Sniper: Special Ops (2016) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
62 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Good for a Laugh
andrewusaf22 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
You need to watch this if you are in the military or have ever served in the military. This will make you laugh so hard. The gear placement, weapons handling, tactics and long hair will make you scream for your First Sgt. There is literally a part where some one screams for a sit rep during a firefight and a soldier screams "A- Ok". Lol

Steve sits a lot and his partner is sweating so much fake sweat that it looks like he's covered in KY jelly lol. Please watch.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Is that your best offer?
nogodnomasters12 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Jake (Steven "Bradley Cooper is a sissy" Seagal) is a sniper who is part of group who is tasked to rescue an anti-war congressman (John Henry Richardson) from the Taliban. Rescue of congressman- good, his security team- not so good. The group gets separated. Jake is left behind with an injured man and some dead soldiers as another group lead by Vic (Tim Abell) gets away. The story divides into a plot and subplot. The plot consists back inside the fence Vic trying to avoid a jinx NATO reporter (Charlene Amoia) who is also the admiral's niece. Seagal is the subplot who basically sits and looks out a window, occasionally reading a line in monotone.

This is the part of the army that doesn't have to wear helmets in a war zone and can disregard regulations on grooming. Tim Abell is the star of the film, as Seagal had a smaller role, if not minor as compared to the overall plot. The dialogue consisted of cliche lines when good. The plot flew by the seat of its pants, with much of the film being consumed with bad dialogue attempting to make a believable tale. Okay, I lied, at no time did they attempt to make this a believable tale. The ending was unorthodox and idiotic to say the least. And the "Van Dam" in the film is Pro Wrestle Rob Van Dam, who can't deliver a line outside of the ring.

It was one of those films so awful you sit with your mouth open watching it. Who gave Fred Olen Ray permission to write a serious film? May have camp value.

Guide: 1 well spoken F-word. No sex or nudity. Partial view of Charlene Amoia' s bra.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Seagal has no idea how to handle a gun.
chuckxx13 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
As others said, not much of sniper action. But Segal obviously never handled a gun and sniping even the less. U squeeze (mind u, not pull) the trigger with the TIP of ur finger and not as Segal does. Then sniping with sunglasses on is also ridiculous. Even an assault gun he doesn't know how to handle. Switching left and right, shooting aimlessly around.

Even for an action movie it is quite lame.

In 2016 there are so many Segal movies released, that it is not surprising that most of them are garbage.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just watching your six.......figure sum......
FlashCallahan3 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Remember when Seagal used to make films where he appeared to be pro-active and actually put some effort into his fight scenes and running scenes?

Where you one of those people who just yearned for a Seagal film where he would be sitting down for 90% of his screen time' and be wearing sunglasses for 99% of his screen time?

Well after 28 years of appearing in films, here's the one you've been waiting for.....

And it's not that Van Damme either.....

When the mission to rescue a U.S. Congressman who has been kidnapped by the Taliban goes sideways, Army sniper Jake Chandler and his injured partner are left behind.

Now, on their own, they must survive in enemy territory and wait for their unit to come back for them........

Terrible is one word to describe this film, others would be using obscene language, so I'm not going to go down that route. The film is split into two different stories, one involving a spoilt little rich girl who wants in on the action, whilst the grizzled soldiers are like 'no way....no way.....no way........go on then'.

The other is involving (ha ha involving) Seagal and a sweaty partner who cannot walk just sitting in a room. He sweaty partner is a walking (pun intended) cliché, talking about being back home and blah blah blah, and Seagal sits there, in his sunglasses saying nothing.

And there is literally one point where he gets up and goes to the shop.

This is a real new low for Seagal, he is once again dubbed, he's hardly in any shots with other people in the film, and he could've been using a double half the time as his face is that obscure.

But it's worth watching for the sheer audacity of a once reputable name in Hollywood doing something so lazy, so meaningless, and so offensive toward his loyal fan base.

He knows his fans will see this no matter what, and he's just sitting there, and I for one, felt unhealthy just looking at the man.

Absolute trash from beginning to end....
103 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sniper : special ops w/out sniper
loreleysherry6 May 2016
The first scene looked quite promising, but after that, It's so bad it's horrible.

The sniper rifle is only used during this first scene, after that Seagal use an automatic rifle and he doesn't even bother to aim ; he sprays bullets at random in a prerecorded sequence that is used again and again.

Actually, Seagal doesn't do much ; he babysits his comrade from a safe place, for the major part of the movie, while another lame movie is playing with Rob Vandamme and an annoying spoilt journalist who can do it all.

Sniper:Special ops, is a low cost and boring movie that use a guest star to sell copies, but don't ask too much from them.
59 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Steven Seagal sitting in a chair
alduropalmer12 October 2019
This movie involved Steven Seagal sitting in the chair for basically the entire movie. Random nobody's complete with a typical female reporter who suddenly knows how to run firearms. It's a giant suckfest but without the fun of a movie that knows that it sucks. Also Steven Seagal weighs 400 pounds.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I want my hour and a half back!
odessit-4131216 January 2017
Yet another in a long succession of horrible straight-to-video movies by Seagal of late. At least there were no CGI bullet holes in this one. What I don't understand is why producers can't hire a decent military consultant when shooting a war movie. Jeff Bosley (Doc) is a Green Beret, how he didn't die laughing during the filming is beyond me. Firearm handling is absolutely ridiculous, Rob Van Dam clearly has never fired a long gun before in his life. Charlene Amoia, who claims to be an "expert marksman" holds a pistol like it's a personal massager (wink-wink).

You see an assortment of optics on the team's rifles (ACOG, Aimpoint, Eotech) but the funniest is a tiny RDS on Segal's rifle that has superimposed hash marks when looking through it in Seagal's first- person view. Absurd.

Overall, horrible low-budget B-flick with bad story, horrible acting and a huge number of blunders. Save yourself some time and DO NOT watch it.
23 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
ridiculous and boring!
rxelex24 May 2020
Segal and a gang of old hairy special ops get caught in Taliban fight an dfight and fight and then report to a colonel old enough to have fought at gettysburg! And a girl with baby who is daughter of Taliban cheif and more fighting and more moe fighting and Seagal mumbles hi sway through it all and men are dying left and right and up and down and... Oh dear this really is a boring film. I stayed watching to end because my neighbours had a party and I couldn't go to bed.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not worth the time.
Toolmom526 March 2020
Top billed Seagal who is so fat, he can only sit and stand, while his words are meant to sound tough only come across as out of breath from doing nothing. Movie is slow paced with lots of gunfire.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Non-action Movie
kbtoys1002 May 2021
Yet another non-action movie featuring fat Seagal in a minor role.

After a decent opening scene, things go flat for almost the entire remaining runtime where the plot involves a group of soldiers and an annoying reporter trying to rescue Steven Seagal and his sweaty wounded friend. As other reviews mention, Seagal basically sits in a chair for most of his brief runtime. The soldier group cast is believable and likable, but the endless scenes of them talking or arguing with the reporter get stale.

Sleaze director Fred Olen Ray has almost exclusively done quickie lifetime Christmas movies in the past years and seemingly decided to shoot this on a desert movie ranch during a free week.

Featuring only three shootout scenes and a lot of talking, Sniper: Special Ops is doomed to simply be a slot-filler on daytime tv. Only for the die hard Seagal fans (do any really exist?!)
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty insulting to be honest.
Beard_Of_Serpico27 February 2021
Steven Seagal's early movies like Out for justice and Marked for death are really great old school action movies but that was a LONG time ago. Sniper: Special Ops finds Seagal deep in to his not caring phase. He's fat, old and mumbles his lines like he doesn't care.

He performs his lines in the same way someone might read Ikea furniture instructions out loud but at the same time i got the feeling that he thinks the things he's saying are really cool and profound. They aren't.

The action is terrible, the acting is worse and most of Seagal's scenes feature him just sitting down and mumbling. If the star of the movie doesn't care then why should the people watching it?

Ludicrous and insulting, don't bother.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not to bad for a 20 day filming
sissy3006-179-64045421 September 2019
I watch all of Seagal films bad, good, semi. The one bad thing about this movie was Rob Van Dam didn't get killed of early in the movie, he looked so uncomfortable and out of place. Excellent performance by Tim Abel.
1 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This movie would have been MUCH better without Seagal
Top_Dawg_Critic27 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This movie would have been MUCH better without Seagal in it.

Firstly, the low score... c'mon people, how can you rate a B movie as an A movie? For a B movie with a decent budget, it was acceptable and enjoyable. Tim Abell was awesome and acted his part very well, as did Charlene Amoia, and as everyone else BUT Steven Seagal. I grew up as a big fan of his but this latest movie disgusted me... why is his name as a headliner? It should have been Tim Abell. Every part of Seagal being in that movie was annoying, from his dark-dyed goatee, lame attitude, lazy acting, boring vocabulary, and lack of Seagal action. Any other actor, even a no name would have made this movie more enjoyable than Seagal being in it.

Aside Seagal, I gave this B movie a 7 and would have given it at least 1-2 more stars if Seagal wasn't in it. Decent story, action and acting.
20 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One of Seagal's worst films, unbelievable cast, bored actors and non-existent budget spell disaster
etackle15 July 2016
Overall plot could have been interesting but direction and casting was incredibly poor. Main actors were decades too old and obviously overweight and out of condition to be remotely believable as active duty soldiers let alone the top-shelf special forces they were portraying.

Soldier ranks and chain of command was completely wrong for the situation and even the most obvious military tactics such as securing a perimeter, finding cover/laying prone during a firefight or trying to avoid an obvious ambush were mostly ignored.

Character development was nil and supporting women only served to annoy the main characters without a hint of romantic interest or sex appeal which might have at least distracted viewers from an overall lackluster film. The audience was given little reason to care who won or lost and there was no interesting subplot, character drama or anything all that interesting to see in terms of actors, vehicles, aircraft or weapons.

In spite of the cast including 7th Dan Aikido black belt Steven Seagal and WWE pro wrestler Rob Van Dam there is never a single physical altercation, only a series of lackluster gunfights.

Some smaller problems the US weapons were obviously not government issue: barrel lengths, flash hiders, sights were all wrong as was the lack of typical support weapons on both sides.

Weapons usage was strange even for b-movies, most rifles were never fired full-auto, characters seemed to have ample ammo but most fired sparingly while the "sniper" was spraying everything in sight with full-auto fire. Later no one remembered to reload a nearly empty M9 pistol before starting a new gunfight...the same M9 pistol which proved far more accurate and deadly than any of the scoped M4 assault rifles the soldiers were firing.

Tim Abell showed some great acting skills and was a likable character as Sgt Mosby but unfortunately he was still far too old and out of shape to pull off the role.
22 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
TERRIBLE,BORING & DULL
lukem-5276012 March 2020
I like alot of Seagal DTV flicks & consider some of them "Gems" like his Driven to Kill,Pistol Whipped,A Dangerous Man & Belly of the Beast. Unfortunately as we all know, with some decent one's we also get the absolute Trash ones like: Attack Force,A Good Man,Shadow Man,Black Dawn & Sniper.

We all know Seagal isn't a good actor but we watch him for the old school brutal vigilante Justice he does to the scum of the world, that's his appeal as we grew up watching him & just enjoy watching his beat the crap outta bad guys. Here in this pile of poop, Seagal is a boring Sniper that sits around & it's just a weird & boring Iraq based war drama. Weird that Seagal was in this & even weirder that he produced it? Like i said i do enjoy alot of Seagal's DTV output but this one was boring & Seagal was a side character & i turned it off halfway through. Just a crappy one of his huge output
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Average!
namashi_18 May 2016
Fred Olen Ray's 'Sniper: Special Ops' is an Average fare at best. It lacks sharpness & also the tension one would associate with a film based on Snipers on a war-zone.

'Sniper: Special Ops' Synopsis: A Special Ops military Force are sent to a remote Afghan village to extract an American congressman being held by the Taliban.

'Sniper: Special Ops' needed better Writing. Olen Ray's Writing begins very well, but loses steam mid-way. And as I mentioned before, the tension & sharpness is missing here. Olen Ray's Direction, on the other-hand, is passable.

Performance-Wise: Steven Seagal is relegated to the backseat. Rob Van Dam does a fair job. Tim Abell is the pick of the lot. He's very sincere. Others lend the required support.

On the whole, 'Sniper: Special Ops' is just about okay.
19 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
MacGyver
jdlg-902821 July 2018
Funny to watch if you are a fan of the old MacGyver series. It reminds me of the approximative ways it made you think you were in the Middle East while it looked so much like a California shooting site. Stephen seagal and Rob Van Dam are marketed as the top actors... You feel sorry for Seagal's part and Rob Van Dam should stick with wrestling. Tim Abell is pretty good though. He is the real actor in the bunch though...
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What did I just try and watch
brett-7626018 January 2020
Sensei Segeal why are you still trying to do movies? I mean your character has never changed one bit in the last 35 years. Its the same thing every time... please stop. please stop making this crap. Its embarrassing. Go back to the bayou and take your fake accent with you. You probably are a much better cop than you are at acting. Movie was so bad it doesnt even quality to be put on VHS cassette.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So that's what Steven Seagal acts like....
mrcardigan24 November 2016
I've never knowingly watched a Steven Seagal movie before and I came into this one 5-10 mins after the start on late-night TV, so I didn't recognize him in the dark glasses and - as somebody else has pointed out here - expanded waistline. I quickly became mesmerized by it, simply because I couldn't believe that anybody really makes movies this bad any more. I thought I must be tripping.

For a start off, as we all know, according to that Paul Hardcastle song, the average age of the combat soldier in Vietnam was 19. According to Sniper: Special Ops, the average age of the combat soldier in Afghanistan appears to be about 59. The commanding officer in particular, played by actor Dale Dye who is in his 70s, looked monstrously miscast.

Then the guy in the dark glasses - presumably the sniper of the title and as I later discovered, played by Seagal - has to get up and get some water. He's behind enemy lines, there are potential snipers behind every wall, IUDs etc, and yes, I know he's hard and frightened of nothing, but wouldn't he have displayed just a little caution in walking around, instead of looking like he's strolling down to the neighborhood 7-11? I found myself yelling at the TV "you're an actor! Why don't you ACT?" Then I found out it was that famous and popular actor with the dozens of movies to his name, Steven Seagal. Wow.

That's 84 minutes of my life I will never get back. Though I must admit I did get a bit of a giggle out of it.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Steven Seagal of the Desert
zardoz-1312 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
As Army sharpshooter Jake Chandler, Steven Seagal drills a neat surgical hole through a Taliban fighter's small flask before he perforates his forehead with another shot. No sooner has he dropped this Taliban fighter in his tracks than another appears, and Jake ices him, too. Writer & director Fred Olen Ray is acclaimed for movies about women in bikinis rather than straight-forward actioneers. Under another name, he made "Bikini Chain Gang," "Bikini Royale," and "Bikini Girls from the Lost Planet." Before his breast fetish days, Ray helmed several direct-to-video action thrillers, including "Armed Response" with Lee Van Cleef, "Terminal Force" with Richard Harrison, and "Commando Squad" with Playmate model Katy Shower. Mind you, Fred Olen Ray is no Spielberg. He specializes in low-budget, exploitation fare, but he displays more than enough competence to keep things going. The derivative "Sniper, Special Ops," with Tim Abell, Dale Dye, and Rob Van Dam, doesn't qualify as one of Ray's run of the mill outings. The adverb 'seriously' best describes the way this movie takes itself, and this attitude enhances what could have amounted to little more than disposable military maneuvers in a wasteland. You cannot watch this gritty, low-budget, patriotic, military mission movie without remembering Clint Eastwood's "Sniper," with Bradley Cooper as real-life U.S. Navy SEAL Chris Kyle.

During the violent opening gambit in "Sniper, Special Ops.," Seagal's sniper caps many threats to Sergeant First Class Vic Mosby (Tim Abell of "We Were Soldiers") and his team. Mosby and company are searching for abducted Congressman Stan Cooper (John Henry Richardson of "Panic 5 Bravo"), who has fallen into the hands of the Taliban. During the withdrawal, Seagal and his spotter cannot reach the rendezvous. Now, Seagal and company find themselves surrounded and trapped by the enemy. What sets "Sniper, Special Ops" apart from the typical Ray movie is heroes don't crack jokes, get drunk, or brawl. Ray shows the terrible consequences of war, with scenes in a plywood infirmary as a soldier experiences the loss of his sight. At the risk of overstating the obvious, Fred Olen Ray has departed from his usual fare. Most of the story takes place on the ground with our heroes exchanging gunfire with the Taliban. Ray keeps the cameras focused on the Americans, while the Taliban soldiers pose as targets. Indeed, the only departure from realism is the inclusion of a female news correspondent who proves that she can handle an automatic pistol with the expertise of Wild Bill Hickox.

Although executive producer Seagal takes top billing, the primary protagonist is the eminently reliable Tim Abell. Abell gives a tenacious performance, and he looks believable in his combat gear. Anyway, once Mosby's men have gotten the Congressman, they come under fire from several turban-wrapped Taliban troops. At this point, Chandler trades his massive sniper rifle for an assault rifle and mows down Taliban troops. Eventually, a convoy consisting of two vehicles careens into the derelict city. An adequate amount of shooting and killing riddles the first few minutes. During this firefight, Chandler and his spotter are separated from Mosby and company. Chandler and his spotter take refuge in an anonymous building. Meantime, Mosby takes the Congressmen back to headquarters, but he isn't happy about leaving Chandler behind. Ray shifts the setting back to base where Lieutenant Colonel Jackson (Dale Dye of "Platoon") is arguing with an embedded NATO correspondent Janet (Charlene Amoia of "Seven Pounds") chafing at the bit to get into the thick of the gunfire despite the Colonel's best efforts to keep her at headquarters.

The chief problem with this contrived, standard-issue actioneer is its utter lack of urgency. This is the kind of thriller that "Bourne Supremacy" director Paul Greengrass could had injected a surfeit of intense energy into each incident and made our teeth rattle with every shot. Greengrass would have lensed it hand-held cameras to thrust audiences into the middle of all the chaos. As it is, Ray keeps the action slogging along without any sense of spontaneity. In just under 30 minutes, Chandler and his wounded spotter Rich (Daniel Booko of "The Hunger Games") have found sanctuary in an upstairs room. Since they cannot communicate with their comrades, they are especially vulnerable. Back at headquarters, Mosby fumes about the situation. He thinks the Congressmen's capture stinks, and he complains about too many suspicious things about the Congressmen's mission. Later, Jackson explains that the Congressman was on a fact-finding mission "to prove that all our efforts are just a waste of time and money." The politician wanted to visit an abandoned village, and the Taliban nabbed him. Initially, Colonel Jackson refuses to let Mosby rescue Chandler and Rich because they are short staffed. Instead, Jackson orders Mosby to find a broken down supply truck with the guidance of a native renegade, Bashir (Anthony Batarse). Naturally, Janet takes advantage of this prime opportunity to stow away aboard the truck with an unsuspecting Mosby and his men. When they get to the stalled truck, Mosby discovers that an Afghan woman with a child is with them. Ultimately, he learns that the girl is the daughter of notorious Taliban leader Abul (Shary Nassimi of "L.A. Nights") who rules the territory that his men and he are. Abdul is reminiscent of a World War II villain. Although he is Afghan, he speaks English fluently. In a sense, "Sniper, Special Ops" channels World War II Allied propaganda features.

In the name of realism, Ray says he bought ten-thousand rounds of blanks so he wouldn't have to insert flare bursts and the ejected cartridge casings with CGI in post-production. The actors are blazing away with blanks and the brass flies. Steve Seagal fans are going to gripe because the martial arts maestro doesn't perform any of his antics. He has the best line in the movie: "If a man does his best . . . what else is there?" "Sniper, Special Ops" ranks as a fair movie.
15 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Decent action, but not enough Seagal
brchthethird11 May 2016
SNIPER: SPECIAL OPS stars Steven Seagal as, get this, a sniper attached to a Special Ops unit. Who knew? It's also the fourth film in what renegade film critic Vern has affectionately dubbed his "Goatee Era." The basic plot is that a Special Ops unit is performing a rescue mission in Afghanistan when things go south and turn into a firefight. Seagal and another soldier are left behind, and the remainder of the team gets sent on a side mission after returning to base, hoping to eventually go back and retrieve Seagal and the other guy, who are still waiting in place. I thought that the story was OK, but nothing special. As is typical with Seagal films, there is some stuff thrown about that makes it a little bit topical, and there was an authentic feel to the dialogue, costumes, and the way the actors carried themselves. All this was fine, and the performances were generally serviceable, if unremarkable. The major problem is the serious lack of Seagal himself. Although he is top-billed and appears on the poster, he really doesn't do all that much. Some other actor could have played his part and no difference would have been made. As for the action, it's mostly just a bunch of shootouts and firefights, and a couple of stock explosions towards the end. There were also a number of interesting throwaway lines and asides that made the characters a little more colorful than they were probably written. Overall, I found this seriously lacking as a Seagal film, but for what it's worth, SNIPER: SPECIAL OPS is a decent low-budget actioner that doesn't insult your intelligence too much.
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A decent war movie
senecl22 July 2016
Another Seagal movie, although he is hardly in this time. I am a big fan of Seagals, but the movie really belonged to Tim Abell, who is a great bad ass. It all feels realistic and down to earth, and, although Seagal has no fight scenes, he does get to kill a couple of terrorists. It is quite short and to the point, and is not graphic with its violence, which can be a pro or con. Seagal sits around a lot, and stays behind enemy lines to help an injured man, while the other team tries to get the military to help them. There is a relatively large body count, and Seagal does get quite a few. Van Dam is OK, but is sometimes wooden. He will be a great action star soon hopefully. Seagal has heaps of movies coming up, so that's why he is not in this much. Code of Honor, and the Asian Connection are also movies of Seagals that came out near this time. Killing Salazar is also upcoming, and I wonder when it will be released in the US and Au. Sniper Special Ops is an OK entertaining movie.
14 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is, oh man this is pathetic!
opticuscro16 October 2020
Please stop acting and loose any connection with movies, Segal looks pathetic with that dyed hair and beard, sometimes actors just don't see when their time is up ... it's pathetic, he makes a mockery of himself and afrom a potentially good movies also!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Even for a Seagal movie, this is beyond awful
stanrogersmith4 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
So, its called Sniper. Sniper is in the title. So, is it a little too much to ask to see a sniper sniping? One would think not. However, this is a Steven Seagal flick, so that means anything goes. As long as Seagal gets to 1. Play it "cool" (check), 2. Have minimal dialogue and deliver it in a low, slow, mumbling voice (check), and 3. Wear sunglasses for 99.99% of his screen time (check).

What really gets me is that I was pumped to see some sniper shots. You know, head shots where people's skulls are obliterated by the expert marksmanship of the sniper. And what do we get? Three, yes count 'em, 3 sniper shots. And one of them the target was a whiskey flask, not a person. I'm not kidding.

The rest of the movie drags on with some lame storyline of special ops guys going to perform automotive maintenance on a broken down supply truck, only to find the head taliban raghead's daughter and infant child trying to flee, thus throwing a monkey wrench in what would have been an easy operation.

OK, so firefights ensue, an expendible soldier gets a bullet in the brains, dozens of taliban clowns are mowed down by the superior firepower and marksmanship of the American soldiers. Scene cuts to Seagal every 15 minutes or so for a 2 minute pontification by Steven, who's trying to save his sniper/spotter squad member whose been paralyzed by a bullet to the spine, well at least according to Dr. Seagal. See, not only is he a sniper, but he's such a seasoned vet that he's also an expert medic and qualified to make battlefield diagnoses.

So, anyhow, the beta-dog member of the squad (since Seagal is the alpha dog, presumably) pulls into town and confronts the head taliban raghead but tricks him thanks to the savvy female war correspondent whose been a real thorn in his side for the entire movie up until now when he can use her for the old switcheroo. The baby is really a bomb dressed up as an infant and the guy gets blown to smithereens. A few more bullets fly and then Seagal and the paralyzed wounded vet get rescued. Seagal then takes off his sunglasses at the end of the movie. Ooh-Rah!
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie is an insult to any fan base Segal once had.
JulianThy7 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I tried watching this movie today and failed. The once great Steven Segal, renoved action star of Under Siege not to mention his martial art and music career, has released this movie on to us and my god was it hard to watch. Although maybe difficult to believe I got excited seeing the poster for it and boy was I let down.

First shot of the movie features Segal with a goatee and mustache rendering him almost unrecognizable and then after 13 minutes of you watching the screen wondering when something is gonna happen something happens. Spoiler alert not even the action scenes are any good. Hope I didn't ruin the surprise.

The G.I. Joes of the movie then just leave their champion sniper along with his partner right there and run away.

I can't believe someone actually made this movie. Don't watch it.
16 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed