Reviews

64 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Nines (2007)
8/10
good cinema!! subtle "science fiction"
25 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I stuck with this because of Ryan Reynolds, Melissa McCarthy and Elle Fanning, whose individual unity of mind/body/spirit and talent kept me from walking away in disgust. I was bothered the whole way by vague puzzles, but toward the end I started thinking about Ingmar Bergman, remembering his films, which I saw religiously beginning in 1958, when I was a first-year student at university.

The copy of "The Nines" available to me happens to have Swedish sub-titles, which felt very appropriate. I strongly suggest that the film deserves patience. Lord knows, the cinematography gives the viewer plenty to do while you sort out the annoying questions raised by sequence, characterization, and coy hints at numerological significance.

There is a unified sense of sincerity behind whatever-the-hell is going on. For all I know Hope Davis represented The Whore of Babylon--a very different persona from Tony Stark's doomed Mom in "Captain America: Civil War." In truth, I have to watch this move--"The Nines"--again. And because of it, I also have to re-view Bergman's work. For the moment, I take "The Nines" as a well-crafted exploration of anybody's reality, laid out by a cruelly meticulous storyteller. Beautifully acted--I remember thinking, "If these fine actors can be patient enough to make this film, I can be patient enough to watch it." And, as I said previously, I'll being in for another viewing. Have fun!!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Francis (1950)
8/10
satisfying comedy ++++
2 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"I suppose in all of us there's a trace of a mother complex." These thoughtful words of U.S. Army mule Francis ("That's spelled with an 'i'.") are an example of the charm of this Hollywood concoction. The voice of Chill Wills is deep and warm, just as the equine star's voice should be, and is equal to the deep voice of the Commanding General. Their scenes together late in the film pack a real punch. But meanwhile you have the 2nd Lieutenant Donald O'Connor, making frequent trips to the "Neuropsychiatric Ward"--having been befriended by Francis, and compelled by higher authorities to disclose that his source of military intelligence is a mule that talks. The war story is actually a story-within-a-story,told by O'Connor's character to his post-war employer, as he tries to save his job at the bank. This movie is well-paced and full of cheerful surprises. Zasu Pitts appears as a psychiatric nurse holding her own in an environment of half-baked military psychiatry. Choreography of encounters in Burmese jungle and on the army base moves smoothly and too soon it's a wrap. Hence several sequels.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prototype (1983 TV Movie)
9/10
well made, emotionally challenging, and thought-provoking
21 April 2017
I am thinking of the 2016 "Arrival" as I watch this beautifully crafted story in which the military believes it is in charge of the "miraculous"--for the questioning mind of Michael, the laboratory-created being,is sensitive and creative. He processes both literature and experience, and asks questions. During his first venture into the world beyond the laboratory he is sensitive to expectations, and capable of wonder--seeing the toy train and being mesmerized by "the little puffs of smoke". The laboratory has produced something which is in fact a someone, a new person. And, as in "Arrival", the appearance of something not understood elicits two kind of response--the need to control it, and the need to understand it. I recognize that we are stuck with institutionalized fear in our military establishment--and by "we" I mean humans. Still crawling forward out of the primordial ooze. And now I'm going to finish watching the excellent movie which gave rise to this realization.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Daredevil (2015–2018)
7/10
Starts with real class, and then poops out
23 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Just because the show poops out after a few episodes doesn't mean I'm not watching the whole series. Matt Murdoch is particularly charming and compelling as a blind man with extraordinary senses otherwise. His sometime friend Claire is first-rate. Seeing Scott Glenn show up a "Stick" is a real hoot, and clearly there are intelligent surprises in store--if you're patient. Meanwhile, the minute Vincent D'Onofrio finally showed his face, I can't help seeing Annoying Orange on the screen. This problem I am hoping to exorcise by writing this review and trying to append a relevant image from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3vksVYHjJU
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a writer's movie
21 February 2017
So, you're still in bed at 1 p.m. composing comments on friends' FaceBook shares, eating the other half of a stevia-sweetened chocolate bar from the night before, and then you move on to Netflix to get further from reality--where you see the face of beloved Bob Odenkirk in a harmless sounding title: "Girlfriends Day". You give it a look-see. You don't turn from it in irritation or boredom--it's holding you with the inscrutable power of untapped human potential. Every character looking at Odenkirk seems to be waiting for "something" to happen. Then his landlord takes action. And then I'm clapping for a brilliant moment, and barking out loud with laughter from my unused vocal chords at another moment. I get comfortable. I know that I, too, like Odenkirk's character, will write again. This film is exquisite.
25 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Helen Mirren's Hair Makes Bid for Top Billing
12 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I had a hard time getting into the theatre for a film with such an unappealing premise. HOWEVER, I had to see the beloved, now iconic, Alan Rickman give his last film performance. And, while glad I saw the movie, in honor of him, and because there were several deeply moving, excellent, spot-on performances (especially Aaron Paul and Barkhad Abdi), I was unnecessarily distracted, even irritated by Helen Mirren's dialed-in performance, which included a great deal of pushing back her stylish forelock. Her work worthy of an over-intense ingénue or a jaded veteran actress. All the inner strength of her Prospero absent. C'mon! Mirren aside, what was a great moment (of many, many great moments)? The tension of the situation has continued to build, and the clock is ticking, when Jeremy Northam, sitting with the Ministry for Defense, takes off his jacket and reveals dark sweat stains in the armpits of his gorgeously, almost laughably fashionable blue shirt. Real sweat. Real fear. Real pain.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rendezvous (1935)
5/10
off-base period piece
6 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Other reviewers have covered the main points of this confused "comedy"/spy-mystery film very well. I would like to point out the particular insult to women and to the intelligence of both sexes in the Rosalind Russell role. It sapped the mystery of any believability--what War Department is the plaything of the daughter of its assistant secretary?? What woman could wander around in such self-centered oblivion to a war-time effort? William Powell is remarkable in his ability to carry off his role as her--huh?--husband-to-be. I mean, NOTHING bothers him. I am not so unflappable--Russell's character kept my teeth on edge throughout. Grrr. Why did I watch this chestnut? To see the beautiful Cesar Romero--that was the payoff. And the rip-off. In this movie the old saying is true: "The good die young." Virtually with the mention of his "mama" on his lips.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pulling a Prize out of the Crackerjacks
26 June 2014
Accidentally erased my review again. Have to be succinct. Mesmerizing footage of the Glenn Miller orchestra. I watched this movie for the great Cesar Romero--didn't know I'd stumbled upon treasure beyond wildest dreams. Horn sections, drummer, the sax and trumpet solos, a French horn! Danced to Glenn Miller records in the junior high gym, but i wasn't hip to what i was listening to. So, taking the corny plot and script for what they are, I live for Cesar Romero delivering his lines, and then whoa! It's young Jackie Gleason and Harry Morgan--two more smart, cool actors. (George Montgomery not so bad either--given the silly plot.) And the music keeps coming--until, when I can hardly stand any more heat, The Nicholas Brothers!!!! Where did these guys come from? Where have I been all my life? So I said "8 stars" instead of 7. Just for these two gentlemen who get pulled out at the end--like magic.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Underdog (2007)
10/10
Film Tribute to a Humble Hero
10 August 2007
I enjoyed this movie. Laughed, and yes, nearly cried. Wonderful to see the existential hero of a great film, "The Station Agent", playing Simon Bar Sinister to the hilt. Good acting. Human actors stood up well against the dog actors, who are known to upstage humans mercilessly. Also, one notable cat actor. Adequately plotted script, with hilarious dialogue. This movie is about a dog--a special dog. As if beagles weren't special enough without genetic enhancement, this beagle (voiced by Jason Lee with absolute sincerity, wit and insouciance) is burdened with super-hero gifts and responsibilities. Jim Belushi is the good dad, playing it straight and steady amidst general mayhem. Also nice examples of sensitive community police-work in this movie.

Probably the most memorable thing for me this viewing (oh yeah, I'm going to see it again!!) is the special puff-of-smoke pattern, true to the original cartoon, that Underdog generates when he accelerates into full flight after hovering in the sky.
34 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
We're on this Earth for a short time
6 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I wonder what my late Pop would have said about this movie. He joined the Border Patrol in 1940. I wonder if he could've sat through it. Probably not, but he would have loved some of the scenes. He would have loved the Mexican villages, the desert, Barry Pepper's parade-rest stance in the background during a law-officer scene. I personally detest the new Border Patrol hats. I guess they're practical. Ditto helicopters.

Chiming patrol car doors. Musical cell phones. The crunch of zucchini after casual sex. A small herd of goats. The indignities inflicted on beef cattle. Guns. Mops. Twilight. The mule. The motor coach. Rattle snakes and fire ants. The cafe and the cantina. These are parts of the complete universe of director Tommy Lee Jones. He knits his film story with a Kurosawa-like care.

I know Jones is proud of his own spoken Spanish and his sound track. He should also be proud of his work with Barry Pepper. Pepper's character Mike Norton comes out of Cincinnati with 21st Century American plastic values, still a kid, and kind of a mean kid at that. Is the secret to changing chickenshit to gold included in this story? Yes it is. Exposure to earth, sun, pain, kindness--being able to accept all these things.

On the DVD commentary, Jones says, "The tears aren't real--" Why does he deny the power of his own film like that? But, my Pop would understand--you can make a song or story so very beautiful, and then never let on that it's absolutely real, that you felt and knew those tender and unspeakably holy things. But, dude, that's how the change comes and why we don't all quit even before our short time on Earth is over.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mughal-E-Azam (1960)
10/10
Opulent Tale of Timeless Emotional Struggle
18 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Mughal-e-Azam may represent history both of India and of film but, as in any good tale, the tensions within and between the characters surprised me by being fresh and immediate. The sheer visual beauty was worth the full-price theatre ticket at a special showing in Richmond. I was a little skeptical beforehand about the colorization--but this is done lovingly as an art in itself and fully supportive of the cinematographic effects of the original filming. Completely enjoyed it! Also a source of pleasure: the traditional figures come to life, and the actors are committed to their characters with depth of sincerity that insures integrity of the story. Now--questions that came out of the theatre with me regarding justice: was it "might makes right"? Was there another justice than this tyrannic "scale" of the Emperor's? Does the Emperor reward the Sculptor to acknowledge a higher Cause, the "Emperor of Emperors"? Is his fatal role the reason the Sculptor (creator of true images) has no name? It was he who brought Amarkali into the court with a prophesy of what would come of it. While the Sculptor seems to be an arm of Fate, so the courtesan Bahar (deliciously played by Nigar Sultana) also administers Fate as she manipulates actions and outcomes. What will her reward be? Is there any other Justice than the Emperor's? Is her self-seeking malice considered so inevitable that Fate does not touch her, in turn? If my answers lie in further reading into these histories, so be it . . . In the meantime, the scenes of the movie play out in my mind as I wonder about fate, justice, and--of course--human love. After the movie, in the theatre lobby, a young woman spotted a mouse skittering from the auditorium across the lobby into a closet. I believe it was Sri Ganesha's vehicle.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Le divorce (2003)
7/10
Disorderly Conduct
2 September 2003
Pardon the military reference. Maybe i just longed for the sense of a firm guiding hand--a plan of action--in this movie with all its charming and fascinating and sad and frightening disparate parts. I went to see it ONLY because i follow the career of Matthew Modine; he does not disappoint. Kate Hudson turned out to be pretty good, too. I am willing to agree now that she is an actress in her own right. The other blonde American suffered from over-scripting. The Americans suffered in general from--well, we do tend to be oblivious. AAH, but the French! I'm glad i saw Leslie Caron, who provided some depth, some veracity. In the end, the weird tribute to "The Red Balloon" was so irritating i almost forgot how much i had enjoyed the many segments and characters. Bebe Neuwirth was another tasteful decoration (for the film is truly decorative); it was good to see a quintessential Englishman in the plot (who looked just like Stephen Fry). And the Eiffel Tower receives its due as a photogenic structure--thanks for that, my dears.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Big Empty (1997)
1/10
Look Ma, I'm acting.
10 December 2002
The fixed and penetrating gaze of the posturing-while-frequently-motionless Mr. McManus was too too much much. I kept watching because I really wanted to find out what happened to Pablo Bryant's character, about whom I cared tremendously, but not enough to rank the movie as better than awful. I will look for Mr. Bryant's work elsewhere.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8 Women (2002)
9/10
Enchante
2 November 2002
This movie is dynamite. From the hot pink floral titles might you not guess you are going to get pinched, licked, clawed, jumped, embraced and maybe even concussed. You will be sung to--ah! worth three returns to the theatre for the musical numbers alone. Couture. ah! Plot? aha! It becomes clear at last, but not until every individual character has been played to the full--against and with the others. This is drama of emotion, highly entertaining, extravagant. I am not kidding. But not fare, perhaps, for the faint of heart.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Openly emotional/no buffers
27 July 2002
I rented WS in order to compare Jennifer Jason Leigh's performance in this with her performance in Kansas City. Both are period pieces, and in both i sensed her willingness to submerge a modern self into the demands of the historic period. This is frightening to behold--Albert Finney, her widowed father, is rock-hard, with glimpses of natural paternal sentiment that only make his determined hardness the more monstrous. So, his daughter Katherine is his victim--a victim of culture, a victim of circumstance--a victim of miscommunications, a victim of her lover, of her aunt? It's all a little hard to bear, except that, as the motif of endurance emerges, the formation of a protective shell over the passions of the young is, finally, a relief.

I don't know if there is enough popcorn and chocolate/caramel/you-name-it to make sitting through this story actually enjoyable. Beautifully dressed and accompanied by exquisite score, it's a tragedy with a conclusion of unillumined defeat. Although Katherine, Leigh's role, keeps for herself, privately, the apparent pleasure of the memory of passion. Is this James's modern leaning? Anyway, I rated it high, because as a window into history it's at least fascinating.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Openly emotional/no buffers
27 July 2002
I rented WS in order to compare Jennifer Jason Leigh's performance in this with her performance in Kansas City. Both are period pieces, and in both i sensed her willingness to submerge a modern self into the demands of the historic period. This is frightening to behold--Albert Finney is rock-hard, with glimpses of natural paternal sentiment that only make his determined hardness the more monstrous. So, his daughter is his victim--a victim of culture, a victim of circumstance--a victim of miscommunications, a victim of her lover, of her aunt? It's all a little hard to bear, except that, as the motif of endurance emerges, the formation of a protective shell over the passions of the young is, finally, a relief. I don't know if there is enough popcorn and chocolate/caramel/you-name-it to make sitting through this story actually enjoyable. Beautifully dressed and accompanied by exquisite score, it's a tragedy with a conclusion of unillumined defeat. Although Katherine, Leigh's role, keeps for herself, privately, the apparent pleasure of the memory of passion. Is this James's modern leaning? Anyway, I rated it high, because as a window into history it's at least fascinating.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spider-Man (2002)
9/10
Take Me With You, Spider Man
4 May 2002
Entering a skeptic, a Spidy lover like billions of others from long time past, asking "How will they do it?" First, they will make sure it has a clear MARVEL imprimatur. Then, they will segue from past comix films with an enrapturing not-unfamiliar-type film score that takes you from the printed page into the wild universes of your imagination. Then, they will create web-swinging on the big screen--but you get into that gently, and i have to say the red and blue spider is a totally cool arachnid, its bite didn't look THAT bad--hey reality is just a sticky hair's breadth from the world of major fantasy mayhem. Can't say it all at once, it's too overpowering. But will note that Willem Dafoe lit up like i didn't think he could. And Toby McG. shot off bolts of personal energy like i didn't think he could. All the actors were their comix people, and it's a magical ensemble that deserves mega-credit for their work. Editors get credit, too. The film kind. (Jonah Jameson is hot, by the way. A real beast.) So . . . while i'm not going back to the theatre on a daily basis, i will go back soon for another look-see.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lantana (2001)
8/10
Not for people who think they know it all
28 March 2002
This is a mystery on more than one level. It's also an exercise in discernment. From a cinematic standpoint, the look is very refined, with frame after frame to die for. The characters are carefully drawn, more consistent than one is accustomed to. They aren't asked to drop character in order to deliver a standard plot resolution. The strength of this film is mind-boggling, and it deserves careful attention, as well as more than one viewing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Slick and Tiresome
21 March 2002
Hard to believe that such an elaborately made film could be so boring. The actors walked through their paces, some adding more interest than others, but few connecting with a core energy. Where was the core energy? Danny Oceans has big brown eyes (Clooney of course). It was just a total RELIEF when one of the actors flickered or sizzled for a moment. Pitt, Roberts, Reiner, Gould-- and the great electronics guy, whose name i don't have. Matt Damon looked hopeful for a while. But, alas, back to old Brown Eyes . . . .

Devices were plunk-plunk-plunked and plop-plop-plopped, and then exploded. The sub-juvenile bad boys did their schtick. Actually, i saw this one back-to-back with "Stuart Little", which also has an electronically operated situation in it. "Stuart Little" was more exciting. This should have been a good movie, too, even better than S.L. Did it have an attitude problem? Was it just a cardboard front so that Soderbergh could film his parody of the Sally Rand scene from "The Right Stuff"? (Suddenly, I wanted Ed Harris, Dennis Quaid and Scott Glenn more than i can even say.) And tell me, are the crooks big heroes? Is their love of money a spiritual experience we should all aspire to? A movie based on assumptions. Unclear purpose. A little wit, plenty of cheap thrills. Maybe too many.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Quaint Hollywood Entertainment
21 March 2002
When I recuperate from this hectic emotional brawl, I'll check out Glasgow's novel and see what sort of story she meant to tell. The manipulative, predatory female role of Stanley (Bette Davis) is so blatantly drawn that the story is spoiled. There is no balance in the cinematic telling. Quite simply, this girl Godzilla wants what she wants, and gets it at any price. The final scene between Uncle William (Charles Coburn) and Stanley is sort of like T-Rex in Jurassic Park coming upon a fear-frozen victim. The overall effect of dripping self-pity in two styles--the doormat sister(Olivia de Haviland as Roy) and the manipulative one (our Stanley): what a cheery way to spend an hour and a half. Bring two hankies. Certainly distracting from the headlines and real personal tragedies of 1942.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Commandments (1997)
4/10
wha?
4 March 2002
Warning: Spoilers
An impassioned, possibly lunatic Aidan Quinn is cared for by his dead wife's sister (Courtney Cox) and her husband (Anthony LaPaglia). As he proceeds to break the 10 commandments, one by one, out of spite to God, he raises a lot of questions for those around him. And of course, since adultery is a no-no, we get a romance between Quinn and Cox. The big "deus ex machina" (wish i could italicize that for you) is a convenient hurricane. The ending is absolutely silly. I felt ripped off at every level. And this was because the opening and development, the acting, even the romance, had been well enough done to engage me at every level. The synagogue scene is riveting. The gun play is well timed. And then such an ending? At least we could have had something under water to put us in the mood . . . . and some character development for Cox.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
U.S. movie i've been waiting for for 40 years
19 February 2002
Because it is cleanly beautiful and careful and truthfully emotional, i feel we have a movie here with the class of the Italian films that i was exposed to when i was a university kid. That's style. As for content: content is darkness growing slightly less dark. Human reality. Good luck. Bad luck. Which possibility will play out? Humor balances pain in the great theatrical tradition. The players are all fully committed, give us subtleties and wholly stated passions. The theme of reflection is not simple--it sticks with me and offers a mystery about existence. I'm going back to the theatre first opportunity.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Milk Money (1994)
5/10
Melanie Griffith's tribute to Jane Fonda?
27 December 2001
I am always interested to see what actors can and will do in their work. I got such a strong Klute vibe from Ms. Griffith in the beginning of this movie. And it was nice to see Ed Harris just be Dad. The story itself is one of those adult fantasies that utilizes the kid mystique. Of course the-Hooker-and-the-Dad plays out an adult fantasy of its own. It turned out not to be a movie i would share with kids, in spite of its rating. It's a "yeah, sure" movie, white bread with way too much jam. BUT, i'm still glad i saw the work of the six pros who make it a viable (okay enjoyable--i enjoyed it)i'm-too-tired-tonight-to-move home entertainment. Yes, Virginia, there is a Hollywood.
11 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shallow Hal (2001)
8/10
perspective, values and slapstick (spoiler, sort of)
4 December 2001
Warning: Spoilers
This is a fascinating movie. Jason Alexander's character (Mauricio) is kind of like Iago in Macbeth; he has a sinister edge--widening his range as an actor--which is pivotal for the dark feelings, pain, sadness. The script lurches seeking resolution toward the end, but Gwyneth Paltrow and Jack Black are actors who can bring to life a tripped-out plot situation and give it human substance. For Ms. Paltrow, the acting challenge is formidable, and she brings it off with sensitivity. She had to, or no movie. The movie has left this writer thinking about reality (singular) and realities (plural). There is point-of-view, and there is what happens to a couple of chairs during restaurant scenes. Also, the movie illustrates how powerful each individual is in interactions with other individuals. The hero is the guy who manages self-awareness and responsibility.

The credits for this movie are very special/complex/enjoyable. Hence I missed the location note. To the message board, away!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hard Eight (1996)
6/10
can i have a cigarette?
8 October 2001
Everything wonderful about this film gets flushed down the noir toilet. Brilliant actors (Paltrow, Jackson, Reilly) all portraying stupidity with the just right flickering wattage. The beautiful old hood (a ronin or samurai type) who can't provide the brains for the kids he loves, no matter how hard he tries. Visuals of fine, pure simplicity within ambience that causes me to remember remarkable this-is-it Italian film experiences of the mid-century. And the point is? Aye, there's the rub. Can't quite find the essential human spirit in the story. Too many sordid details distract? Tragic stupidity too deep a hole to climb out of?
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed