Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Unscarred (2000)
An average of 8.1 ? Yeah, I don't think so !
21 June 2003
An average of 8.1 ? I don't know how this movie got an average of 8.1. This movie is on all fronts the worst movie I've seen in a long time. The plot is terribly predictable. The acting in the first 5 minutes is so bad you might get so sick you through up. But, you can say, you can't judge a movie on the first 5 minutes! And this of course is true, but the acting isn't going to be much better in the following 85 minutes. The best acting you will see comes from James Russo and that is saying enough. So don't bee fooled by the high score it gets. I guaranty you, you'll be wasting your money !
0 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
spectacular, spectacular !!
16 May 2003
It was, of course, spectacular. It overwhelms you with special effects. But I'm used to spectacular. I want to see something new and this I've seen before. Also the story took a obvious backseat to the special effects. They wanted it to be a complicated and well thought out story but I just thought it was a lot of blablabla. In didn't make much sense to me.

With a sequel like this, they should stopped at just the one Matrix movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Donnie Darko (2001)
8/10
I must be stupid, but I don't really understand.
2 November 2002
I agree with carlwrighteous (writer of the user comment from London, England). I know this is supposed to be a great movie and it probably is. And I don't admit this easily, but you need a users manual to understand this movie. I probably have to see this movie a couple of times more, but I don't think I ever understand it completely. But I just must be stupid and I'm the only one that doesn't understand this movie. So people, feel free to explain it to me.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed