Reviews

This has to be one of the worst and most unusual Hoppy movies. It has little of the features that make the Hoppy films a great Western series, like William Boyd's warm, commanding personality and the idiosyncrasies of the other characters. Instead we had to suffer through one long, tedious, convoluted, unbelievable "caper" — Hoppy's plan to incriminate and identify the bosses of the stage robbers.

Spoilers. The stage is robbed, and only a few people knew that it was carrying $30,000 in gold coins. One person who knew is the sheriff, a friend of Hoppy, and the sheriff comes under suspicion. That begins the first of the unbelievable coincidences. The sheriff's children ride to get Hoppy's help, and on the way happened to come across a usually deserted shack that some men are staying at. They mention this to Hoppy, who presciently decides to investigate the shack, and he immediately overhears the men discussing the stage robbery and their taking $800 from the money bags for their immediate needs. Instead of arresting the men, taking possession of the money and forcing the men to identify their bosses, Hoppy leaves everything as is in the hopes of smoking out the bosses. In doing so, the kids and Hoppy's sidekicks get endangered. Finally, when everyone and the money is brought together at the jail-house, Hoppy explains that two of the men still happen to have the $800 on them (lucky Hoppy). (Incidentally, I could never understand what was the use of Hoppy marking the money bags at the shack.)

I found this to be an average Hoppy movie. The first half bored me for the most part. It showed the bad guys rigging the election for Sheriff, defeating Hoppy! In various ways they discourage pro-Hoppy voters from voting, and finally they stuff the ballot box! Hoppy turns in his badge but is confident that the Governor will sense foul play and order a new election within a week. …. The second half of the movie is better, filled with a number of good scenes. ***Spoilers.****

Among the good scenes: ¶ after Hoppy "loses" the election, there is a great noir-like scene in the saloon. The main bad guy, Hammond, who is out to kill Hoppy for sending him to prison, is dealing poker hands to his outlaw friends. The one who receives the highest hand is to collect the pot and agree to kill Cassidy. Hoppy walks in on the "game" in its early stage, and he forces them to complete the deal. He dares the winner to draw on him. There are no takers. He orders them all out of town within 12 hours. Hoppy turns his back on the group and observes them in the bar room mirror as he exits. He sees some reach for their guns. He spins around and kills a number of them, shoots out the lights and gets away. ¶ to make good on his threat that the outlaws all leave town, Hoppy alone, on foot, faces them (all mounted on horseback) on the street. They charge him. See the movie to see how he survives! ¶ it was clever of Hoppy to figure out how the ballot box was stuffed — he examined the ballots and noticed that the non-Hoppy ballots had some different type font for certain letters. different than the legitimate ballots. ¶ at the end of the movie there is a terrifically filmed scene of Hoppy in a fistfight with Hammond on a suspension bridge over a ravine.

Some other observations: ¶ the heroine (who lacks a sweet voice) is surprisingly silent throughout the second half of the movie. She is shot at while in a stagecoach, kidnapped and tied up, rescued, watches Hammond fall to his death from the suspension bridge, etc — and never says a word! ¶ California Carlson's (Hoppy's comic sidekick) often turns me off with his inane antics. Here he tries to eat an eight inch high sandwich. In fact, the other actors (both sidekicks, the heroine, even Buck Peters) were poor compared to other Hoppy movies. ¶ I was surprised to see Hoppy pull this deadly ploy on the harmless inept newly-elected sheriff: as noted above, the heroine is kidnapped by Hammond, and Hoppy is instructed to come alone to retrieve her. Sure death is waiting him. So Hoppy changes clothes with the Sheriff and forces him to accompany Hoppy to the rendezvous with Hammond. So Hammond mistakenly shoots dead the Sheriff, giving Hoppy the opportunity to rescue the girl, etc. Not very good-guy heroic of Hoppy.

This is a fair Hoppy movie. I bother to review it to point out one unusual thing. Virtually all of the Hoppy movies entail some kind of mystery or some clever way to flush out the bad guys, get the goods on them. ***Spoilers*** This Hoppy movie is very different! In this oater, after Hoppy helps capture the Trilling gang (but not Trilling himself, who is unknown outside of his gang) at the start of the movie, from there until the conclusion of the movie it is one long caper: the bad guys getting out of jail to rustle Hoppy's 1000-head of cattle being driven for sale at the Circle J, and Hoppy recapturing and losing the herd, etc.

(1) The Trilling gang rustles Hoppy's herd by sneaking up to the cowboys' downtime camp, scattering the cowboys' horses and making off with the herd.

(2) Hoppy and his men gather their horses, follow the herd, chase off the rustlers and regain the herd.

(3) The rustlers pretend to be a posse of lawmen, get the drop of Hoppy, tie up Hoppy and his men at their hideout, and go off with the herd.

(4) Hoppy and men escape the hideout, but before they can regain the herd, Trilling has pretended he is Hopalong, owner of the herd, and Trilling sics the local Sheriff on the real Hoppy and company, who are thrown in jail.

(5) The Sheriff's daughter knows the truth, so she breaks the real Hoppy and crew out of jail, and they finally apprehend the Trilling gang.

This is one of the better Hoppy movies, with a clever, intricate plot. It is also unusual in that Steve Reeves (TV's Superman) and Robert Mitchum (who went on to super star status), both of whom had minor (mainly outlaw) parts in earlier Hoppy movies, have meaty co-starring roles here.

***Some spoilers. *** The plot revolves around Mitchum's stolen jewels that are worth about $10,000, but the thieves, led by Victor Jory, will take a $3000 ransom for them. Both good-guy Hoppy and bad-guy Jory have an interest in helping Mitchum raise the $3000 to get the jewels back. Hoppy has $4000 cash to buy 100 head of cattle for the Bar 20 Ranch. The cattle are owned by Mitchum's fiancé' who will end up with the jewels as a wedding gift, so $3000 could be used to ransom the jewels. On the other hand, Jory wants to buy some of Mitchum's land, the proceeds of which would ransom the jewels.

Hoppy's $4000 is stolen by Jory's gang, and $3000 of it is given to Mitchum by Jory as part of the land deal mentioned above. Mitchum then takes the $3000 to meet the outlaws and ransom the jewels back. In some complicated maneuvers, Hoppy goes along to help, and he recovers both the money and the jewels. But Jory has poisoned Mitchum's mind into believing that Hoppy is the jewel thief. You'll have to see the movie to see how Hoppy convinces Mitchum that Jory is the bad guy and how Hoppy captures the bad guys.

Poor entry in the Hoppy series — seems out of place for a Hoppy film. Reminded me of Tarzan leading an expedition through sacred ruins to old Egyptian remains. It was confusing for most of the time. We didn't know —till the end— what the disparate groups wanted and how they knew so much about each other.

**Spoilers*** There was the scientific expedition Hoppy was leading to old Indian ruins. There were Chinese who we later learn were interested in protecting their "Shangri La" community hidden in the desert, waiting to file legal claim to it. And there were American gunmen believing that there was a hidden gold mine in the Indian ruins that the Chinese were hiding. Added to that was the Sheriff and his posse wondering what to do.

The mystery was confusing and boring. There was little action (gunplay). The sets at the ruins were phony looking. Mostly there was boring talking. I love Hoppy movies generally, but find it hard to take his comic sidekicks (California Carlson here). Hoppy's young romantic sidekick here was the worst of the lot (Brad King as Johnny Nelson); he was a stiff, uninteresting actor.