Hard Target 2 (Video 2016) Poster

(2016 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
66 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Not a good sequel still a one time watchable flick
AthulRamesh18 September 2016
First of all, anyone expecting ties or similarities to Hard Target will be disappointed from this so called sequel.There are inexplicable doves flying in slow motion and some daredevil action sequences, that's about the only sequel touch we get here.

This just is a no-frills human hunt movie capitalizing on the title of the 90's hit film. On the story part there isn't anything interesting but it moves at a rapid clip and the action never really slows down.

We have to accept the fact that it is a low budget action flick meant to be enjoyed for its combative nature. Like most 'B' movies the acting is a little uneven,Although It delivers a good amount of action and Adkins does a sterling job at being the hunted hero. The film is fun once the hunt gets going, which takes a good half hour. Adkins is in top form here, getting in lots of those crazy slow motion kicks and shows us a little bit of acting.

I am not saying that its a good sequel to the JCVD film but still you can give it a try if you like to see some action and some slow motion kicks, the film won't disappoint you in that.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A cameo by JCVD would have been welcome!
Coventry1 February 2021
Yours truly is a Belgian, and was a teenager during the 1990s, so as a matter of course I went through a fanatic Jean-Claude Van Damme phase. "Hard Target" was definitely my favorite! The premise of hunting humans for sport is one of the oldest in action/thriller cinema history, and "Hard Target" is by no means a classic, but the combination of a long-haired Van Damme and excessive violence worked effectively; for sure. I never even realized there existed a sequel, even if it was a cheap and direct-to-video one. Luckily, I have a good buddy who specializes in lousy and obscure sequels, and he assured me that "Hard Target 2" was fun, straightforward, unpretentious, ... and worth a look.

My pal's judgement is reliable, as always. I enjoyed this film, although I'm likely to completely forget about it again in just a few days. I never heard about lead actor Scott Adkins, but he seems to be a regular in the field of meaningless action guff. Some of the people hunting down Scott in the Myanmar jungle are more known, like Rhona Mithra ("Doomsday") and Temuara Morrison ("Once Were Warriors"). The background story of Wes - the prey - Baylor is hilariously dumb. During an ultimate fighting battle, Wes killed his best friend and feels traumatized ever since. How could he not realize that his endless kicks and punches were going to cause irreparable damage? Please, don't go sobbing and mourning that you "accidentally" killed your buddy after you hit him repeatedly in the brains. Anyway, it's not the type of movie where you expect logic or intelligence, merely fast-paced actions, nasty killings and ingenious death traps. "Hard Target 2" does deliver in this particular department.

Could the film have been even more enjoyable? Well, yes, I think so! They should have lobbied to have JCVD appear in a small cameo. He's at a point in his career where he probably had accepted if the paycheck was worthwhile. How cool it would have been if Van Damme starred as an arrogant and eccentric hunter, for instance?
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worth it for fans of Adkins and those getting into him.
subxerogravity30 November 2016
When I herd that Hard Target 2 was going to be on Netflix, I was all set to jump at the chance to see it, but I must admit that I was a little upset to see the film starred Scott Adkins and not Jean Claude Van Damme.

Not that I don't love Scott Adkins, I do. He's this generations' marshal arts action star, but possibly because I'm such a huge fan of Van Damme and the idea that he can still do the high flying kicks that made him worth loving is the reason why it took me so long to see it.

The wait was well worth it. Of course it's not as good as the first one. Like I said the 1st one had Van Damme and was directed by John Woo in his first American picture, Just before Hollywood thought enough of him to temper with his genius. Not to mention that Lance Henriksen and Arnold Vosloo played possibly the first gay villains I ever seen on the big screen.

But like I said, Scott Adkins is this generations answer to Van Damme. In Hard Target 2, Adkins plays a Mixed Marshal Arts fighter (stretch), who accidentally kills his best friend in the ring. Filled with depression, he accidentally signs up to be hunted in Indonesia by a group of rich bastards, but of course "They picked the wrong man to hunt'"

It's interesting that happens though. When you play a game like Hard Target, eventually you will pick the wrong man to hunt, and man, you do not want to be on the team when that happens. There was at least two characters: A billionaire game developer and the son of some rich gun totting type who were hoping to start off with something a little simpler. Rounding out the variety of the hunters was a women with daddy issues and some famous Spanish guy looking for a thrill.

It's an action packed sequel. Not the best fighting Adkins has done in a picture (That I think was Undisputed 2 and 3), but I think Hard target 2 will work on those guys who never herd or don't really know who Adkins is. It's a great way to introduce him to the audience with a group of people wondering why Van Damme is not in it, but will not be disappointed with Adkins.

http://cinemagardens.com
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decent B Movie but far from the original Hard Target
abisio26 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
HARD TARGET was a Van Damme vehicle directed by the legendary John Woo.

This one is no related with the original but keep most of its structure; two bad guys a group of cruel hunters (the baddest of all very well played by Rhona Mitra) and a prey that does not like to be hunted. There are some variations on the beginning, the end, and the locations (here Myammar and Thailand jungle); but the core is humans hunting humans like in the Most Dangerous Game.

There are also a few moments with doves and a very recognizable gun; so I am assuming Roel Reiné is paying tribute to the original movie.

The problem is he is not Woo and you can easily notice. Some scenes are not well choreographed and the script could have benefited from better dialog, less clichés.

Production values are low but effective and the acting is mostly good; specially Robert Knepper

Scott Adkins is not as charismatic as Van Damme but his fighting skills are very good and keep the movie interesting.

The end could have been far better; but it was basically what you expected.

In brief; a good way to spend a couple of hours, if you prefer real live actions than digital unrealistic.
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lackluster Sequel
zardoz-136 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Scott Atkins survives "Hard Target 2," but this straight-to-video sequel isn't as challenging as the John Woo original. Having said that, I would also say that Atkins is a better actor that most give him credit, and straight-to-video helmer Roel Reiné is probably the best in the business at directing fare such as "Dead in Tombstone," "Death Race 2," and "Marine 2." "Hard Target 2" squanders gorgeous actress Rhona Mitra, who is a vision in black leather wielding an assortment of weapons, but she does have a terrific death scene. Reiné and "Act of Defiance" scenarists Matt Harvey & Dominic Morgan with "Swimming with Sharks" scribe George Haung keep our embattled hero roughing it from start to finish. Wes Baylor (Scott Atkins) kills his best friend, a competing MMA fighter named Landon (Jamie Timony), when he delivers a spinning head kick that allows him to triumph over him. Only after he has celebrated his success does Wes realize that he has killed him. Afterward, Wes can only find fights in Asia where he runs into slimy Aldrich (Robert Knepper of "Transporter 3") who has a deal for him. The haul that Wes is promised will set him up for life, but Wes gets the surprise of his life. He has to elude several hunters armed with weapons of every description through the jungles of Mynmar. Aldritch gives him a water bottle and a bag of rubies as payment and sends him packing. Near the end of this R-rated actioneer, Atkins gets his hands on an assault rifle and takes out dozens of bad guys. Along the way, the hunters fall prey either to Wes or natives who have been used in the hunt. Knepper makes a good, solid villain who doesn't have a qualm against killing innocent bystanders. The jungle scenery and the high stakes pursuit is strictly average. Reiné does double-duty as lenser, too, so these outlandish shenanigans are beautifully shot. The script has no surprises and there are no reversals worth mentioning. Altogether, Scott Atkins deserves better movies.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This is not good for business
nogodnomasters10 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The film opens with a man being hunted with crossbows in a warehouse and then goes six months earlier to Las Vegas where Wes "The Jailer" Baylor (Scott Adkins) kills his friend Johnny "Solid Gold" Sutherland (Troy Honeysett) in a kickboxing match. Wes feels bad, so like most depressed kick-boxers in films he moves to Bangkok and makes chum change fighting unsanctioned street fights living in pigeon filth.

Enter Aldrich (Robert Knepper) a man who promotes high purse unsanctioned fights. Baylor agrees to the fight in corrupt Myanmar, but is tricked into being the hunted as hunters from around the world peruse Baylor through the jungle whose talents as a kick-boxer are not as meaningful as all that special ops stuff he now does. You can guess how it ends. I was confused by the opening hunt, expecting it to circle around to it with the six month information, but it does not. That was a separate hunt altogether, but is a tie-in. Arrows fly in slow motion, but didn't seem to add anything.

Standard protagonist hero being hunted film. Doesn't require thinking. Decent for what it was.

Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing
benny_55 July 2020
The only good thing in this mess is Rhona Mitra. The acting overall is laughable, the story is stupid and the fight choreography is beyond laughable, stupid and unrealistic. Especially the "MMA fight" in the beginning is total crap.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very Exciting
rutzelb12 November 2016
Retired MMA fighter Wes Baylor (Scott Atkins) is given a chance to fight in Myanmar for 1-Million Dollars. He sort of retired after killing his best friend in a championship bout. When he goes there, he discovers there is no fight, but instead he will be the hunted. He is given a million dollars in rubies and can keep them if he makes it to the border. He sees the 7- men and one woman, Sofia (Rhona Mitra), who will be hunting him along with Aldrich (Robert Knepper) the so- called fight promoter. Let the games begin.

This is, of course, a variation of the Most Dangerous Game, but here Baylor will be hunted down with a GPS locator, long range rifles, hi-tech crossbows- with lights-, knives, swords, stun guns, pistols, jeeps, drones, motorcycles, and helicopters. (Didn't see any hand-grenades) Along the way he meets Tha (Ann Truong) a pretty jungle girl, whose brother is missing and she suspects he is being hunted and is hiding from Aldrich.

The fighting, stunts are simply brutal but outstanding. (Remember this is just a movie) Atkins as Baylor isn't given the wry comedic quips as a Bond, James Bond is known for. No, we see him as deadly serious as he is literally fighting for his life. Well, now for Tha's too.

The photography and cinematography are outstanding. The acting all around is good and the pacing is fast and furious.

Robert Knepper who will be forever known as Tea Bag from that Prison Break TV series did good as the boss of this gang of hunters and, at times, he was able to inject some morbid humor into this. He has a good way of doing that.

The only complaint I have is why, why , why would Baylor leave guns and knives on the ground after he kills one of the hunters and runs away? Why indeed.

Overall this was pretty exciting. The ending kind of left me thinking there might be a Hard Target 3 and maybe, just maybe we will see a more animated Baylor with some humorous quips. Could happen. (7/10)

Violence: Yes. Sex: No. Nudity: No. Language: Yes, not much.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Is it an homage to John Woo?
lojitsu19 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Here's a better late then never review of "Hard Target 2" (R - 2016 - US)...Was it an homage to John Woo, or were they making fun of him?

Genre: Action/Martial Arts

My Score: 5.2

Cast=6 Acting=4 Plot=5 Ending=7 Story=3 Action=6 Pace=5 F/X=6 Fight=8 Sequel=2

A down on his luck mixed martial artist can't refuse a million-dollar purse he's offered for one final bout. When he arrives for the fight, he learns he's been tricked into becoming the target of a human hunt.

They say it's an homage to John Woo and the first film. It just seemed like they were making fun of him instead. The scenes with the doves were laughable, but the fight scenes and the ending were pretty cool. As a straight to DVD martial arts film it's not bad...but as a sequel to "Hart Target" it can't even hold a candle to it. Scott Adkins is a great action star and I love Rhona Mitra, but the movie could have been better.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't Hunt What You Can't Kill
cogeorge-1794931 May 2018
Scott Adkins has definitely taken after Jean-Claude Van Damme after a few movies together like Universal Soldier (2012), and The Shepherd. I'm one of his behind-the-scenes fans.

I'm quite impressed that so many features and themes of the first firm are played out in the second: the opening chase scene; the lead actor meets a girl who tags along; the single-load gun wielded by both lead villains, and the human hunt theme. Here, Aldrich and his corrupt minions pick on a 'piece of meat' they can't chew.

I like recurrent the hand-to-hand fights, and the idea of Adkins' survival with little or no use of weapons, it retains Van Damme's style of fighting, including having a favorite (finisher) kick. This is a movie about hunting humans, so I think the villains could do with a little more of gruesome deaths, like Sofia's (remember how Arnold Vosloo was killed in the first film).

I saw Thriller as one of this movie's genres, but frankly it's far from thrilling. The plot was quite predictable. For me the actors are not really to blame for any lags in the plot. The actors were great, but Reiné overlooked certain unrealistic scenarios. The minefield, for instance. The time between Baylor shooting at Tobias Zimling and his getting to a safe distance from the explosion is unrealistic for me. I also think with all the hunters' expertise, high-tech weapons and escorts, they shoulda hit Baylor at least once, that would raise the thriller scale.

It's just another movie by another director on the human hunt theme. I wouldnt dabble into which is better, this or the first movie. Roel Reiné did a fine job nonetheless.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
even as a fan of Adkins and Mitra, this is one mediocre movie; action is unexceptional, riddled with sappy cliches and bad acting
jdring200715 March 2022
I didn't go into this with high expectations, even as a guilty fan of Scott Adkins and Rhona Mitra, but lo and behold it was too subpar to enjoy. That said, they shot on location which has to be appreciated so there's some meritable authenticity with the "sets." However most of the acting is painfully wooden, and while Adkins isn't an Academy nod he's still passable; his fighting is what you really want to see. Unfortunately a lot of the fight choreography wasn't that great, and you know you're watching a low-grade movie when you can blatantly discern punches and kicks not connecting. Adkins still had a few cool scenes but they get lost in the slew of sappy clichés, cringey dialogue, and laughable plot. Robert Knepper was really the only credible character, who, besides Mitra's fleeting scenes, added some personality to the cesspool.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Action Thriller
saptesh78617 April 2018
Just watched 'Hard Target 2' starred by Scott Adkins. It is very good action movie. Deadly hunting with hi-tech devices in the deep wood. Story grips from very first scene of movie and keeping anxiety till the end. Scott alias 'Boyka' is superb action hero in latest age of Hollywood. Farewell to Arnold, Sylvester Stallone, Vin Diesel and most boring Bruce Willis. As me where Scott's name is that movie is full of action alike from traditional fighting and that is why it is must watchable. I can put similar names in this line ' Eliminator', 'Accident Man',' Close Range','Undisputed' etc. Despite a good action thriller Hard Target 2 movie does not get a good rating. Many reviewers compare this to old Hard Target. But it was different movie. I really a hard fan of Scott Adkins, and eagerly waiting to his new movies. This is must watchable movie for action thriller lovers. I give it 8 starts.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
At least Knepper looks like Henriksen....
FlashCallahan30 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
It seems that the straight to DVD market are beginning to run out of ideas again, as they've decided to hark back to making sequels to moderately successful films that have now become something of a cult for some.

About ten years ago, we had Hollow Man 2, 8mm 2, Single White Female 2, and a slew of American Pie films.

Just Lately we've had Jingle All The Way 2, Kindergarten Cop 2, and now this. I had relatively high expectations because Scott Adkins is quite he prolific straight to DVD action star. In fact, he's this generations Michael Dudikoff..

Retired mixed martial artist Wes "The Jailer" Baylor can't refuse a million-dollar purse he's offered for one final bout in Myanmar.

But when he arrives for the fight, he learns he's been tricked into becoming the star of a very poor sequel.

Carrying only water and a ruby-filled money belt for the last person standing, Wes must outsmart the heavily armed group that has paid to kill him.

As he fights for his life in the treacherous jungle terrain, the hunters become the hunted.

Me and my silly expectations. Even though I had hopes for this, deep down I knew it wouldn't be any good, because the original is wonderfully over the top, and is almost fairy tale like in the way the film is edited. Here, we just have a whole load of slow motion, and if you thought 300 was in excess of using that style of filming, it's beyond ridiculous here.

In sure if the slow motion was taken out, the film wouldn't last twenty minutes.

So the film begins like an ending to any other Adkins movie, with a fight. But wait a minute, he ends up doing so terrible in the ring, he turns his back on society and turns to the bottle and stars in his own mini remake of A.W.O.L. For about ten minutes (a remake within a remake, how meta).

So then we get Jango Fett and cut price Henriksen who dupe him into becoming the hunted. And that's it.

Once we are in the jungle, we have a little bit of First Blood: Part 2 thrown in, some admittedly good fight scenes, and some admittedly really bad CG blood, and before you can say 'is there any decent female characters in this film?', Rhona Mitra walks in, and does absolutely nothing apart from pout and walk away from explosions.....in slow motion.

It's a lifeless ordeal, nothing more than a blatant cash in on a wonderfully over the top action film.

And the biggest crime the film does?

Have bloomin' doves in it for no good reason.

Steer clear, it's very poor.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Garbage
ekko-322772 June 2019
Pure garbage. No script Worth mentioning, and the laws of physics are suspended
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
pretty generic...but
baqari-com29 August 2016
i didn't expect much from this one. and to be fair all i wanted to see at that moment, was a decent action flick. and surprisingly enough - i got it!

plot is predictable. i mean really. they did put some effort into developing main protagonist and it works, a bit. the acting is fairly average. but since this is an action film, let's get to action.

fight choreography is good, and one particular kill will catch you off guard(believe me i've seen it). since Adkins isn't playing Boyka, his technique is different, more simplified, but efficient enough.

there is a nice nod to the original HT and you will easily recognize it.

as for the supporting cast Rhona is playing a really stereotypical character, which was my main problem throughout the film. i mean she really can do better than that. Robert Kneppers main villain was decent enough to listen to his dialogue.

and for the last when you'll watch it make sure to know that some sequences take place simultaneously at different spots, so you won't feel lost in the pacing

overall i would give it 6.5/10 if you have enough time, watch it...
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Watch it and forget it!
daverutland17 November 2021
I'm sure Adkin could b a good actor but have not seen a good film with him in it. Not a good film! Run of the mill action movie but without the great storyline and acting.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty good
joerg-nezmeskal22 October 2016
If you are a fan of Van Damme's "Hard Target" or Action movies in General you should see this one. It's not right up there with the original, lacking the style of John Woo and the Charisma of Van Damme but it makes up with great Locations (can't see all those movies shot in the same Areas of Eastern Europe or Canada any more), good Action setups (lots of shootouts and explosions) and a pretty fine cast. You have to give the Producers and the director credit not just to cash in on the Name of a hidden nostalgic Action gem but coming up with a pretty good flick, they seemingly invested a good amount of Money and work in. Oh, and Rhona Mitra is in it *swoon*.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
bad sequel
carlodegraaff12 August 2019
This movie has some good actors in it but the script is pathetic. The action scenes could be a lot better and the dialogue even better. I'm glad I didn't pay for this movie. Scott Adkins is wasted in this role.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you're willing to forgive the almost impressive lack of originality here and just concentrate on the Adkins action, Hard Target 2 is certainly worth seeing.
tarbosh2200010 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Wes Baylor (Adkins) is on a career trajectory that could be the case for anyone: He was a Las Vegas-based MMA fighter, he accidentally kills his buddy in the ring during a fight, he feels bad, he starts drinking and hits the skids, he begins Punchfighting in Bangkok, and an unscrupulous baddie tricks him into hunting him for sport. Could happen to anybody. Of course, said baddie, Jonah Aldrich (Knepper) has a hunting party with him in the Burmese jungle that also enjoy hunting the greatest prey of all...MINK! Oh wait, no. MAN! These hunting compatriots include a gaggle of stereotypes such as the Weak Link, the Millennial Video Game Designer, the Tough Chick, A Spanish Bullfighter, an Australian Outback (?)-style hunter, and the dad trying to toughen up said Weak Link.

Aldrich has his second-in-command, Madden (Morrison) as the tough guy of the group. Aldrich is paying off the Burmese authorities with suitcases full of cash, but there's also a cache of rubies at stake. When the initially down-and-out Baylor (whose MMA nickname was "The Jailor", which is actually spelled correctly) finds an innocent country girl named Tha (Truong) in the jungle, he finally finds he has something to fight for, and he unleashes his power on the Aldrich group. Will Baylor be a HARD TARGET 2 Aldrich?

While Hard Target 2 is not a bad movie, it doesn't live up to the potential that a Hard Target sequel starring the great Scott Adkins promises. It's certainly better than previous Adkins vehicles such as El Gringo (2012), but even seeing this movie for the first time feels like watching a repeat. If we may compare it to a superior Adkins film, Green Street 3 (2013), that one was like admiring a brilliant piano player, while Hard Target 2 is like watching a player piano. It hits all the right notes on cue, but that's about it.

It has absolutely beautiful Thai locations, and thankfully the production values are high, but exactly how many Most Dangerous Game/Surviving the Game movies need to be made at this point? Should we be happy that the DTV industry is still making these or not? It depends on your tolerance for a lack of a creative or original plot, or if you just really like the whole "hunting humans in the jungle" thing. There have to be fans out there of it...but how many to justify yet another one?



It all starts right away with a nice bang (complete with some funny yelling), and the whole outing has plenty of action. That being said, the 104-minute running time could have been chopped down a bit. The always-enjoyable Adkins has some great fighting moves on display, but we missed his natural British accent. How come the Burmese country girl had one but he wasn't allowed to have one? (We think we may have detected a few instances where it slipped through, however).

There are several references to the earlier Hard Target film, from the use of slow motion, to the casting of Robert Knepper as the baddie, probably because he physically resembles Lance Henriksen. Not that Knepper isn't great in his own right, but the resemblance does give this sequel a sort of continuity to the earlier film.





Director Reine's filmography is pretty rife with sequels to other people's movies (or his own), but he's notable (?) for directing the Connecticut-shot Seagal vehicle Pistol Whipped (2008) - also starring Lance Henriksen. Fun facts aside, Hard Target 2 is another in a long line of movies of this sort that include everything from Death Ring (1992) to Soldiers of Fortune (2012), and countless other examples.

The action is there, Adkins is there, the production values are there - just a tad bit of originality would have gone a long way, because it's not there. Linking this with the earlier Hard Target in viewers' minds may have been shrewd, but another title might have been a better move. But that's unlikely to have happened, because the sign on the door here is apparently, "no originality, no problem".

Still, we should be happy this came out in the U.S. It seems like something this would be exclusively made for foreign markets. If you're willing to forgive the almost impressive lack of originality here and just concentrate on the Adkins action, Hard Target 2 is certainly worth seeing.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lead Character was
suhstayn24 September 2016
I came into this with low expectations ... hoping for an average run of the mill action movie.

And frankly this film couldn't even achieve that.

The lead character / actor was just so dull. I never found myself rooting for him to succeed. Hoping he doesn't die. Nor do you want him to fail. He was not even bad enough to root against him. He was just completely bland. Uninteresting. Bordering on irrelevance.

It's hard for a movie to get any traction when the lead character is so dull. He has no charisma. No enjoyment. No real relationship. One pointed to in the beginning but sped past at full speed so you never get any feel for either the lead character or the friend. Then there is the obligatory love interest which comes too late in the film and there is never any spark on screen between the two actors.

So bad lead character. No charisma. No relationships to get the lead out his shell. Thoroughly uninteresting individual and the whole movie revolves around him. When you do not care about the lead character it makes everything else less interesting. When you do not have a strong story (not that you would expect one in an action movie like this), you cannot overcome that.

Even when you do some of the other things right.

So overall, a 3 or 4 out of 10.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Many Movies
bemyfriend-401845 April 2021
Many movies have used this exact theme; with even similar characters. Surviving the Game, The Hunt, American Hunt, etc. But this one was nicely done; with lots of good martial arts; pretty women, and pretty women doing good martial arts. I gave it six out of ten.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
HORRIBLE
jw-0925512 June 2022
Probably one of the worst movies I've ever watched. Nothing even remotely realistic or accurate or believable. Do not waste your time. You won't be able to get your wasted time back. And it's nothing like the first Hard Target except someone was hunted.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better than the original
darrellpirkey2 June 2021
Tried watching Hard Target and stopped 30 minutes in. This sequel, which shares nothing with the original except a title, was at least watchable til the end. The level of acting is about what you expect but the action sequences are great. If you're a fan of Adkins, you'll enjoy this one. If you're not and you're in the mood for sometimes cheesy martial arts action, give this a try.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
90's style martial arts action flick
s327616930 August 2016
Anyone remember the 90's? The age of mobile phones that looked like bricks and cheesy martial art action flicks?

Hard Target 2 is firmly set in the 90's action flick mould. Its simple formulaic stuff but its also good fun. There's no pretension here just lots or corny but enjoyable scripting and tons of kick ass action. Lead actor Scott Adkins is a worthy successor to Jean Claude Van Damme. He's a talented martial artist and puts on a polished performance, that really helps to lift this film.

One to enjoy if, like me, you grew up on a diet of 90's action flicks. Seven out of ten from me.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If I could give less, I would
bobnbits19 November 2021
Shocking, bad acting, shocking storyline, ridiculous plot! Guy "kills" friend in kickboxing fight then suddenly ends up in the jungle trying to survive people hunting him for $1m (they looked like mnm's) he meets an attractive woman who's brother (I believe) shows up in a cave, then she manages to buy his safety from some military with half the mnm's (sorry rubies) and then they go their separate ways,! This ain't action, it ain't a love story, this ain't even straight to dvd, it's shockingly bad, I'd sooner watch dry paint dry, DO NOT BOTHER.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed