when next year's BAFTA's are handed out with Florence Pugh a shoe in for best female actor.

Slow but sublime with excellent direction from William Oldroyd.
30 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Excellent Drama With Quiet Power And A Remarkable Florence Pugh
david-meldrum26 July 2020
Frances Pugh is the gravitational force of this film; not simply filling the role, but her presence consuming the other characters, the building to which she is confined for most of the film and the shots she inhabits even when silent. In that respect, it's a performance that reminds me of Glenn Close's brilliant turn as the central character in The Wife, a role and film that have more similarities to this than one might first think. That's not to say her performance is greedy - far from it, it has a remarkably understated power; and the rest of the cast act without ego, with great subtlety to all how her to shine in the way in which her role demands. The purpose of the title is only occasionally and vaguely apparent for much of the film, but comes into horrible and brilliant focus in the final act; it's a title the central character earns. But it's the silences that haunt the most and lend this film its creeping power - the background silence of a stately home in the middle of rural northern England; the silence of the house itself; the silence of key characters; and most of all Florence Pugh's silence as she fills the screen, motionless and noiseless in a series of near but not quite identical shots that punctuate the film like refrains, lending a quiet kind of awe to the devastating ending.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rousing telling of Lady MacBeth (Russian style)
paul-allaer4 August 2017
As "Lady Macbeth" (2016 release from the UK; 90 min.) opens, we see a young woman (we later learn her name is Katherine) getting married in what looks to be 19th century England. On her wedding night, she is left untouched by her (older) husband. Her father-in-law, also living there, is equally unpleasant. Katherine is utterly lonely and depressed. Then one day, both her husband and father-in-law must go out of town for business. It's not long before Katherine strikes up a torrid affair with one of the groomsmen. At this point we're about 10 min. into the movie. What will become Katherine and her lover? To tell you more of the plot would spoil your viewing experience, you'll just have to see for yourself how it all plays out.

Couple of comments: you may think this is yet another movie adaptation of the Shakespeare play, but in fact this is based on the Russian novel Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District by Nicolai Leskov. I will leave it to the Shakespeare experts to comment how different this story is from Shakespeare's. What I can say is this: the movie is very much story-driven. Things happen, and happen fast, and it doesn't let up! There is hardly any music in the film. Another unusual fact: the movie does not have a title. There are no opening credit, and when the end titles start, it simply says "Based on Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District by Nicolai Leskov", and that's it. (The Katherine character is regularly referred to as "Mrs. Lester" or maybe that should be "Leicester".) The star of the movie for sure is Florence Pugh, an up-and-coming British actress, whom I can assure you we will see plenty more of (she reminds me of a young Kate Winslett). Played by Pugh, Katherine is passionate and ruthless. Last but not lest, the movie was filmed (according to the end titles) in Northumberland, the area just below the border with Scotland, just beautiful.

"Lady MacBeth" premiered at the 2016 Toronto International Film Festival to positive buzz. It finally opened this weekend at my local art-house theater here in Cincinnati, and I couldn't wait to see it. The Friday early evening screening where I saw this at was attended dismally (4 people, including myself), which does not bode well for this movie, considering it was the opening night. That's a shame. Maybe this will gather a larger audience through Amazon Instant Video, or eventually on DVD/Blu-ray. If you like a strong story-driven movie with great acting, you could do a lot worse than this particular "Lady MacBeth"!
23 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superbly Well-Made, Chilling Period Drama
bastille-852-73154724 July 2017
This small independent film from the United Kingdom is an astonishing portrait of the bleak realities of how Scottish culture viewed class, race, and (especially) gender in the nineteenth century. The film does this without ever needing to be preachy or overtly politically correct. It is very dark and rather disturbing, and it will get under your skin--but it is brilliantly made. It is the best film of the year so far. It should also, however, be noted that this film is not an adaptation of Shakespeare's "Macbeth." Rather, it is an adaptation of a Russian novel about a woman who begins to exhibit deranged behaviors after being forced into an arranged--and loveless--marriage.

Despite using minimal set pieces and little music, the aesthetics of this film are truly sublime. They add to the simple feel of the film, rather than the extravagant sense of many period dramas. The costume design is also simple rather than outlandish or flamboyant. Once again, this makes the film feel realistic and tense, rather than removed from reality. The film's cinematography is top-notch as well, reflecting the dark tone of the film in its entirety. Florence Pugh is exceptional in the lead role as Katherine. Despite the actions that her character commits in the second half of the film, she manages to generate sympathy while still portraying herself as a twisted individual--almost an impossible trick to pull off. But what elevates this film to utter brilliance is that it is not solely a defense of her--or a defense of anyone. Rather, it is simply a unique reflection on the notion of social status at the time period that skewers all preconceived notions of judgment--including morals and morality--to the point of ambiguous analysis. The film's true messages are quite complex, even though its direct plot is not difficult to follow. This is why even simple, dialogue-free scenes such as moments when the camera stares at Katherine's face as she is seated, tell you so much about her as a character and her mood to a degree that I have not really seen in any film of recent memory. Such complexity, though, is what makes the film an unforgettable watch. (Of course, the uniquely simple look and feel to the film and its excellent, slow-burn-style pacing also contributes greatly to it.) Recommended to the highest degree. 10/10
84 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth watching
euroGary25 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
My enjoyment of the first fifteen minutes of the 2016 London Film Festival's showing of 'Lady Macbeth' was spoiled by the large numbers of people arriving late and causing disruption as they tried to find their seats in the darkened cinema. For Heaven's sake, make an effort to turn up on time, people!

Anyway, having got that out of my system... Katherine (Florence Pugh) is bought, together with a piece of land "not fit to graze a cow on", by wealthy mine owner Boris (Christopher Fairbank, forever remembered as Moxey in 'Auf Wiedersehen, Pet') as a wife for his son Alexander (Paul Hilton). But when both Boris and Alexander (the latter having failed miserably in the bedroom department) are called away, Katherine, left alone in a house full of servants, catches the eye of groom Sebastian (Cosmo Jarvis). We then have a quick canter through the old 'woman half-heartedly resists arrogant man' plot (which to me always carries an unwelcome whiff of 'when a woman says "no" she really means "yes"') before Katherine enthusiastically submits to Sebastian's straggly-bearded charms. (And why wouldn't she? Describing his participation in the gang assault on her maid as 'weighing a sow', he's plainly a keeper.) But if Sebastian thinks he is getting things all his own way, Katherine soon proves the shoe is on the other foot...

Whether the audience were supposed to laugh I am not sure; but when we did, we were laughing with the film, not at it. Certainly the matter-of-fact way Katherine proceeds on her rebellious, seductive, murderous way had an element of black comedy about it; it was only her shooting of a horse that caused horrified silence (remember, this was an English audience). Pugh does well in making Katherine neither a wild-eyed lunatic nor a Hannibal Lecter-style psychopath. As her maid and unwilling accomplice, Naomi Ackie also provides nice work.

How close this is to the source material - a Russian novella written in 1865 - I do not know. I found the maid's sudden muteness a mite convenient, since it meant she could not tell on her mistress; and Sebastian's change of heart was hardly unexpected. But this was an interesting film and I will probably watch it again if it turns up on television.
21 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent story telling - beautifully acted and directed.
choonmixer954 May 2017
I was enthralled by this movie from start to finish. The cinematography and sound were excellent. The complete absence of a music soundtrack except for two notable atmospheric crescendos added to the overall oppressiveness of the story and the location. All of the performances were excellent and the lead was outstanding IMO. The story was in many ways familiar - being evocative of Bronte and Hardy - with its portrayal of Victorian country gentry and the brutality and sense of entitlement that sometimes occurred between the classes but the way the story unfolded frequently surprised me by not following through in the way one might have expected it to. I too would recommend a cinema viewing in order to get the full effect of the landscape and the oppressive silence of the house.
57 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Watch it for Florence Pugh
gbill-748776 October 2019
The mood of the 19th century is captured well in the silence of this film, which for the most part is sparse on dialog and has little soundtrack. This allows us to hear all of those wonderful sounds of heavy wooden doors in the mansion, and the wind blustering in those beautiful open spaces of Scotland. Florence Pugh has an engaging screen presence and is one to watch for, though I'm not so sure I see the chemistry in the affair her character has with Cosmo Javis's. The story is mostly faithful to the original novella from minor Russian Golden Age author Nikolai Leskov (and one of his better works), but somehow it seems a little off here, maybe because her bored/dominated predicament segues to the affair/murder too quickly, maybe because the servant character (Naomi Ackie) isn't developed all that well, or maybe because the affair doesn't seem authentic enough to justify the actions, especially the last one.

Compare these bits from the novella to how the scene with the line "It's husbands and wives that kiss like that" plays out: "'Then why did you kiss me that way?' Sergei said nothing at all. 'It's only husbands and wives,' Katerian Lvovna went on, playing with his curls, 'who shake the dust off each other's lips like that. Kiss me so that these young apple blossoms over us fall to the ground. Like this, like this,' Katerian Lvovna whispered, twining around her lover and kissing him with passionate abandon."

Followed later by: "The old clerk, asleep in the shed, began to hear through his sound sleep, in the stillness of the night, now whispering and quiet laughter, as if mischievous children were discussing some wicked way to mock feeble old age; now ringing and merry laughter, as if mermaids were tickling somebody. It was all Katerina Lvovna frolicking and playing with her husband's young clerk, basking in the moonlight and rolling on the soft rug. White young blossoms from the curly apple tree poured down on them, poured down, and then stopped pouring down. Meanwhile, the short summer night was passing; the moon hid behind the steep roofs of the tall storehouses and looked askance at the earth, growing dimmer and dimmer; a piercing cat duet came from the kitchen roof, then spitting, angry snarling, after which two or three cats, losing hold, tumbled noisily down a bunch of boards leaning against the roof."
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Intriguing Failure
dwankan20 May 2018
This film tries to do some interesting things, but it fails. It tries to be a feminist critique of old fashioned sexism, and so we have a young woman whose father has sold her to an abusive husband who controls her and is unable to show any affection for her. Where it goes from there is an absurd slippery slope. Her first subtle step toward disobeying her husband leads her headlong into sociopathic selfishness. I could almost handle that as a statement of "look what oppression does to people," but other details in the film suggest the message that women are better under control. She was immediately attracted to a man whom she caught leading a group sexual assault on another woman, and she stifled her feelings until the man forced himself into her room and sexually assaulted her (I mean, what girl can resist a rapist). The plot was tense, and I watched it partly out of intrigue and partly out of curiosity. There were a number of complications throughout, but they became progressively less believable. The writer seemed to have thought less about the logic/motivation of each new twist, and by the end, the turns in the plot had become consistently both absurd and unsurprising. I gave up trying to find a way to explain the ridiculous choices the characters made because they were largely unexplainable. The casting was the final weirdness. A great deal of the cast were black actors. Had this been a light-hearted comedy or action flick, I would have been okay with the anachronistic lack of racism, but since it was a starkly realistic film focused on ugly human behavior, it makes no sense to pretend that that one didn't exist in that time and place. A glaring example of this is when a black woman walks into the home of a white woman in 19th century Scotland and makes demands of her, demands which the white woman seems powerless to resist. I feel weird complaining that a black character had social power in a film's story, but in the context, it feels wrong. Not only were there very few people of African descent in that time in Scotland, but they certainly would not have been able to lord themselves over white people, as that particular character did to the protagonist. I can't help wondering if the director just wanted to earn progressive points by saying at parties (to other white people of course) that he had hired some of "those people" for his film.
35 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Masterful photography of a Shakespeare-like lusty drama.
JohnDeSando5 August 2017
Looking at the title, you might think director William Oldroyd's Lady Macbeth is about revenge, lust, murder, and boredom, and you would be right on all counts. Katherine (Florence Pugh), a 19th century teen bride of an arranged marriage to a middle-aged drunk, can't get no satisfaction. Her husband is impotent for starters, and the estate is so forbidding murder would seem to be a required pastime.

Yet, sex is the prime mover here, where she discovers randy groomsman Sebastian (Cosmo Jarvis), and takes him to bed in the long absence of her hubby. Meek black Anna (Naomi Ackie), Katherine's servant, observes the shenanigans, much as we do, unable to change what she sees will be an outcome unpleasant to the core. To the end Anna is faithful to Katherine, a slave to a mistress who is herself a slave to men and convention.

Several archetypal themes arise in this somber, artfully-photographed drama. For instance, one that emphasizes the wages of sin is prominent; another about the subjugated rising against the oppressor; and another about the danger of socially imprisoning smart women in a paternalistic society. A leitmotif also surfaces about the dangers of debilitating class distinctions, which are never a good thing in the long haul.

Ari Wegner's cinematography is portrait-like if considering only the recurring shot of Katherine sitting on her Victorian couch in a consuming dress that seems to deteriorate with each similar shot. Underneath the dress is the corset, so long a symbol of the era's tight hold on women.

Remembering Amma Asante's Belle, I'm pleased to see another art- film treatment of fraught race relations in merry ol' England. That none of this will ever stop is promised in the spawn of the miscreants, children of evil destined to repeat their parents' sins.

Lady Macbeth is an interesting minimalist story of a smothered young woman, whose intensity will lay waste to the social fabric of the estate. In fact, much of the proceedings are Shakespearean with their emphasis on man's weakness in his dominance, a woman's Eve-like ability to lure men into sin, and the pride that inevitably leads to a fall.

Depressing but dramatically satisfying.
31 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I enjoyed it
adventurer_ci16 October 2017
The film is based on an essay by Nikolai Leskov "Ledi Makbet Mtsenskogo uezda", written in 1864. The story name contains an allusion to Ivan Turgenev's story "Hamlet of Shchigrovsky Uyezd" (1849)

I liked this move. Great performances by a young and talented actress Florence Pugh and Cosmo Jarvis. Not sure why feminism was brought into discussion of this film, mostly by those who did not like it. Imagination gone wild I guess. Leskov himself called his story a gloomy story in strict tones of a strong and passionate feminine character. The story was to be the beginning of a cycle about the characters of Russian women. So it has nothing to do with feminism.

There is a Russian version of this movie, Ledi Makbet Mtsenskogo uezda (1989) (Леди Макбет Мценского уезда (1989), Director: Roman Balayan. You might want watch it on one of the Russian sites kinobanda dot net for example. It is in Russian language though.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One more for the collection
pacolopezpersonal22 August 2017
The figure of Lady Macbeth has been treated beforehand directly or indirectly on many occasions. 12 films about Macbeth and his inseparable Lady counted from 1908 to 2015, T. V. film adaptations, Plays, Ballet, Opera, etc. All those antecedents along with the BBC's seal seemed to guarantee the good result of this work. This Lady Macbeth is slightly inspired by the novel "Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District" by the Russian writer of the 19th century Nikolai Leskov, so slightly that along 89 min.they do not get a base or solid structure. In the argument. They appear, a husband and a wife, heirs, servants and lovers themselves, suddenly. as fast is their appearance as their disappearance, we do not know its origin, (they appear without more), to disappear (by hindrance) at the same speed. As to scenes of sex the movie meets the quota, it is remarkable the final gaze of the lady protagonist; it seems to indicate us; "Be careful, the next victim could be yourself." The movie in general is fine but it could have been achieved a better result with a longer duration, the title of the film is its best guarantee facing the box office but It only manages to be one more for the collection (and not the best one).
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Oddly compelling
paul2001sw-125 January 2020
'Lady Macbeth' is the tale of a woman lumbered with a monstrous husband and father-in-law who, driven in part by lust, sets out to do whatever it takes to get what she wants. Unlike her Shakesperian namesake, it's not her character who ends up consumed with guilt. The film features no background music, sparse dialogue and some of the key scenes occur off-camera or the action is filmed in a stationary and unmelodramatic way; meanwhile, the sex-drive is presented as absolutely elemental. The result is deliberately stilted (the opening minutes reminded of Joanna Hogg's work), yet for all that, suprisingly emotionally compelling.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Psychopaths don't get cooler than this
jamesfriern23 April 2017
Florence Pugh is magnificent in the lead role as a cool lady psychopath. And this is one of the best films I've seen this year. It's gripping from start to finish, there's just not even a little bit of fat in the production, every scene, every piece of dialogue is sparse but meaningful and the actors all carry it off with panache. The direction is flawless. i felt trapped in a Victorian drama with no escape. The camera work is wonderful, grainy and grim in the candle light of the mansion and you could feel the personality of the characters oozing into your pores from the close-ups. Its quite brilliant. Don't miss it.
43 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wow!
Sherazade29 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This acting was on point but to be honest to me this was more of a horror film than romance. The introduction of each new character seemed only to prove that there is an even more daft person than the one who was previously holding your attention. The content is very disturbing and it certainly was a different look at life in 1800s England. Definitely a one time watch, once is enough.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Florence Pugh is excellent
aistingaling6 February 2020
Florence Pugh really shines in this film, her performance is utterly brilliant, cold and harrowing but also full of emotion. The directing is also fantastic, so many artistically framed shots that emphasises her loneliness and boredom.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Oppressive, intelligent - cold as the north England moors.
Avwillfan899 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This film's lack of music helps to build into the atmosphere of quiet, oppressive nature and boiling anger of the main protagonist.

The young Katherine Lester is bought by mean old rich white man to provide his pathetic, angry son with an heir, to which he is profoundly useless - forcing her to face the wall naked while he wanks. No joke.

While he and his father are away, the bored, sleepy Katherine is drawn into a romance with one of her husband's workers, Sebastian, and conducts an affair.

After which, things gradually fall into deep, murderous despair.

What appears at first to be a woman desperate to get out of a literal prison, and find happiness - soon turns into, well - as the title says, Lady Macbeth. A woman who manipulates her loved one into committing heinous, awful crimes along with her to fulfil her needs, with no thought as to how he feels, and betraying ones closest to her.

This is not really a feminist story about a woman rebelling against the oppressive patriarchy - but more like an interesting villain origin story. We're left with not knowing much about what she will do next, if it was all worth it and if she's satisfied with her goals, as she simply sits in the exact same position in the same chair with the same expression: boredom. I wish we had a little more from her in that ending.

7 out of 10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Like a brutal and cruel Brontë story
vampire_hounddog12 August 2020
In 1865, young Katherine (Florence Pugh) is married off to the older lord of the manor (Paul Hilton) in what turns out to be a lonely, loveless and even cruel marriage. He is often away and she is left to her boredom and isolation and ends up having a torrid affair with a groom (Cosmo Jarvis). Their passion turns to muder to keep it alive.

Based off Nikolai Leskov's Russian novel, 'Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk', this Angliscised film comes across as a brutal version of a Brontë novel with its added dimension of cruelty, even beyond that of the Brontës. Bleak and bare in appearance, the film is as engaging as it is shocking, but keeps itself gritty and true to itself.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lady Macbeth
CinemaSerf20 April 2024
Florence Pugh is quite effective in this story of "Katherine", trapped in a loveless and sterile marriage with "Alexander" (Paul Hilton) who, with his father "Boris" (Christopher Fairbanks) treat her with a mixture of tolerance and contempt. The solution to her insatiety looks like it might come from their swarthy farm hand "Sebastian" (Cosmo Jarvis) and when the husband has to leave for an extended time, she discovers a sense of happiness and fulfilment that disbars any thoughts of returning to her former life of obedience and boredom - regardless of how dangerous that may be. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the Scottish play, nor with any of it's characterisations so don't expect any similarities - beyond the fact that "Katherine" soon emerges from her fragile cocoon to become a determined - and dangerous - creature bent on securing her happiness and freedom at any costs. The one thing you will notice is the distinct lack of a soundtrack. There is plenty of pretty Northern English scenery to drink in, but when there is no dialogue (especially scenes in the forest) the only sounds we hear are of nature. The ending, i found particularly fitting for her by this stage rather unlikeable character and it is quite a telling depiction of just how completely ineffective 19th Century British policing was!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unbelievable Story
nicholls_les16 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Story of a woman who is at first a victim then becomes worse than her abusers. What is hard to understand is why? Something is clearly missing from the plot. Yes she is young and bored and married to a man of dubious moral character, but to resort to murder and to have no regard for other humans is baffling. Maybe she is a Psychopath? Some say she is a feminist, but to lose all morals and murder even a child is not feminist. That said, the acting was very good and the scenery so I give it 5 stars.
25 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed