3-Headed Shark Attack (Video 2015) Poster

(2015 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Jaws x 3
Prismark1018 November 2018
A giant mutated three headed shark is roaming the ocean and eating people. Porn star Jazy Berlin is the first vicitm and the shark got angry after chewing on her silicone breasts.

However despite the size of the shark and its three heads, people just keep going into the water especially now the shark is after a cruise ship to devour.

Asylum have managed to produce a decent CGI shark. The story is drab.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
More heads.
Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki7 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Another genetically mutated shark goes after more imbeciles. So much for the plot.

About on par with its predecessor; the acting is just as putrid as the previous film (2 Headed Shark Attack) and there are just as many continuity problems (which is to say, many) and just as much logic (which is to say, none) , but no one watches a movie with a title like this for anything other than to laugh at its ineptitude. It is unfortunate however, that the film has only a handful of unintentional laughs, the remainder either stupid, or just boring. The shark's size is at least consistent now. This time, it's the size of a bus, yet it can leap twenty feet into the air, and manoeuvre tight corridors with ease. It can also survive out of water for extended periods of time.

My favourite scene is when that guy, ... Joey, Jojo, jnr.,... or whatever the bloody hell his name is, jumps off the boat into the water, swinging an ax at the shark, in super slow motion.

And the trailer itself should include a spoiler warning, as it shows Danny Trejo's death scene!
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Giving extra head
kosmasp31 May 2021
Now I have not watched the first one yet (which has a two headed shark), but I can imagine how ... crazy it must be. This can be taken as an example of how not to do certain things ... in editing for example. The reaction shots to things happening are awful ... you could argue that the actors are not up for it, but maybe it is not their fault.

Anyway, Trejo gives it his all, when he can be seen, there was no nudity (which is surprising considering this would be a selling point, not that it would make the movie "better", but there was also an Axe scene that Sharknado probably is jealous of ... not that they were able to milk much out of it (again reaction shots ;) ) ... anyway, I've seen worse movies .. I'm guessing the sequels might get in that list if I ever see them.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
As predictable and interesting as watching grass grow on a meadow.
modeldyr2 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Let's just say that each time the "shark" ate someone, I was hoping it had room for one more. I simply cannot understand how anybody would want to invest other than time in watching this piece of crap, and I do believe the producers should have their heads examined along with the people conceiving the plot. I actually like and respect Danny Trejo as an actor, but he should definitely have passed this part along with the remains after his breakfast. More specifically, it is the profound idiocy in this movie that really turns me off. I don't mind watching D-movies as long as they are have a certain minimum of innate logic, and to point to some examples I better first write this:

SPOILER ALERT:

Don't read this if you want to see this movie without first learning about some of its more blatant flaws. The actual action starts when this 3-headed fish arrives and for some reason decides to rip a large underwater research facility apart. At first it just swims a little around and is spotted by some visitor named Brad who see its shadow, complete with a large tail fin swinging from side to side some distance away. Now, everybody knows of course that a whale will swing its tail up and down, but Brad, who according to his own statement ("Nah, it's fine professor. We've all kicked it with whales before!") should have known better, mistakes this typical fish-mode of swimming for that of a large whale and waddles out in the water to have a better look. The water is not deep at all so when this guy almost reaches a large collection of floating debris it reaches no higher than a little bit below his knees. In the mean time wee see this gigantic shark, which I estimate to be something like 15-30 meters long (its size seems to fluctuate throughout this movie) and perhaps 2-3 meters tall and with a back fin no less than 2 meters in height, approaching with its head immediately underneath the floating debris. The back fin turns out to be no problem because it somehow manages to tuck it away so it does not stick up through the floating debris, thus warning Brad. Then it finally comes close enough to initiate a giant leap out of the water, and we are talking a leap at least twice as high, relatively, as one of the great white jumping sharks you might have seen on TV, and who requires at least a depth of 4-5 times their body lengths to build enough speed for the jump. Brad is of course just standing in his knee-deep water with open mouth and an expression of surprise all over, and then the shark slams right down on him and disappears deep below the surface of what must obviously be solid sand. Amazing. The rest of Brad's buddies on shore then run for the only safe place on this atoll that have probably been above sea level for hundreds of years - yes, they of course run deep down into the facility, which is then trashed by the shark, that also manages to snatch some guy sitting on a toilet by jumping up through the floor. At this point in the movie I actually started to expect the shark to start jumping out the faucets, but no. Then they all run upstairs and decide to swim out to a little boat one by one rather than staying in complete safety on land, and the rest is so stupid that it is hard to fathom. Why can't the shark catch a couple of slow swimming "actors" when it has no problem swimming faster than a speedboat on other occasions? How come the water is completely still around the boat while the "actors" discuss their options when we have just seen one of them fire it up at half speed? Why would I waste maybe half an hour of my precious life writing this critique when I have seen at least ten movies just as bad, or worse? Who reads these reviews anyway?
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
SyFy seems to not even care any more
jmstanton20 July 2015
This is a horrible movie. The animations are terrible and the plot is pathetic. It's obvious they rushed the editing to get this movie out for shark week, but come on SyFy, we can see other boats in the background and they are clearly in a channel with land all around them when they are trying to find a place to get to with the boat. The boat that was sinking one minute, with bodies all over it, was perfectly fine minutes later. One mistake after another. Perhaps you could also try and find actors who can really act next time. The level of acting here is grade level. I get the "B" grade quality of your movies and we normally enjoy that but even we were hard pressed to make it through this stinker. Terrible, terrible movie.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really bad
hotkewi7 August 2015
I am a fan of B-movies and appreciate the humor in them. They are aware of the audiences expectations and delivers.

But this movie really tries to be a real movie. My expectations were very low and only wanted a bit of brainless entertainment. But the brain could not relax with all these unnecessary flaws. Going full speed and barely make any waves. Badly broken things are suddenly whole again. Using the same cut scene over and over and ... again. At least some laws of physics?

I seldom regret watching a movie but this one can with good continence be skipped. It only makes you feel bad that you gave it a chance.

All though Danny Trejo saves it a little it's way below par for B-movies.

Let it slip by you unwatched.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dumb fun
Leofwine_draca14 November 2015
3 HEADED SHARK ATTACK is unsurprisingly a follow-up to 2-HEADED SHARK ATTACK. It's another monster flick from The Asylum, in which an unlikely creation goes after a group of partygoers and various assorted individuals off the coast of Florida.

You know the score by now if you're familiar with The Asylum's work: this is a so-bad-it's-good piece of film-making cheese, loaded with unashamed dodgy special effects, lashings of bloodshed, and almost constant eye candy. The scenarios and situations are ripped off from various movies, including PIRANHA 3D, but nonetheless I found myself enjoying it. The film provides a near-constant stream of shark attack scenes with plenty of goofy acting to applaud.

This is a step up from the previous movie and one of the most fun films from The Asylum that I've yet watched. They even have Danny Trejo making an extended cameo in a spin on his character from MACHETE. Really, though, it's all about the likes of Dawn Hamil and Brianna Ferris parading around in their form-fitting bikinis to titillate male viewers, and some better than average CGI effects used to animate the three-headed shark. Normal cinema-goers will hate this film, but B-movie fans should get a kick or two (or three!) out of it.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It may have had three heads, but where were the brains and fun to go with it?
TheLittleSongbird9 August 2015
While I didn't think much at all of 2-Headed Shark Attack, this was worse. The former at least tried to be fun (although the cheapness and ineptitude of it all got in the way) and had one cast member who tried, but 3-Headed Shark Attack takes itself too seriously, as well as being so stupid and being unoriginal in doing so, with next to nothing that makes it stand out from other shark movies (apart from with the shark) and wastes the talent it has.

3-Headed Shark Attack is by far the worst looking of the SyFy shark movies aired this year. Any nice scenery that the movie has is difficult to appreciate when the movie is shot in such a drab way and when it's edited so amateurishly that bacon-slicer-like editing looks more refined. Worst of all in this regard are the effects, as it was made on low-budget it would have been forgiven a little if it was not great, but when the effects for the shark look as if no effort was given in making them without looking so goofy and unfinished-looking that is hard to ignore, the only thing that it has that's superior for that of 2-Headed Shark Attack is that the size is more consistent. So is the shark's lack of presence or personality, it's not menacing, it's not scary and it's not fun, it's not even strong enough to bring any unintentional humour or goofiness, that's how bland it is. Music is very generic and adds very little, it's not always appropriate either.

The movie's writing ranges between incredibly bad to appalling, with the exception of two dark comedy moments with the head inside the shark and the boy riding the shark as if skiing, and they only raised a mild chuckle and like they were lifted right out of other shark movies (the latter being a little like in Sharknado 2). Any comedy is incredibly forced and is so cheesy it is enough to make the eyes roll in disbelief, while the more serious moments are very awkwardly written and as trite as anybody can possibly go. The attacks are far too rushed, lack any kind of suspense and the over-silliness to the point of intelligence-insulting stupidity, terrible shark effects, bad editing and even more gratuitous gore further cheapen them. To describe the story as weak is being too insulting to the word weak, it is a very lethargically paced and thin as ice story with lots of padding that is either badly written or serves no point at all to the movie, other than attempts at novelty value, which falls flat on its face because it all feels so tired. It is not fun, it is not scary and it is not thrilling or suspenseful, it's just nothing but tired stupidity.

As for the characters, that they're tired clichés isn't so much a problem, the problem is that they are either obnoxious with them constantly doing stupid things, so bland that it makes zombies seem more animated or both. Some of them are superfluous to the story or come and go out of nowhere constantly. The direction is as flat as a pancake, and the acting is awful with the unforgivable waste of Danny Trejo being one of the movie's biggest offences. Trejo, no matter how hard he tries, has nothing to work with with none of his material playing to his strengths as a performer, and he over-compensates as a result, for someone like Trejo who has a knack for raising a lot of bad movies up a notch it's shameful. Everybody else either overacts painfully or are amateurishly bland.

In summary, despite the small bit of originality with the shark 3-Headed Shark Attack is a dreadful movie all round and near-indefensible. 1/10 Bethany Cox
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What a piece of trash
khushpreetsarnobat21 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Some of those movies are entertaining, this one is not.

Bad acting (including Danny Trejo, watch his face during the boat ride), stupid behavior of all people (yes, make sure you're next after you've seen other people fall into the water), bad editing, of course I don't have to talk about a script or a story and the way the shark gets killed at the end (oh, did I reveal too much?) - ridiculous.

I was often wondering where the money is coming from and who gives green light to make movies like that. Look what some kids with some decent home equipment can put together on YouTube. Let them make movies.

Waste of time unless you want to joke around how bad it is.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another Bad movie
khuklux19 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This is the worst movie I've watched so far in 2020, I really regret wasting my time. I can't get that time back. The actors were very poor at acting. It seem the actors were directed by a fourteen year old kid. Using a machete to behead a shark by hitting the teeth. Come on. This movie deserved no rating.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Z list movie
stephenlangtonriley17 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I find the 1950's B movies amusing and watch out for the goofs but this one almost defies belief, I have never seen anything so bad, from the overacting (very badly) to the title review about a cruise ship, it was a small boad that should only operate on a river and a small one at that. Repeated use of the same shots, land appearing when they are supposed to be miles from land, a "cruise" ship that is half sunk and then back afloat. This is a typical teen angst movie where all the cast are screaming wimps, with the exception of the gung ho suicide squad. 30 minutes towards the end, I am "watching" it now, all the boats have self repaired. Gung Ho has been caught from behind by this abysmal excuse for SFX, no continuity, the script? I can't write the words to describe it. I see the macho women have finally taken command and little wimp boy barks orders as 3 head has now morphed into 5 head. This appears to have been a badly produced Greenpeace production as it keeps going on and on and on about the pollution and how this laughable mutated predator is attracted to it. I have to change channels now as I cannot bear any more teen angst about trying to save their friends and the world when they don't have the skills to do either and especially not a movie. I having given it any stars but will probably be required to give it one and it doesn't even deserve that.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the Great Cinema Masterpieces of Our Time.......
imiuru220 July 2015
Top notch cinematography? Check.

A-List actors? Double check.

Genius storyline? Triple check.

This film not only captures one's spirit from the opening scene, it grips it with a fiery control right up until the closing credits. On par with such films as "Shawshank Redemption" and "Gladiator", this my friends is superb storytelling at his finest. Nominated for 17 Academy Awards (and projected to sweep all of them), this moveable piece of on screen art is sure to be cemented in history for many, many years to come.

Enjoy!
4 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Three Heads, But Could Have Had A Little More Bite
By-TorX-123 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The Three-Headed Shark Attack is an entertainingly bad film, and as it's title is a thematic/quality giveaway no one is going to be expecting Citizen Kane 2 (Rosebud's Revenge). On the plus side, the shark is an effective CGI creation and there is enough chomping to keep the pizza-movie viewer happy. But, the film is often slack in terms of narrative with some padding in the first section. For example, one sequence has three characters slowly take turns swimming out to a boat with the same outcome each time, plus, there is an odd 'rescue' bit in which a group seek out the hapless Howard and save him from being buried alive under some chairs. More shark action would have been good in lieu of such time-wasting. However, there are also many marvellous plots turns and visual points that compensate and which will amaze viewers, like: a victim taken by the shark even though he is only in ankle-deep water; a bullet-proof shark; a group who reason that staying on an island is much riskier then setting back out onto the high seas in rickety boats; angst about reaching land when land is clearly visible on either side of a boat and looks about a mile away in either direction; machinegun-toting fishermen; a nice Danny Trejo self-film reference; shark-skiing, an ending that is pretty much the same as Mega Piranha (and equally illogical); many characters obsessed with engaging in swimming races with the titular multi-noggined beast, and, best of all, Rob Van Dam rocking the socks with sandals look.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
1 star movie
aubreannashaw22 February 2016
Graphics are pretty bad!!! If it wasn't for Karrueche I wouldn't have finished the movie. I DID NOT LIKE IT AT ALL!!! I am a little embarrassed for her honestly. I love her as a person but she just cannot act. Seriously. This is not a movie I would recommend to ANYONE. Not only is Karrueches acting very fake so are the other unprofessional actors. This is one of those movies you kinda just wonder how they were funded for this. & if they even made money off of this. Karrueche definitely Needs some more acting skills. You need to go to sleep? This is just the prefect sale. I believe It could have been down a lot more my prices.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie blows balls
rhqb-618955 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is by far the worst movie I've seen this year. The CGI is terrible. The acting is worse. The plot is no where to be found. Let's put it this way, your underwater research lab is attacked but our hero's make it out and are standing on land. The movie should have ended right there. But no, they swim to a boat to get away. Then they look for another island while the camera shots show land on both sides of them 😂. And there's a river boat in the ocean. Jesus Christ this movie blows balls.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
a shame for cinema
eddiecolazzo28 June 2019
A crystal clear example of how not to make a movie and a proof they all chose a wrong job
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
THE ASYLUM as it's worse
frwatson28 July 2015
Another piece of crap brought to us by THE ASYLUM and Syfy. Not worth the time to watch. Just goes to show you that THE ASYLUM and Syfy doesn't care what they produce. Awful. Cheap. Dull. Bad Acting. Bad Direction. Bad screenplay. It really needs a -10 or more. Nothing THE ASYLUM produces is worth watching. Syfy is just as bad. Too cheap to actually make a decent movie. Instead they spend little and send work to a crap production company.

The two positive reviews must have been from THE ASYLUM, in noway it is a masterpiece. I always check to see who the production company when it comes to Syfy. If it's THE ASYLUM, the TV goes off.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Does an additional head make for a greater fright?
Seth_Rogue_One22 August 2015
Not really, but did anyone think it was gonna be? The predecessor: "2 Headed Shark Atttack" was nothing short of a masterpiece.

Who knew that a shark with 2 heads could inflict such fright in it's viewer?

Steven Spielberg didn't for instance if he did he would have made Jaws have 2 heads instead of just one With 3 heads involved you imagine the fright to be even greater, but such is not the case.

Not terrible by any means and a above average when it comes to Asylum-movies and most of the cast actually made an attempt at acting which is nice to see, in many Asylum-movies they can't be bothered.

If you like 'so bad it's good' type of movies then yeah you can do worse than this for sure.

Just don't expect the laughters and cries you experienced from watching '2 Headed Shark Attack'. A movie that in many minds were robbed off plenty of Academy Awards the year of it's release.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Best movie to watch with Friends !!!
manishsharma-7019524 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is so awfully awesome that i promise you if you are gonna watch it with your friends you will really love it. I think it's better if i don't give any spoiler ahead. Believe me you won't be able to predict any thing in the movie. The shark gets killed in the most awesome way and i bet you won't be able to predict it. Guess what the shark eats it's head out and dies.Yeah you heard it right. This movie has really solved the quest regarding how to be safe from shark. The safest place is sea itself. Even if you are on the land get yourself in the water if you see a shark. Spoiler ahead ! to really understand this movie you must know something about quantum mechanics ,Yeah they have used it. Sorry for the spoiler even if i promised not to tell anything.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
3-Headed Shark Attack
jboothmillard6 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I unintentionally watched this straight-to-DVD sequel before the original, 2-Headed Shark Attack, made by the same studio as Sharknado, but it didn't make any different, I knew it was going to be bad, directed by Christopher Ray (Mega Shark vs. Crocosaurus). Basically, a 3-headed great white shark attacks a small where a group of teenagers are partying, all those on the beach are killed, apsrt from Mark (Stephen Harwick) who swam to a buoy. The shark then attacks the Persephone, an underwater research facility studying the pollution of the Pacific Garbage Patch. The resulting damage causes the facility to explode, killing everybody inside. Marine biologists Ted Nelson (Jason Simmons) and Dr Laura Thomas (Jena Sims) manage to escape, along with touring activists Greg (Brad Mills), Ryan Bennett (Scott Thomas Reynolds), Omar (Rico Ball) and Alison (Dawn Hamil), and Greg's ex-girlfriend, college graduate Maggie Peterson (Karrueche Tran), who was applying for a job at the facility. The facility floods, and the island it is on, forcing the group to swim out to a boat, Laura and Omar are eaten in the process. The others reach the boat, with the shark following them. Ryan radios for help, and gets in contact with fisherman Max Burns, asking for help. Burns does not believe that there is a 3-headed shark, but reluctantly agrees to help them hearing of the attacks. The shark next heads toward a boat full of partying teenagers. The group attempts to warn those onboard, but the shark starts ramming into the boat, knocking numerous people into the water where they are eaten. The group manage to get aboard and help some injured passengers. Nelson is eaten, and as the boat starts to sink, the group are joined by passengers Stanley (Rob Van Dam), Rosemarie (Brianna Ferris) and Howard (Carlos Javier Rivera). Ryan stays behind and attempts to impale the shark with an axe, but it kills him in retaliation. Running low on fuel, the group is forced to stop at the island that the shark attacked earlier. Meanwhile, Burns, and his two men attempt to kill the shark, with Burns' men killed in the process. Burns manages to decapitate the shark's middle head, seemingly killing it. When Burns finds the rest of the group, the shark suddenly reappears, growing three more heads in place of the middle head (like Hydra), and it eats Burns. Traumatised by Burns' death, the group run to the centre of the island, where they find Mark. Maggie theorises that the shark is attracted to pollution, and that the heads are becoming more aggressive with each other. The group finds two motorboats and begin to drive away from the island. One of the boats is attacked by the shark, killing Alison, Rosemarie, Howard, and Mark. Meanwhile, Maggie, Stanley and Greg manage to attract the shark's attention by throwing bags of garbage into the water. Stanley's hand is bitten off in the process (but you can clearly see it is still there when he is swimming). Stanley decides to sacrifice himself, causing the shark heads to fight each other, and it dies from blood loss after eating itself. Maggie and Greg rekindle their relationship as a helicopter arrives to rescue them. Trejo does his usual tough guy stuff, but almost nothing else, the whole cast are lame and wasted with terrible dialogue. It is a terrible idea for a shark movie, it looks very cheaply made, with repetitive underwater shots to save on the awful special effects and silly attempts at over-the-top gory deaths, and it is not scary, funny or exciting in any way, a pointless and abysmal science-fiction action horror. Poor!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Three Heads Are Better Than Two
Michael_Elliott22 July 2015
3 Headed Shark Attack (2015)

** (out of 4)

A group of scientist come under attack by a mutated three-headed shark and soon the creature is attacking anyone that it can. Soon the group realizes that the sharks are going after pollution, which leads to a cute political message about keeping the world clean.

2-HEADED SHARK ATTACK was a decent monster flick and you know what they say, three heads are better than two. Well, at least this film proves that. Much like the first film, you'd be downright insane if you went into a picture like this expecting any kind of art. Just so you know, there are countless logical issues with the story but if you're willing to watch a movie called 3 HEADED SHARK ATTACK then can you really question logic?

Again, if you're a fan of this type of film then you already know what to expect. A movie like this just needs to be entertaining in a so bad it's good kind of way and I think this film succeeds at that. There are all sorts of bloody attack sequences, which are pretty much and I must admit that the actual look of the shark is quite good. The CGI effects are obviously very cheap but at the same time they at least look better than the majority of the films like this. The performances are decent for what they are and it's Danny Trejo who does the celebrity small part.

3 HEADED SHARK ATTACK is exactly what it sounds like and for the most part it's cheap entertainment.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It was a fun one, and I did like the design of the shark. It was nasty looking.
subxerogravity9 February 2016
3-Headed Shark Attack is just one in what is becoming a really long list of disaster movies that exploit cheap CGI effects in order to give us a giant freak of nature destroying the seas.

But I did get some enjoyment out of it. I watched it out of pure curiosity over Karrueche Tran, who I know nothing about except for who she use to date. Not the best actress in the world, that's a given, but easy on the eyes, and delvers her lines like someone who gets it.

Same thing with Danny Trejo, who I hope got a nice big paycheck for being himself in this movie. He even takes a machete to the shark. Seeing Trejo be bad ass in a movie is always worth seeing.

My favorite moments came with Rob Van Dam who was the third name on the poster. I don't know if it's his first movie, but he did some bad acting, but like the others you can see he was having some fun with it.

Plus, there was some nudity, and people got slaughtered quite horrifically, so you have that.

It's a fun film to watch if you run into it.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Shocking Horror and Important Cautionary Tale
jlthornb5126 July 2015
Christopher Ray, a gifted and visionary director, has crafted a very unique horror film of extraordinary quality that at the same time serves as a significant cautionary tale regarding pollution of our oceans. While the idea of a rampaging 3-headed shark may seem ridiculous at first, certainly in light of the fouling of our great seas there are mutations occurring that are truly frightening. Jacob Cooney and Bill Hanstock, superb screenwriters, have penned a screenplay of stunning insight and show a clear understanding of the dangers humanity faces if the madness continues. The tension, suspense, and terror in this incredible film are unrelenting and so powerfully intense that it becomes virtually unendurable by the shattering climax. An important motion picture that is also the finest entry in the Monster Shark genre in quite some time.
7 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great camera work, not too bad cgi, bad script
jehemabv19 January 2021
The movie uses high quality cameras in recording so it's not a low quality movie in that sense.

The shark looks pretty good when under water. I really like the design of the shark. Unfortunately the cgi is noticeably bad at other times. Like the Water doesn't move properly when the shark comes out of the water. And the shark looks unrealistic in daylight. Also, the shark is often shown as being deep under water when it is actually near the surface with its top fin breaking the surface of the water. It's seems clear to me that this was done because it was easier.

The acting doesn't seem bad to me. But the script is really bad. The characters make weird replies and go about doing things which makes no sense (I don't know if this qualifies as plot and not script)

Apparently, there are scenes with topless women in them. After watching the movie I didn't even know about it. As soon as I thought something sexual was going to happen I skipped the scene. Nothing important happens in those scenes which is usually what I'm concerned about.

Overall movie was fairly entertaining. I appreciate a lot of variation in location in a shark movie and this movie has it. It's not just scared people running around in one place trying to survive.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Thank You Karrueche Tran
opstrader27 July 2015
In order for me to make through 60+ minutes of this movie, if it was not for Karrueche Tran, I would have given this movie a 1.

Of course this was not a big budget film or at least I hope not, because if it was, someone stole the money.

Even title had me on OMG here go again with another crappy CGI film. The story was all over the place, but I feel if there was some better writers and some decent money put into better graphics, this might have had a decent chance of being a somewhat movie.

Regardless, for me it was all Karrueche Tran that kept me glued and so i lost track of time and watched it all.

one vote for the movie and the remaining two votes for Karrueche Tran.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed