It's incomprehensible why anyone would hazard the making of this movie. As a wonderful tour of a classic French farm house, and the creation of every artists' ideal of the perfect French artist's studio it's perfect. Otherwise it's a self important, arty disaster - even though that certainly isn't the opinion of virtually every "external review" I read. If it's French, dares to be 4 hours long, and deals with A R T it must be a masterpiece.
The artist used for the endless exploratory sketches is embarrassingly bad and the final showing of "the masterpiece" (or at least the one we get to see and not the one bricked into the studio wall)is such bad art and such an anti-climax that the camera lingers on it only as long as it's forced to.
Beart demonstrates what every art school student learns in their first life drawing class: that the nude human body is beautiful and when presented naturally is devoid of all the contrived sexiness that our society layers on it.
If the painting and drawing had been talented and exciting, the pace picked up and the actors given some clearer roles that they could inhabit, the wonderful ambiance of the house and the studio would not have been wasted.
The artist used for the endless exploratory sketches is embarrassingly bad and the final showing of "the masterpiece" (or at least the one we get to see and not the one bricked into the studio wall)is such bad art and such an anti-climax that the camera lingers on it only as long as it's forced to.
Beart demonstrates what every art school student learns in their first life drawing class: that the nude human body is beautiful and when presented naturally is devoid of all the contrived sexiness that our society layers on it.
If the painting and drawing had been talented and exciting, the pace picked up and the actors given some clearer roles that they could inhabit, the wonderful ambiance of the house and the studio would not have been wasted.
Tell Your Friends