This film while being not very good, is also a bit of an insult to filmmakers who can't afford to shoot on film, or to hire Julia Roberts to act in their movies. It's like a nose-thumbing to all the indies who haven't made it like Mr. Soderberg. This may not be intentional, and I hope it isn't, but one comes away with a feeling that the filmmakers here have no regard for the audience.
I assume that critics who do like this movie will chalk the harsh critiques up to people 'Not getting it'...well, I 'Get it' but I also recognize that there's not much to get. Other than crappy looking DV work (if you're going to use it, use it to it's potential), Blair Witch seems like A Conrad Hall lensed film by comparison.
This may set back DV filmmakers a ways and keep barriers for mainstream theatrical releases up high. In the back of my mind I wonder if it might even be the intention of the filmmakers to do this, a sort of 'Not So Fast' to those who are trying to break down doors with their indie film projects originating on DV. That would be sad, it already is. This sub-par effort by all involved has crowded multi-plexes and will make theater owners think twice next time they hear about some DV feature coming to a theater near you..."NOT SO FAST!"
0 out of 0 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends