Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Joe Schmo Show (2003– )
good, not great
25 August 2004
This show is certainly better than most of what's on television, but not as good as the original JOE SCHMO SHOW. Having two marks at a time tended to cause a loss in the focus and the concept had worn just a tad bit thin. Also, the producers and cast were careless in letting Ingrid get so many clues that the show was fake. Nevertheless, it was a welcome change of pace from hearing people babble at the library and the supermarket about, "DID YOU SEE WHO GOT VOTED OFF LAST NIGHT?!?!?!" on reality game shows that take themselves seriously. Unlike many people, I found the flatulence and diarrhea scene offensive. I liked the "reveal" in the last episode. In both seasons so far they've had the most-threatening character bring on the reveal and the host has asked the actors to raise their hands to acknowledge that there were in on the joke. The sentimental stuff at the end was mostly nice and well-done. I'm hoping for a JOE SCHMO 3, this time more carefully done and satirizing the job-search sub-genre of reality game shows started by THE APPRENTICE.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Joe Schmo Show (2003– )
nice change of pace
6 September 2003
For those of us who have become annoyed with the producers, screenwriters and excessively-enthusiastic viewers of the reality game shows that have come out in the last few years (starting with SURVIVOR) , this show is a welcome alternative. Although one person is putting on an act using his real first name, the stars are pretending to compete with each other on a nonexistant reality show called LAP OF LUXURY while lying about their names, ages, homes, occupations, families, incomes, backgrounds, education and personal experience. Only one guy doesn't know that it's not for real. Everybody else struggles to keep a straight face and prevent Matt (a law student turned pizza deliverer from Pittsburgh) from getting suspicious. Instead of going to the watercooler each morning and hearing people gossip about "who got voted off this week", we'll hear about the clever joke that's being played- which I'm sure for many of us is a vast improvement and possibly even a sadistic thrill.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
SPOILERS
14 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Bruce Willis as Malcolm doesn't figure out until the end that he's dead. This is not possible. He tries several times before that to talk to his wife and she rarely says anything. If that were happening all the time and no one EVER reacted to him, he would know within a few hours. Also, some people have posted here not knowing why the mother was poisoning her daughter. The answer is that she had a condition called Munchausen syndrome by proxy. The screenwriters apparently assumed that the audience would know about that.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
worth about six dollars to see
31 August 1999
This film is very entertaining, exciting and worthwhile, especially for the die-hard "Star Wars" fan. It is rather eerie to watch Anakin Skywalker as a young boy, knowing that he will eventually turn into the evil Darth Vader in later movies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed