User Reviews

The two lead characters of the film 'Fleuve noir' are confronted with personal dramas and dark psychological problems, each in his own way. Police investigator Visconti carries with him the drama of complicated relationships with his son a teenager who's in trouble with drug trafickers. He is rarely awake, permanently looking for alcohol, untidy and dressed in a raincoat that rivals that of the legendary Inspector Columbo. The literature teacher Belaille hides behind the appearance of a good teacher and a happy new father hiding unfulfilled writing ambitions and character vices that make him confuse reality with gloomy imaginary fantasies. Director Erick Zonca benefited for this 2018 film from a screenplay based on a book by Israeli crime novelist Dror Mishani and two exceptional actors in the lead roles - Vincent Cassel and Romain Duris. And yet, 'Fleuve noir', despite its ambitions, manages to be only a little less than the sum of the talents that participated in the making of the film.

The story of the film is built around the investigation of the disappearance of a teenager. The elements of the police procedure are not completely absent, but are pushed into the background by the psychological aspects of the investigation. Visconti is a cop who relies primarily on intuition and rummages through the lives of those involved. The results do not take long to appear, but family conflicts, vices and psychological traumas are multiple and are gradually revealed. Repeated surprises and upheavals lead both police officers and spectators astray, and the truth - if this is the truth - is revealed only in the final scene.

The adaptation of the script to the French reality seemed successful to me, and the succession of revelations and changes of views always keeps the interest of the spectators. The excellent cinematography alternates between the police station, the dark and violent streets of Paris at night, the building where the heroes of the drama live, and the forest next to it that plays its role in the drama. The interpretations of Vincent Cassel and Romain Duris seemed a bit exaggerated to me. On a theater stage, they would be perfect, but in the film it seemed to me that the characters were embodied with an excess of mannerism, and it is precisely the key scenes in which the obsessed policeman and the suspected teacher who has many things to hide meet that do not work very well. The surprise character is played by Sandrine Kiberlaine, an actress who lives with more discretion the personal traumas of the mother of the teenager who disappeared and is searched by the police, traumas that are no less profound than those of the policeman or the teacher. The series of successive endings and the acting will make the heroes of this dark psychological thriller continue to haunt us even after the end of the screening.

A bleak and dramatic French who dunnit movie, worth watching because of the great actors starring in it.

The story: A French who dunnit story about the sudden disappearance of a schoolboy. What happened to him and is someone in his surroundings responsible for his disappearance?

The good: Excellent French actors. One of the best one could find in French cinema these days.

The bad: A few parts of this story arent very credible and seem a bit far fetched. That's a shame, because this movie is meant to be a drama, and when I think that the story is kinda unbelievable (at moments) then I cant get (really) excited by the story or moved by the characters any more. Could have been better, but still worth watching.

It didn't take much to know who was behind it all and the circumstances around are not the biggest part. The weird guy is too on the nose for the rest of the world to ignore it. And the family drama of cassel is simply ignored by the end. I assume this originally lasted 3 hour or I hope so

As a psychological mystery I think that it was a good movie. The acting is excellent especially that of Romain Duris whom I know from totally different roles. The only think that turned me off (done on purpose I guess but still...) was the greasy hair of the "commandant". It is gross to watch and not even realistic because even if he does not wash his hair everyday, he does wash it once in a while. I guess this was done to reflect his depressive state but still for me it was difficult to watch. Definitely recommend the movie to anyone who is in the mood for a slow, dark and good mystery.

This could have been a very good noir if it wasn't for the implausible ending which absolutely kills one of the most interesting subplots. A real pity.

Vincent Cassel was good in this film. He's convincing as a slimeball, wacked out cop trying to solve a disappearance.

It was a thriller with lots of twists & turns. I didn't always find the plot particularly convincing. Some stretches of the imagination are necessary.

As a very angry alcoholic police inspector with a troubled teenage son, who finds himself investigating the disappearance of another teenage boy, Vincent Cassel is terrifically good in Erick Zonca's first-class policier "Black Tide". The material may not be particularly original but the handling is splendid. In this case, the devil's in the detail; this is a brilliantly written, directed and acted film. You might say it's even old-fashioned and what's wrong with that when it's coupled with this degree of intelligence, (it's even got a couple of nice twists). For once, a thriller well worth seeking out.

I had recorded this movie without much expectation (not really my kind of stuff) and it stayed half a year "on the plank" before I eventually watched it. It blew my mind. I loved everything about it. The actors - every one of them: outstanding performances. Yann the creepy neighbour: wowowow. Sandrine Kinberlain: absolutely great. Vincent Cassel: breathtaking. So far I actually disliked him as an actor (preferred his father very much), but in Fleuve Noir, he is astonishingly perfect. I give it a 10, because there is nothing in the film that I would like done otherwise. In my eyes, it is just right. Every bit of it. The acting is right, the filming is right, the story telling is right, the dialogues are right, the sound recording is right. About the latter: you hear Cassel's heavy breathing, it's as if you were him. It helps appearance and motion to make you intimatedly feel his constant state of inebriation. Almost unbearable.