redservo's Reviews

United 93 (2006)

10/10

13 September 2006

This is not a movie, it is a memorial. I was not able to catch this film during it's theatrical release. I believe that it was to my benefit.

I rented it through Netflix, and viewed it on a few short days after the fifth anniversary of the actual events. And, unlike the theatrical release alone, it provided the opportunity for the families to voice their emotions, their personal experiences and the raw sense of loss that no movie alone could portray.

The film is incomplete without knowing who those 40 people were, and the people they left behind.

Tasteful, quiet, painful, real.

0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Moment by Moment (1978)

1/10

"Use in case of accidental poisoning"

10 July 2006

I used to think that I had seen all 'The Bad Classics, but I have been mistaken.

WORST SCRIPT - WORST EDITING - WORST ACTING - UGH.

I'd heard of this film, but never understand the acute severity of CRAP that oozed from every sleazy, polyester pore in the rotten flesh of this movie!

How, by gods, did this pathetic drivel EVER make it to a public theater in 1978, and then, cruelly, at many more on TV, and in HI-DEF, no less? At least the 'hep 70' soundtrack' was in Dolby.

Pay close attention to Ms. Tomlin's laugh while pouring her friend a cocktail. This movie makes me ache for Joel, Crow & Servo.

I watched Waterworld a few nights back, and recalled the jibes by critics, calling it Kevin's Gate, etc. And now, I wonder why this big LOAD wasn't called Tomlin's Titanic.

I can't help flying in to hysterics imagining what the outtakes looked like. More drugs were snorted, shot, popped and smoked in this flick than Easy Rider. The cast party must've been quite the par-tay to

I wanted disparity to find something happy or at least conciliatory. No such luck.

So now I'm off to watch a good film, say, 'Manos, the Hands of Fate". (Even the dog is a better actor).

22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Vivacious Lady (1938)

7/10

surprisingly good!

23 February 2006

Warning: Spoilers

Although a huge Stewart and Rogers fan, I was reluctant to see this film, mostly due to the ridiculous title. But I Tivo-ed it regardless, to share w/ my husband, an ardent Rogers fan. Needless to say, I'm delighted that I did save it.

At first I was a little put off by the early scenes with the three main characters, mostly because I did not see Ginger Rogers' unique comedic style being utilized to it's fullest. And the dreadful song, "You'll Be Reminded of Me", sung by Rogers, was an almost schizophrenic experience.

However, as I watched on, the characters became further developed and were at last given the opportunity to show each of their strengths, both comedic and dramatic.

The strongest of those performances were from Ginger Rogers herself. Her comedic timing and playful nature shined as the film progresses. In addition, the supporting cast was the glue that held the film together, providing the strong base on which the lead actors could relax into a true ensemble performance. Pay attention to the smaller roles of the druggist, the manager of the 'girls only' apartments, the couple on the train, and Stewart's assistant and students. Also delightful, was the performance of James Ellison, a handsome leading man, playing second fiddle to Stewart; playfully witty and always charming, without trying to steal every scene.

James Stewart also redeemed himself of his somewhat stiff performance early in the film. He gradually builds his character from the inside out, coming out on top, and giving the audience a glimpse into the future of his phenomenal aptitude for comic timing and dramatic talent. And this is definitely one of Stewart's top 'drunk' scenes.

The writing was sharp and refreshing for the time period, and I believe might even hold it's own in today's films. And the underlying sexual innuendos were surprisingly modern for it's time fulfilling the title of 'romantic comedy' quite well.

Gratefully, the director allowed this gifted ensemble the time to play up the physical comedy as well, which was one of the film's strongest points. The fight between Rogers and Frances Mercer at the dance was hysterical, and Rogers winning over her reluctant mother-in-law, Beulah Bondi, was delightful.

My recommendation is this: Ignore the goofy title, be patient through the first few acts, and you'll be delightfully rewarded by the films remainder. For that reason, I gave it a 7 out of 10, and am adding it to my list of favorite classics.

3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005)

10/10

Perfect!!

21 May 2005

Beautiful. Epic. Did I mention perfect? I usually rant on and on about a film, but this one speaks for itself.

In 1977 I stood in line for an hour to see the phenomenon movie that would change the art of films forever. When the lights dimmed, those trademark credits rolled, and Williams' score belted out those now infamous chords, I got goosebumps. I was only eleven, but I knew that somehow, this movie called Star Wars would be different. Today, I got those goosebumps back.

Pride is not a Jedi quality, but for you, Mr. Lucas, an exception will surely be made.

Bravo!!

3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Terror in the Mall (1998 TV Movie)

MST3K - WHERE ARE YOU???

30 August 2004

Warning: Spoilers

***************AVAST! THAR BE SPOILERS AHEAD!****************

The big secret??

What a piece of CRAP! All I can say, is that it's an absolute tragedy that Mystery Science Theater 3000 is no longer in first run. This would have been ideal fodder for Mike and the Bots. Otherwise, don't waste your time, unless you're under the influence. The plot - implausible w/ holes like swiss cheese. The acting - well, let's just say that Joey Tribiani would be an improvement to the cast. The special effects....neither special or effective. (And boy, they sure dried off fast after that elevator escape!) Once again...MST3K where are you?!?

3/10 for it's farce potential. (Guilty pleasure...the very cute bald guy w/ the very sexy accent!!)

1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Mr. Mom (1983)

7/10

What's not to like?

29 July 2004

A classic John Hughes 1980's flick! Sure, it's a bit formulaic, and the premise wouldn't hold water in today's mixed families and diverse working environments. However, I must confess that the lingo has gotten into my everyday vernacular. "Woobies", "220, 221, whatever it takes", etc.

It's an excellent showcase for Michael Keaton's comedic timing, and frankly, a much more likable character than Beatlejuice! Predictable direction is made up for with a witty script and some very funny and memorable scenes that never fail to get a laugh. Well worth watching more than once. One of my personal 'everyday' modern classics. Grab some popcorn, your woobie, and enjoy!!

2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Dutch (1991)

Never judge a book by it's cover!

12 October 2003

I recently saw that this film was scheduled to air on TV. Thinking to myself, "I really liked this movie", I went to IMDb to see what others thought of the film. I was utterly surprised to see the mediocre score that was it given, so I perused through the comments. Almost all the comments listed praised this film, as did I. So why the low score?

In the context of recent films such as "Shindler's List", "The Pianist", "Gangs of New York" and other heavies; this film is quiet and unassuming. But should NOT be overlooked!

I had never cared much for Ed O'Neill in his neanderthal 'Al Bundy' role, but my opinion of him turned 180 after this film. He conveys depth, restraint, humor and pathos without resorting to the caricature of his previous work. And it is the chemistry between O'Neill and Embry as the spoiled prep school brat, that carry this film so well.

This is a charming, unassuming film about growing up and first impressions. An excellent family film, that will amuse the younger children and still thoroughly entertain the adults in the room. All of this while reminding us to never judge a book (or a movie) by it's cover.

6.5 out of 10

16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer (1947)

7/10

Delightful, funny and charming!

24 August 2003

I've always loved everything that Cary Grant has done, and this is no exception. A fast-paced, well-written and witty script does more than just show off the three main actors, Grant, Myrna Loy and Shirley Temple, it gives some of the funniest lines to the supporting cast.

Despite it's highly predictable plot, it isn't the outcome that kept me watching, but the wonderful witty script and comic timing. I understand that the behind the scenes tension, secondary to Ms. Loy being accused of a communist by McCarthy, was thick. But you would never guess it. The actors appear to be thoroughly, and genuinely enjoying themselves.

And it's that obvious pleasure that oozes out of the screen and into the audience. More than once, I caught myself laughing out loud. Definitely one to take time out and enjoy!

5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The Front Page (1974)

6/10

No "His Girl Friday" but...

10 August 2003

it's still quite enjoyable. It's always wonderful to see Lemmon and Matthau together, exchanging the quite-witted banter that made the previous incarnations of this production (both stage and screen) so entertaining.

But I must confess, that if I had to recommend just one of the many versions of this story, it would have to be the Cary Grant version, "His Girl Friday". However, if you have the opportunity to see this 1974 treatment, then by all means, do so. The mere fact that this film takes place in the 1930's and is brought to the screen in the 1970's, does add something that the earlier versions could not; profanity. I've never recommended a film strictly on that basis, but come on, these are hard-core news men, who we all know curse, drink and smoke like fiends. The ability to add the colorful language makes this version all the more believable.

There are certainly moments of hilarity, albeit a bit fractured and without the cohesiveness of the earlier versions. But still, it's Lemmon and Matthau. A pairing that's always worth watching.

A gave his film a 6 out of 10.

4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Days of Wine and Roses (1962)

9/10

Mesmerizing

10 August 2003

Like standing on the edge of a black hole, this movie tantalizes the audience in the beginning, then plunges you into the dark, vast horror of alcoholism.

Jack Lemmon has always been a personal favorite of mine, especially for screwball comedy. But, just like Robin Williams, Lemmon is capable of turning heads w/ his dramatic roles. "The Days of Wine and Roses" is a showcase of that dramatic talent. And along with Lee Remick, this film's performances exceed all expectations. The direction and cinematography utilizes the black and white medium to it's fullest extent, while the script is earthy, human and most of all, believable.

This is a tour de force in the craft of modern filmmaking. And an absolutely essential requirement for aficionados of the dramatic genre. How Remick and Lemmon managed to be past up for the best actor/actress Oscar for their phenomenal performances never ceases to amaze me. Twenty years later, their performances are just as fresh, relevant and just as powerful.

There was no sugarcoated ended. This film sought to depict alcoholism as the demon it truly is, and that sometimes, people just don't get well, despite all the love and support that's offered to them.

If you've never seen it, rent it. Just be sure to rent it in letterbox, to maintain the movies original ratio. A film this beautiful needs to be seen in it's best form. Take someone you love along with you for the ride.

40 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Operation Petticoat (1959)

Curtis and Grant at their peak.

9 August 2003

A wry and lighthearted look at the U.S. Navy in 1941. Cary Grant and Tony Curtis shine amongst a wonderful supporting cast in this fictional story inspired by an actual incident that occurred during WWII. So many war movies are depressing, while others are completely ridiculous. This film, while full of sexual innuendo and lighthearted humor, still manages to keep it's humanity, with one foot planted firmly in the reality of the Pacific theater.

A jaunty tale of an injured sub, a few army nurses, a group of lonely sailors, and some pink paint. The direction is above par for the time period and genre, the writing is bright and witty, even for today's standards, and the performances are thoroughly entertaining.

This is a recommended must-see for fans of Curtis and Grant. Grab the popcorn and soda and enjoy! I give this charming 1959 classic a 7 out of 10.

39 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Unbreakable (2000)

10/10

Not your average movie-Thank God!

4 August 2002

Who says comics have to be campy?

I love a good action film just like the next guy, but Unbreakable was not intended to be just-another-cartoon-super-hero-saving-the-world-from-evil. I left the theater completely awed and speechless, yet wanting to say soooo much about the plot, the characters, the haunting cinematography, brilliant use of costuming and perspective, and the fresh, inventive direction.

M. Night Shyamalan has proven himself as a top-notch writer, director and producer with The Sixth Sense. However, w/ Unbreakable, he exceeds even himself with this somber, subtle and methodical film. He has been criticized for his slow-pacing. Instead, he should be heralded for bringing back substance to the cinema. Not since Hitchock, has there been a better psychological director. And just like Hitch, his direction is not just for visual effect, but to inflect mood, character and storyline with a mere camera angle. Although what the audience sees via his inventive camera angles tugs and nudges the audience's psyche, the real brilliance lies in his ability to direct his actors.

Bruce Willis has been criticized for 'not acting' in this movie. On the contrary, his subtlety and humanity was right on the money. So little was said, but so much was conveyed. But not all kudos goes to Willis and Shyamalan. The supporting cast is excellent. You know that something's not right w/ Samuel L. Jackson's sympathetic, yet slighty askew character; but you just don't know what until the truth is revealed. Robin Wright was excellent as a confused mother and heart-broken wife. Spencer Treat Clark was engaging as the dutiful son looking for any excuse to worship a father that doesn't understand himself, much less his family.

Well-paced, beautifully directed and strongly acted, Unbreakable is a sign of hope for the fate of cinema; that movies don't have to be predictable, over-the-top, or based on yet-another British literary classic to have substance, integrity and fine performances.

Unbreakable proves that the coasters aren't the only thrill rides at the carnival.

(But if you still insist on the coaster, just look for the "Signs"!)

0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Always (1989)

9/10

Still moves me.

12 June 2002

Having just seen a re-cap of AFI's 100 most romantic films, I decided to go through my own video library to see how many I owned. Of course, starting alphabetically, I pulled out "Always". It wasn't on AFI's list. But it is on mine. I threw it in the VCR, having seen it at least 3-4 times before, and it was like watching it for the first time again.

To sum it up, I wept, from the opening to the closing scene. Rarely am I so touched by a film that it affects me so strongly as to push aside all rational thought and open up the flood gates. But I should expect no less from the man (Spielberg) who single-handedly keeps the tissue industry in the black. He knows how to tug those heart-strings. He's doesn't just play off one emotion; he goes for them all! Drama, action, humor, loss and love. And what he does in "Always", just like "Empire of the Sun", "The Color Purple", "E.T.", "Schindler's List", and "Saving Private Ryan"; is never let the rider off the coaster.

Unfortunately, at the release of "Always", he had not fully gained the respect of the industry enough to prevent this film from being pushed aside. For me, however, it's still right there up on top!

Kudos Spielberg , for reminding us that even your less-seen films were done w/ brilliance, integrity, humor and a more than just a few tears.

48 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Soultaker (1990)

It's no Red Zone Cuba!

1 June 2002

Ok, I just had to say a few words here. Yes, I'll disclaim myself as a HUGE MST3K fan....HOWEVER....I am also a sincere student of fine films. With that said, I'd like to address the previous comments regarding City of Angels "ripping-off" Soultaker. City of Angels is a REMAKE of Wim Wenders' WINGS OF DESIRE. It was made in 1987. Three years prior to Soultaker. So....in essence, Soultaker could be said to be "ripping off" WINGS OF DESIRE. But, in truth, it is not a rip off, it is merely a shadow (no pun intended) of many movies that deal with the subject of the afterlife.

Now, on to the meat of things. No, this is NOT the worst movie ever made. That title goes, without reservation, to Red Zone Cuba. Cut, or uncut, it is still Hollywood's biggest embarrassment. However, as it stands, Soultaker is not the BEST movie ever made, slashed for MST3K, or not.

But, come on people (and you know who you are). ANY movie, good, mediocre, bad or horrendous is fair game for movie critics and at-home MSTies everywhere. Who hasn't, after the 98th showing, ripped a little on Star Wars? Even Citizen Kane, Gone with the Wind, and Casablanca have been spoofed! Humor can be seen in ANY film (yes, even APOCALYPSE NOW is not exempt to a few quiet, open-for-comment, moments.)

Honestly, Soultaker is not that bad. Not good, but not that bad. The acting is decent, the story flows, and I have to admit that I actually paid more attention to the story than I did to the bots. I know, I know, that's treason in MST-land, and my head could be in danger of being lopped off at any moment (or at least jettisoned into space).

Let's all just admit that bad and mediocre movies just add to the tapestry of filmmaking and that they are ALL fair game to a little criticism at worst, and a little humor, at best.

3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

redservo

Reviews

Tell Your Friends

Recently Viewed