"Jonathan Creek" Daemons' Roost (TV Episode 2016) Poster

(TV Series)

(2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Glad to have them back
Sleepin_Dragon1 January 2017
It's fair to say that the last few outings for Creek and co have been very much hit and miss. Good or bad I'm a huge fan of the series, and glad to have it back, this episode I thought was a pretty good one. In some ways it felt like an echo back to Satan's Chimney, a hugely successful episode. Demons' Roost not the quality of Satan's Chimney, but full of good stuff nonetheless. I don't think it's as deserving of the negative reviews, as a few others are.

On the downside, I found the plot a little muddled at times, it could have been me, or simply the Red wine. The two sub plots seemed to combine in a somewhat odd manner.

The negatives I felt were rather minor, the production values were top notch, and as a story it kept me guessing right the way through. David Renwick's imagination is a wonderful thing, some of the theories and plots here were very well thought out. Lovely light touches and bits of humour, Renwick has a particular brand of humour which I love. That lighter side was well balanced with the darker side too, the death of Patrick (Ryan Oliva) was very grim.

I loved the references back to earlier episodes, the show boasts a rich history, it's nice that it's mentioned. I also thought that Creek and Polly felt a much better combo (at last.)

More please. 7/10
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This may not be perfect, but certainly worthy of the series
d.lodewijks29 December 2016
The new Jonathan Creek special finds a way up for Creek. By no means perfect, this episode does bring back the core of the series that was so painfully betrayed in the previous three episodes. There are a lot of mysteries to be solved, and most of them are quite satisfying. Several mysteries spanning many eras tie together, with Creek being pulled in to help solve them. There may be one or two plots that cross the line of silliness for little reason, but much of this episode works very well, and the creepy bits are quite well crafted. It may not be up there with the first two Creek specials, but it's great to see something that really does rightfully belong in the series.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Daemons' Roost
Prismark1028 December 2016
Recent irregular episodes of Jonathan Creek did not match the earlier vintage series but Daemons' Roost suggested we were going to have the right mixture of the macabre, fiendish puzzles and humour.

Alison is returning with her husband to her childhood home owned by schlocky horror director Nathan Clore who wants to tell her some family secrets but he becomes incapacitated by a stroke.

The house was once owned by a 19th century sorcerer Jacob Surtees who terrorised the nearby village and had a torture chamber in the mansion. Some spooky incidents leads Alison to call Jonathan as he once helped her husband, Stephen out in the past when he was accused of killing his first wife.

There were plenty of red herrings but also some confusion and plenty of daftness in the plot. It turns out that Stephen might have fooled Jonathan in the past and it did occur to me this might had happened when Jonathan revealed how he solved his first wife's murder. There was one thing bothering me, that Stephen never seemingly met his brother in law.

The ex con stalking Jonathan and who gets burnt to a crisp by also sat uneasily with me.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Missing a good friend
Johnny_West9 February 2024
Jonathan Creek (Alan Davies) and Sarah Alexander make the best romantic team since back when Caroline Quentin played Maddy. Maddy was the best partner to Creek. She had a genuine comedy chemistry and warmth that none of the replacement girlfriends or wives ever had with Alan Davies. The subtle humor of Davies depended on having a great partner.

I love the Jonathan Creek series. I am sad that it ended. Stuart Milligan played a great supporting role in the series, and he was eliminated in season five. He added humor too.

Jonathan had an unlikey job this season as a corporate CEO in a business owned by his Father-in-Law. After a couple of scenes at the coporate offices, that entire back-story disappeared. Jonathan Creek's career as a magic show consultant was part of what made him unique and special. Jonathan's career background was one of his strengths, and it should have been respected.

In regards to this episode, one of the worst misses is that the amazing Warwick Davis was the guest star, but it seemed like they had no idea what to do with him. Having seen Davis in numerous other roles, it was clear that he was given nothing to do in this episode. What a waste.

The back-story about Belkin, the death of his past wife, and Jonathan's involvement in that mystery was badly botched. It was clear almost as soon as the story was revealed, that Belkin would probably turn out to be the killer. All the odd flashbacks were intended to deflect suspicion away from the killer, and so they just came across as bizarre.

Especially odd was the giant pill that rolled down the shelf into the cup. That pill would have taken hours to dissolve, and it would have been impossible for anyone not to notice a big fat pill in their transparent cup of water.

The fact that nothing about the first victim's family was discussed made the eventual twist seem kind of a cheap dodge by the writer. Also wrong was when everyone met the vigilante killer at the end, why wasn't Belkin's wife included in the meeting? They all knew Barnett killed Belkin, so why was the meeting so angry?

Barnett figured it all out before Creek or Warwick Davis. That was also kind of deflating for this last episode. It seemed like a lot of the story was about Jonathan Creek failing to discover who the killer was on the first time Belkin killed his first wife, and then failing again in this mystery. Barnett even made dismissive remarks to Creek, and that was not really necessary. Him going out like a loser was a bit sad for any fan of Jonathan Creek.

The last subplot that was a waste of time was the Tyree character trying on various occasions to kill Creek. It seemed like a tip of the hat to the Pink Panther, or perhaps some other character. It also felt like they were using that vengeful ex-convict as a time-filler to make up for a light script.

Another odd plot twist was that Philippa (Rosalind March) kept quiet about the fact that the 6 page letter to Alison (Georgie Lord) from her Father (Ken Bones) was missing four pages. Considering all the grief that caused everyone, it was hard to believe Philippa's excuse for not telling everyone the truth.

Overall, I was sad to see that Warwick Davis, one of my favorite actors, was not better integrated into the story, and that there was a lot of negativity going in the direction of Jonathan Creek and his skills.

On the positive side, there was a fair amount of action, and a lot more killing than usually happened. All the villains got their due.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The best for some time
boxyfella28 April 2022
A return to form after the poor episodes of series 5 until now, this harks back to the basics that the show got so right in its vintage years.

I too loved the references back to the show's past, and it was a neat idea to have Jonathan stalked by someone he helped put away previously (the culprit in the 'House of Monkeys' episode - although he wasn't actually seen in that particular episode). There were echoes of 'Satan's Chimney' in this episode, although this episode is inferior, I feel.

I too felt that at last Polly and Jonathan seemed to be a much better fit - this was certainly Sarah Alexander's best performance in the role. The scene where she gets into bed with a corpse was laugh out loud funny.

The striped unicorn subplot was almost as interesting as the main story itself, although anyone with a knowledge of chemistry will spot the culprit easily, as I did.

On the downside Warwick Davies tries to be funny but ends up just being annoying.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very poor plot with awful twists. Not up to standard
thomridgers9 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I am normally a big fan of the series but this episode was quite frankly terrible. Awful twists, wooden acting, ridiculous plot lines and unbelievable coincidences are mashed together and served Luke warm with a side order of disappointment.

The episode begins with a gimmicky mock horror trailer that appears to be an amateur parody of an old-timey horror film, which makes me cringe just remembering it. Later on it transpires that this scene becomes essential to the extremely weak plot.

The biggest problem with this episode is the writing. The episode has multiple side plots which appear farcical and pointless. The scarecrow/Warwick Davies plot is a vague poke at humour, however is not on par with other comedic endeavours. As for the murderous ex- convict-that-gets-burnt-to-death plot line, not much can really be said for this ridiculous waste of pixels as it only serves to remove the viewer from even vaguely being drawn into the episode. This side- plot was clearly a bad attempt at creating 'danger' and may have scared anyone under 5 but nobody else. This toddler-scaring continued with a rather silly scene involving desecrating a grave (with an painfully fake gravestone) to reveal a spooky-spooky ghost which came flying out of the coffin. Ahhh!! no wait, it was another attempt at 'danger' clearly generated by £1.50 worth of CGI (a real let-down throughout the episode).

The twists were another major problem as they were overly-simple and very poorly developed. The "anti-money" character was barely a red- anchovy let alone a herring and it took me mere seconds to work out the connection with the initials and the constant repetition of a mysterious 'anti- capitalist agenda' against the 'Banker'was infuriatingly poor misdirection.The supposedly baffling 'magic' flying trick (from the terrible film clip earlier) was also solved instantaneously. The whole main-plot seemed bizarrely contrived and illogical throughout. This episode was upsettingly sub-par and Alan and David should be ashamed that this made it to air. 3/10
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The worst episode of Jonathan Creek ever
ememessien-977-87096130 December 2016
The show began with an appalling 'risque' racially tinged 'joke' that laid the foundations for a dreadful episode of what was once my favorite British television show.

The entire episode felt like an amateur production. The casting was atrocious throughout - not sure what would have motivated the casting director to choose any of the supporting members, besides desperation.

The writing was equally poor, failing to captivate in the manner of older episodes with a lazy unsatisfying conclusion to boot. Gone are the days of the clever plot twist and analysis by the main protagonist, instead the viewer is reminded of the creative failings of the writers who refuse to wrap up this end of year Jonathan Creek special in the conclusive manner that fans of this once great show have become accustomed to.
17 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What have they done?
LW-0885428 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I can't quite share the enthusiasm of some the reviews on here. The shy recluse who lives in a windmill and does magic for a living is no more. This new chap is a murder! I'm not making this up.

Again with all these recent specials it all has to revolve around a great big spooky mansion which apparently proliferate our country. Warick Davies makes a guest appearance and attempts to inject some lightness to the piece, a lot of the jokes though fell a little flat it seemed and it wasn't really clear what the purpose of his character was in terms of the story.

The reveal of the identity of the killer who's been behind it all verges on a clue so cryptic it could have meant 100 other things too, glancing at phone and then up is meant to clearly tell us something it seems. Also a child drawing a picture of a giraffe leads us to deduce they have relatives in Africa...

A comically one dimensional baddie also stalks the set, his dialogue is just horrendous too "I'm coming for you Jonathan!" A real shame in the end because this one did have promise and did a lot of things right. The campness of the early horror sequence and some of the humour involving the scarecrow contest were very well done.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not at all familiar with Creek- but not at all impressed
ostrowskid30 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
To preface this I have never seen an episode of the series before this one. It's entirely possible that what seems like poor writing to my uncultured eye is in fact expected of the series, and entirely what you're looking for. But ultimately I found this episode wholly disappointing- for the reason that none of the mystery is resolved satisfactorily.

The first half of the episode is fine. The more lighthearted side of things with Warwick Davis is entertaining enough, and the mysteries are both intriguing and plentiful. This is completely soured by the fact that nothing is resolved satisfactorily later.

The final conclusion to the plot revolves around coincidences, entirely unbelievable luck on the part a focal character and some entirely unbelievable decisions too. The solution is therefore not only completely improbable but also impossible to work out- for the viewer or for Creek. Some elements involving an unsolved crime 6 years ago work out well, but are undermined by the rest of the plot.

Sideplots prove not only irrelevant but also incredibly bizarre- one in particular is difficult to mention at all without spoilers, but its conclusion will leave you wondering if the protagonists or even the police have any morals at all.

It certainly provides an enjoyable first 45 minutes, but the second half lets it down entirely. It could be that I'm somewhat missing the point of the series, but I certainly wouldn't recommend this particular episode.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed