Planet of the Sharks (TV Movie 2016) Poster

(2016 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
45 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Asylum's New Suck Fest
shawnblackman5 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I thought some astronauts would land on a planet that was run by shark men that spoke English and captured humans as slaves but it wasn't. This one is set in the future where all the polar caps have melted leaving the whole planet in water. The fish are dying off due to the increase of temperatures leaving all the sharks hungry, so now they seek the only food source left, humans.

This is an Asylum suck fest. It feels like a cheap Waterworld with CGI sharks jumping around. It does get super ridiculous when they stab a shark to power their generator.

Overall summary is don't waste your time here.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Another mutant shark that threatens our very existence...
paul_haakonsen5 October 2016
Well, let's be honest, it is no big secret that when you sit down to watch any of the numerous creature features from SyFy, then you know that chances are more than overwhelming that you will be in for something cheesy and very low budget. And "Planet of the Sharks" wasn't a movie that broke that stereotype.

What do you get if you take elements from "Waterworld", "Planet of the Apes" and "Jaws" and put it into a blender and serve after one hour and thirty minutes of non-stop high-speed blending? You get "Planet of the Sharks", of course.

The story in this movie is about our planet having suffered from some kind of natural disaster which has left the entire planet flooded, and people live afloat some makeshift flotillas. But the waters are far from safe. The temperature is changing, which is causing plankton growth to diminish, which in turn is causing a massive drop in the fish population, which ultimately ends up in the apex predators of the sea, the sharks, to have nothing to feed on. And when there is nothing to feed on below the waves, the sharks seek to feed on the humans above the waves.

Right, well the story is not the cheesiest of story lines that I have witnessed from SyFy, but it wasn't a particularly convincing storyline either. And that was perhaps because of the poor CGI and lack of a captivating storyline as a whole.

As with most SyFy movies, then the effects in "Planet of the Sharks" were questionable. Sometimes the sharks looked alright, but most of the time they were poorly animated, and when the fins broke through the surface of the water, there were no visual effect of this, and it was painstakingly obvious that it was just poorly animated CGI shark fins.

The acting in the movie was adequate, well as far as acting in movies such as these go. I have seen worse acting, believe you me. So I will say that people were doing good enough jobs with their given roles and characters throughout the course of this movie.

"Planet of the Sharks" is one of those guilty pleasures. You know, a movie that is so bad that it is actually fun and sort of pseudo-entertaining to watch.

I am rating this movie three out of ten stars. SyFy have a lot of creature features, and many of them are better than this one. Sure, it is good enough to watch if you have nothing better to watch and just need a movie where you don't have to think a single though, but it is hardly a movie that you will watch more than a single time.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Shark movie is a little different to the rest
Leofwine_draca6 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
PLANET OF THE SHARKS is something a little different from the usual nonsense put out by The Asylum and SyFy, here working together. The story is set in a futuristic world which has been destroyed by the flooding of the oceans. Sharks now outnumber mankind and survivors live a precarious life on anything that floats. This most reminded me of WATERWORLD mixed with the usual CGI shark antics of fare like DEEP BLUE SEA. The acting is nothing to write home about and the plot is strictly hackneyed, but the film features a multitude of action sequences and has a fast pace so you don't really notice the various flaws and problems too much. Calling this a good film would be a step too far, but by Asylum standards it's not the worst.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Some of the worst acting you will ever see
Sammy741 June 2018
Totally a B-movie. But the acting is so bad - you just gotta see it. Especially this one woman with the most fake texan accent ever. Love it. I enjoyed this movis about 100 times more than Deep Blue Sea 2
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
People walking on the seawall in the background
bmwpc-4004412 August 2017
Did none of you watch this on anything larger that an iPhone? The water scenes of the "floating" villages was shot in Houts Bay, south Africa. And in those scenes you can see the water breaking over the dock/seawall in the bay. This is supposed to be out in the middle of the deep ocean and the water is really about 6 foot deep. Notice how the anchoring ropes are almost horizontal indicating shallow water versus hanging straight down like an anchor in deep water. Of course in several scenes near the end you can actually see people (not in the movie) walking along the seawall in the deep background. Either they are walking on water or, most likely, the seawall. Hilarious. Then there's another scene where another boat motors by in the background. I won't even comment about the flying sharks as that was kind of expected.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The cheap and ridiculous flourishing of sharks
TheLittleSongbird18 March 2018
Have made no secret in the past of intensely disliking, and even outright hating a lot, a vast majority of The Asylum's and SyFy's (near-universally maligned for good reason) output, though there is curiosity as to whether they are capable of making something good and compulsive about their output's badness. Admittedly, both The Asylum and SyFy do have a small group of watchable films and the occasional (big emphasis on that word) above average one, unfortunately outweighed by the lacklustre at best and often dreadful films they churn out.

Before anybody gets defensive, am well aware that films like 'Planet of the Sharks' are not ones to be taken seriously. Have seen my fair share of low-budget shark films, and any other kind of low-budget creature film, and will admit to finding some guilty fun in some of them (i.e. the first two 'Sharknado' films). There are far worse shark films, but is that an endorsement or saying much? Not really.

Take no pleasure in rating films low or leaving negative reviews. Actually always aim to be an encouraging and perceptive reviewer, and 1/10 ratings are extremely rare.

Sadly 'Planet of the Sharks' is just too amateurish to accept as a guilty pleasure, where nearly everything is just poor quality that it's insulting and there is nowhere near enough fun, intentional or unintentional, moments. Was not expecting anything intelligent here, am well versed now to know that it is not that kind of film, but it does feel like it was made by somebody who didn't know how to give a film brains, so much so that it'll make the viewer feel dumb and that is not a nice sensation to feel watching a film.

Got some marginal entertainment out of the opening scene as it was sort of fun, although it was also very predictable and silly. Unfortunately, it rapidly fell downhill, where ridiculousness and cheapness amongst other things were taken to extremes.

Visually, even when knowing what to expect, 'Planet of the Sharks' still looks really cheap. Any nice scenery that the movie has is difficult to appreciate when the movie is shot in such a drab way and when it's edited so amateurishly that bacon-slicer-like editing looks more refined. Worst of all in this regard are the effects, as it was made on low-budget it would have been forgiven a little if it was not great, but when the effects for the sharks look as if no effort was given in making them without looking so goofy and unfinished-looking that is hard to ignore.

Can say little better about the personalities. The sharks are not menacing, not scary and not fun, not even strong enough to bring any unintentional humour or goofiness, that's how bland they are. The music is very generic and adds very little, it's not always appropriate either and quite a lot of it is actually pretty annoying.

Writing ranges between incredibly bad to appalling. Any comedy is incredibly forced and is so cheesy it is enough to make the eyes roll in disbelief, while the more serious moments are very awkwardly written and as trite as anybody can possibly go. Regarding the shark attacks, some are rushed, others are badly drawn out. They lack any kind of suspense and the over-silliness to the point of intelligence-insulting stupidity, terrible shark effects, bad editing and even more gratuitous gore further cheapen them. To describe the story as weak is being too insulting to the word weak, it is a very lethargically paced and thin as ice story with lots of padding that is either badly written or serves no point at all to the movie, other than attempts at novelty value, which falls flat on its face because it all feels so tired. It is not fun, it is not scary and it is not thrilling or suspenseful, it's just nothing but tired stupidity.

As for the characters, that they're tired cliches isn't so much a problem, the problem is that they are either obnoxious with them constantly doing stupid things, so bland that it makes zombies seem more animated or both. Some of them are superfluous to the story or come and go out of nowhere constantly. The direction is as flat as a pancake, and the acting is amateur hour awful. The film may not unforgivably waste dependable actors, again that is saying little when you are watching actors looking bored or over-compensating to extreme levels.

Overall, awful. 1/10 Bethany Cox
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Mad Max meets Waterworld and neither win...
AndyVanScoyoc4 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Boring...

I wasn't sure what to expect when I started watching this film. Good thing my expectations were low.

This film isn't really bad...I've seen much worse...but if you're looking for scares, or to be seriously freaked out like with JAWS, you'll be let down.

The mayor or whatever she was of the town called, Salvation, was ridiculous looking and looked like a cross between a role playing gaming character and Tina Turner in Beyond Thunderdome.

Just not good...at least not as anything scary...it's just too ridiculous and the sharks way too fake.

Even for CGI.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Just Awful (but not as bad as some other SyFy movies)!!
brandon_veracka30 July 2016
Somebody needs to tell the people at SyFy that SHARKS DON'T ROAR! Almost every shark movie I've seen on the SyFy network lately contains roaring sharks that sound like lions--and those sounds were obviously taken from pre-recorded lion roars.

That said, the reason I'm giving this a 4 out of 10 because it's not as bad as "Sharknado". Yes, there is still--as in almost every SyFy movie-- some kind of disgusting & egregious use of pretty young girls getting all hot over young guys; SyFy just loves their pointless use of sexuality. However, at least the writing in this film's story isn't quite as awful as some other SyFy flicks. There are some (sort-of) likable characters and a decent story arc.

There is actually an okay story here; there's a decent beginning, middle, and end. Some like-able characters also sweeten the mix. Unlike "Sharknado" there are actually some well-edited bits of stock footage of sharks mixed into the film that don't look too out-of-place. The acting is naturally sub-par, but it's not total garbage. You can tell some of these actors at least rehearsed their roles and didn't push it or over-act them.

So while "Planet of the Sharks" definitely isn't the film you want to save for that special weekend night, it could be a good bit of entertainment to chuckle at with a buddy or your significant other on a rainy day. It is totally forgettable, but it's not so awful it'll make you angry!

4/10 for creative effort, some okay writing, and entertainment value.
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A battle to stay awake...
jazmyn-135-2011319 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This was possibly the most boring SF movie I ever tried to watch. Might have missed bits of it cause I was struggling to keep watching it through the severe boredom. CGI was really bad. They could have filmed sharks from most video games and it would have looked more realistic. The dialogue was painfully bad and overall it came off like a really bad remake of Waterworld.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Blah, blah, blah...Sharks! Blah, Blah Blah...Sharks!
Aaron13755 September 2018
My fiance found this one Hulu I believe and thankfully we could watch it for free because I would have wasted money on this cause it is bad enough I wasted time. Though that is not fair, as it was very entertaining to make fun of this film, but riffing this film is like shooting fish in a barrel, just not much of a challenge. The sharks look horrid, like a screen saver coming across the screen and they don't even attempt to make them look real when they are jumping, you have people with accents that are barely audible and what made this one particularly bad was all the talking! I am like, don't cheapen yourself further by acting like this is some high end pretentious movie then throw super jumping sharks into the mix!

The story, the world is completely covered in water due to the ice caps melting and the fact that the people who made this film actually think that could cover the entire earth. Well we have this city called junk city population 72 getting attacked by the sharks right from the start with only one survivor...a girl who one would think is important, but really kind of pointless. Well another city with a population of over 400, though it looks like the same city and looks like it has less people and a scientific center join forces to combat the sharks! Not really, the strange leader of the one city speaks in what I finally figured must be a horrid Cajun accent tries to fight the sharks, and then there is just a whole lot of plans being formed that make no sense as white Ice T, hipster Bill Nye, pointless girl, fat comedy relief guy, surf board girl, Nye's girlfriend and Glen Close come together to talk a lot and once in a while fight stupid jumping sharks.

The actors and actresses in this film are just embarrassing. Honestly, had I gotten this script I would have said "hell no". They play it off so seriously and that somehow makes this all worse! When you see the sharks attack at the beginning this is not a film you are going to take seriously, but that is how it is played off. Not only seriously, but deadly seriously! Cajun lady had me laughing as her plan to fight the sharks was to stab them and have her guy friend then kick them...it worked better than that volcano plan!

So no, this film is bad to the highest degree. SyFy, used to be the SciFi channel and it was a great station. They would play animes, Godzilla films, horror films and they even had MST3K for awhile. Then they went to rather high end television shows and the occasional good home brewed movies. Now they seem to make their living doing mainly horrible shark movies, they should stop being the SyFy channel and just turn into the SharkFy station!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bad. And boring
Stevieboy66624 December 2017
Well, here's yet another rubbish SyFy shark movie. Slightly interesting idea about the ice caps melting & land mass now being underwater. With a few groups of survivors we have shades of Waterworld & Mad Max. However I got completely lost trying to understand the plot about the scientists' ambitious plan to reverse the environmental disaster. Acting is average at best but there are a couple of characters - the South African guy & the female leader with the Deep South accent - who are painfully bad to watch. Usual rubbish CGI sharks. The biggest gaff is that the film is set out in the ocean yet in some scenes you can clearly see waves crashing in with bathers STANDING, waste deep in water, in the background! Yes, it's that bad. Perhaps if they had made this film with tongue in cheek it may have been more watchable, sadly they played it straight.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant film
chuckhundred21 November 2016
Utterly gobsmacked at the depth (no pun intended) of the story line. Don't want to spoil anything but the story was solid and immersive throughout. Special effects were far better than I expected from a Syfy attempt and at times had to remember this was a movie.

Brandon Auret and Stephanie Beran had real chemistry and delivered a real powerful performance throughout (why no Oscar nominees?). I love it when I pick up a movie expecting a bit of mindless hum-drum and get hit with this kind of quality.

A true masterpiece, I won't be swimming in the ocean any time soon.

If I could give this 11 stars I would, loved it!
12 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sharks! Volcano! Wave! I got only two sips left!
nogodnomasters23 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is an Asylum/SyFy rated TV-14 movie. Most of you can stop reading at that point. The world is covered by water and due to a lack of food in the ocean, sharks are jumping 10 feet into the air to eat people. They are also traveling together controlled by an alpha female. Now here is where the plot gets tricky. In order to save the planet they need to launch a CO2 scrubber into the atmosphere and need an underwater volcano eruption to do it. (I think I was making a sandwich when they explained why.) They have a tight launch window because hitting the atmosphere may be otherwise impossible.

Nothing like combining the second worst Kevin Costner film on the planet with Asylum sharks. We get to see the statue of liberty underwater during the opening credits and not the last scene like that ape picture. Asylum never lets science and facts get in the way of a bad film. Indeed, just about everything they did, you couldn't do and if all the icecaps melted, you would still have plenty of dry land and at that point, it you removed the CO2 from the atmosphere, the water wouldn't recede. We did get many close-ups of Stephanie Beran's foot (or perhaps that was a naked foot double) and I am still trying to figure out the fake accent of Angie Teodora Dick. Was she celebrating Talk Like a Pirate Day? It's bad. If you love a film you can laugh at and not with, be my guest.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It ain't Jaws that's for sure!
nebk29 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Given that this is a TV movie you might expect it not to be the best written or acted movie, or have the best effects. And you would be right. In fact your expectations might be exceeded. This movie has atrocious effects, bad acting and a convoluted story. It might have been written by someone who watched Waterworld, Jaws and Deep Blue Sea and had the idea to combine some of the elements of the these films as badly as possible. It also has a roaring/growling shark.

The movie takes place in a world where 98% of the surface of the earth is water covered and sharks are being led by an alpha shark that controls them through electrical impulses. At the same time there are human survivors with South African Accents living on floating platforms trying to fight the sharks using an electro magnetic pulse weapon whilst simultaneously attempting to launch some sort of rocket into the atmosphere in order to prevent the planet from heating up any more than it already has. Apparently if they do this the water levels will recede. Why you may ask? Only the movie scientist and the super shark might know the answer to that. OK I might be exaggerating, the super shark has no clue to what is going on and in this respect it is similar to the viewer of this movie. In the end some characters get eaten by the sharks and he super shark is blown up on a boat after it launches itself on the boat in a move very similar to the one executed by the shark in Jaws. Will they never learn....

In conclusion, this movie is downright terrible and should not be seen unless you want to remind yourself why you should watch something better.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Awful
mlkincade12 August 2018
Watched about five minutes of movie, felt like it may have killed off brain cells! One of the worst movies ever
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Shark's don't roar, unless you watch Asylum/SyFy films
one9eighty12 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Sometime in the future, when global warming has knackered the planet, ice glaciers have melted and most of the planet is submerged in water. Humanity has taken a turn for the worse and is living in a 'Mad Max'/ 'Waterworld' style dystopian future environment - only on the water instead of a baron landscape. People live on small islands made of junk, in small tribes. Sharks have evolved into the number one predator; they are able to work together taking their lead from an alpha shark.

Before I watched this I left expectation at the door. I knew this would not be like 'Mad Max', 'Waterworld', or 'Planet of the Apes'. I knew, made by Asylum and SyFy, that this would not be believable, authentic; Hollywood stylish or even excellently delivered.... But... this has to be amongst the lamest shark based films I have watched in recent years (and I've seen a lot!), it's instantly forgettable - or at least I wish I could erase it from my brain. The story is stupid (it had the premise to be slightly clever, but then went off on a tangent and never delivered), the plot has more holes than a colander, the dialogue and acting is atrocious, there are times when sexuality (poorly attempted too) is used to cover the poor acting and story, the CGI is weak (oh so bad it hurt at times), there are people in the background of some scenes walking on water because the production team are lazy and used a public location and didn't think about people walking passed the set.... I could go on but I'm boring myself now. Don't watch this if you can help it, not for a bet, not for a dare, not for a laugh.

2 out of 10, and I'm being very generous!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Admittedly, not great. But...........
uscmd9 August 2019
Its strange, there are "bad" movies I dump in the first 10 minutes. Then there are others, that have 1 or more qualities that can grab a viewer.. I plead guilty to being hooked by this film.

Its pretty easy to do a bombing run on a movie with a 2.7 rating. Easily the lowest rating, on which I've offered a review.

By far the best 'shark' movie I recall watching. I not only watched it to the very end, I also paused it, each time I left the room. CGI were abysmal. But it did have a plot, that was incredibly timely..

Not GWTW, or Shawshank.........but if you are stuck for a watchable movie, you could do a lot worse.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Better than others, but still boring.
dannyc-3168324 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Planet of the sharks is about how planet Earth has become flooded all over the globe with no land. Scientists have invented this chemical which , when launched, will create land. I did find some parts of this film exciting, but mainly it was only average. Again its the sharks that don't look real whats so ever. The acting was pretty good. There's one woman who went really over the top (the woman in charge of one of the floating villages - can't remember her name) she was extremely irritating and I was really put off her performance; mainly when she and her men were stabbing the sharks; it was so irritating! The other actors in this film were pretty good. I warmed up to a few of them and it was sad when bad things happened that effected them as a character. The film also did drag from time to time, like building this rocket thing was dragged way to long which kind of made you forget the whole plot. They talk about building it and given the go ahead ; they kept dragging it and when they did launch this damn thing, the ending was pretty cool.

Positives: Likeable characters, Action sequences were entertaining, Plot was creative and the story line was quick to pick up and not get lost throughout, Most of the actors did a good job with their character performances.

Negatives: Sharks roar and were unrealistic, very boring dragged out scenes in some parts, queen of the floating village was extremely annoying; didn't like her at all (performance kind of ruined it for me). 3/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Outrageous! Over the top! Silly! Cheap! And over the top!
Patient4444 August 2016
Oddly enough Planet of the Sharks came from syfy channel but with a plot involved. Yes, you heard me right, you actually get to see more than just silly, cheap CGI, you will indeed witness a plot developing under you very eyes.

That is of course if you can make it through this movie as it really is as terrible as they get, a movie where the brain needs to be shut down, and you need to see the forest beyond the trees. All in all, for a syfy production it is slightly better yes, but is that really saying much?

So if you wanna see a movie with sharks, but not much more, I guess if all the other nature channels have nothing on, you could do this. Tho I recommend you do not!

Cheers!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Complete waste of time
niwty30 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Where to start? Script that is absolutely shi sorry, shockingly bad, delivered by "actors" that inevitably went straight back to waiting table after filming. The plot has more holes than the winning holiest Dutch cheese in a holey Dutch cheese competition. The so called Queen of the Salvation City as others have said is awful, annoying, etc, right through the whole alphabet of adjectives than mean bad. The premise is that the polar ice caps have melted due to global warming. This in turn has caused the sea levels to rise and somehow completely flooded the land masses, (see what I mean about plot holes? Thats just the first of many) Despite this the surviving humans have managed to collect timber and surprisingly palm leaves with which to build a makeshift floating collection of huts. Oh yes. They also have a generator, a speed boat and a gyrocopter (and somehow plenty of fuel for all 3) The doctors/scientists (one of whom is complete with bow tie) in this floating metropolis have also managed to amazingly build a rocket on another platform with seemingly no labs and little or no manufacturing plants. The rocket is apparently equipped with a device which will scrub the co2 out of the atmosphere to presumably refreeze the ice caps, (don't ask) The problem they have is that the warming sea is supposed to have caused the plankton etc to die off and subsequently the fish that live on it and also the fish that live on the fish, so on and so on up the food chain to the sharks. With no food below the water they are now seeking it above the water, ie, the humans. However, one has to wonder what the humans are supposed to have been living on? No land mass to grow it and no fish in the water? Did I also mention the fact that the sharks, led by an alpha, have also evolved the ability to leap like dolphins and roar like lions now? No? Sorry yes that's a thing too apparently. Anyway back to the "plot". Our protagonists also need to trigger an underwater volcano! To do this they need to reactivate a HARRP device, (that is also on the floating platform it's the rocket where the basic manufacturing tools and circa 1990's computers are) bounce a beam of energy from that off the atmosphere and direct it at, I'm sorry, I'm struggling to even think about this nonsense let alone write it.) at the caldera of a now undersea volcano causing it to erupt wiping out the sharks? I know! However, No one appears to have considered the tidal wave that follows the eruption, (Scientists eh?) Anyway somehow the big bad shark survives and pursues them back to the main platform again. They need to launch the rocket but have no power so devise a plan to obtain power from the alpha shark? The shark attacks with some others that survived but the day is saved by Doctor bow tie who turns out is also a South African samurai complete with sword! Anyway the rocket gets launched, bow tie and his assistant kiss and before teatime the torch of the Statue of Liberty is one again visible above the waves! Hooray! I gave it a rating of 2. 1 for the fact that it was in colour, even though colour is obviously still a negative thing in South Africa as there was one POC in the cast with little or no lines and nothing to do but stand in the background or hide, (but at least she didn't die!) and the other for the very redeemable fact that no sharks were hurt in the making of the film. Summary. Don't waste your time. I watched it. I made the sacrifice so that you don't have to.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Interesting Premise
glengolf25 April 2019
Not to be taken lightly the basic message of this movie. Forget the so called bad acting, the fact is we as humans are not as powerful as we are led to believe. Consequences are coming and they are coming fast. In whatever form it may take.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Is there any hope for mankind on a flooded planet?
michaelRokeefe4 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Global warming has not made it easy on the human race. This futuristic world has left very little of the planet not flooded by melting glaciers. The Earth's future looks mighty grim and there is just small bands of humans left to survive massive, ravenous mutated alpha sharks that patrol the oceans as an organized mass of chomping menace. Survivors are desperate and dependent on reversing global weather patterns. And believe it, sharks are the hungriest species.

Low budget, cheesy sci-fi for a lazy hour and a half. Mark Atkins co-writes and directs a cast featuring: Stephanie Beran, Brandon Auret, Christia Visser, Daniel Barnett, Lauren Joseph, Lindsay Sullivan and John B. Swart.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Decent entry, if not overtly spectacular
kannibalcorpsegrinder28 July 2016
Stuck on an over-flooded planet, a group of survivors trying desperately to restore land mass to the surface finds that a group of sharks has gathered together to follow a leader of the creatures and must put their plans on hold to stop the deadly creatures.

This one here wasn't all that bad of a killer shark effort. One of the better features here is the surprisingly fun and enjoyably cheesy post-apocalyptic storyline presented here, which is so nicely integrated into a normal killer shark film that gets featured here in quite fine form throughout. A vast majority of this is due to the setting in the future where it's all based on the end-of-the-world scenario where it brings in the flooded surface world, the isolated segments of humanity living on floating islands in the middle of the sea and the overall look and feel of the characters in here makes this one really feel like a new concept for the creatures, and there's plenty of fun here that comes from the great action scenes that come from being put into this background. The main start-up scene here of the easy rampage against the undefended community at sea where they rampage across the group and taking out both the fisherman on the surface as well as the buildings nearby which starts this off on a nice note, while the later attack on the supply crew where their initial harvesting the ocean celebration that draws the sharks in for them to slaughter gets turned against them when they start launching the attack against them leaping out of the water to take them out and really gets into the fun of the swarm attacking the different people going around the different buildings and levels along the scene where it's got plenty of fun action along the way. As well, the big finale where it's all about the charging sharks attacking the different sections of the facility and going onto the big battles against the remaining fish as there's a great method of finally defeating the creatures once and for all. These elements here really do work nicely here, while there's a few somewhat minor elements that hold this one down. One of the bigger issues is the fact that there's some really lazy work done on trying to try to explain why the sharks are clearly behaving as they are. There's a scene here where they do manage to showcase that to the audience with the sequence where they tell why there's an alpha- shark controlling the others which are comprised of different species which doesn't happen in real-life yet the way it tries to go about making sure it plays out for the film here is really lazy and makes no sense as they go about it here. As well, there's plenty of the genre's usually-atrocious CGI that crops out here, which has some absolutely ridiculous work here in not only rendering the creatures who have all that ridiculously pixelated look but also feature that kind of horrible look where they don't interact with their surroundings at all and really helps to sell the terrible CGI here. Otherwise, this one wasn't all that bad.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Violence, Language and mild scenes of children-in-danger.
6 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Brilliant!!!
joshuajweil22 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
They used a shark as a potato battery to launch a rocket to reverse global warming.

Shame on all of you who disrespected this film's brilliance with your poor ratings.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring!
altichy4 September 2018
Planet of the Sharks is nothing next to Ghost Shark. It isn't even as good as Ice Sharks. Could have been fun, but falls flat.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed